[[1] Regulation (EU) No 305/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 2011 laying down harmonised conditions for the marketing of construction products and repealing Council Directive 89/106/EEC, Official Journal of the European Union, 43 p.]Search in Google Scholar
[[2] EN 197-2:2014: Cement-Part 2: Conformity evaluation.]Search in Google Scholar
[[3] Lawrence, C.D. (1998): The Constitution and Specification of Portland Cements, In: Hewlett, P.C. (Ed): Lea´s Chemistry of Cement and Concrete, London: Arnold, pp. 131-194.10.1016/B978-075066256-7/50016-3]Search in Google Scholar
[[4] Tsamatsoulis, D., Nikolakakos, N. (2012): Investigation of Some Basic Parameters Affecting the Optimum Sulfates Content of Cement, In: Balas, V.E., Koksal, M. (Eds.): Recent Researches in Circuits and Systems, Proceedings of the 16th WSEAS International Conference on Circuits and Systems, Kos Island, Greece. WSEAS Press, pp. 152-157.]Search in Google Scholar
[[5] Odler, I. (1998): Hydration, setting and hardening of Portland cement, In: Hewlett, P.C. (Ed): Lea´s Chemistry of Cement and Concrete, London: Arnold, pp. 260-263.10.1016/B978-075066256-7/50018-7]Search in Google Scholar
[[6] Scrivener, K., Skalny, J. (2004): International RILEM Workshop on Internal Sulfate Attack and Delayed Ettringite Formation. Proceedings pro035: International RILEM Workshop on Internal Sulfate Attack and Delayed Ettringite Formation, 316 p.10.1617/2912143802.018]Search in Google Scholar
[[7] ASTM C150-07 Standard Specification for Portland Cement.]Search in Google Scholar
[[8] EN 197-1: 2011: Cement. Composition, specifications and conformity criteria for common cements.]Search in Google Scholar
[[9] Stutzman, P., Heckert, A., Tebbe, A., Leigh, S. (2014): Uncertainty in Bogue-calculated phase composition of hydraulic cements. Cement and Concrete Research, 61-62, 40-48.10.1016/j.cemconres.2014.03.007]Search in Google Scholar
[[10] ISO/IEC 17025/2007: General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories.]Search in Google Scholar
[[11] Guide To The Expression Of Uncertainty In Measurement. ISO: Geneva (1993).]Search in Google Scholar
[[12] (ISBN 92-67-10188-9) (Reprinted 1995: Reissued as ISO Guide 98-3 (2008), also]Search in Google Scholar
[[13] Available from http://www.bipm.org as JCGM 100:2008)]Search in Google Scholar
[[14] EURACHEM/CITAT Guide CG4, Quantifying Uncertainty in Analytical Measurements. EURACHEM: Teddington, 3rd Edition, Ellison, S.L.R, Williams, A. (eds), 2012, 135 pp.]Search in Google Scholar
[[15] EUROLAB Technical Report No. 1/2007 (2007): Measurement uncertainty revised: alternative approaches to uncertainty evaluation. Available on: http:// www.eurolab.org/documents/Technical_Report_Measurement_Uncertainty_2007.pdf.]Search in Google Scholar
[[16] Uusitalo, L., Lehikoinen, A., Helle, I., Myberg, K. (2015): An overview of methods to evaluate uncertainty of deterministic models in decision support. Environmental Modelling & Software, 63, pp. 24-31.10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.09.017]Search in Google Scholar
[[17] NT Technical report (2012): A handbook for calculation of measurement uncertainty in environmental laboratories. NORDTEST, pp. 46.]Search in Google Scholar
[[18] EN 196-2:2013, Methods of testing cement - Part 2: Chemical analysis of cement]Search in Google Scholar
[[19] Jarvis, B., Corry, J.E.L., Hedges, A.J. (2007): Estimates of measurement uncertainty from proficiency testing schemes, internal laboratory quality monitoring and during routine enforcement examination of foods. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 103, pp. 462-467.10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.03258.x17650207]Search in Google Scholar
[[20] Lyn, J.A., Ramsey, M.H., Damant, A.P., Wood, R. (2007): Empirical versus modelling approaches to the estimation of measurement uncertainty caused by primary sampling. Analyst, 132, pp. 1231-1237.10.1039/b709539m18318284]Search in Google Scholar
[[21] ISO 13528, Statistical methods for use in proficiency testing by inter-laboratory comparison. ]Search in Google Scholar