1. bookVolume 59 (2010): Issue 1-6 (December 2010)
Journal Details
First Published
22 Feb 2016
Publication timeframe
1 time per year
access type Open Access

Clonal Variation and Genotype by Environment Interactions in Growth and Wood Density in Eucalyptus camaldulensis at Three Contrasting Sites in Vietnam

Published Online: 20 Oct 2017
Volume & Issue: Volume 59 (2010) - Issue 1-6 (December 2010)
Page range: 17 - 28
Received: 06 Jul 2010
Journal Details
First Published
22 Feb 2016
Publication timeframe
1 time per year

A total of 172 clones of Eucalyptus camaldulensis were tested in three clonal tests in northern, north-central and southern Vietnam, with 32 of them planted across all three sites. At age 3-5 years, the clonal repeatabilities were 0.18-0.42 for growth traits, 0.71-0.78 for wood basic density and 0.56-0.66 for pilodyn penetration. Genotypic correlations between growth and density at the three sites were from -0.24 to 0.17, and did not differ significantly from zero. Genotypic correlations between sites were 0.32-0.56 for growth traits at age 3 years, and 0.72-0.88 for density and pilodyn penetration. Selection gains for breast height diameter at individual sites at a selection proportion of 5% were 22-32%, with minor effects on density. Selection for diameter at one site gave indirect responses in diameter at the other two sites that were only 40-60% of the gains obtainable from direct selection at those sites. This study shows that fast-growing E. camaldulensis clones can be selected in Vietnam with only minor effects on density. Selection for growth should be regionally based to maximize selection gain whereas clonal rankings for density will change little across regions.


BECKER, W. A. (1992): Manual of quantitative genetics: Academic Enterprises, Washington.Search in Google Scholar

BOOTH, T. H., M. DUDZINSKI, T. JOVANOVIC, K. M. OLD, K. PONGPANICH and P. Q. THU (2000): Identifying high risk areas for Cylindrocladium quinqueseptatum and Cryptosporiopsis eucalypti on eucalypts. In: Eucalypt diseases and their management. Kasertsat University, Bangkok.Search in Google Scholar

BROOKER, M. I. H. and D. KLEINIG (2004): Field guide to Eucalypts Volume 3 - Northern Australia. CSIRO Publishing, Melbourne.Search in Google Scholar

BURDON, R. D. (1977): Genetic correlation as a concept for studying genotype by environment interaction in forest tree breeding. Silvae Genetica 26: 168-175.Search in Google Scholar

BUREAU OF METEOROLOGY (2009): Australia Climate Data Online. Available from http://www.bom.gov.au/climate (accessed 19th June 2008).Search in Google Scholar

BUTCHER, P., M. MCDONALD and J. BELL (2009): Congruence between environmental parameters, morphology and genetic structure in Australia’s most widely distributed eucalypt, Eucalyptus camaldulensis. Tree Genetics and Genomes 5, 189-210.10.1007/s11295-008-0169-6Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

CHIEU, T. T. and D. D. THUAN (1996): Vietnam soil (in Vietnamese).Agriculture Publishing House, Hanoi. Search in Google Scholar

CHUONG, H. (1992): Results of species/provenance trials of eucalypts in Vietnam (in Vietnamese). Forest Science Institute of Vietnam, Hanoi.Search in Google Scholar

COSSALTER, C. and C. PYE-SMITH (2003): Fast-Wood Forestry - Myths and Realities. Center for International Forestry Research, Jakarta.Search in Google Scholar

DAC, P. T. and P. N. TOAN (1993): Vietnam Climate (in Vietnamese). Science and Technique Publishing House, Hanoi.Search in Google Scholar

DEAN, G. H. (1995): Objectives for wood fibre quality and uniformity. In: POTTS, B. M., BORRALHO, N. M. G., REID, J. B., CROMER, R. N., TIBBITS, W. N., RAYMOND, C. A. (Eds.). Eucalypt plantations: improving fibre yield and quality. CRC for Temperate Hardwood Forestry, Hobart.Search in Google Scholar

ELDRIDGE, K. G., C. HARWOOD, G. VAN WYK and J. DAVIDSON (1993): Eucalypt Domestication and Breeding. Oxford University Press. New York.Search in Google Scholar

EMERY, B. M. and F. T. LEDIG (1987): Provenance variation in Eucalyptus camaldulensis Dehnh. in California. Silvae Genetica 36: 172-180.Search in Google Scholar

FALCONER, D. S. and T. F. C. MACKAY (1996): Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. Longman Group Ltd, Essex.Search in Google Scholar

GIBSON, A., E. P. BACHELARD and K. T. HUBICK (1994): Growth strategies of Eucalyptus camaldulensis Dehnh. at three sites in northern Australia. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 21: 653-662.10.1071/PP9940653Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

GIBSON, A., E. P. BACHELARD and K. T. HUBICK (1995): Relationship between climate and provenance variation in Eucalyptus camaldulensis Dehnh. Australian Journal Plant Physiology 22: 453-460.10.1071/PP9950453Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

GILMOUR, A. R., B. J. GOGEL, B. R. CULLIS, S. J. WELHAM and R. THOMPSON (2006): ASReml User Guide Release 2.0. VSN International Ltd, Hemel Hempstead.Search in Google Scholar

GWAZE, D. P., F. E. BRIDGWATER and W. J. LOWE (2000): Performance of interspecific F1 eucalypt hybrids in Zimbawe. Forest Genetics 7: 295-303.Search in Google Scholar

HANSEN, C. P. (2000): Application of the Pilodyn in forest tree improvement. Danida Forest Seed Centre, Humlebaek.Search in Google Scholar

