1. bookVolume 62 (2013): Issue 1-6 (December 2013)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2509-8934
First Published
22 Feb 2016
Publication timeframe
1 time per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

Different diversity measures and genetic traits reveal different speciesgenetic diversity relationships: A case study in forest tree communities

Published Online: 01 Jul 2017
Volume & Issue: Volume 62 (2013) - Issue 1-6 (December 2013)
Page range: 25 - 37
Received: 18 Apr 2012
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2509-8934
First Published
22 Feb 2016
Publication timeframe
1 time per year
Languages
English
Abstract

Relationships between species diversity and genetic diversity, the two most important elements of biodiversity, have recently attracted considerable interest in the field of community genetics. The present study contributes to this issue by addressing three questions that seem to have been ignored so far, namely whether the use of (a) different diversity measures, of (b) different components of diversity, and of (c) different genetic traits may lead to different assessements of speciesgenetic diversity relationships. For this purpose, data on species composition and genetic traits were collected from the natural regeneration of nine forest communities, which consist of three pure and six mixed tree stands located in the Thuringian forest area. The genetic traits comprised one DNA (AFLP) and five isozyme traits all of which were determined in all species. In contrast to other studies, the species diversity was determined for two components, SD (species diversity) and NeS (effective number of genetically distinct species), and the genetic diversity was determined for three components, TSGD (the transspecific genetic diversity taken over all species of a community), ISGD and NGS (each describing a special average of intraspecific genetic diversity). Each component was quantified by measures of diversity representing four orders of the Renyi/Hillfamily. The orders correspond to the degree to which prevalence of types is considered in the diversity measure (at the lowest order, known as richness, prevalence is disregarded, with increasing order, the diversity measure reports prevalent types only). In our data, the diversity measured for each genetic trait separately showed a great range of variation across traits and components of diversity even in the same stand. The choice of the diversity component thus turned out to have a substantial effect on the assessment of the level of genetic diversity within stands. This prompted more detailed studies of the relationships between species and genetic diversity. Relationships were quantified with the help of the coefficient of co-variation, and the statistical significance of the co-variations was verified through permutation tests. The co-variations between SD and TSGD were found to be generally positive and in most cases significant, but the co-variation declined with increasing orders of diversity for most of the genetic traits. In contrast, the co-variation between SD and ISGD was not consistent for the four orders of diversity. In particular, the co-variations for the highest order were found to be negative for all traits. The results of our explorative study thus demonstrate that the assessment of levels of genetic diversity within stands as well as species-genetic interrelations critically depend on the choice of the diversity component, of the order of diversity, and of the genetic trait. These observations lend support to different and even opposing hypotheses on the processes potentially generating species-genetic relationships. Therefore, strategies in the conservation of biodiversity, for example, are suggested to be related more specifically to the components and orders of diversity to be safegarded and to consider the functions of genetic traits in relation to adaptationally relevant environmental factors.

Keywords

AARSSEN, L.W. (1983): Ecological combining ability and competitive combining ability in plants: toward a general evolutionary theory of coexistence in systems of competition. The American Naturalist, 122 (6), 707-731.10.1086/284167Search in Google Scholar

ANTONOVICS, J. (1992): Toward community genetics. In: FRITZ, R. S., SIMMS, E. L. (eds.). Plant Resistance to Herbivores and Pathogens: Ecology, Evolution and Genetics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 429-449.Search in Google Scholar

ANTONOVICS, J. (2003): Toward community genomics? Ecology, 84, 598-601.10.1890/0012-9658(2003)084[0598:TCG]2.0.CO;2Search in Google Scholar

BOOTH, R. E. and J. P. GRIME (2003): Effects of genetic impoverishment on plant community diversity. Journal of Ecology 91, 721-733.10.1046/j.1365-2745.2003.00804.xSearch in Google Scholar

FRIDLEY, J. D. and J. P. GRIME (2010): Community and ecosystem effects of intraspecific genetic diversity in grassland microcosms of varying species diversity. Ecology 91, 2272-2283.10.1890/09-1240.1Search in Google Scholar

GIBSON, D. J., A. J. ALLSTADT, S. G. BAER and M. GEISLER (2012): Effects of foundation species genotypic diversity on subordinate species richness in an assembling community. Oikos 121, 496-507.10.1111/j.1600-0706.2011.19447.xSearch in Google Scholar

GREGORIUS, H.-R. (2010): Linking diversity and differentiation. Diversity 2, 370.10.3390/d2030370Search in Google Scholar

GREGORIUS, H.-R. and F. BERGMANN (1995): Analysis of isoenzyme genetic profiles observed in tree populations. In: BARADAT, P., ADAMS, W. T., MÜLLER-STARCK (eds.). Population Genetics and Genetic Conservation of Forest Trees. SPB Academic Publishers, Amsterdam. pp. 79-96.Search in Google Scholar

GREGORIUS, H.-R., F. BERGMANN and CHR. WEHENKEL (2003): Analysis of biodiversity across levels of biological organization: a problem of defining traits. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 5, 209-218.10.1078/1433-8319-00035Search in Google Scholar

GREGORIUS, H.-R., B. DEGEN and A. KÖNIG (2007): Problems in the analysis of genetic differentiation among populations - a case study in Quercus robur. Silvae Genetica 56, 190-199.10.1515/sg-2007-0029Search in Google Scholar

HE, T., B. B. LAMONT, S. L. KRAUSS, N. J. ENRIGHT and B. P. MILLER (2008): Covariation between intraspecific genetic diversity and species diversity within a plant functional group. Journal of Ecology 96, 956-961.10.1111/j.1365-2745.2008.01402.xSearch in Google Scholar

HILL, M. O. (1973): Diversity and evenness: A unifying notation and its consequences. Ecology 54, 427-432.10.2307/1934352Search in Google Scholar

HU, X.-S., F. HE and S. P. HUBBEL (2006): Neutral theory in macroecology and population genetics. Oikos 113, 548-556.10.1111/j.2006.0030-1299.14837.xSearch in Google Scholar

JOST, L. (2007): Partitioning diversity into independent alpha and beta components. Ecology 88, 2427-2439.10.1890/06-1736.118027744Search in Google Scholar

KARLIN, A. A., W. S. GUTTMAN and S. L. RATHBUN (1984): Spatial autocorrelation analysis of heterozygosity and geographic distribution in population of Desmognathus fuscus (Amphibia: Plethodontidae). Copeia 1984, 343-356. 10.2307/1445190Search in Google Scholar

KONNERT, M. and W. MAURER (1995): Isozymic investigations on Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) and European silver fir (Abies alba Mill.): A practical guide to separation methods and zymogram evaluation. Laboratory Manual (edited by the German Federal State Work Group “Conservation of Forest Genetic Resources”), pp 79. Search in Google Scholar

MARKUSSEN, T., A. TUSCH, B. R. STEPHAN and M. FLADUNG (2005): Identification of molecular markers for selected wood properties of Norway spruce (Picea abies L. (Karst.). II. Extractives content. Silvae Genetica 54, 145-152.10.1515/sg-2005-0022Search in Google Scholar

PATIL, G. P. and C. TAILLIE (1982): Diversity as a concept and its measurement. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 77, 548-561.10.1080/01621459.1982.10477845Search in Google Scholar

POTT, R. (1992) Die Pflanzengesellschaften Deutschlands. Verlag Eugen Ulmer, Stuttgart.Search in Google Scholar

RENYI, A. (1961) On measures of entropy and information. In: NEYMANN, J. (ed.). Proceedings of the 4th Berkeley Symposium on Mathematics, Statistics and Probability. Vol. 1. .University of California Press, Berkeley, pp. 547-561.Search in Google Scholar

SILVERTOWN, J., P. M. BISS and J. FREELAND (2009): Community genetics: resource addition has opposing effects on genetic and species diversity in a 150-year experiment. Ecology Letters 12, 165-170.10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01273.x19143828Search in Google Scholar

VELLEND, M. (2003): Island biogeography of genes and species. The American Naturalist 162, 358-365.10.1086/37718912970843Search in Google Scholar

VELLEND, M. (2004): Parallel effects of land-use history on species diversity and genetic diversity of forest herbs. Ecology 85, 3043-3055.10.1890/04-0435Search in Google Scholar

VELLEND, M. (2005): Species diversity and genetic diversity: parallel processes and correlated patterns. The American Naturalist 166, 199-215.10.1086/43131816032574Search in Google Scholar

VELLEND, M. and M. A. GEBER (2005): Connections between species diversity and genetic diversity. Ecology Letters 8, 767-781.10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00775.xSearch in Google Scholar

VELLEND, M. and J. L. ORROCK (2009): Genetic and ecological models of diversity: lessons across disciplines. In: LOSOS, J. B., RICKLEFS, R. E. (eds.). The Theory of Island Biogeography Revisited. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp. 439-461.10.1515/9781400831920.439Search in Google Scholar

VOS, P., R. HOGERS, M. BLEEKER, M. REIJANS, T. VAN DE LEE, M. HORNES, J. FRIJTERS, J. PELEMAN, M. KUIPER and M. ZABEAU (1995): AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucleic Acids Research 23, 4407-4414.10.1093/nar/23.21.44073073977501463Search in Google Scholar

WEHENKEL, Chr., F. BERGMANN and H.-R. GREGORIUS (2006): Is there a trade-off between species diversity and genetic diversity in forest tree communities? Plant Ecology 185, 151-161.10.1007/s11258-005-9091-2Search in Google Scholar

WEHENKEL, CHR., F. BERGMANN and H.-R. GREGORIUS (2007): Genotype-species interactions in neighbourhoods of forest tree communities. Silvae Genetica 56, 1101-110.10.1515/sg-2007-0016Search in Google Scholar

WEI, X. and M. JIANG (2012): Contrasting relationships between species diversity and genetic diversity in natural and disturbed forest tree communities. New Phytologist 193, 779-786.10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03957.x22106986Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo