1. bookVolume 64 (2015): Issue 1-6 (December 2015)
Journal Details
First Published
22 Feb 2016
Publication timeframe
1 time per year
Open Access

Provenance by site interaction and stability analysis of European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) provenances grown in common garden experiments

Published Online: 07 Jun 2017
Volume & Issue: Volume 64 (2015) - Issue 1-6 (December 2015)
Page range: 133 - 147
Received: 24 Feb 2015
Journal Details
First Published
22 Feb 2016
Publication timeframe
1 time per year

Fifteen provenances of European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) were evaluated for stability and adaptability by height growth at four test sites in Bosnia and Herzegovina (1), Croatia (1) and Serbia (2). Provenance trials were established in spring 2007 by planting 2- and 3-yearold seedlings and arranged in a randomized complete block design. The data from seven 6- year-old and eight 5-year-old provenances were obtained in 2009 and analyzed separately. Finlay and Wilkinson’s regression analysis and Additive main effects and multiplicative interaction model (AMMI model) were used to assess provenance by site interaction (P × S) and to identify beech provenances that have high and stable performance in different environments, at the juvenile stage of development. Analysis of variance showed that effects of provenance, site, and P×S interaction are highly significant (p<0.001) in both age groups. Linear regression model evidenced that most of the provenances had regression coefficients not significantly different from unity (b=1.0), except for provenances Sjeverni Dilj Caglinski (HR24) and Vranica-Bistrica (BA59). The partitioning of the total sum of squares (SS) exhibited that the site effect was the predominant source of variation in both age groups of provenances (50.7% and 38.5%, respectively). Additionally, regression analysis explained 15.8% and 33.2% of provenance by site interaction terms, in provenances age six and five years, respectively, while the AMMI analysis accounted for 62.2% and 78.7% in P×S interaction. The results of AMMI showed that the first principal component (PC1) was statistically significant in both age groups. Adaptability and stability of provenances to the test sites were estimated with AMMI1 and AMMI2 biplots. Provenance Sjeverni Dilj Caglinski (HR24) showed constant performance over tested sites, characterizing with aboveaverage height growth at low yielding environments. Provenances HR25 and BA61 showed the opposite type of adaptation, being adapted to high yielding sites. Provenance Valkonya (HU42) was characterized by IPCA1 score close to zero and above average mean height growth, suggesting general adaptation to the tested environments. The implication of P×S was discussed in light of impact of climate change on beech and selection of most suitable provenances for future reforestation programs.


ABBOTT, L., S. FILIPPINI, H. DELFINO and S. PISTORALE (2012): Stability analysis of forage production in Bromus catharticus (prairie grass) using three methodologies. Ciencia e investigación agraria 39: 331-338.10.4067/S0718-16202012000200009Search in Google Scholar

ADUGNA, A., T. TESFAYE, E. DEGU, T. TADESSE, F. MERGA, W. LEGESSE, A. TIRFESSA, H. KIDANE, A. WOLE and C. DABA (2011): Genotype-by-environmentinteraction and yield stability analysis in finger millet (Elucine coracana L. Gaertn) in Ethiopia. American Journal of Plant Sciences 2: 408-415.10.4236/ajps.2011.23046Search in Google Scholar

ALIA, R., G. BOZIC, D. GÖMÖRY, G. HUBER, E. RASZTOVITS and G. VON WÜHLISCH (2010): The survival and performance of beech provenances over a Europe-wide gradient of climate, pp. 115-126. In: Monografias INIA: Serie Forestale No. 22. Genetic Resources of European Beech (Fagus sylvatica L.), edited by I. Aranda. Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria, Madrid, ES.Search in Google Scholar

AMMER, C., E. BICKEL and C. KOLLING (2008): Converting Norway spruce stands with beech - a review of arguments and techniques. Austrian Journal of Forest Science 125: 3-26.Search in Google Scholar

ARANDA, I., L. GIL and J. PARDOS (1996): Seasonal water relations of three broadleaved species (Fagus sylvatica L., Quercus petraea (Mattuschka) Liebl. and Quercus pyrenaica Willd.) in a mixed stand in the centre of the Iberian Peninsula. Forest Ecology and Management 84: 219-229.10.1016/0378-1127(96)03729-2Search in Google Scholar

ATHANASIOU, K., B. C. DYSON, R. E. WEBSTER and G. N. JOHNSON (2010): Dynamic Acclimation of Photosynthesis Increases Plant Fitness in Changing Environments. Plant Physiology 152: 366-373.10.1104/pp.109.149351279937019939944Search in Google Scholar

BABIĆ, V., M. BABIĆ, M. IVANOVIĆ, M. KRALJEVIĆ-BALALIĆ and M. DIMITRIJEVIĆ (2010): Understanding and utilization of genotype-by-environment interaction in maize breeding. Genetika 42: 79-90.10.2298/GENSR1001079BSearch in Google Scholar

BALTUNIS, B. S., W. J. GAPARE and H. X. WU (2010): Genetic parameters and genotype by environment interaction in Radiata pine for growth and wood quality traits in Australia. Silvae Genetica 59: 113-124.10.1515/sg-2010-0014Search in Google Scholar

BELLARD, C., C. BERTELSMEIER, P. LEADLEY, W. THUILLER and F. COURCHAMP (2012): Impacts of climate change on the future of biodiversity. Ecology Letters 15: 365-377.10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01736.x388058422257223Search in Google Scholar

BLUM, A., 2005: Drought resistance, water-use efficiency, and yield potential - are they compatible, dissonant, or mutually exclusive? Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 56: 1159-1168.10.1071/AR05069Search in Google Scholar

BOSE L. K., N. N. JAMBHULKAR, K. PANDE and O. N. SINGH (2014a): Use of AMMI and other stability statistics in the simultaneous selection of rice genotypes for yield and stability under directseeded conditions. Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research 74: 3-9.10.4067/S0718-58392014000100001Search in Google Scholar

BOSE, K. L., N. N. JAMBHULKAR and K. PANDE (2014b): Genotype by environment interaction and stability analysis for rice genotypes under Boro condition. Genetika 46: 521-528.10.2298/GENSR1402521BSearch in Google Scholar

BUGMANN, H. (1997): Sensitivity of forests in the European Alps to future climatic change. Climate Research 8: 35-44.10.3354/cr008035Search in Google Scholar

CROSSA, J. (1990): Statistical analysis of multi location trials. Advances in Agronomy 44: 55-86.10.1016/S0065-2113(08)60818-4Search in Google Scholar

CZAJKOWSKI, T. and A. BOLTE (2005): Unterschiedliche Reaktion deutscher und polnischer Herkünfte der Buche (Fagus sylvatica L.) auf Trockenheit. [Different reaction of beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) provenances from Germany and Poland to drought]. AllgemeineForst- und Jagd- Zeitung 177: 30-40.Search in Google Scholar

DOUNAVI, A., F. NETZER, N. CELEPIROVIC, M. IVAN - KOVIĆ, J. BURGER, A. G. FIGUEROA, S. SCHÖN, J. SIMON, E. CREMER, B. FUSSI, M. KONNERT and H. RENNENBERG (2016): Genetic and physiological differences of European beech provenances (F. sylvatica L.) exposed to drought stress. Forest Ecology and Management 361: 226-236.10.1016/j.foreco.2015.11.014Search in Google Scholar

EBERHART, S. A. and W. A. RUSSELL (1966): Stability Parameters for Comparing Varieties. Crop Science 6: 36-40.10.2135/cropsci1966.0011183X000600010011xSearch in Google Scholar

EILMANN, B., F. STERCK, L. WEGNER, S. M. G. DE VRIES, G. VON ARX, G. M. J. MOHREN, J. DEN OUDEN and U. SASS-KLAASSEN (2014): Wood structural differences between northern and southern beech provenances growing at a moderate site. Tree Physiology 34: 882-893.10.1093/treephys/tpu06925163729Search in Google Scholar

FALKENHAGEN, E. (1996): A comparison of the AMMI method with some classical statistical methods in provenance research: the case of the South African Pinus radiata trials. Forest Genetics 3: 81-87.Search in Google Scholar

FARSHADFAR, E., M. GERAVANDI and Z. VAISI (2012): Chromosomal localization of QTLs controlling genotype environment interactions in barley. International Journal of Agriculture and Crop Sciences 4: 317-324.Search in Google Scholar

FINLAY, K.W. and G. N. WILKINSON (1963): The analysis of adaptation in a plant-breeding programme. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 14: 742-754.10.1071/AR9630742Search in Google Scholar

GAUCH, H. G. (1988): Model selection and validation for yield trials with interaction. Biometrics 44: 705-715.10.2307/2531585Search in Google Scholar

GWAZE, D. P., J. A. WOLLIAMS, P. J. KANOWSKI and F. E. BRIDGWATER (2001): Interactions of genotype with site for height and stem straightness in Pinus taeda in Zimbabwe. Silvae Genetica 50: 135-140.Search in Google Scholar

HANNERZ, M., J. SONESSON and I. EKBERG (1999): Genetic correlations between growth and growth rhythm observed in a short-term test and performance in long-term field trials of Norway spruce. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 29: 768-778.10.1139/x99-056Search in Google Scholar

HANNRUP, B., G. JANSSON and Ö. DANELL (2008): Genotype by environment interaction in Pinus sylvestris L. in Southern Sweden. Silvae Genetica 57: 306-311.10.1515/sg-2008-0046Search in Google Scholar

HOGBERG, K. A. and B. KARLSSON (1998): Nursery selection of Picea abies clones and effects in field trials. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 13: 12-20.10.1080/02827589809382957Search in Google Scholar

IVANKOVIĆ, M., M. POPOVIĆ, I. KATI IĆ, G. VON WUEHLISCH and S. BOGDAN (2011): Quantitative genetic variation of European beech (Fagus sylvat-ica L.) provenances from the southeastern Europe. S˘umarski list: 25-37.Search in Google Scholar

JAZBEC, A., K. SEGOTIĆ, M. IVANKOVIĆ, H. MARJANOVIĆ and S. PERIĆ (2007): Ranking of European beech provenances in Croatia using statistical analysis and analytical hierarchy process. Forestry 80: 151-162.10.1093/forestry/cpm007Search in Google Scholar

JUMP, A. S., J. M. HUNT and J. PENUELAS (2006): Rapid climate change-related growth decline at the southern range edge of Fagus sylvatica. Global Change Biology 12: 2163-2174.10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01250.xSearch in Google Scholar

KARIMIZADEH, R., M. MOHAMMADI, M. ARMION, M. K. SHEFAZADEH and H. CHALAJOUR (2012): Determining heritability, reliability and stability of grain yield and yield-related components in durum wheat (Triticum durum L.). Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science 18: 595-607.Search in Google Scholar

KARLSSON, B. and K. HOGBERG (1998): Genotypic parameters and clone site interaction in clone tests of Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.). Forest Genetics 5: 21-30.Search in Google Scholar

KIM, I., H. KWON, K. RYU and W. Y. CHOI (2008): Provenance by Site Interaction of Pinus densiflora in Korea. Silvae Genetica 57: 131-139.10.1515/sg-2008-0020Search in Google Scholar

KOSKELA, J., A. BUCK, E. TEISSIER DU CROS (2007): Climate change and forest genetic diversity: Implications for sustainable forest management in Europe. Bioversity International, Rome.Search in Google Scholar

