1. bookVolume 62 (2017): Issue 4 (December 2017)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1508-5791
First Published
25 Mar 2014
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

Application of gamma radiation and physicochemical treatment to improve the bioactive properties of chitosan extracted from shrimp shell

Published Online: 16 Feb 2018
Volume & Issue: Volume 62 (2017) - Issue 4 (December 2017)
Page range: 245 - 251
Received: 24 Apr 2017
Accepted: 14 Nov 2017
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1508-5791
First Published
25 Mar 2014
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

The aim of this study is to exploit a suitable chitosan extraction method from the chitin of indigenous shrimp shells by employing different physicochemical treatments and to improve different bioactive properties of this extracted chitosan (CS) by applying gamma radiation. Chitin was prepared from shrimp shell by pretreatment (deproteination, demineralization and oxidation). Chitosan was extracted from chitin by eight different methods varying different physicochemical parameters (reagent concentration, temperature and time) and assessed with respect to the degree of deacetylation, requirement of time and reagents. The method where chitin was repeatedly treated with 121°C for 30 min with 20 M NaOH, produced the highest degree of deacetylation (DD) value (92%) as measured by potentiometric titration, with the least consumption of time and chemicals, and thus, selected as the best suitable extraction method. For further quality improvement, chitosan with highest DD value was irradiated with different doses (i.e., 5, 10, 15, 20 and 50 kGy) of gamma radiation from cobalt-60 gamma irradiator. As the radiation dose was increased, the molecular weight of the wet irradiated chitosan, as measured by the viscosimetric method, decreased from 1.16 × 105 to 1.786 × 103, 1.518 × 103, 1.134 × 103, 1.046 × 103 and 8.23 × 102 dalton, respectively. The radiation treatment of chitosan samples increased the antimicrobial activity significantly in concentration dependent manner on both gram-positive (Staphylococcus aureus) and gram-negative (Escherichia coli) bacteria, as determined by the well-diffusion method. Four to five percent wet chitosan treated with a radiation dose range of 5.0–10.0 kGy rendered the highest antimicrobial activity with least energy and time consumption. Solubility, water binding capacity (WBC) and fat binding capacity (FBC) also improved due to irradiation of chitosan.

Keywords

1. Shahidi, F., Arachchi, J. K. V., & Jeon, Y. J. (1999). Food application of chitin and chitosan. Trends Food Sci. Technol., 10(2), 37–51. DOI: 10.1016/S0924-2244(99)00017-5.10.1016/S0924-2244(99)00017-5Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

2. Majeti, N. V., & Kumar, R. (2000). A review of chitin and chitosan applications. React. Funct. Polym., 46(1), 1–27. http://doi.org/10.1016/S1381-5148(00)00038-9.10.1016/S1381-5148(00)00038-9Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

3. Fernandes, J. C., Tavaria, F. K., Soares, J. C., Ramos, Ó. S., Monteiro, M. J., Pintado, M. E., & Malcata, F. X. (2008). Antimicrobial effects of chitosans and chitooligosaccharides, upon Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli, in food model system. Food Microbiol., 25, 922–928. DOI: 10.1016/j.fm.2008.05.003.10.1016/j.fm.2008.05.003Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

4. Devlieghere, F., Vermeulen, J., & Debevere, J. (2004). Chitosan: antimicrobial activity, interactions with food components and applicability as a coating on fruit and vegetables. Food Microbiol., 21, 703–714. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2004.02.008.10.1016/j.fm.2004.02.008Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

5. Rout, S. K. (2001). Physicochemical, functional and spectroscopic analysis of crawfish chitin and chitosan as affected by process modification. Dissertation (Thesis), Louisiana State University, and Agricultural and Mechanical College, Department of Food Science. http://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/432.Search in Google Scholar

6. Tajik, H., Moradi, M., Rohani, S. M. R., Erfani, A. M., & Jalali, F. S. S. (2008). Preparation of chitosan from brine shrimp cyst shell and effects of different chemical processing sequences on the physicochemical and functional properties of the product. Molecules, 13(6), 1263–1274. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18596653.10.3390/molecules13061263Search in Google Scholar

7. No, H. K., Meyers, S. P., & Lee, K. S. (1995). Preparation and characterization of chitin and chitosan – a review. J. Aquat. Food Prod. Technol., 4(2), 27–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J030v04n02_03.10.1300/J030v04n02_03Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

8. Tolaimate, A., Desbrieres, J., Rhazi, M., Alague, A., Vincendon, M., & Vottero, P. (2000). On the influence of deacetylation process on the physicochemical characteristics of chitosan from squid chitin. Polymer, 41, 2463–2469. DOI: 10.1016/S0032-3861(99)00400-0.10.1016/S0032-3861(99)00400-0Search in Google Scholar

9. Liu, N., Chen, X. g., Park, H. J., Liu, C. G., Liu, S. C., Meng, X. H., & Yu, L. J. (2006). Effect of MW and concentration of chitosan on antibacterial activity of Escherichia coli. Carbohydr. Polym., 64, 60–65. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2005.10.028.10.1016/j.carbpol.2005.10.028Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

10. Rege, P. R., Garmise, R. J., & Block, L. H. (2003). Spray-dried chitinosans. Part I: preparation and characterization. Int. J. Pharm., 252, 41–51. DOI: 10.1016/S0378-5173(02)00604-X.10.1016/S0378-5173(02)00604-XSearch in Google Scholar

11. Matsuhashi, S., & Kume, T. (1997). Enhancement of antimicrobial activity of chitosan by irradiation. J. Sci. Food Agric., 73(2), 237–241. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0010(199702)73:2<237::AIDJSFA711> 3.0.CO;2-4.10.1002/(SICI)1097-0010(199702)73:2<237::AIDJSFA711>3.0.CO;2-4Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

12. Muzzarelli, R. A. A. (2013). Chitin. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Search in Google Scholar

13. Rhazi, M., Desbrieres, J., Tolaimate, A., Alague, A., & Vottero, P. (2000). Investigation of different natural sources of chitin: influence of the source and deacetylation process on the physicochemical characteristics of chitosan. Polymer Int., 49(4), 337–344. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0126(200004)49:4<337::AIDPI375> 3.0.CO;2-B.10.1002/(SICI)1097-0126(200004)49:4<337::AIDPI375>3.0.CO;2-Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

14. Knorr, D. (1982). Functional properties of chitin and chitosan. J. Food Sci., 47(2), 593–595. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2621.1982.tb10131.x.10.1111/j.1365-2621.1982.tb10131.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

15. Gryczka, U., Dondi, D., Chmielewski, A. G., Migdal, W., Buttafava, A., & Faucitano, A. (2009). The mechanism of chitosan degradation by gamma and e-beam irradiation. Radiat. Phys. Chem., 78(7/8), 543–548. DOI: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2009.03.081.10.1016/j.radphyschem.2009.03.081Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

16. Le Caër, S. (2011). Water radiolysis: Influence of oxide surfaces on H2 production under ionizing radiation. Water, 3(1), 235–253. DOI: 10.3390/w3010235.10.3390/w3010235Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo