1. bookVolume 2 (2014): Issue 1 (June 2014)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
First Published
15 Dec 2015
Publication timeframe
1 time per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

Russia’s Containment and Engagement Strategies in the U.S. Foreign Policy during the Presidency of G. W. Bush

Published Online: 19 Jan 2016
Page range: 53 - 69
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
First Published
15 Dec 2015
Publication timeframe
1 time per year
Languages
English

Traditionally, Containment and Engagement strategies are considered to be the part of the United States foreign policy during the Cold War. However, recent developments in international relations indicated that these strategies are still relevant to the contemporary foreign policy of the U.S., particularly in the U.S.-Russian relations. Contradictory presidency of George W. Bush has raised a question which of the mentioned foreign policy strategies was dominating in the U.S.-Russian relations. On the one hand, U.S. officials had declared that partnership with Russia was being pursued. On the other hand, the administration of G.W. Bush favored the expansion of NATO and did not surrender the initiative of missile defense shield. This paper intends to assess which foreign policy strategy (Containment or Engagement) dominated in U.S.-Russian relations during the presidency of G.W. Bush and to analyse reasons of such domination and the ways these strategies were implemented. The results of the research indicate that G. W. Bush administration implemented different foreign policy towards Russia on the declared and practical foreign policy levels. If on the official U.S. foreign policy level Russia’s engagement strategy dominated, in the U.S. foreign policy practice, particularly influenced by the foreign policy of Russia, and to a lesser extent by the events in the international arena, the dominant foreign policy strategy towards Russia was Russia’s containment strategy.

Keywords

Azar E. (1972). ‘Conflict Escalation and Conflict Reduction in an International Crisis: Suez, 1956.’ The Journal of Conflict Resolution. 16 (2).Search in Google Scholar

‘Dealing With Mr. Putin’ (2001). New York Times. March 17.Search in Google Scholar

Jakštaitė G. (2012). Rusijos sulaikymo ir įtraukimo strategijos šiuolaikinėje JAV užsienio politikoje ir Baltijos šalių reikšmingumas. Kaunas.Search in Google Scholar

Kuchins A., Zevelev I. (2012). ‘Russian Foreign Policy: Continuity in Change’. The Washington Quarterly. Available at <http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0163660X.2012.642787> [Accessed on 4 February 2013].Search in Google Scholar

McCormick J. (2005). American Foreign Policy and Process. Wadsworth.Search in Google Scholar

Myers S. (2007). ‘No Cold War, Perhaps, but Surely a Lukewarm Peace’. New York Times. February 18.Search in Google Scholar

Myers S. (2008). ‘No Cold War, But Big Chill’. New York Times. August 16.Search in Google Scholar

Morgenthau H. (2011). Politika tarp valstybių. Vilnius: Margi raštai.Search in Google Scholar

National Security Strategy of the United States of America. September 17, 2002. Available at <http://merln.ndu.edu/whitepapers/USnss2002.pdf> [Accessed 22 December 2013].Search in Google Scholar

Perlez J. (2001). ‘Tougher on Russia’. New York Times. March 24.Search in Google Scholar

Rumer E. (2004). ‘Why Contain Russia?’ The Washington Post. December 17.Search in Google Scholar

Russia’s National Security Concept. January 14, 2000. Available at <http://www.armscontrol.org/act/2000_01-02/docjf00.asp> [Accessed 4 February 2013].Search in Google Scholar

Schrodt Ph. (1993). ‘Event Data in Foreign Policy Analysis’. Available at <http://eventdata.psu.edu/papers.dir/Haney.pdf> [Accessed 22 December 2013].Search in Google Scholar

SIPRI Yearbook 2002. The Stockholm International Peace Research Institute. Available at <http://www.sipri.org/yearbook/2002/files/SIPRIYB0206.pdf> [Accessed 22 December 2013].Search in Google Scholar

Shanker Th. (2007). ‘Administration Rebukes Putin On His Policies’. New York Times. June.Search in Google Scholar

State of the Union Address. January 29, 2002. Available at <http://millercenter.org/president/speeches/detail/4540> [Accessed 22 December 2013].Search in Google Scholar

State of the Union Address. January 28, 2003. Available at <http://millercenter.org/president/speeches/detail/4541> [Accessed 22 December 2013].Search in Google Scholar

State of the Union Address. January 23, 2007. Available at <http://millercenter.org/president/speeches/detail/4455> [Accessed 22 December 2013].Search in Google Scholar

The National Security Strategy of the United States of America. March 2006. Available at http://www.comw.org/qdr/fulltext/nss2006.pdf> [Accessed 22 December 2013].Search in Google Scholar

Urbelis V. (2001). Strategija – jos elementai ir sąvokos evoliucija. Politologija, Vol. 4.Search in Google Scholar

Veen T. (2008). ‘Event Data: A method for analysing political behaviour in the EU’. Paper prepared for delivery at the Fourth Pan-European Conference on EU Politics, Riga, 25-27 Sep. Available at <http://www.jhubc.it/ecpr-riga/virtualpaperroom/002.pdf> [Accessed 22 December 2013].Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo