[Abdollahian, M. A., Coan, T. G., Oh, H. and Yeşilada, B. A. 2012. Dynamics of Cultural Change: The Human Development Perspective. International Studies Quarterly, 56, 827-842.10.1111/j.1468-2478.2012.00736.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Ahumada, H., Alvaredo, F. and Canavese, A. 2008. Th e Monetary Method to Measure the Shadow Economy: Th e Forgotten Problem of the Initial Conditions. Economic Letters, 101, 97-99.10.1016/j.econlet.2008.06.001]Search in Google Scholar
[Alesina, A. 2013. Women, Fertility and the Rise in Modern Capitalism. Science, 342(6157), 427-428.10.1126/science.1246228]Search in Google Scholar
[Alesina, A. and Angeletos, G. M. 2005. Fairness and Redistribution. American Economic Review, 95(4), 960-980.10.1257/0002828054825655]Search in Google Scholar
[Alesina, A. and Fuchs-Schündeln N. 2007. Goodbye Lenin (or Not?): The Effect of Communism on People. American Economic Review, 97(4), 1507-1528.10.1257/aer.97.4.1507]Search in Google Scholar
[Alesina, A. and Giuliano, P. 2010. Th e Power of the Family. Journal of Economic Growth, 15, 93-125.10.1007/s10887-010-9052-z]Search in Google Scholar
[Alesina, A. and Giuliano, P. 2011. Family Ties and Political Participation, Journal of the European Economic Association, 9(5), 817-839.10.1111/j.1542-4774.2011.01024.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Alesina, A. and Guiliano, P. 2013. Culture and Institutions. NBER Working Paper Series, Working Paper 19750.]Search in Google Scholar
[Alesina, A., Cozzi, G., and Mantovan N. 2012. Th e Evolution of Ideology, Fairness, and Redistribution. Th e Economic Journal, 122 (565), 1244-1261.10.1111/j.1468-0297.2012.02541.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Alesina, A., Di Tella, R., and MacCulloch, R. 2004. Inequality and Happiness: Are Europeans and Americans Diff erent? Journal of Public Economics, 88(9-10) 2009-2042.10.1016/j.jpubeco.2003.07.006]Search in Google Scholar
[Alexander, A., R. Inglehart, R. and Welzel, C. 2012. Measuring Effective Democracy: A Defense. International Political Science Review, 33(1), 41-62.10.1177/0192512111414682]Search in Google Scholar
[Barro, R. J. and McCleary R. M. 2003. Religion and Economic Growth across Countries. American Sociological Review, 68(5), 760-781.10.2307/1519761]Search in Google Scholar
[Ben Menachem, Y. 2017. Th e Two-Faced Erdoğan. Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs. Available at http://jcpa.org/the-two-faced-erdogan/.]Search in Google Scholar
[Biswas, A. K., Farzanegan, M. R. and Th um, M. 2012. Pollution shadow economy and corruption-theory and evidence, Ecological Economics, 75, 114-125.10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.01.007]Search in Google Scholar
[Blackburn K., Bose, N. and Capassom, S. 2012. Tax evasion, the underground economy and financial development. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 83(2), 243-253.10.1016/j.jebo.2012.05.019]Search in Google Scholar
[Carkoglu, A. and Rubin, B. 2003. Turkey and the European Union: Domestic Processes, Economic Integration and International Dynamics. London: Frank Cass and Company.10.4324/9780203011485]Search in Google Scholar
[Chaudhuri, K., Schneider, F. and Chattopadhyay, S. 2006. Th e size and development of the shadow economy - an empirical investigation from states of India, Journal of Development Economics, 80, 428-443.10.1016/j.jdeveco.2005.02.011]Search in Google Scholar
[Clesse, A. and Tashan, S. 2004. Turkey and the EU: 2004 and beyond. Amsterdam: Dutch University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[D’Hernoncourt, D. and Meon, P. G. 2012. Th e not so dark side of trust: Does trust increase the size of the shadow economy?, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 81, 97-121.10.1016/j.jebo.2011.09.010]Search in Google Scholar
[Dien, J., Beal D. J. and Berg, P. 2005. Optimizing principal components analysis of event-related potentials: Matrix type, factor loading weighting, extraction, and rotations, Clinical Neurophysiology, 16, 1808-1825.10.1016/j.clinph.2004.11.025]Search in Google Scholar
[Diez-Nicolas, J. 2007. Value Systems of Elites and Publics in the Mediterranean: Convergence and Divergence. In ‘Values and Perceptions of the Islamic and Middle Eastern Publics’ (Moaddel M. (Ed.)): 47-70, Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230603332_3]Search in Google Scholar
[Diez-Nicolas, J. 2010. Cultural Diff erences on Values about Confl ict, War, and Peace. World Values Research, 3(1), 1-20.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dreher, A., Gaston, N. and Martens, P. 2008. Measuring Globalisation: Gauging its Consequences. New York: Springer.10.1007/978-0-387-74069-0]Search in Google Scholar
[Eilat, Y. and Zinnes, C. 2002. Th e Shadow Economy in Transition Countries: Friend or Foe? A Policy Perspective, World Development, 30(7), 1233-1254.10.1016/S0305-750X(02)00036-0]Search in Google Scholar
[Elgin, C. and Uras, B. R. 2012. Public debt, sovereign default risk and shadow economy, Journal of Financial Stability, 9 (2013) 628-64.10.1016/j.jfs.2012.09.002]Search in Google Scholar
[Erişen, C., Erişen, E. and Özkeçeci-Taner, B. 2013. Research Methods in Political Psychology. Turkish Studies, 14(1), 13-33.10.1080/14683849.2013.766979]Search in Google Scholar
[Finch, H. 2006. Comparison of the Performance of Varimax and Promax Rotations: Factor Structure Recovery for Dichotomous Items, Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 10(2), Article 14.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hadenius, A., and Teorell, J. 2005. Cultural and economic prerequisites of democracy: Reassessing recent evidence. Studies in Comparative International Development, 39(4), 87-106.10.1007/BF02686166]Search in Google Scholar
[Haferlach, L., Tekin, F., & Wódka, J. 2017. Friends. Foes. Frenemies? Unpacking the future of EU-Turkey relations. Futures, Volume 97, March 2018, Pages 53-62, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016328717300150?via%3Dihub.10.1016/j.futures.2017.04.006]Search in Google Scholar
[Haller, M. 2002. Th eory and Method in the Comparative Study of Values: Critique and Alternative to Inglehart. European Sociological Review, 18(2), 139-158.10.1093/esr/18.2.139]Search in Google Scholar
[Haller, M. and Hadler, M. 2006. How Social Relations and Structures Can Produce Happiness and Unhappiness: An International Comparative Analysis. Social Indicators Research, 75(2), 169-216.10.1007/s11205-004-6297-y]Search in Google Scholar
[Heshmati, A. 2006a. Measurement of a Multidimensional Index of Globalization, Global Economy Journal, 6(2), Article 1.10.2202/1524-5861.1117]Search in Google Scholar
[Heshmati, A. 2006b. Th e Relationship between Income Inequality Poverty, and Globalization, in Th e Impact of Globalization on the World’s Poor (M. Nissanke and E. Th orbecke, (Eds.)), Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 59-93.10.1057/9780230625501_3]Search in Google Scholar
[Hofstede, G. 2001. Culture’s consequences: comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hofstede, G. and Minkov, M. 2010. Long- versus short-term orientation: new perspectives. Asia Pacific Business Review, 16(4), 493-504.10.1080/13602381003637609]Search in Google Scholar
[Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J. and Minkov, M. 2010. ‘Cultures and Organizations: Soft ware of the Mind.’ Revised and expanded 3rd Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill.]Search in Google Scholar
[Huntington S. P. 1996. Th e clash of civilizations and the remaking of world order. New York: Simon & Schuster.]Search in Google Scholar
[IBM. 2011. IBM SPSS Statistics 20 Algorithms. Armonk, New York.]Search in Google Scholar
[Indjikian, R. and Siegel, D. S. 2005. Th e impact of investment in IT on economic performance: implications for developing countries, World Development, 33(5), 681-700.10.1016/j.worlddev.2005.01.004]Search in Google Scholar
[Inglehart, R. F. 2003. Islam, Gender, Culture, and Democracy. (Ronald Inglehart, Ed). Willowdale, ON, Canada: de Sitter.]Search in Google Scholar
[Inglehart, R. F. and Baker, W. E. 2000. Modernization, Cultural Change, and the Persistence of Traditional Values. American Sociological Review, 65(1), 19-51.10.2307/2657288]Search in Google Scholar
[Inglehart, R. F. and Norris, P. 2003. Rising tide: gender equality and cultural change around the world. Cambridge, UK; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2003.10.1017/CBO9780511550362]Search in Google Scholar
[Inglehart, R. F. and Welzel, C. 2003. Political Culture and Democracy: Analyzing Cross-Level Linkages. Comparative Politics, 36(1), 61-79.10.2307/4150160]Search in Google Scholar
[Inglehart, R. F. and Welzel, C. 2005. Modernization, Cultural Change and Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kang, S. M. 2002. A Sensitivity Analysis of the Korean Composite Environmental Index. Ecological Economics, 43, 159-174.10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00207-0]Search in Google Scholar
[Kearney, A. T., Inc., Th e Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. 2002. Globalization’s Last Hurrah? Foreign Policy. January/February, 38-51.10.2307/3183355]Search in Google Scholar
[Larrabee, F. S. 2018. Troubled Partnership. U.S.-Turkish Relations in an Era of Global Geopolitical Change. Rand Corporation, available at https://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG899.html.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lim, G.C. and V.H. Nguyen (2014), Alternative weighting approaches to computing indices of economic activity, Journal of Economic Surveys, in press.10.1111/joes.12053]Search in Google Scholar
[McLeod, L. D., Swygert, K. A. and Th issen, D. 2001. Factor analysis for items scored in two categories. In: Test scoring (D. Th issen & H. Wainer (Eds.)), pp. 189-216). Mahwah, N. J.: Erlbaum.]Search in Google Scholar
[Minkov, M. 2009. Predictors of Diff erences in Subjective Well-Being across 97 Nations. Cross-Cultural Research, 43, 152-179.10.1177/1069397109332239]Search in Google Scholar
[Minkov, M. and Hofstede, G. 2011. Cultural diff erences in a globalizing world. Bingley, UK: Emerald.]Search in Google Scholar
[Minkov, M. and Hofstede, G. 2013. Cross-cultural analysis: the science and art of comparing the world’s modern societies and their cultures. Los Angeles: Sage.10.4135/9781483384719]Search in Google Scholar
[Moaddel, M. 2002. Th e Study of Islamic Culture and Politics: An Overview and Assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 359-86.10.1146/annurev.soc.28.110601.140928]Search in Google Scholar
[Moaddel, M. 2003. Public Opinion in Islamic Countries: Survey Results. Footnotes, 31(1).]Search in Google Scholar
[Moaddel, M. 2008. Religious Regimes and Prospects for Liberal Politics: Futures of Iran, Iraq, and Saudi-Arabia. World Values Research, 1(2), 36-58.]Search in Google Scholar
[Morel, J. SJ. 2003. Radikale Kirchenreform: für eine mutige Erneuerung: Fakten und religionssoziologische Theorien über die Krise der katholischen Kirche von 1950 bis in die Gegenwart als Entscheidungsgrundlagen notwendiger Reformen. Innsbruck: Tyrolia-Verlag.]Search in Google Scholar
[Negrón-Gonzales, M. 2012. Cooperation between Secular and Religious Rights Organizations in Turkey. Turkish Studies, 13(3), 415-430.10.1080/14683849.2012.717842]Search in Google Scholar
[Neriah, J. (2018) Turkey’s Expansionist Military Policies in the Middle East. Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs, available at http://jcpa.org/article/turkeys-expansionist-military-policies-in-the-middle-east/.]Search in Google Scholar
[Noorbakhsh, F. 1998. Th e Human Development Index: Some Technical Issues and Alternative Indices. Journal of International Development. 10: 589-605.10.1002/(SICI)1099-1328(199807/08)10:5<589::AID-JID484>3.0.CO;2-S]Search in Google Scholar
[Sarigil, Z. 2011. Civil-Military Relations Beyond Dichotomy: With Special Reference to Turkey. Turkish Studies, 12(2), 265-278.10.1080/14683849.2011.572633]Search in Google Scholar
[Schneider, F. 2005. Shadow economies around the world: what do we really know? European Journal of Political Economy, 21, 598-642.10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2004.10.002]Search in Google Scholar
[Şimşek, S. 2013. Conservative Democracy as a Cosmetic Image in Turkish Politics: The Semiology of AKP’s Political Identity. Turkish Studies, 14(3), 429-446.10.1080/14683849.2013.831258]Search in Google Scholar
[SPSS, 2007. Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, User Guide. Version 14, August 2007.]Search in Google Scholar
[Steenkamp, J. -B. E. M. and Geyskens I. 2012. Transaction cost economics and the roles of national culture: A test of hypotheses based on Inglehart and Hofstede. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(2), 252-270.10.1007/s11747-011-0266-1]Search in Google Scholar
[Szymański, A. 2015. EU Pre-accession Process of Turkey-Determinants and Prospects. Przegląd Politologiczny, (1), 7-20.10.14746/pp.2015.20.1.1]Search in Google Scholar
[Szymański, A. 2016a. Państwo świeckie w Turcji - historyczna i współczesna perspektywa, Studia Politologiczne, vol. 42, 2016, pp 324-346.]Search in Google Scholar
[Szymański, A. 2016b. Political Culture of Turkish Elites and Democratic Consolidation. IPSA World Congress of Political Science, Poznan, available at http://paperroom.ipsa.org/papers/paper_57524.pdf.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tabachnick, B. G. and Fidell, L. S. 2001. Using multivariate statistics. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tanzi, V. 1999. Uses and abuses of estimates of the underground economy. Economic Journal, 109, 338-340.10.1111/1468-0297.00437]Search in Google Scholar
[Tanzi, V. and Schunecht L. 1997. Reconsidering the fi scal role of government: the international perspective. American Economic Review, 87, 164-168.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tausch, A. and Karoui H. 2011. Les Musulmans: Un cauchemar ou une force pour l’Europe? Paris: Harmattan.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tausch, A. and Moaddel M. 2009. What 1.3 billion Muslims really think. An answer to a recent Gallup study, based on the ‘World Values Survey’. Hauppauge, N.Y.: Nova Science Publishers.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tessler, M. 2003. Arab and Muslim Political Attitudes: Stereotypes and Evidence from Survey Research. International Studies Perspectives, 4, 175-80.10.1111/1528-3577.402005]Search in Google Scholar
[Toghill, J. 2012. Are the official economic and political obstacles to Turkey’s EU accession merely a ‘fig leaf’ covering real unoffi cial cultural and religious reservations? POLIS Journal, 6, Winter 2011/2012, pp. 1-39.]Search in Google Scholar
[Torgler, B. and Schneider, F. 2009. Th e impact of tax morale and institutional quality on the shadow economy. Journal of Economic Psychology, 30, 228-245.10.1016/j.joep.2008.08.004]Search in Google Scholar
[Torgler, B., and García-Valinas, M. A. 2007. Th e determinants of individuals’ attitudes towards preventing environmental damage. Ecological Economics, 63(2-3), 536-552.10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.12.013]Search in Google Scholar
[Torgler, B., and Schneider, F. 2007. What shapes attitudes toward paying taxes? Evidence from multicultural European countries. Social Science Quarterly, 88(2), 443-470.10.1111/j.1540-6237.2007.00466.x]Search in Google Scholar
[UNDP 2013. Human Development Report 2013. Th e rise of the South: Human progress in a diverse world, United Nations Development Program.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wasilewski, K. 2017a. Th e “New Turkey” in the Making: What Should the EU’s Strategy Be? Polish Institute for International Aff airs, PISM, Strategic File no. 2 (86): http://www.pism.pl/Publications/PISM-Strategic-Files/PISM-Strategic-File-no-2-86.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wasilewski, K. 2017b. Turkey’s Strategic Culture: Between Republican Tradition and Neo-Ottoman Ambitions. Working Paper, Warsaw University, https://uw.academia.edu/KarolWasilewski.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wódka, J. (2017). Institutional Aspects of the (De-) Europeanization of Turkish Political Parties. Th e Case of the Justice and Development Party (AKP) and the Republican People’s Party (CHP). Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies, 19(2), 153-170.10.1080/19448953.2015.1106112]Search in Google Scholar
[Yeşilada, B. A. 2002. Th e Virtue Party. Turkish Studies, 3(1), 62-81.10.1080/714005697]Search in Google Scholar
[Yeşilada, B. A. and Noordijk P. 2010. Changing Values in Turkey: Religiosity and Tolerance in Comparative Perspective. Turkish Studies, 11(1), 9-27.10.1080/14683841003746999]Search in Google Scholar
[Yilmaz, G. 2016. From EU Conditionality to Domestic Choice for Change Exploring Europeanisation of Minority Rights in Turkey. In C. Nas and T. Özer, Eds., Turkey and the European Union: Processes of Europeanisation, Chapter 6, pp. 119-140, London: Routledge.10.4324/9781315549569-7]Search in Google Scholar