KRSTIĆ, M., M. MEDAREVIĆ, Lj. STOJANOVIĆ and S. BANKOVIĆ (2002): State and silvicultural problems of beech forests in Northeast Serbia. Bulletin of the Faculty of Forestry 86: 161-171.10.2298/GSF0286161KSearch in Google Scholar

LENORMAND, T. (2002): Geneflow and the limits to natural selection. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 17: 183-189.10.1016/S0169-5347(02)02497-7Search in Google Scholar

LINDNER, M. (2007): How to adapt forest management in response to the challenges of climate change?, pp. 31-42. In: Climate change and forest genetic diversity: Implications for sustainable forest management in Europe, edited by J. KOSKELA, A. BUCKAND E. TESSIER DU CROS. Bioversity International, Rome, Italy.Search in Google Scholar

LINDNER, M., J. GARCIA-GONZALO, M. KOLSTRÖM, T. GREEN, R. REGUERA, M. MAROSCHEK, R. SEIDL, M. J. LEXER, S. NETHERER, A. SCHOPF, A. KREMER, S. DELZON, A. BARBATI, M. MARCHETTI and P. CORONA (2008): Impacts of climate change on European forests and options for adaptation. Report to the European Commission Directorate- General for Agriculture and Rural Development. pp. 173.Search in Google Scholar

LINDNER, M., M. MAROSCHEK, S. NETHERER, A. KREMER, A. BARBATI, J. GARCIA-GONZALO, R. SEIDL, S. DELZON, P. CORONA, M. KOLSTROM, M. LEXER and M. MARCHETTI (2010): Climate change impacts, adaptive capacity, and vulnerability of European forest ecosystems. Forest Ecology and Management 259: 698-709.10.1016/j.foreco.2009.09.023Search in Google Scholar

LITTVAY, T. (2011): Phenotypic stability and adaptability of families of common walnut (Juglans regia L.) in progeny tests. Šumarski list 13: 38-45.Search in Google Scholar

MATHESON, A. C. and C. A. RAYMOND (1986): A review of provenance x environment interaction: its practical importance and use with particular reference to the tropics. Commonwealth Forest Review 65: 283-302.Search in Google Scholar

MCKEAND, S. E., B. LI, A.V. HATCHER and R. J. WEI (1990): Stability parameter estimates for stem volume for loblolly pine families growing in different regions in the southeastern United States. Forest Science 36: 10-17.Search in Google Scholar

MCLACHLAN, J. S., J. J. HELLMANN and M.W. SCHWARTZ (2007): A framework for debate of assisted migration in an era of climate change. Conservation Biology 21: 297-302.10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00676.x17391179Search in Google Scholar

MIROSAVLJEVIC, M., N. PRZULJ, J. BOCANSKI, D. STANISLAVJEVIC and B. MITROVIC (2014): The application of AMMI model for barley cultivars evaluation in multi-year trials. Genetika 46: 445-454.10.2298/GENSR1402445MSearch in Google Scholar

MOHAMMADI, R. and A. AMRI (2011): Graphic analysis of trait relations and genotype evaluation in durum wheat. Journal of Crop Improvement 25: 680-696.10.1080/15427528.2011.601437Search in Google Scholar

MUHS, H. J., L. PAULE, L. IONITA and G. VON WUEHLISCH (2010): Concept and design of the international beech provenance trials of 1995 and 1998, and suggestions for future trials. Book of abstracts. COST E52 “Evaluation of Beech Genetic Resources for Sustainable Forestry” Final Meeting. 4-6th May 2010, Burgos, Spain. p. 19.Search in Google Scholar

MURILLO, O. (2001): Genotype by environment interaction and genetic gain on unbalanced Pinus oocarpa provenances trials. Agronomía Costarricense 25: 21-32.Search in Google Scholar

ODEWALE, J. O., C. D. ATAGA, C. AGHO, G. ODIOWAYA, M. N. OKOYE and E. C. OKOLO (2013): Genotype evaluation of coconut (Cocos nucifera L.) and mega environment investigation based on additive main effects and multiplicative interaction (AMMI) analysis. Research Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Management 2: 1-10.Search in Google Scholar

PERKINS, J. M. and J. L. JINKS (1968): Environmental and genotype-environmental components of variability. III. Multiple lines and crosses. Heredity 23: 339-356.10.1038/hdy.1968.485250121Search in Google Scholar

PONTON, S., J. DUPOUEY, N. BRÉDA and E. DREYER (2002): Comparison of water-use efficiency of seedlings from two sympatric oak species: genotype environment interactions. Tree Physiology 22: 413-422.10.1093/treephys/22.6.41311960766Search in Google Scholar

Pswarayi, I. Z., R. D. Barnes, J. S. Birks and P. J. Kanowski (1997): Genotype-Environment Interaction in a Population of Pinus elliottii ENGELM. var. elliottii. Silvae Genetica 46: 35-40.Search in Google Scholar

PURCHASE, J. L., H. HATTING and C. S. VANDEVENTER (2000): Genotype environment interaction of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in South Africa: II. Stability analysis of yield performance. South African Journal of Plant and Soil 17: 101-107.10.1080/02571862.2000.10634878Search in Google Scholar

RAMBURAN, S., M. ZHOUAND M. LABUSCHAGNE (2011): Interpretation of genotype? environment interactions of sugarcane: Identifying significant environmental factors. Field Crops Research 124: 392-399.10.1016/j.fcr.2011.07.008Search in Google Scholar

RAYMOND, C. A. and G. NAMKOONG (1990): Optimising breeding zones: Genetic flexibility or maximum value? Silvae Genetica 39: 110-112.Search in Google Scholar

REZENE, Y., A. BEKELE and Y. GOA (2014): GGE and AMMI biplot analysis for field PEA yield stability in SNNPR State, Ethiopia. International Journal of Sustainable Agricultural Research 1: 28-38.Search in Google Scholar

ROBSON, T. M., D. SAN´CHEZ-GÓMEZ, F. J. CANO and I. ARANDA (2012): Variation in functional leaf traits among beech provenances during a Spanish summer reflects the differences in their origin. Tree Genetics and Genomes 8: 1111-1121.10.1007/s11295-012-0496-5Search in Google Scholar

RWEYONGEZA, D. (2011): Pattern of genotype-environment interaction in Picea glauca (Moench) Voss in Alberta, Canada. Annals of Forest Science 68: 245-253.10.1007/s13595-011-0032-zSearch in Google Scholar

SAS INSTITUTE, INC. (2011): SAS/STAT Users Guide, Version 9.1.3. Cary, NC: SAS Institute, Inc. SHAFII, B. and W. J. PRICE (1998): Analysis of genotype- by-environment interaction using the additive main effects and multiplicative interaction model and stability estimates. Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics 3: 335-345.Search in Google Scholar

STATSOFT, INC. (2013): STATISTICA (data analysis software system), version 12.Search in Google Scholar

STOJANOVIĆ, D. B., A. KRŽIĆ, B. MATOVIC, S. ORLOVIC, A. DUPUTIE, V. DJURDJEVIC, Z. GALIC and S. STOJNIC (2013): Prediction of the European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) xeric limit usinga regional climate model: An example from southeast Europe. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 176: 94-103.10.1016/j.agrformet.2013.03.009Search in Google Scholar

STOJNIĆ, S., S. ORLOVIĆ, Z. GALIĆ, V. VASIĆ, D. VILOTIĆ, M. KNEŽEVIĆ and M. ŠIJAIĆ-NIKOLIĆ (2012): Environmental characteristics in the European beech provenance trials at Fruška Gora Mountain and Debeli Lug. Topola/Poplar 189/190: 145-162. [in Serbian with English summary]Search in Google Scholar

