1. bookVolume 60 (2015): Issue 4 (December 2015)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1508-5791
First Published
25 Mar 2014
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

Development of the Chalmers Grouped Actinide Extraction Process

Published Online: 30 Dec 2015
Volume & Issue: Volume 60 (2015) - Issue 4 (December 2015)
Page range: 829 - 835
Received: 25 Jun 2015
Accepted: 21 Aug 2015
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1508-5791
First Published
25 Mar 2014
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

Several solvents for Grouped ActiNide EXtraction (GANEX) processes have been investigated at Chalmers University of Technology in recent years. Four different GANEX solvents; cyclo-GANEX (CyMe4- -BTBP, 30 vol.% tri-butyl phosphate (TBP) and cyclohexanone), DEHBA-GANEX (CyMe4-BTBP, 20 vol.% N,N-di-2(ethylhexyl) butyramide (DEHBA) and cyclohexanone), hexanol-GANEX (CyMe4-BTBP, 30 vol.% TBP and hexanol) and FS-13-GANEX (CyMe4-BTBP, 30 vol.% TBP and phenyl trifluoromethyl sulfone (FS-13)) have been studied and the results are discussed and compared in this work. The cyclohexanone based solvents show fast and high extraction of the actinides but a somewhat poor diluent stability in contact with the acidic aqueous phase. FS-13-GANEX display high separation factors between the actinides and lanthanides and a good radiolytic and hydrolytic stability. However, the distribution ratios of the actinides are lower, compared to the cyclohexanone based solvents. The hexanol-GANEX is a cheap solvent system using a rather stable diluent but the actinide extraction is, however, comparatively low.

Keywords

1. Madic, C., Testard, F., Hudson, M., Liljenzin, J. -O., Christiansen, B., Ferrando, M., Facchini, A., Geist, A., Modolo, G., Gonzalez-Espartero, A., & De Mendoza, J. (2004). PARTNEW New solvent extraction processes for minor actinides. Final report. CEA. (Report CEA-R-6066).Search in Google Scholar

2. Aoki, S. (2002). Research and development in Japan on long-lived nuclide partitioning and transmutation technology. Prog. Nucl. Energy, 40, 343-348.10.1016/S0149-1970(02)00027-6Search in Google Scholar

3. Salvatores, M., Slessarev, I., Ritter, G., Fougeras, P., Tchistiakov, A., Youinou, G., & Zaetta, A. (1998). Long-lived radioactive waste transmutation and the role of accelerator driven (hybrid) systems. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A-Accel. Spectrom. Dect. Assoc. Equip., 414, 5-20.10.1016/S0168-9002(98)00522-1Search in Google Scholar

4. Mtingwa, S. K. (2005). Feasibility of transmutation of radioactive elements. In An international spent nuclear fuel storage facility-exploring a Russian site as a prototype: Proceedings of an international workshop (pp. 30-49). The National Academies Press: Washington, DC.Search in Google Scholar

5. Todd, T., Law, J., Herbst, R., Lumetta, G., & Moyer, B. (2000). Treatment of radioactive wastes using liquid-liquid extraction technologies-fears, facts, and issues. In Waste Management 00, 27 February - 2 March 2000. Tucson, AZ, USA.Search in Google Scholar

6. Anderson, H., Newton, M., Asprey, L., & Richmond, C. (1960). U.S. Patent No. 2,924,506. California: U.S. Patent and Trademark Offi ce.Search in Google Scholar

7. Aneheim, E., Ekberg, C., Fermvik, A., Foreman, M. R. S. J., Retegan, T., & Skarnemark, G. (2010). A TBP/BTBP-based GANEX separation process. Part 1: Feasibility. Solvent Extr. Ion Exch., 28, 437-458.10.1080/07366299.2010.480930Search in Google Scholar

8. Löfström-Engdahl, E., Aneheim, E., Ekberg, C., Foreman, M., & Skarnemark, G. (2013). Comparison of the extraction as a function of time in two GANEX solvents: Infl uence of metal loading, interfacial tension, and density. Solvent Extr. Ion Exch., 31, 604-616.10.1080/07366299.2013.810945Search in Google Scholar

9. Löfström-Engdahl, E., Aneheim, E., Ekberg, C., Foreman, M., & Skarnemark, G. (2014). A comparison of americium extractions as a function of time using two bis-triazine-bipyridine ligands in long-chained alcohol diluents. Separ. Sci. Technol., 49, 2060-2065.10.1080/01496395.2014.911325Search in Google Scholar

10. Halleröd, J., Ekberg, C., Foreman, M., Löfström- -Engdahl, E., & Aneheim, E. (2015). Stability of phenyl trifl uoromethyl sulfone as diluent in a grouped actinide extraction process. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem., 304, 287-291.10.1007/s10967-014-3657-1Search in Google Scholar

11. ACSEPT: Final Report Summary (2013). ACSEPT (Actinide reCycling by SEParation and Transmutation). Retrieved June 24, 2015 from http://cordis.europa.eu/result/rcn/56366en.html.Search in Google Scholar

