1. bookVolume 59 (2010): Issue 1-6 (December 2010)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2509-8934
First Published
22 Feb 2016
Publication timeframe
1 time per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

Population Differentiation and Climatic Adaptation for Growth Potential of White Spruce (Picea glauca) in Alberta, Canada

Published Online: 20 Oct 2017
Volume & Issue: Volume 59 (2010) - Issue 1-6 (December 2010)
Page range: 158 - 169
Received: 09 Mar 2010
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2509-8934
First Published
22 Feb 2016
Publication timeframe
1 time per year
Languages
English
Abstract

Genetic differentiation among white spruce populations in Alberta, Canada, was studied using time series data of height and diameter and a climatic index developed by principal component analysis. The objectives were to discern patterns of variation for growth potential and predicted optimum climate; compare optimum climate between populations, between height and diameter at the same age and between height or diameter at different ages; and to see if optimum climate differed from the climate inhabited by populations. Using cluster analysis we found that: (1) populations from mid-latitudes (54° - 57°N) and mid-elevations (600 - 800 m) were grouped together and exhibited high growth potential; populations from north of 57°N were grouped with those from elevations higher than 900m in the Rocky Mountains and exhibited low growth potential; and (2) With minor exceptions, populations from similar climates or geography were grouped together in terms of predicted optimum climate. (3) Analysis of variance showed that optimum climate differed significantly (P < 0.05) among populations; among heights at different ages; among diameters at different ages and between height and diameter at the same ages. However, there was no consistent trend in the direction of change in optimum climate with tree age. (4) The range of climate inhabited by the populations (PI₁ = -5.792 to 4.483) was much wider than the range of their predicted optimum climate (P̂Ō₁ = -1.001 to 0.842), which suggests that in terms of growth potential some populations inhabit sub-optimal climates. Implications of the results on management of white spruce in Alberta are discussed.

Keywords

AARD (Alberta Agriculture and Rural Development) (2005): Agricultural land resource atlas of Alberta - frost-free period of Alberta 1971-2000. Available at: http://www1.agric.gov.ab.ca/$department/deptdocs.nsf/all/agdex10304.Search in Google Scholar

ALBERTA ENVIRONMENT (2005): Alberta Climate Model (ACM) to provide climate estimates (1961-1990) for any location in Alberta from its geographic coordinates. Publ. No. T/749. Alberta Environment, Edmonton.Search in Google Scholar

ANDALO, C., J. BEAULIEU, J., and J. BOUSQUER (2005): The impact of climate change on growth of local white spruce populations in Quebec, Canada. For. Ecol. Manage. 205: 169-182.Search in Google Scholar

CANNELL, M. G. R. (1974): Production of branches and foliage by young trees in Pinus contorta and Picea sitchensis: provenance differences in their simulation. J. Appl. Ecol. 11: 1091-1115.10.2307/2401768Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

CARTER, T. R., M. HULME and M. LAL (1999): Guidelines on the use of scenario data for climate impact and adaptation assessment. Task Group on Scenarios for Climate Impact Assessment of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Available at: http://ipcc.ddc.cru.uea.ac.uk.Search in Google Scholar

DOAK, C. C. (1935): Evolution of folia types, dwarf shoots and cone scales of Pinus. Illinois Biol. Monogr. 13: 1-163. Search in Google Scholar

EARTHINFO INC. (1994): Database guide. Earthinfo Inc. Boulder, CO (on CD ROM). ENVIRONMENT CANADA (1993): Canadian climate normals 1961-1990. Prairie Provinces. Available at: http://climate.weatheroffice.ec.gc.ca/climate_normals/index_e.html.Search in Google Scholar

FUTUYMA, D. J. (1979): Evolutionary biology. Sinauer Associates Inc. Sunderland, ma.Search in Google Scholar

GIERTYCH, M. (1979): Summary of the results of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) height growth in iufro provenance experiments. Silvae Genet. 28: 136-152.Search in Google Scholar

KRAMER, P. J. and T. T. KOZLOWSKI (1979): Physiology of woody plants. Academic Press Inc. San Diego.Search in Google Scholar

KRUTZSCH, P. (1992): Iufro’s role in coniferous tree improvement: Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst). Silvae Genet. 41: 143-150.Search in Google Scholar

LANGLET, O. (1971): Two hundred years genecology. Taxon 20: 653-722.10.2307/1218596Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

LANGLET, O. (1959): A cline or not a cline - a question of Scots pine. Silvae Genet. 8: 13-22.Search in Google Scholar

LANNER, R. M. (1976): Patterns of shoot development in Pinus and their relationship to growth potential, pp. 223-243. In: Tree Physiology and Yield Improvement, edited by M. G. R. CANNEL and F. T. LAST, Academic Press, London/UK.Search in Google Scholar

LAROI, G. H. and J. R. DUGLE (1968): A systematic and genecological study of Picea glauca and P. engelmannii, using paper chromatograms of needle extracts. Can. J. Bot. 46: 649-687.10.1139/b68-093Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

LARSON, P. R. (1962): The indirect effect of photoperiod on tracheid diameter in Pinus resinosa. Am. J. Bot. 49: 132-137.10.1002/j.1537-2197.1962.tb14918.xSearch in Google Scholar

LINHART, Y. B. and M. GRANT (1996): Evolutionary significance of local differentiation in plants. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 27: 237-277.10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.27.1.237Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

LOEHLE, C. (1998): Height growth rate tradeoffs determine northern and southern range limits for trees. J. Biogeogr. 4: 735-742.10.1046/j.1365-2699.1998.2540735.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

MATYAS, CS. and C. W. YEATMAN (1992): Effect of geographic transfer on growth and survival of jack pine (Pinus banksiana Lamb.) populations. Silvae Genet. 41: 370-376.Search in Google Scholar

MELLEROWICZ, E. J., W. K. COLEMAN., R. T. RIDING and C. H. A. LITTLE (1992): Periodicity of cambial activity in Abies balsamea. I. Effects of temperature and photoperiod on cambia dormancy and frost hardiness. Physiol. Plant. 85: 515-525.Search in Google Scholar

MORGENSTERN, E. K. (1996): Geographic variation in forest trees: Genetic basis and application of knowledge in silviculture. UBC Press, Vancouver.Search in Google Scholar

NAMKOONG, G. (1969): Nonoptimality of local races. In Proceedings of the Tenth Southern Conference on Forest Tree Improvement, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas. pp 149-153.Search in Google Scholar

RAJORA, O. P. and B. P. DANCIK (2000): Population genetic variation, structure, and evolution in Engelmann spruce, white spruce and their natural hybrid complex in Alberta. Can. J. Bot. 78: 768-780.10.1139/cjb-78-6-768Search in Google Scholar

REHFELDT, G. E. (1978): Genetic differentiation in Douglas- fir populations from the northern Rocky Mountains. Ecology 59: 1264-1270.10.2307/1938240Search in Google Scholar

REHFELDT, G. E., C. C. YING, D. L. SPITTLEHOUSE and D. A. HAMILTON (1999): Genetic response to climate in Pinus contorta: Niche breadth, climate change and reforestation. Ecolog. Monogr. 69: 375-407.10.1890/0012-9615(1999)069[0375:GRTCIP]2.0.CO;2Search in Google Scholar

REHFELDT, G. E., N. M. TCHEBAKOVA, Y. I. PARFENOVA, W. R. WYKOFF, N. A. KUZMINA and L. I. MILYUTIN (2002): Interspecific responses to climate change in Pinus sylvestris. Global change Biol. 8: 912-929.10.1046/j.1365-2486.2002.00516.xSearch in Google Scholar

REHFELDT, G. E., W. R. WYKOFF and C. C. YING (2001): Physiologic plasticity, evolution, and impacts of a changing climate on Pinus contorta. Climatic Change 50: 355-376.10.1023/A:1010614216256Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

ROBERDS, J. H., J. O. HYUN and G. NAMKOONG (1990): Height response functions for white ash provenances grown at different latitudes. Silvae Genet. 39: 121-129.Search in Google Scholar

RWEYONGEZA, D. M., R-C. YANG, N. K. DHIR, L. K. BARNHARDT and C. HANSEN (2007): Genetic variation and climatic impacts on survival and growth of white spruce in Alberta, Canada. Silvae Genet. 56: 117-127.10.1515/sg-2007-0018Search in Google Scholar

SAS INSTITUTE (2004): SAS System for Windows. Version 9.2. Carry, NC. Search in Google Scholar

SCHMIDTLING R. C. (1994): Use of provenance tests to predict response to climatic change: loblolly pine and Norway spruce. Tree Physiology 14: 805-817.10.1093/treephys/14.7-8-9.80514967650Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

STEPHENSON, N. A. (1990): Climatic control of vegetation distribution: The role of water balance. Am. Nat. 135: 649-670.Search in Google Scholar

TAIZ, L. and E. ZEIGER (2006): Plant Physiology. 4th Ed. Sinauer Associates Inc. Sunderland, MA. Search in Google Scholar

THOMSON, A. M. and W. H. PARKER (2008): Boreal forest provenance tests used to predict optimal growth and response to climate change. 1. Jack pine. Can. J. For. Res. 38: 157-170.Search in Google Scholar

THOMSON, A. M., C. L. RIDDELL and W. H. PARKER (2009): Boreal forest provenance tests used to predict optimal growth and response to climate change: 2. Black spruce. Can. J. For. Res. 39: 143-153.Search in Google Scholar

THORNTHWITE, C.W. (1948): An approach toward a rational classification of climate. Geogr. Rev. 38: 55-94. Search in Google Scholar

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE (1994): U.S. divisional and station climatic data and normals. National Climatic Data Center, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Ashille, NC. Vol. 1 (on CD ROM).Search in Google Scholar

VAARTAJA, O. (1954): Photoperiodic ecotypes of trees. Can. J. Bot. 32: 392-399.10.1139/b54-036Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

VAARTAJA, O. (1959): Evidence of photoperiodic ecotypes in forest trees. Ecolog. Monogr. 29: 92-111.10.2307/1942199Search in Google Scholar

WANG, T., A. HAMANN, A. YANCHUK, G. A. O’NEIL and S. N. AITKEN (2006): Use of response functions in selecting lodgepole pine populations for future climates. Global Change Biol. 12: 2404-2416.10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01271.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

WAREING, P. F. and D. L. ROBERTS (1956): Photoperiodic control of cambial activity in Robinia pseudacacia L. New Phytol. 55: 356-367.10.1111/j.1469-8137.1956.tb05295.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

WU, H. X. and C. C. YING (2004): Geographic pattern of local optimality in natural populations of lodgepole pine. For. Ecol. Manage. 194: 177-198.Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo