[Ács, Z. & Kováts, D. 2013. Phylogenetic patterns of a Nightingale population in a contact zone of Luscinia megarhynchos and L. luscinia in Hungary. – North-Western Journal of Zoology 9(2): 365–373.]Search in Google Scholar
[Alerstam, T. 2006. Conflicting evidence about long-distance animal navigation. – Science 313(5788): 791–794. DOI: 10.1126/science.112904810.1126/.1129048]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Bairlein, F., Dierschke, J., Dierschke, V., Salewski, V., Geiter, O., Hüppop, K., Köppen, U. & Fiedler, W. 2014. Atlas des Vogelzugs [Bird Migration Atlas]. – AULA-Verlag, p. 471. (in German with English Summary)]Search in Google Scholar
[Becker, J. 1995. Sympatric occurrence and hybridization of the Thrush Nightingale (Luscinia luscinia) and the Nightingale (Luscinia megarhynchos) at Frankfurt (Oder), Brandenburg. – Vogelwelt 116(10): 109–118.]Search in Google Scholar
[Becker, J. 2007. Nachtigallen Luscinia megarhynchos, Sprosser L. luscinia und ihre Hybriden im Raum Frankfurt (Oder) – weitere Ergebnisse einer langjährigen Beringungsstudie [About Nightingales Luscinia megarhynchos, Thrush Nightingales L. luscinia and their hybrids in the area of Frankfurt (Oder) – further results of long-term investigations using bird ringing]. – Vogelwarte 45: 15–26. (in German with English Summary)]Search in Google Scholar
[BirdLife Hungary 2018. Magyarország madarai: nagy fülemüle [Birds of Hungary: Thrush Nightingale]– Magyar Madártani és Természetvédelmi Egyesület [BirdLife Hungary]. URL: http://www.mme.hu/magyarorszagmadarai/madaradatbazis-luslus, downloaded on 12 May 2018. (in Hungarian)]Search in Google Scholar
[BirdLife International 2018. Species factsheet: Luscinia luscinia. Downloaded from http://www.birdlife.org on 16/05/2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[BirdLife International 2004. Birds in Europe: population estimates, trends and conservation status. – BirdLife International, BirdLife Conservation Series No.12., Cambridge, U.K., pp. 269–271.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bogucki, Z. & Sorjonen, J. 1997. Luscinia luscinia, Thrush Nightingale. – In: Hagemeijer, W. J. & Blair, M. J. (eds.) The EBCC atlas of European breeding birds: Their distribution and abundance. – T & AD Poyser, London, pp. 514–515.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bønløkke, J., Madsen, J. J., Thorup, K., Pedersen, K. T., Bjerrum, M. & Rahbek, C. 2006. Dansk trækfugleatlas [Danish Bird Migration Atlas]. – Rhodos, Humlebæk, p. 602. (in Danish with English Summary)]Search in Google Scholar
[Cleveland, W. S., Grosse, E. & Shyu, W. M. 1992. Local regression models. – In: Chambers, J. & Hastie, T. (eds.) Statistical Models in S. – Pacific Grove, California, pp. 309–376.]Search in Google Scholar
[Collar, N. 2018. Handbook of the birds of the world alive. – In: del Hoyo, J., Elliott, A., Sargatal, J., Christie, D. & de Juana, E. (eds.) Handbook of the Birds of the World Alive – Lynx Edicions, Barcelona (https://www.hbw.com/node/58454 on 15 May 2018)]Search in Google Scholar
[Cooper, C. B., Shirk, J. & Zuckerberg, B. 2014. The invisible prevalence of citizen science in global research: Migratory birds and climate change. – PLoS ONE 9(9): e106508. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.010650810.1371/journal.pone.0106508415359325184755]Search in Google Scholar
[Cramp, S. 1988. Handbook of the Birds of the Western Palearctic, Vol. 5. – Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 616–626.]Search in Google Scholar
[Csörgő, T., Fehérvári, P., Karcza, Zs. & Harnos, A. 2017. Exploratory analyses of migration timing and morphometrics of the Common Nightingale (Luscinia megarhynchos). – Ornis Hungarica 25(2): 116–140. DOI: 10.1515/orhu-2017-001910.1515/orhu-2017-0019]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Csörgő, T. & Harnos, A. 2018. Az Ócsai Madárvárta működése és fontosabb kutatási eredményei – Természetvédelem és kutatás a Turjánvidék északi részén [The operation and selected research results of the Ócsa Bird Ringing Station – Conservation and research at the northern part of “Turjánvidék”]. – Rosalia 10: 929–960. (in Hungarian)]Search in Google Scholar
[Csörgő, T., Harnos, A., Rózsa, L., Karcza, Zs. & Fehérvári, P. 2016. Detailed description of the Ócsa Bird Ringing Station, Hungary. – Ornis Hungarica 24(2): 91–108. DOI: 10.1515/orhu-2016-001810.1515/orhu-2016-0018]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Csörgő, T. & Kováts, L. 2009. Nagy fülemüle [Thrush Nightingale]. – In: Csörgő, T., Karcza, Zs., Halmos, G., Magyar, G., Gyurácz, J., Szép, T., Bankovics, A., Schmidt, A. & Schmidt, E. (eds.) Magyar madárvonulási atlasz [Hungarian Bird Migration Atlas]. – Kossuth Kiadó Zrt., Budapest, pp. 444–445. (in Hungarian with English Summary)]Search in Google Scholar
[Csörgő, T. & Lövei, G. L. 1986. Nagy fülemüle (Luscinia luscinia) testtömeg gyarapodása őszi vonulás előtt [Premigratioy fattening of the Thrush Nightingale (Luscinia luscinia)]. – Magyar Madártani Egyesület II. Tudományos Ülése, Szeged. pp: 143–148. (in Hungarian with English Summary)]Search in Google Scholar
[Csörgő, T. & Lövei, G. L. 1995. Migration and recurrence of the Thrush Nightingale Luscinia luscinia at a stopover site in Central Hungary. – Ardeola 42: 57–68.]Search in Google Scholar
[Demongin, L. 2016. Identification guide to birds in the hand. – Beauregard-Vernon, p. 246.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dittberner, H. & Dittberner, W. 1989. Alters-und Geschlechtskennzeichen beim Sprosser [Age and sex characteristics of the Thrush Nightingale]. – Falke 36: 255–259. (in German)]Search in Google Scholar
[Dowle, M., Short, T. & Lianoglou, S. 2013. data.table: Extension of data.frame for fast indexing, fast ordered joins, fast assignment, fast grouping and list columns. – R package version 1.8.10; with contributions from Srinivasan, S., Lianoglou, A. & Saporta, R. URL: http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=data.table]Search in Google Scholar
[Eason, P., Rabia, B. & Attum, O. 2016. Hunting of migratory birds in North Sinai, Egypt. – Bird Conservation International 26(1): 39–51. DOI: 10.1017/S095927091500018010.1017/S0959270915000180]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[EURING 2015. The EURING Exchange Code 2000 Plus. – The European Union for Bird Ringing, Thetford, UK. URL: http://www.euring.org/data_and_codes/euring_code_list/index.html]Search in Google Scholar
[Farkas, T. 1954. Der Sprosser (Luscinia luscinia L.) als Brutvogel in Ungarn: nebst einige Bemerkungen zu seiner Systematik [The Thrush Nightingale (Luscinia luscinia L.) as a breeding bird in Hungary: notes on its sistematics]. – Annales Biologicae Universitatum Hungariae (2): 57–81. (in German)]Search in Google Scholar
[Finch, T., Butler, S. J., Franco, A. M. A. & Cresswell, W. 2017. Low migratory connectivity is common in long-distance migrant birds. – Journal of Animal Ecology 86(3): 662–673. DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.1263510.1111/1365-2656.1263528093769]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Fransson, T. & Hall-Karlsson, S. 2008. Thrush Nightingale (Luscinia luscinia). – In: Svensk Ringmärkningsatlas, Vol. 3. [Swedish Bird Ringing Atlas, Vol. 3.]. – Stockholm, Naturhisto ed., pp. 62–78. (in Swedish with English Summary)]Search in Google Scholar
[Fransson, T., Jakobsson, S. & Kullberg, C. 2005. Non-random distribution of ring recoveries from trans-Saharan migrants indicates species-specific stopover areas. – Journal of Avian Biology 36(1): 6–11. DOI: 10.1111/j.0908-8857.2005.03471.x10.1111/j.0908-8857.2005.03471.x]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Gienapp, P., Leimu, R. & Merilä, J. 2007. Responses to climate change in avian migration time microevolution versus phenotypic plasticity. – Climate Research 35: 25–35. DOI: 10.3354/cr0071210.3354/cr00712]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Ginn, H. & Melville, D. 1983. Moult in birds. BTO Guide 19. – British Trust for Ornithology, Tring]Search in Google Scholar
[Hadarics, T. & Zalai, T. 2008. Nomenclator avium Hungariae – Magyarország madarainak névjegyzéke [An annotated list of the birds of Hungary]. – Magyar Madártani és Természetvédelmi Egyesület, Budapest, p. 175. (in Hungarian)]Search in Google Scholar
[Hahn, S., Korner-Nievergelt, F., Emmenegger, T., Amrhein, V., Csörgő, T., Gursoy, A., Ilieva, M., Kverek, P., Pérez-Tris, J., Pirrello, S., Roselaar, C. S., Zehtindjiev, P. & Salewski, V. 2016. Longer wings for faster springs – wing length relates to spring phenology in a long-distance migrant across its range. – Ecology and Evolution 6(1): 68–77. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.186210.1002/ece3.1862471651126811775]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Harnos, A., Csörgő, T. & Fehérvári, P. 2016. Hitchhikers’ guide to analysing bird ringing data. Part 2. – Ornis Hungarica 24(1): 172–181. DOI: 10.1515/orhu-2016-001010.1515/orhu-2016-0010]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Harnos, A., Csörgő, T. & Fehérvári, P. 2017. Hitchhikers’ guide to analysing bird ringing data. Part 3. – Ornis Hungarica 25(2): 141–156. DOI: 10.1515/orhu-2017-002010.1515/orhu-2017-0020]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Harnos, A., Fehérvári, P. & Csörgő, T. 2015. Hitchhikers’ guide to analysing bird ringing data. Part 1. – Ornis Hungarica 23(2): 163–188. DOI: 10.1515/orhu-2015-001810.1515/orhu-2015-0018]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Heldbjerg, H. & Fox, T. 2008. Long-term population declines in Danish trans-Saharan migrant birds. – Bird study 55(3): 267–279. DOI: 10.1080/0006365080946153210.1080/00063650809461532]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Hildén, O. & Koskimies, P. 1984. Pesimdlinnuston kannanmuutokset Suomessa 1973–82 kyselytutkimuksen valossa [Summary: Population changes of Finnish breeding birds in 1973–82]. – Lintumies 19: 15–25. (in Finnish with English Summary)]Search in Google Scholar
[Hogg, P., Dare, P. & Rintoul, J. 1984. Palaearctic migrants in the central Sudan. – Ibis 126(3): 307–331.10.1111/j.1474-919X.1984.tb00253.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Jenni, L. & Winkler, R. 1994. Moulting and ageing of European passerines. – Academic Press, New York, p. 94.]Search in Google Scholar
[Karlsson, L., Ehnbom, S. & Walinder, G. 2005. A comparison between ringing totals at Falsterbo, SW Sweden, ringing totals at Ottenby, SE Sweden, and point counts from the Swedish breeding bird census during 20 years (1980–1999). – Ornis Svecica 15: 183–205.]Search in Google Scholar
[Klaassen, M., Lindström, Å. & Zijlstra, R. 1997. Composition of fuel stores and digestive limitations to fuel deposition rate in the long-distance migratory Thrush Nightingale, Luscinia luscinia. – Physiological Zoology 70(1): 125–133. DOI: 10.1086/63955610.1086/6395569231384]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Klvaňa, P., Cepák, J., Munclinger, P., Michálková, R., Tomášek, O. & Albrecht, T. 2018. Around the Mediterranean: an extreme example of loop migration in a long-distance migratory passerine. – Journal of Avian Biology 49(2): jav–01595. DOI: 10.1111/jav.0159510.1111/jav.01595]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Kováts, D. 2012. Autumn migration of the Thrush Nightingale (Luscinia luscinia) in northern Hungary. – Ring 34(1): 23–36. DOI: 10.2478/v10050-012-0001-410.2478/v10050-012-0001-4]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Kováts, D. & Harnos, A. 2015. Morphological classification of conspecific birds from closely situated breeding areas – A case study of the Common Nightingale. – Ornis Hungarica 23(2): 20–30. DOI: 10.1515/orhu-2015-001110.1515/orhu-2015-0011]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Kováts, D., Végvári, Z. & Varga, Z. 2013. Morphological patterns of a nightingale population in a contact zone of Luscinia megarhynchos and L. luscinia. – Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 59(2): 157–170.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kverek, P., Storchová, R., Reif, J. & Nachman, M. 2008. Occurrence of a hybrid between the Common Nightingale (Luscinia megarhynchos) and the Thrush Nightingale (Luscinia luscinia) in the Czech Republic confirmed by genetic analysis. – Sylvia 44: 17–26.]Search in Google Scholar
[Marra, P. P., Francis, C. M., Mulvihill, R. S. & Moore, F. R. 2004. The influence of climate on the timing and rate of spring bird migration. – Oecologia 142(2): 307–315. DOI: 10.1007/s00442-004-1725-x10.1007/s00442-004-1725-x15480801]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Merikallio, E. 1958. Finnish birds: their distribution and numbers. – Fauna Fennica 5: 1–181.]Search in Google Scholar
[Miller-Rushing, A. J., Primack, R. B. & Stymeist, R. 2008. Interpreting variation in bird migration times as observed by volunteers. – The Auk 125(3): 565–573. DOI: 10.1525/auk.2008.0700510.1525/auk.2008.07005]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Moreau, R. E. & Dolp, R. M. 1970. Fat, water, weights and wing-lengths of autumn migrants in transit on the northwest coast of Egypt. – Ibis 112(2): 209–228. DOI: 10.1111/j.1474-919X.1970.tb00094.x10.1111/j.1474-919X.1970.tb00094.x]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Newton, I. 2008. The ecology of bird migration. – Academic Press, London]Search in Google Scholar
[Pearson, D. & Backhurst, G. 1976. The southward migration of Palaearctic birds over Ngulia, Kenya. – Ibis 118(1): 78–105. DOI: 10.1111/j.1474-919X.1976.tb02012.x10.1111/j.1474-919X.1976.tb02012.x]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Pearson, D. J. & Lack, P. C. 1992. Migration patterns and habitat use by passerine and near-passerine migrant birds in eastern Africa. – Ibis 134(s1): 89–98.10.1111/j.1474-919X.1992.tb04756.x]Search in Google Scholar
[R Core Team 2017. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. – R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, URL: https://www.R-project.org/]Search in Google Scholar
[Ranoszek, E. 2001. Occurrence and habitat preferences in breeding season of the Thrush Nightingale Luscinia luscinia and the Nightingale Luscinia megarhynchos in the Barycz river valley. – Ptaki Slaska 13: 19–30. (in Polish with English Summary)]Search in Google Scholar
[Reifová, R., Kverek, P. & Reif, J. 2011a The first record of a female hybrid between the Common Nightingale (Luscinia megarhynchos) and the Thrush Nightingale (Luscinia luscinia) in nature. – Journal of Ornithology 152(4): 1063–1068. DOI: 10.1007/s10336-011-0700-710.1007/s10336-011-0700-7]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Reifová, R., Reif, J., Antczak, M. & Nachman, M. W. 2011b Ecological character displacement in the face of gene flow: Evidence from two species of Nightingales. – BMC Evolutionary Biology 11(1): 138. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-11-13810.1186/1471-2148-11-138312162621609448]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Robinson, R. A., Julliard, R. & Saracco, J. F. 2009. Constant effort: Studying avian population processes using standardised ringing. – Ringing & Migration 24(3): 199–204. DOI: 10.1080/03078698.2009.967439210.1080/03078698.2009.9674392]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Schaub, M. & Jenni, L. 2000. Fuel deposition of three passerine bird species along the migration route. – Oecologia 122(3): 306–317. DOI: 10.1007/s00442005003610.1007/s00442005003628308281]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Schaub, M., Jenni, L. & Bairlein, F. 2008. Fuel stores, fuel accumulation, and the decision to depart from a migration stopover site. – Behavioral Ecology 19(3): 657–666. DOI: 10.1093/beheco/arn02310.1093/beheco/arn023]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Schmidt, E. 1973. Zur Okologie des Sprossers (Luscinia luscinia L.) in der Theissauen bei Tiszatelek, nach seiner Ankunft im Frühling [On the ecology of the Sposser (Luscinia luscinia L.) in the Tisza at Tiszatelek, after spring arrival]. – Tiscia 8: 79–81.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sorjonen, J. 1986. Mixed singing and interspecific territoriality – consequences of secondary contact of two ecologically and morphologically similar Nightingale species in Europe. – Ornis Scandinavica 17(1): 53–67. DOI: 10.2307/367675310.2307/3676753]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Spina, F. & Volponi, S. 2009. Atlante della migrazione degli uccelli in Italia, Vol. 2.: Passeriformi [Italian Bird Migration Atlas, Vol. 2.: Passeriformes]. – Ministero dell’Ambiente e della Tutela del Territorio e del Mare, Roma (Italy) ISPRA, pp. 156–157. (in Italian with English Summary)]Search in Google Scholar
[Stach, R., Jakobsson, S., Kullberg, C. & Fransson, T. 2012. Geolocators reveal three consecutive wintering areas in the Thrush Nightingale. – Animal Migration 1: 1–7. DOI: 10.2478/ami-2012-000110.2478/ami-2012-0001]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Storchová, R., Reif, J. & Nachman, M. W. 2010. Female heterogamety and speciation: Reduced introgression of the z chromosome between two species of Nightingales. – Evolution 64(2): 456–471. DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00841.x10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00841.x291143919796142]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Svensson, L. 1992. Identification Guide to European Passerines. – Ugga, Stockholm, 4th ed., pp. 110–111.]Search in Google Scholar
[Szentendrey, G., Lövei, G. & Kállay, Gy. 1979. Az Actio Hungarica madárgyűrűző tábor mérési módszerei [Measuring methods in the bird ringing camps of Actio Hungarica]. – Állattani Közlemények 66: 161–166. (in Hungarian)]Search in Google Scholar
[Thorup, K., Tøttrup, A. P., Willemoes, M., Klaassen, R. H., Strandberg, R., Vega, M. L., Dasari, H. P., Araújo, M. B., Wikelski, M. & Rahbek, C. 2017. Resource tracking within and across continents in long-distance bird migrants. – Science Advances 3(1): e1601360. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.160136010.1126/sciadv.1601360521458128070557]Search in Google Scholar
[Tøttrup, A., Klaassen, R., Willemoes, M., Strandberg, R., Vardanis, Y., Lindström, Å., Rahbek, C., Alerstam, T. & Thorup, K. 2012. Drought in Africa caused delayed arrival of European songbirds. – Science 338(6112): 1307–1307. DOI: 10.1126/science.122754810.1126/.1227548]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Tøttrup, A. P., Rainio, K., Coppack, T., Lehikoinen, E., Rahbek, C. & Thorup, K. 2010. Local temperature fine-tunes the timing of spring migration in birds. – Integrative and Comparative Biology 50(3): 293–304. DOI: 10.1093/icb/icq02810.1093/icb/icq02821558204]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Tøttrup, A. P., Thorup, K. & Rahbek, C. 2006. Patterns of change in timing of spring migration in North European songbird populations. – Journal of Avian Biology 37(1): 84–92. DOI: 10.1111/j.0908-8857.2006.03391.x10.1111/j.0908-8857.2006.03391.x]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Tucker, G. M. & Heath, M. F. 1994. Birds in Europe: their conservation status. – Cambridge, U.K.: BirdLife International (BirdLife Conservation Series no. 3., p. 450.]Search in Google Scholar
[Valkama, J., Saurola, P., Lehikoinen, A., Lehikoinen, E., Piha, M., Sola, P. & Velmala, W. 2014. Suomen Rengastusatlas. Osa II. [The Finnish Bird Ringing Atlas Vol. II.]. – Finnish Museum of Natural History and Ministry of Environment, Helsinki, pp. 404–407. (in Finnish with English Summary)]Search in Google Scholar
[Vickery, J. A., Ewing, S. R., Smith, K. W., Pain, D. J., Bairlein, F., Škorpilová, J. & Gregory, R. D. 2014. The decline of Afro-Palaearctic migrants and an assessment of potential causes. – Ibis 156(1): 1–22. DOI: 10.1111/ibi.1211810.1111/ibi.12118]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Yohannes, E., Biebach, H., Nikolaus, G. & Pearson, D. J. 2009a Migration speeds among eleven species of long-distance migrating passerines across Europe, the desert and eastern Africa. – Journal of Avian Biology 40(2): 126–134. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-048X.2008.04403.x10.1111/j.1600-048X.2008.04403.x]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Yohannes, E., Biebach, H., Nikolaus, G. & Pearson, D. J. 2009b Passerine migration strategies and body mass variation along geographic sectors across East Africa, the Middle East and the Arabian Peninsula. – Journal of Ornithology 150(2): 369. DOI: 10.1007/s10336-008-0357-z10.1007/s10336-008-0357-z]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Zalakevicius, M., Bartkeviciene, G., Raudonikis, L. & Janulaitis, J. 2006. Spring arrival response to climate change in birds: a case study from eastern Europe. – Journal of Ornithology 147(2): 326–343.10.1007/s10336-005-0016-6]Search in Google Scholar