STOJNIĆ, S., U. SASS-KLAASSEN, S. ORLOVIC, B. MATOVIC and B. EILMANN (2013a): Plastic growth response of European beech provenances to dry site conditions. IAWA Journal 34: 475-484.10.1163/22941932-00000038Search in Google Scholar

STOJNIĆ, S. (2013b): Variability of anatomical, physiological and morphological traits of different European beech provenances in Serbia. PhD thesis, University of Belgrade Faculty of Forestry, Republic of Serbia. pp. 340. [in Serbian with English summary]Search in Google Scholar

SYKES, R., B. LI, F. ISIK, J. KADLA and H-M. CHANG (2006): Genetic variation and genotype by environment interactions of juvenile wood chemical properties in Pinus taeda L.. Annals of Forest Science 63: 897-904.10.1051/forest:2006073Search in Google Scholar

THIEL, D., J. KREYLING, S. BACKHAUS, C. BEIERKUHNLEIN, C. BUHK, K. EGEN, G. HUBER, M. KONNERT, L. NAGY and A. JENTSCH (2014): Different reactions of central and marginal provenances of Fagus sylvatica to experimental drought. European Journal of Forest Research 133: 247-260.10.1007/s10342-013-0750-xSearch in Google Scholar

VIŠNJIĆ, Ć. (2010): Variability of some morphological characteristics of 16 provenance of the European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.). Works of the Faculty of Forestry University of Sarajevo 2: 55-70.Search in Google Scholar

VON WUEHLISCH, G. (2004): Series of International Provenance Trials of European Beech, pp. 135-144. In: Proceedings from the 7th International Beech Symposium IUFRO Research Group 1.10.00 Improvement and Silviculture of Beech, edited by K. SAGHEB-TALEBI, P. MADSEN and K. TERAZAVA. Tehran, Iran.Search in Google Scholar

VON WUEHLISCH, G. (2008): EUFORGEN Technical Guidelines for genetic conservation and use for European beech (Fagus sylvatica). Bioversity International, Rome, Italy. VON WUEHLISCH, G. (2010a): Introductory note, pp. 8-9. In: Genetic resources of beech in Europe - current state, edited by J. FRÝDL, P. NOVOTNÝ, J. FENNESSY and G. VON WÜHLISCH. Johann Heinrich von Thünen-Institut, Braunschweig, Germany.Search in Google Scholar

VON WUEHLISCH, G., D. BALLIAN, S. BOGDAN, M. FORSTREUTER, R. GIANNINI, B. GÖTZ, M. IVANKOVIC, S. ORLOVIC, A. PILIPOVIC and M. SIJACIC NIKOLIC (2010b): Early results from provenance trials with European beech established 2007. Book of abstracts. COST E52 “Evaluation of Beech Genetic Resources for Sustainable Forestry” Final Meeting. 4-6th May 2010, Burgos, Spain. p. 19.Search in Google Scholar

WORTEMANN, R., S. HERBETTE, T. S. BARIGAH, B. FUMANAL, R. ALIA, A. DUCOUSSO, D. GOMORY, P. ROECKEL-DREVET and H. COCHARD (2011): Genotypic variability and phenotypic plasticity of cavitation resistance in Fagus sylvatica L. across Europe. Tree Physiology 31: 1175-1182.10.1093/treephys/tpr10121989814Search in Google Scholar

ZAS, R., E. MERLO and J. FERNÁNDEZ-LÓPEZ (2004): Genotype environment interaction in Maritime pine families in Galicia, Northwest Spain. Silvae Genetica 53: 175-182.10.1515/sg-2004-0032Search in Google Scholar

ZOBEL, R.W., M. J. WRIGHT and H. G. GAUCH (1988): Statistical analysis of a yield trial. Agronomy Journal 80: 388-393.10.2134/agronj1988.00021962008000030002xSearch in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo