1. bookVolume 57 (2008): Issue 1-6 (December 2008)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
First Published
22 Feb 2016
Publication timeframe
1 time per year
Languages
English
Copyright
© 2020 Sciendo

Direct and Competition Additive Effects in Tree Breeding: Bayesian Estimation From an Individual Tree Mixed Model

Published Online: 14 Oct 2017
Page range: 45 - 56
Received: 23 Aug 2006
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
First Published
22 Feb 2016
Publication timeframe
1 time per year
Languages
English
Copyright
© 2020 Sciendo

An individual tree model with additive direct and competition effects is introduced to account for competitive effects in forest genetics evaluation. The mixed linear model includes fixed effects as well as direct and competition breeding values plus permanent environmental effects. Competition effects, either additive or environmental, are identified in the phenotype of a competitor tree by means of ‘intensity of competition’ elements (IC), which are non-zero elements of the incidence matrix of the additive competition effects. The ICs are inverse function of the distance and the number of competing individuals, either row-column wise or diagonally. The ICs allow standardization of the variance of competition effects in the phenotypic variance of any individual tree, so that the model accounts for unequal number of neighbors. Expressions are obtained for the bias in estimating additive variance using the covariance between half-sibs, when ignoring competition effects for row-plot designs and for single-tree plot designs. A data set of loblolly pines on growth at breast height is used to estimate the additive variances of direct and competition effects, the covariance between both effects, and the variance of permanent environmental effects using a Bayesian method via Gibbs sampling and Restricted Maximum Likelihood procedures (REML) via the Expectation- Maximization (EM) algorithm. No problem of convergence was detected with the model and ICs used when compared to what has been reported in the animal breeding literature for such models. Posterior means (standard error) of the estimated parameters were σ̂2Ad = 12.553 (1.447), σ̂2Ac = 1.259 (0.259), σ̂AdAc = -3.126 (0.492), σ̂2 p = 1.186 (0.289), and σ̂2e = 5.819 (1.07). Leaving permanent environmental competition effects out of the model may bias the predictions of direct breeding values. Results suggest that selection for increasing direct growth while keeping a low level of competition is feasible.

Keywords

ARANGO, J., I. MISZTAL, S. TSURUTA, M. CULBERTSON and W. HERRING (2005): Estimation of variance components including competitive effects of Large White growing gilts. J. Anim. Sci. 83: 1241-1246.10.2527/2005.8361241xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

ARORA, V. and P. LAHIRI (1997): On the superiority of the Bayesian method over the BLUP in small area estimation problems. Statistica Sinica 7: 1053-1063.Search in Google Scholar

BORRALHO, N. M. G. (1995): The impact of individual tree mixed models (BLUP) in tree breeding strategies. In Proceedings of the CRC-IUFRO Conference: Eucalypts plantations: Improving fibre yield and quality. 12-24 February. 1995, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia. Edited by B. M. POTTS, N. M. G. BORRALHO, J. B. REID, R. N.Search in Google Scholar

CANTET, R. J. C., D. GIANOLA, I. MISZTAL, R. L. FERNANDO (1993): Estimates of dispersion parameters and of genetic and environmental trends for weaning weight in Angus cattle using a maternal animal model with genetic grouping. Livest. Prod. Sci. 34: 203-212.10.1016/0301-6226(93)90107-SOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

CAPPA, E. P. and R. J. C. CANTET (2006): Bayesian inference for normal multiple-trait individual-tree models with missing records via full conjugate Gibbs. Can. J. For. Res. 36: 1276-1285.Search in Google Scholar

CASELLA, G. and E. I. GEORGE (1992): Explaining the Gibbs Sampler. Am. Stat. 46: 167-174.Search in Google Scholar

DEMPSTER, A. P., N. M. LAIRD and D. B. RUBIN (1977): Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via EM algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistics Society 39: 1-38.Search in Google Scholar

DUANGJINDA, M., I. MISZTAL, J. K. BERTRAND, S. TSURUTA (2001): The empirical bias of estimates by restricted maximum likelihood, Bayesian method, and method R under selection for additive, maternal, and dominance models. J. Anim Sci. 79: 2991-2996.10.2527/2001.79122991xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

FOSTER, G. S., R. J. ROUSSEAU and W. L. NANCE (1998): Eastern cottonwood clonal mixing study: intergenotypiccompetition effects. Forest Ecology and Management. 112: 9-22.Search in Google Scholar

GELMAN, A., J. B. CARLIN, H. S. STERN and D. B. RUBIN (1995): Bayesian data analysis. Chapman and Hall. New York, USA.Search in Google Scholar

GRIFFING, B. (1967): Selection in reference to biological groups. I. Individual and group selection applied to populations of unordered groups. Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 20: 127-139.Search in Google Scholar

GRIFFING, B. (1968a): Selection in reference to biological groups. II. Consequences of selection in groups of one size when evaluated in groups of a different size. Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 21: 1163-1170.Search in Google Scholar

GRIFFING, B. (1968b): Selection in reference to biological groups. III. Generalized results of individual and group selection in terms of parent-offspring covariances. Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 21: 1171-1178.Search in Google Scholar

GWAZE, D. P. and J. A. WOOLLIAMS (2001): Making decisions about the optimal selection environment using Gibbs sampling. Theor. Appl. Genet. 103: 63-69.10.1007/s001220000502Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

HARVILLE, D. A. (1974): Bayesian inference for variance components using only error contrasts. Biometrika 61: 383-384.10.1093/biomet/61.2.383Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

HENDERSON, C. R. (1977): Best linear unbiased prediction of breeding values not in the model for records. J. Dairy Sci. 60: 783-787.10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(77)83935-0Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

HINSON, K. and W. D. HANSON (1962): Competition studies in soybeans. Crop. Sci. 2: 117-123.10.2135/cropsci1962.0011183X000200020010xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

HOBERT, J. P. and G. CASELLA (1996): The effects of improper priors on Gibbs sampling in hierarchical linear models, J. Amer. Statist. 91: 1461-1473.Search in Google Scholar

JENSEN, J., C. S. WANG, D. A. SORENSEN and D. GIANOLA (1994): Bayesian inference on variance and covariance components for traits influenced by maternal and direct genetic effects, using the Gibbs sampler. Acta Agric. Scand. 44: 193-201.Search in Google Scholar

KASS, R. E., B. P. CARLIN, A. GELMAN and R. M. NEAL (1998): Markov chain Monte Carlo in practice: a roundtable discussion. Amer. Stat. 52: 93-100.Search in Google Scholar

KEMPTHORNE, O. (1969): An Introduction to Genetic Statistics. Iowa State Univ. Press, Ames Iowa.Search in Google Scholar

LYNCH, M. and B. WALSH (1998): Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits. Sinauer Associates. Sunderland M/A.Search in Google Scholar

MAGNUSSEN, S. (1989): Effects and adjustments of competition bias in progeny trials with single-tree plots. Forest Science 35(2): 532-547.Search in Google Scholar

MAGNUSSEN, S. (1993) Bias in genetic variance estimates due to spatial autocorrelation. Theorical and Applied Genetics 86: 349-355.Search in Google Scholar

MUIR, W. M. and A. SCHINCKEL (2002): Incorporation of competitive effects in breeding programs to improve productivity and animal well being. CD-ROM Communication No. 14-07 in Proc. 7th World Cong. Genet. Appl. Livest. Prod., Montpellier France.Search in Google Scholar

MUIR, W. M. (2005): Incorporation of competitive effects in forest tree or animal breeding programs. Genetics 170: 1247-1259.Search in Google Scholar

PATTERSON, H. D. and R. THOMPSON (1971): Recovery of inter-block information when block sizes are unequal. Biometrika 58: 545-554.10.1093/biomet/58.3.545Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

RADTKE, P. J., J. A. WESTFALL and H. E. BURKHART (2003): Conditioning a distance-dependent competition index to indicate the onset of intertree competition. Forest Ecology and Management 175: 17-30.Search in Google Scholar

SILVERMAN, B. W. (1986): Density estimation for statistics and data analysis. Chapman and Hall. London.Search in Google Scholar

SMITH, B. J. (2003): Bayesian Output Analysis Program (BOA) version 1.0 user’s manual. Available from http://www.public-health.uiowa.edu/boa/Home.html.Search in Google Scholar

SORENSEN, D. and D. GIANOLA (2002): Likelihood, Bayesian, and MCMC Methods in Quantitative Genetics. Springer-Verlag, New York.Search in Google Scholar

SORIA, F., F. BASURCO, G. TOVAL, L. SILIÓ, M. C. RODRIGUEZ and M. TORO (1998): An application of Bayesian techniques to the genetic evaluation of growth traits in Eucalyptus globulus. Can. J. For. Res. 28: 1286-1294.Search in Google Scholar

VAN TASSELL, C. P., G. CASELLA and E. J. POLLAK (1995): Effects of Selection on Estimates of Variance Components Using Gibbs Sampling and Restricted Maximum Likelihood. J. Dairy Sci. 78: 678-692.10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(95)76680-2Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

VAN VLECK, L. D. and J. P. CASSADY (2005): Unexpected estimates of variance components with a true model containing genetic competition effects. J. Anim. Sci. 83: 68-74.10.2527/2005.83168xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

WILLHAM, R. L. (1963): The covariance between relatives for characters composed of components contributed by related individuals. Biometrics 19: 18-27.10.2307/2527570Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

WOLF, J. B. (2003): Genetic architecture and evolutionary constraint when the environment contains genes. Proc. Nat. Academy of Sciences 100: 4655-4660.10.1073/pnas.0635741100Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

WRIGHT, A. J. (1986): Individual and group selection with competition. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 72: 256-263.Search in Google Scholar

ZENG, W., S. K. GHOSH and B. LI (2004): A Blocking Gibbs Sampling Method to Detect Major Genes Affecting a Quantitative Trait for Diallel Mating Design. Genetical Research 84: 1-12.Search in Google Scholar

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo