[ALTMAN, D.G. (1991). Practical Statistics for Medical Research. London: Chapman & Hall10.1201/9780429258589]Search in Google Scholar
[AMARAL. A., MAGALHÃES.A. (2002). The Emergent Role of External Stakeholders in European Higher Education Governance. Governing Higher Education: National Perspectives on Institutional Governance. Higher Education Dynamics.2002 (2). Pp. 1-21. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-015-9946-7_110.1007/978-94-015-9946-7_1]Search in Google Scholar
[ANDERSON L. IRIGGS. A. R. J.. BURTON. N. (2001). Managing Finance. Resources and Stakeholders in Education. London: Paul Chapman Publishing10.4135/9781446221082]Search in Google Scholar
[BRYSON. J. M. (2004). What to do when Stakeholders Matter? Stakeholder Identification and Analysis Techniques. Public Management Review.6(1). pp. 21-53.10.1080/14719030410001675722]Search in Google Scholar
[BRYSON. J. M. (2011). Strategic Planning for Public and Nonprofit Organizations: A Guide to Strengthening and Sustaining Organizational Achievement. San Francisco: John Wiley &Sons.]Search in Google Scholar
[BURROWS, J. (1999). Going Beyond Labels: A Framework for Profiling Institutional Stakeholders. Contemporary Education.70(4). Pp. 5-10.]Search in Google Scholar
[BURTON. C. (2001). The Entrepreneurial University: New Foundations for Collegiality, Autonomy, and Achievement. Journal of the Programme on Institutional management in Higher Education 13(2). Pp. 9-24]Search in Google Scholar
[BUYSSE, K., VERBEKE, A. (2003). Proactive Environmental Strategies: A Stakeholder Management Perspective. Strategic Management Journal. 24 (5). Pp. 453-470.10.1002/smj.299]Search in Google Scholar
[CHINYIO. E. et al. (2010). Construction Stakeholder Management. Chichester: Blackwell Publishing.]Search in Google Scholar
[CLARKSON.M. (1994). A risk based model of stakeholder theory: Toronto. Proceedings of the Second Toronto Conference on Stakeholder Theory. Centre for Corporate Social Performance and Ethics, University of Toronto: Toronto.]Search in Google Scholar
[CLARKSON.M. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analysing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review 20 (1). Pp. 92-117.10.2307/258888]Search in Google Scholar
[EESLEY. C., LENOX.M. (2006). Firm Responses to Secondary Stakeholder Action.Strategic Management Journal. 27(8). Pp. 765-781]Search in Google Scholar
[EURYDICE (2008).Higher Education Governance in Europe Policies. structures. funding and academic staff. Brussels: Eurydice. ISBN 978-92-79-08524-6]Search in Google Scholar
[FIALA. R., PROKOP. M., ŽIVĚLOVÁ, I. (2012). The relationship between interorganizational trust and performance. Acta universitatis agriculturae Mendelianae Brunensis. 55(4). Pp. 89–98.]Search in Google Scholar
[FRANZ, R. (1998). Whatever you do, don‘t treat your students like customers! Journal of Management Education. 22(1). Pp. 63-69. DOI: 10.1177/10525629980220010510.1177/105256299802200105]Search in Google Scholar
[FREEMAN. R. E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Massachusetts. USA: Pitman Publishing Company.]Search in Google Scholar
[FREEMAN. R. E. (2010). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139192675]Search in Google Scholar
[HILLMAN. A. J., KEIM. G. D. (2001). Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: What’s the bottom line? Strategic Management Journal. 22(2). Pp. 125-139. DOI: 10.1002/1097-0266(200101)22:2<125::AID-SMJ150>3.0.CO;2-H10.1002/1097-0266(200101)22:2<125::AID-SMJ150>3.0.CO;2-H]Search in Google Scholar
[JOHNSON, G., SCHOLES, K., WHITTINGTON, R. (2008). Exploring Corporate Strategy. Text and Cases. Harlow: Financial Times / Prentice Hall.]Search in Google Scholar
[KANJI, G. K., TAMBI, M. B. A. (1999). Total quality management in UK higher education institution. Total Quality Management. 10(1). Pp. 129-153. DOI: 10.1080/095441299812610.1080/0954412998126]Search in Google Scholar
[KOTLER, P., FOX, K. (2002).Strategic Marketing For Educational Institutions. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.]Search in Google Scholar
[LAAN, VAN DER G., EES VAN H., WITTELOOSTUIJN Van A. (2008). Corporate Social and Financial Performance: An Extended Stakeholder Theory, and Empirical Test with Accounting Measures. Journal of Business Ethics.79 (3).Pp. 299-310. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-007-9398-010.1007/s10551-007-9398-0]Search in Google Scholar
[LICATA, J., FRANKWICK, G. (1996). University marketing: a professional service organisation perspective. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education. 7(2). Pp. 1-16.10.1300/J050v07n02_01]Search in Google Scholar
[LUMBY. J., FOSKET. N. H. (1999). Managing External Relations in Schools and Colleges: International Dimensions. London: Paul Chapman Publishing.10.4135/9781446219508]Search in Google Scholar
[MAINARDES. W. E..ALVES.H.. RAPOSO.M. (2010). An Exploratory Research on the Stakeholders of University. Journal of Management and Strategy.10 (1). pp. 76-88.]Search in Google Scholar
[MAINARDES. W. E..ALVES.H.. RAPOSO.M.(2013). Identifying Stakeholders in a Portuguese university: a case study. Revista de Educación. . 2013 (362). pp. 429-457.]Search in Google Scholar
[MAINARDES. W. E..RAPOSO.M., ALVES.H.. (2012). Public university students’ expectations: an empirical study based on the stakeholders theory. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Science. 2012 (35). pp. 173-196.]Search in Google Scholar
[MARIĆ.I. (2013). Stakeholder analysis of higher education institutions. Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems.11(2).Pp. 217-226]Search in Google Scholar
[MIROIU. A., ANDREESCU. L. (2010). Goals and Instruments of Diversification in Higher Education. Quality Assurance Review.2(2). Pp. 89-101]Search in Google Scholar
[MOSAIC.(2015). Key Stakeholders. From: http://www.mosaicprojects.com.au/Mag_Articles/N008_Key_Stakeholders.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[OECD. 2013. Education at a Glance 2013: OECD Indicators. OECD Publishing. ISBN 978-92-64-20105-7]Search in Google Scholar
[PARIS. K.A. (2003). Strategic planning in the university. Madison. WI: Office of Quality Improvement. University of Wisconsin-Madison. Retrieved on July 25. 2007 from: http://kathleenparis.com/ee-assets/my-uploads/docs/Strategic-Planning-%20inthe-University.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[PARK.T. (2011). Academic Capitalism and its Impact on the American Professoriate. The Journal of the Professoriate. An affiliate of the Center for African American Research and Policy.6(1). Pp. 84-99.]Search in Google Scholar
[PEREIRA, M. A. C., SILVA DA, M. T. (2003). A Key Question for Higher Education: Who are the customers? Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Production and Operations Management Society. Atlanta. pp. 1-16.]Search in Google Scholar
[PLESSIS. du N., GERBER. K. (2009). Marketing communication. Cape Town: Pearson Education South Africa Ltd.]Search in Google Scholar
[ROSENMAYER.T. (2014). Using Data Envelopment Analysis: a Case of Universities. Národohospodářský obzor.14(1). Pp. 34–54. DOI: 10.2478/revecp-2014-000310.2478/revecp-2014-0003]Search in Google Scholar
[ROWLEY, J. (1997). Beyond service quality dimensions in higher education and towards a service contract. Quality Assurance in Education.5(1). Pp. 7 – 14.10.1108/09684889710156530]Search in Google Scholar
[ROWLEY.J. (1997). Beyond service quality dimensions in higher education and towards a service contract. Quality Assurance in Education.5(1). Pp. 7 – 14.]Search in Google Scholar
[SLANTCHEVA, S. AND LEVY, D. (2007). Private higher education in post-communist Europe. New York: Macmillan.10.1057/9780230604391]Search in Google Scholar
[SMITH, L., CAVUSGIL, T. (1984). Marketing planning for colleges and universities. Long Range Planning.17(6). Pp. 104-117. DOI: 10.1016/0024-6301(84)90223-110.1016/0024-6301(84)90223-1]Search in Google Scholar
[SVĚTLÍK, J. (2006). Marketingové řízení školy. Praha: ASPI.]Search in Google Scholar
[WAGNER. N., HASSANEIN. K., HEAD. M. (2008). Who is responsible for E-Learning Success in Higher Education? A Stakeholders' Analysis. Educational Technology & Society.11(3).Pp. 26-36]Search in Google Scholar
[WEAVER, T. (1976). What is the good of higher education? Higher Education Review, 8(3). Pp. 3-14.]Search in Google Scholar
[ZAIT.A.(2006). Higher Education Marketing: Stakeholders' Perceptions, Degree of Trust and Desired Student Abilities - Case of Romania (Preliminary Raw Results). From http://ssrn.com/abstract=98230610.2139/ssrn.982306]Search in Google Scholar