<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Based on a geographical-administrative definition of the region, the theoretical assumptions of contemporary French structuralist geopolitics, cross-sectional data for 1990, 1995, 2000, 2005 and 2010 from the Updated Arctic Regional Attributes Dataset, and the technical capabilities of MS Office Excel 2010, this research (a) reveals and contrasts the Arctic states’ capability constraints deriving from their longitudinal material and virtual power potential (physical potential, socio-economic potential, military potential, and symbolic potential); and (b) analyses the role of this constraint in the process of preference formation in case of one specific Arctic actor, Russia, in the Arctic territorial dispute. This study confirms that Russia’s capability constraint is the lowest in the region and that the latter does not form a stable trend throughout the period studied. It also suggests the preference formation framework for Russia in the Arctic dispute based on the evolution of its polar capability constraint.</p></abstract>

Based on a geographical-administrative definition of the region, the theoretical assumptions of contemporary French structuralist geopolitics, cross-sectional data for 1990, 1995, 2000, 2005 and 2010 from the Updated Arctic Regional Attributes Dataset, and the technical capabilities of MS Office Excel 2010, this research (a) reveals and contrasts the Arctic states’ capability constraints deriving from their longitudinal material and virtual power potential (physical potential, socio-economic potential, military potential, and symbolic potential); and (b) analyses the role of this constraint in the process of preference formation in case of one specific Arctic actor, Russia, in the Arctic territorial dispute. This study confirms that Russia’s capability constraint is the lowest in the region and that the latter does not form a stable trend throughout the period studied. It also suggests the preference formation framework for Russia in the Arctic dispute based on the evolution of its polar capability constraint.

The Power of the Capability Constraint: On Russia’s Strength in the Arctic Territorial Dispute

Ph.D. Candidate and lecturer at the Department of Political Science, Institute of Political Studies, Faculty of Social Sciences, Charles University in Prague

Politics in Central Europe

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Based on a geographical-administrative definition of the region, the theoretical assumptions of contemporary French structuralist geopolitics, cross-sectional...

The Power of the Capability Constraint: On Russia’s Strength in the Arctic Territorial Dispute

Published Online: Jun 24, 2016

Page range: 167 - 189

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/pce-2016-0009

Keywords
Russia, the Arctic, geopolitical analysis, power, capability constraint, regional strategy

© 2016

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

The Power of the Capability Constraint: On Russia’s Strength in the Arctic Territorial Dispute

Published Online: Jun 24, 2016

Page range: 167 - 189

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/pce-2016-0009

KeywordsRussia, the Arctic, geopolitical analysis, power, capability constraint, regional strategy

© 2016

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Keywords
Russia, the Arctic, geopolitical analysis, power, capability constraint, regional strategy