This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Breslin TM, Banerjee M, Gust C, Birkmeyer NJ. Trends in advanced imaging use for women undergoing breast cancer surgery. Cancer 2013; 119: 1251-6. 10.1002/cncr.2783823212691BreslinTMBanerjeeMGustCBirkmeyerNJ.Trends in advanced imaging use for women undergoing breast cancer surgeryCancer20131191251610.1002/cncr.2783823212691Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Houssami N, Hayes DF. Review of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in breast cancer: should MRI be performed on all women with newly diagnosed, early stage breast cancer? CA Cancer J Clin 2009; 59: 290-302. 10.3322/caac.2002819679690HoussamiNHayesDF.Review of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in breast cancer: should MRI be performed on all women with newly diagnosed, early stage breast cancer?CA Cancer J Clin20095929030210.3322/caac.2002819679690Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Teifke A, Lehr HA, Vomweg TW, Hlawatsch A, Thelen M. Outcome analysis and rational management of enhancing lesions incidentally detected on contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003; 181: 655-62. 10.2214/ajr.181.3.181065512933456TeifkeALehrHAVomwegTWHlawatschAThelenM.Outcome analysis and rational management of enhancing lesions incidentally detected on contrast-enhanced MRI of the breastAJR Am J Roentgenol20031816556210.2214/ajr.181.3.181065512933456Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Brennan ME, Houssami N, Lord S, Macaskill P, Irwig L, Dixon JM, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging screening of the contralateral breast in women with newly diagnosed breast cancer: systematic review and metaanalysis of incremental cancer detection and impact on surgical management J Clin Oncol 2009; 27: 5640-9. 10.1200/JCO.2008.21.5756BrennanMEHoussamiNLordSMacaskillPIrwigLDixonJMMagnetic resonance imaging screening of the contralateral breast in women with newly diagnosed breast cancer: systematic review and metaanalysis of incremental cancer detection and impact on surgical managementJ Clin Oncol2009275640910.1200/JC0.2008.21.575619805685Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Houssami N, Turner R, Morrow M. Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer: meta-analysis of surgical outcomes. Ann Surg 2013; 257: 249-55. 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31827a8d1723187751HoussamiNTurnerRMorrowM.Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer: meta-analysis of surgical outcomesAnn Surg20132572495510.1097/SLA.0b013e31827a8d1723187751Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Arponen O, Masarwah A, Sutela A, Taina M, Könönen M, Sironen R, et al. Incidentally detected enhancing lesions found in breast MRI: analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient and T2 signal intensity significantly improves specificity. Eur Radiol 2016; 26: 4361-70. 10.1007/s0033-016-4326-227114285ArponenOMasarwahASutelaATainaMKönönenMSironenRIncidentally detected enhancing lesions found in breast MRI: analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient and T2 signal intensity significantly improves specificityEur Radiol20162643617010.1007/s0033-016-4326-2Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Spick C, Baltzer PA. Diagnostic utility of second-look US for breast lesions identified at MR imaging: systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiology 2014; 273: 401-9. 10.1148/radiol.1414047425119022SpickCBaltzerPA.Diagnostic utility of second-look US for breast lesions identified at MR imaging: systematic review and meta-analysisRadiology2014273401910.1148/radiol.1414047425119022Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Hollowell L, Price E, Arasu V, Wisner D, Hylton N, Joe B. Lesion morphology on breast MRI affects targeted ultrasound correlation rate. Eur Radiol 2015; 25: 1279-84. 10.1007/s00330-014-3517-y25500714HollowellLPriceEArasuVWisnerDHyltonNJoeB.Lesion morphology on breast MRI affects targeted ultrasound correlation rateEur Radiol20152512798410.1007/s00330-014-3517-y25500714Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Newburg AR, Chhor CM, Young Lin LL, Heller SL, Gillman J, Toth HK, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging-directed ultrasound imaging of non-mass enhancement in the breast: Outcomes and frequency of malignancy. J Ultrasound Med 2017; 36: 493-504. 10.7863/ultra.16.0300128108994NewburgARChhorCMYoung LinLLHellerSLGillmanJTothHKMagnetic resonance imaging-directed ultrasound imaging of non-mass enhancement in the breast: Outcomes and frequency of malignancyJ Ultrasound Med20173649350410.7863/ultra.16.0300128108994Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Gao Y, Bagadiya NR, Jardon ML, Heller SL, Melsaether AN, Toth HB, et al. Outcomes of preoperative MRI-guided needle localization of nonpalpable mammographically occult breast lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2016; 207: 676-84. 10.2214/AJR.15.1591327275652GaoYBagadiyaNRJardonMLHellerSLMelsaetherANTothHBOutcomes of preoperative MRI-guided needle localization of nonpalpable mammographically occult breast lesionsAJR Am J Roentgenol20162076768410.2214/AJR.15.1591327275652Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Wilson SR, Greenbaum LD, Goldberg BB. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound: what is the evidence and what are the obstacles? AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009; 193: 55-60. 10.2214/AJR.09.255319542395WilsonSRGreenbaumLDGoldbergBB.Contrast-enhanced ultrasound: what is the evidence and what are the obstacles?AJR Am J Roentgenol2009193556010.2214/AJR.09.2553Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Buckley DL, Drew PJ, Mussurakis S, Monson JR, Horsman A. Microvessel density of invasive breast cancer assessed by dynamic Gd-DTPA enhanced MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 1997; 7: 461-4.10.1002/jmri.18800703029170027BuckleyDLDrewPJMussurakisSMonsonJRHorsmanA.Microvessel density of invasive breast cancer assessed by dynamic Gd-DTPA enhanced MRIJ Magn Reson Imaging199774614Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Giesel FL, Choyke PL, Mehndiratta A, Zechmann CM, von Tengg-Kobligk H, Kayser K. Pharmacokinetic analysis of malignant pleural mesothelioma-initial results of tumor microcirculation and its correlation to microvessel density (CD-34). Acad Radiol 2008; 15: 563-70. 10.1016/j.acra.2007.12.01418423312GieselFLChoykePLMehndirattaAZechmannCMvon Tengg-KobligkHKayserK.Pharmacokinetic analysis of malignant pleural mesothelioma-initial results of tumor microcirculation and its correlation to microvessel density (CD-34)Acad Radiol2008155637010.1016/j.acra.2007.12.014Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Knopp MV, Weiss E, Sinn HP, Mattern J, Junkermann H, Radeleff J, et al. Pathophysiologic basis of contrast enhancement in breast tumors. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999; 10: 260-6.10.1002/(SICI)1522-2586(199909)10:3<260::AID-JMRI6>3.0.CO;2-710508285KnoppMVWeissESinnHPMatternJJunkermannHRadeleffJPathophysiologic basis of contrast enhancement in breast tumorsJ Magn Reson Imaging1999102606Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Hayes C, Padhani AR, Leach MO. Assessing changes in tumour vascular function using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. NMR Biomed 2002; 15: 154-63.1187091110.1002/nbm.756HayesCPadhaniARLeachMO.Assessing changes in tumour vascular function using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imagingNMR Biomed20021515463Search in Google Scholar
Jansen SA, Paunesku T, Fan X, Woloschak GE, Vogt S, Conzen SD, et al. Ductal carcinoma in situ: X-ray fluorescence microscopy and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging reveals gadolinium uptake within neoplastic mammary ducts in a murine model. Radiology 2009; 253: 399-406. 10.1148/radiol.2533082026JansenSAPauneskuTFanXWoloschakGEVogtSConzenSDDuctal carcinoma in situ: X-ray fluorescence microscopy and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging reveals gadolinium uptake within neoplastic mammary ducts in a murine modelRadiology200925339940610.1148/radiol.2533082026Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Giorgio R, Roberta C. Enhancing the role of ultrasound with contrast agents. Milan: Springer; 2006.GiorgioRRobertaCEnhancing the role of ultrasound with contrast agentsMilanSpringer2006Search in Google Scholar
Du J, Wang L, Wam CF, Hua J, Fang H, Chen J, et al. Differentiating benign from malignant solid breast lesions: combined utility of conventional ultrasound and contrast-enhanced ultrasound in comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. Eur J Radiol 2012; 81: 3890-9. 10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.09.00423062280DuJWangLWamCFHuaJFangHChenJDifferentiating benign from malignant solid breast lesions: combined utility of conventional ultrasound and contrast-enhanced ultrasound in comparison with magnetic resonance imagingEur J Radiol2012813890910.1016/j.ejrad.2012.09.004Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Jiang YX, Liu H, Liu JB, Zhu QL, Sun Q, Chang XY. Breast tumor size assessment: comparison of conventional ultrasound and contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol 2007; 33: 1873-81. 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2007.06.00217686569JiangYXLiuHLiuJBZhuQLSunQChangXY.Breast tumor size assessment: comparison of conventional ultrasound and contrast-enhanced ultrasoundUltrasound Med Biol20073318738110.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2007.06.002Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Corcioni B, Santilli L, Quercia S, Zamagni C, Santini D, Taffurelli M, et al. Contrast-enhanced US and MRI for assessing the response of breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. J Ultrasound 2008; 11: 143-50. 10.1016/j.jus.2008.09.00723396645CorcioniBSantilliLQuerciaSZamagniCSantiniDTaffurelliMContrast-enhanced US and MRI for assessing the response of breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapyJ Ultrasound2008111435010.1016/j.jus.2008.09.007Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Fujisawa T, Hirakata T, Yanagita Y, Iijima M, Horikoshi H, Takeuchi K, et al. The detection of pCR after PST by contrast-enhanced ultrasonography for breast cancer. Breast Cancer 2013; 20: 75-82. 10.1007/s12282-011-0311-422203579FujisawaTHirakataTYanagitaYIijimaMHorikoshiHTakeuchiKThe detection of pCR after PST by contrast-enhanced ultrasonography for breast cancerBreast Cancer201320758210.1007/s12282-011-0311-4Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Rautiainen S, Sudah M, Joukainen S, Sironen R, Vanninen R, Sutela A. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound -guided axillary lymph node core biopsy: Diagnostic accuracy in preoperative staging of invasive breast cancer. Eur J Radiol 2015; 84: 2130-6. 10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.08.00626343047RautiainenSSudahMJoukainenSSironenRVanninenRSutelaA.Contrast-enhanced ultrasound -guided axillary lymph node core biopsy: Diagnostic accuracy in preoperative staging of invasive breast cancerEur J Radiol2015842130610.1016/j.ejrad.2015.08.00626343047Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Sardanelli F, Boetes C, Borisch B, Decker T, Federico M, Gilbert FJ, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: recommendations from the EUSOMA working group. Eur J Cancer 2010; 46: 1296-316. 10.1016/j.ejca.2010.02.015SardanelliFBoetesCBorischBDeckerTFedericoMGilbertFJMagnetic resonance imaging of the breast: recommendations from the EUSOMA working groupEur J Cancer201046129631610.1016/j.ejca.2010.02.01520304629Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Abe H, Schmidt RA, Shah RN, Shimauchi A, Kulkarni K, Sennett CA, et al. MR-directed (“Second-Look”) ultrasound examination for breast lesions detected initially on MRI: MR and sonographic findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010; 194: 370-7. 10.2214/AJR.09.270720093598AbeHSchmidtRAShahRNShimauchiAKulkarniKSennettCAMR-directed (“Second-Look”) ultrasound examination for breast lesions detected initially on MRI: MR and sonographic findingsAJR Am J Roentgenol2010194370710.2214/AJR.09.270720093598Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Westwood M, Joore M, Grutters J, Redekop K, Armstrong N, Lee K, et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound using SonoVue(R) (sulphur hexafluoride microbubbles) compared with contrast-enhanced computed tomography and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for the characterisation of focal liver lesions and detection of liver metastases: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis. Health TechnolAssess 2013; 17: 1-243. 10.3310/hta17160WestwoodMJooreMGruttersJRedekopKArmstrongNLeeKContrast-enhanced ultrasound using SonoVue(R) (sulphur hexafluoride microbubbles) compared with contrast-enhanced computed tomography and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for the characterisation of focal liver lesions and detection of liver metastases: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysisHealth TechnolAssess201317124310.3310/hta17160478137623611316Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Heijblom M, Klaase JM, van den Engh FM, van Leeuwen TG, Steenberg W, Manohar S. Imaging tumor vascularization for detection and diagnosis of breast cancer. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2011; 10: 607-23. 10.7785/tcrt.2012.50022722066601HeijblomMKlaaseJMvan den EnghFMvan LeeuwenTGSteenbergWManoharS.Imaging tumor vascularization for detection and diagnosis of breast cancerTechnol Cancer Res Treat2011106072310.7785/tcrt.2012.50022722066601Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Santamaria G, Velasco M, Farrús B, Caparrós FX, Fernández PL. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI reveals the extent and the microvascular pattern of breast ductal carcinoma in situ. Breast J 2013; 19: 402-10. 10.1111/tbj.1213523758454SantamariaGVelascoMFarrúsBCaparrósFXFernándezPL.Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI reveals the extent and the microvascular pattern of breast ductal carcinoma in situBreast J2013194021010.1111/tbj.1213523758454Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Chevrier MC, David J, Khoury ME, Lalonde L, Labelle M, Trop I. Breast biopsies under magnetic resonance imaging guidance: Challenges of an essential but imperfect technique. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 2016; 45: 193-204. 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2015.07.00226272705ChevrierMCDavidJKhouryMELalondeLLabelleMTropI.Breast biopsies under magnetic resonance imaging guidance: Challenges of an essential but imperfect techniqueCurr Probl Diagn Radiol20164519320410.1067/j.cpradiol.2015.07.00226272705Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Choi HY, Kim SM, Jang M, Yun BL, Kim SW, Kang E, et al. MRI-guided intervention for breast lesions using the freehand technique in a 3.0-T closedbore MRI scanner: feasibility and initial results. Korean J Radiol 2013; 14: 171-8. 10.3348/kjr.2013.14.2.171ChoiHYKimSMJangMYunBLKimSWKangEMRI-guided intervention for breast lesions using the freehand technique in a 3.0-T closedbore MRI scanner: feasibility and initial resultsKorean J Radiol201314171810.3348/kjr.2013.14.2.171359032723482868Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