KANG, M. S., J. D. MILLER and L. L. DARRAH (1987): A note on relationship between stability variance and ecovalence. Heredity 78: 107.10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a110322Search in Google Scholar

KHA, L. D. (2003): Selection, breeding and propagation of some main plantation tree species in Vietnam (in Vietnamese). Agricultural Publishing House, Hanoi.Search in Google Scholar

KHA, L. D., H. H. Thinh and N.V. CUONG (2003): Improvement of Eucalypts for Reforestation in Vietnam. In: TURNBULL, J.W. (Ed.). Eucalypts in Asia. Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research, Zhanjiang.Search in Google Scholar

LIBBY, W. J. and R. M. RAUTER (1984): Advantages of clonal forestry. Forestry Chronicle 60, 145-149.10.5558/tfc60145-3Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

LIMA, J. T., M. C. BREESE and C. M. CAHALAN (2000): Genotype-environment interaction in wood basic density of Eucalyptus clones. Wood Science and Technology 34: 197-206.10.1007/s002260000041Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

MAHMOOD, K., N. E. MARCAR, M. H. NAQVI, R. J. ARNOLD, D. F. CRAWFORD, S. IQBAL and K. M. AKEN (2003): Genetic variation in Eucalyptus camaldulensis Dehnh. for growth and stem straightness in a provenance-family trial on saltland in Pakistan. Forest Ecology and Management 176: 405-416.10.1016/S0378-1127(02)00230-XSearch in Google Scholar

MARD (2002): Statistics of agriculture and rural development 1996-2000. Agicultural Publishing House, Hanoi.Search in Google Scholar

MCDONALD, M.W., M. I. H. BROOKER and P. A. BUTCHER(2009): A taxonomic revision of Eucalyptus camaldulensis (Myrtaceae). Australian Systematic Botany 22: 257-285.10.1071/SB09005Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

MIDGLEY, S. J., K. G. ELDRIDGE and J. C. DORAN (1989): Genetic resources of Eucalyptus camaldulensis. Commonwealth Forestry Review 68: 295-308.Search in Google Scholar

MULLIN, T. J. and Y. S. PARK (1992): Estimating genetic gains from alternative breeding strategies for clonal forestry. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 22: 14-23.10.1139/x92-003Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

MUNERI, A. and C. A. RAYMOND (2000): Genetic parameters and genotype-by-environment interactions for basic density, pilodyn penetration and diameter in Eucalyptus globulus. Forest Genetics 7: 317-328.Search in Google Scholar

NAMKOONG, G. (1981): Introduction to quantitative genetics in forestry. Castle House, Turnbridge Wells.Search in Google Scholar

NAMKOONG, G., H. C. KANG and J. S. BROUARD (1988): Tree breeding: principles and strategies. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.10.1007/978-1-4612-3892-8Search in Google Scholar

OLD, K. M., M. J. DUDZINSKI, K. PONGPANICH, Z. Q. YUAN, P. Q. THU and N. T. NGUYEN (2002): Cryptosporiopsis leaf spot and shoot blight of eucalypts. Australasian Plant Pathology 31: 337-344.10.1071/AP02037Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

OLESEN, P. O. (1971): Water displacement method. A fast and accurate method to determine green volume of wood samples. Forest Tree Improvement 3: 1-23.Search in Google Scholar

OSORIO, L. F., T. L. WHITE and D. A. HUBER (2001): Age trends of heritabilities and genotype by environment interactions for growth traits and wood density from clonal trials of Eucalyptus grandis Hill ex Maiden. Silvae Genetica 50: 108-117.Search in Google Scholar

OTEGBEYE, G. O. (1985): Provenance productivity in Eucalyptus camaldulensis Dehnh. and its implications to genetic improvement in the Savanna region of Nigeria. Silvae Genetica 34: 121-126.Search in Google Scholar

PINYOPUSARERK, K., J. C. DORAN, E. R. WILLIAMS and P. WASUWANICH (1996): Variation in growth of Eucalyptus camaldulensis provenances in Thailand. Forest Ecology and Management 87: 63-73.10.1016/S0378-1127(96)03835-2Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

PISUTTIPICHED, S., E. RETULAINEN, R. MALINEN, H. KOLEHMAINEN, M. RUHANEN and S. SIRIPATTANADILOK (2003): Effect of harvesting age on the quality of Eucalyptus camaldulensis bleached kraft pulp. Appita Journal 56: 385-390.Search in Google Scholar

SHUKLA, G. K. (1972): Some statistical aspects of partitioning genotype-environmental components of variability. Heredity 29: 237-245.10.1038/hdy.1972.874507945Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

THU, P. Q., K. M. OLD, M. J. DUDZINSKI and R. J. GIBBS (2000): Results of eucalypt disease surveys in Vietnam. In: Eucalypt diseases and their management. Kasetsart University, Bangkok.Search in Google Scholar

VARGHESE, M., C. HARWOOD, R. HEDGE und N. RAVI (2008): Evaluation of provenances of Eucalyptus camaldulensis and clones of E. camaldulensis and E. tereticornis at contrasting sites in southern India. Silvae Genetica 57: 170-179.10.1515/sg-2008-0026Search in Google Scholar

WHITE, T. L. (1987): A conceptual frame work for tree improvement programs. New Forests 1: 325-342.10.1007/BF00031742Search in Google Scholar

WILLIAMS, E. R., A. C. MATHESON and C. E. HARWOOD (2002): Experimental design and analysis for tree improvement. CSIRO Publishing, Melbourne.10.1071/9780643090132Search in Google Scholar

WRICKE, G. (1962): Evaluation method for recording ecological differences in field trials (in German). Z. Pflanzenzüchtung 47: 92-96.Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo