Zing Zing Bang Bang: How Do You Know What She Really Meant. Gender Bias in Response to Irony: The Role of Who is Speaking to Whom

Abele, A.E. (2003). The dynamics of masculine-agentic and feminine-communal traits: findings from a prospective study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85 (4), 768–776.10.1037/0022-3514.85.4.768Search in Google Scholar

Anolli, L., Ciceri, R., & Infantino, M.G. (2002). From “blame by praise” to “praise by blame”: Analysis of vocal patterns in ironic communication. International Journal of Psychology, 37 (5), 266–276.10.1080/00207590244000106Search in Google Scholar

Attardo, S. (2002). Humor and irony in interaction: From mode adoption to failure of detection. In L. Anolli, R. Ciceri, & G. Riva (Eds.), Say not to Say: New Perspectives on Miscommunication (pp. 159–179). Amsterdam: IOS Press.Search in Google Scholar

Biernat, M. & Manis, M. (2007). Stereotypes and Shifting Standards: Assimilation and Contrast in Social Judgment. New York, NY: Psychology Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bromberek-Dyzman, K. (2011). Język emocji a język ironii w pragmatyce eksperymentalnej. Studia z Kognitywistyki i Filozofi i Umysłu, 5 (1), 5–38.Search in Google Scholar

Bromberek-Dyzman, K. (2012). Affective twist in irony processing. Humana. Mente Journal of Philosophical Studies, 23, 83–111.Search in Google Scholar

Brown, P. & Levinson, S.C. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage (Vol. 4). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511813085Search in Google Scholar

Collignon, O., Girard, S., Gosselin, F., Saint-Amour, D., Lepore, F., & Lassonde, M. (2010). Women process multisensory emotion expressions more efficiently than men. Neuropsychologia, 48 (1), 220–225.10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.09.007Search in Google Scholar

Colston, H.L. & Lee, S.Y. (2004). Gender differences in verbal irony use. Metaphor and Symbol, 19 (4), 289–306.10.1207/s15327868ms1904_3Search in Google Scholar

Colston, H.L. & O’Brien, J.E. (2000). Contrast of kind versus contrast of magnitude: The pragmatic accomplishments of irony and hyperbole. Discourse Processes, 30 (2), 179–199.10.1207/S15326950DP3002_05Search in Google Scholar

Culpeper, J. (1996). Towards an anatomy of impoliteness. Journal of Pragmatics, 25 (3), 349–367.10.1016/0378-2166(95)00014-3Search in Google Scholar

Cutler, A. (1974). On saying what you mean without meaning what you say. In M.W. Fox, R.A. Bruck, & A. La Galy (Eds.), Papers from the Tenth Regional Meeting Chicago Linguistic Society (pp. 17–127). Chicago: CLS.Search in Google Scholar

Dews, S., Kaplan, J., & Winner, E. (1995). Why not say it directly? The social functions of irony. Discourse Processes, 19 (3), 347–367.10.1080/01638539509544922Search in Google Scholar

Fiske, S.T., Cuddy, A.J., & Glick, P. (2007). Universal dimensions of social cognition: Warmth and competence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11 (2), 77–83.10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.005Search in Google Scholar

Freud, S. (1927). The Future of an Illusion. London, UK: Hogarth Press.Search in Google Scholar

Gibbs, R.W. (2000). Irony in talk among friends. Metaphor and Symbol, 15 (1-2), 5–27.10.1080/10926488.2000.9678862Search in Google Scholar

Gibbs, R.W. & O’Brien, J. (1991). Psychological aspects of irony understanding. Journal of Pragmatics, 16 (6), 523–530.10.1016/0378-2166(91)90101-3Search in Google Scholar

Gross, J.J., & Levenson, R.W. (1995). Emotion elicitation using films. Cognition & Emotion, 9 (1), 87–108.10.1080/02699939508408966Search in Google Scholar

Guimond, S., Chatard, A., Martinot, D., Crisp, R.J., & Redersdorff, S. (2006). Social comparison, self-stereotyping, and gender differences in self-construals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90 (2), 221–242.10.1037/0022-3514.90.2.221Search in Google Scholar

Hall, J.A. (1984). Nonverbal Sex Differences: Communication Accuracy and Expressive Style. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Holtgraves, T. (1991). Interpreting questions and replies: Effects of face-threat, question form, and gender. Social Psychology Quarterly, 54 (1), 15–24.10.2307/2786785Search in Google Scholar

Isen, A.M. & Shalker, T.E. (1982). The influence of mood state on evaluation of positive, neutral, and negative stimuli: When you “accentuate the positive,” do you “eliminate the negative”? Social Psychology Quarterly, 4, 58–63.10.2307/3033676Search in Google Scholar

Jorgensen, J. (1996). The functions of sarcastic irony in speech. Journal of Pragmatics, 26 (5), 613–634.10.1016/0378-2166(95)00067-4Search in Google Scholar

Kałowski, P. (2015). Gender of the speaker and the addressee of an ironic utterance and irony comprehension. (Unpublished seminar thesis). University of Warsaw.Search in Google Scholar

Kałowski, P. (2016). The effect of gender on irony understanding. Master’s thesis in preparation. University of Warsaw.Search in Google Scholar

Katz, A., Piasecka, I., & Toplak, M. (November 2001). Comprehending the sarcastic comments of males and females. Paper presented at the 42nd Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Orlando, FL.10.1037/e537102012-525Search in Google Scholar

Kotthoff, H. (2003). Responding to irony in different contexts: On cognition in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 35 (9), 1387–1411.10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00182-0Search in Google Scholar

Kreuz, R.J. & Roberts, R.M. (1995). Two cues for verbal irony: Hyperbole and the ironic tone of voice. Metaphor and Symbol, 10 (1), 21–31.10.1207/s15327868ms1001_3Search in Google Scholar

Lakoff, R.T. (1973). The logic of politeness; or minding your p’s and q’s. In C. Corum, T.C. Smith Stark, & A. Weiser (Eds.), Papers from the 9th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society (pp. 292–305). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Longman, D.L. & Graesser, A.C. (1988). Wit and humor in discourse processing. Discourse Processes, 11 (1), 35–60.Search in Google Scholar

Mead, M. (2001). Sex and Temperament: In Three Primitive Societies. New York, NY: Harper Perennial. (Original work published 1935)Search in Google Scholar

Milanowicz, A. (2016). Irony processing task (Unpublished questionnaire from doctoral thesis). University of Warsaw.Search in Google Scholar

Milanowicz, A. (2013). Irony as a means of perception through communication channels. Emotions, attitude and IQ related to irony across gender. Psychology of Language and Communication, 17 (2), 115–132.Search in Google Scholar

Milanowicz, A. & Bokus, B. (2013). Gender and moral judgments: The role of who is speaking to whom. Journal of Gender Studies, 22 (4), 423–443.10.1080/09589236.2012.719314Search in Google Scholar

Moskowitz, G.B. (2005). Social Cognition: Understanding Self and Others. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Search in Google Scholar

Soleymani, M., Pantic, M., & Pun, T. (2012). Multimodal emotion recognition in response to videos. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, 3 (2), 211–223.10.1109/T-AFFC.2011.37Search in Google Scholar

Teasdale, J.D. & Fogarty, S.J. (1979). Differential effects of induced mood on retrieval of pleasant and unpleasant events from episodic memory. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 88 (3), 248–257.10.1037/0021-843X.88.3.248Search in Google Scholar

Todorov, A., Said, C.P., Engell, A.D., & Oosterhof, N.N. (2008). Understanding evaluation of faces on social dimensions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12 (12), 455–460.10.1016/j.tics.2008.10.001Search in Google Scholar

Turner, J.C., Hogg, M.A., Oakes, P.J., Reicher, S.D., Wetherell, M.S. (1987). Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-Categorization Theory. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Weitzman, L.J. (1979). Sex Role Socialization. Palo Alto, CA: MayfieldSearch in Google Scholar

Wigboldus, D. & Douglas, K.M. (2007). Language, stereotypes, and intergroup relations. In K. Fiedler (Ed.), Social Communication (pp. 79–106). New York, NY: Psychology Press.Search in Google Scholar

Wojciszke, B. (2010). Sprawczość i wspólnotowość: podstawowe wymiary spostrzegania społecznego. Gdańsk: Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne.Search in Google Scholar

Wojciszke, B., Szlendak, M.A. (2010). Skale do pomiaru orientacji sprawczej i wspólnotowej. Psychologia Społeczna, 5 (1), 57–70.Search in Google Scholar

Wu, D., Courtney, C.G., Lance, B.J., Narayanan, S.S., Dawson, M.E., Oie, K.S., & Parsons, T.D. (2010). Optimal arousal identification and classification for affective computing using physiological signals: virtual reality Stroop task. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, 1 (2), 109–118.10.1109/T-AFFC.2010.12Search in Google Scholar

• Online intergroup contact and intergroup attitudes: A cross sectional and a longitudinal study of Greeks and Germans interacting on Twitter and Facebook
• Why do outsiders commend us? Reactions to group-based praise concerning morality or competence
• Social identity uncertainty during the Greek financial crisis: The role of media narratives
• Outgroup threat and opportunity to derogate: A social neuroscience approach
• Prolegomena toward integrating social psychological and communicative parameters of intergroup relations
• When voice signals nationality and sexual orientation: Speakers’ self-perceptions and perceived stigmatization
• The effects of situational contexts and occupational roles on listeners’ judgements on accented speech
• The semantic inflation of “trauma” in psychology
• The process and domain of intergroup communication: Mapping the field.
• Contexts and conditions of outgroup influence