12. Adnet, J. M., Miguirditchian, M., Hill, C., Heres, X., Lecomte, M., Masson, M., Brossard, P., & Baron, P. (2005). Development of new hydrometallurgical processes for actinide recovery: GANEX concept. In Proceedings of GLOBAL, October 9-13, 2005. Tsukuba, Japan.Search in Google Scholar

13. Carrott, M., Bell, K., Brown, J., Geist, A., Gregson, C., Héres, X., Maher, C., Malmbeck, R., Mason, C., Modolo, G., Müllich, U., Sarsfi eld, M., Wilden, A., & Taylor, R. (2014). Development of a new fl owsheet for co-separating the transuranic actinides: the “EURO-GANEX” process. Solvent Extr. Ion Exch., 32(5), 447-467.10.1080/07366299.2014.896580Search in Google Scholar

14. Foreman, M. R. S. J., Hudson, M. J., Geist, A., Madic, C., & Weigl, M. (2005). An investigation into the extraction of americium(III), lanthanides and d-block metals by 6,6ʹ-bis-(5,6-dipentyl-[1,2,4] triazin-3-yl)-[2,2ʹ]bipyridinyl (C5-BTBP). Solvent Extr. Ion Exch., 23, 645-662.10.1080/07366290500230735Search in Google Scholar

15. Nilsson, M., Ekberg, C., Foreman, M., Hudson, M., Liljenzin, J. -O., Modolo, G., & Skarnemark, G. (2006). Separation of actinides(III) from lanthanides( III) in simulated nuclear waste streams using 6,6ʹ-bis-(5,6-dipentyl-[1,2,4]triazin-3-yl)-[2,2ʹ]bipyridinyl (C5-BTBP) in cyclohexanone. Solvent Extr. Ion Exch., 24, 823-843.10.1080/07366290600952659Search in Google Scholar

16. Warf, J. C. (1949). Extraction of cerium (IV) nitrate by butyl phosphate. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 71, 3257-3258.10.1021/ja01177a528Search in Google Scholar

17. Schulz, W., & Navratil, J. (1984). Science and technology of tributyl phosphate. Vol. 1. CRC Press Inc.Search in Google Scholar

18. Löfström-Engdahl, E. (2014). On the diluent and solvent effects in liquid-liquid extraction systems based on bis-triazine-bipyridine (BTBP) ligands. Doctoral dissertation, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden.Search in Google Scholar

19. Madic, C., & Hudson, M. J. (1998). High level liquid waste partitioning by means of completely incinerable extractants. (Tech. Rep. EUR 18038, European Commission Contract No. FI2W-CT91-0112).Search in Google Scholar

20. Shevchenko, V., & Smelov, V. (1958). The effect of mono- and dibutyl phosphates on the extraction of plutonium with tributyl phosphate. Sov. J. Atom. Energy, 5, 1455-1459.10.1007/BF01498488Search in Google Scholar

21. Clayden, J., Greeves, N., Warren, S., & Wothers, P. (2001). Organic chemistry (pp. 181-208). Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

22. Nair, G., Mahajan, G., & Prabhu, D. (1995). Extraction of uranium (VI) and plutonium (IV) with some high molecular weight aliphatic monoamides from nitric acid medium. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem., 191, 323-330.10.1007/BF02038228Search in Google Scholar

23. Prabhu, D., Mahajan, G., & Nair, G. (1997). Di(2-ethylhexyl)butyramide and di(2-ethylhexyl) isobutyramide as extractants for uranium(VI) and plutonium(IV). J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem., 224, 113-117.10.1007/BF02034622Search in Google Scholar

24. Aneheim, E. (2012). Development of a solvent extraction process for group actinide recovery from used nuclear fuel. Doctoral dissertation, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden.Search in Google Scholar

25. Nilsson, M., Andersson, S., Drouet, F., Ekberg, C., Foreman, M., Hudson, M., Liljenzin, J. -O., Magnusson, D., & Skarnemark, G. (2006). Extraction properties of 6,6ʹ-bis-(5,6-dipentyl-[1,2,4]triazin-3- yl)-[2,2ʹ] bipyridine (C5-BTBP). Solvent Extr. Ion Exch., 24, 299-318.10.1080/07366290600646947Search in Google Scholar

26. Geist, A., Magnusson, D., & Müllich, U. (2012). A kinetic study on the extraction of americium(III) into CyMe4-BTBP. In Twelfth Information Exchange Meeting on Actinide and Fission Product Partitioning and Transmutation (12-IEMPT) (pp. 24-27). Prague, Czech Republic.Search in Google Scholar

27. Retegan, T., Berthon, L., Ekberg, C., Fermvik, A., Skarnemark, G., & Zorz, N. (2009). Electrospray ionization mass spectrometry investigation of BTBP-lanthanide(III) and actinide(III) complexes. Solvent Extr. Ion Exch., 27, 663-682.10.1080/07366290903113991Search in Google Scholar

28. Weast, R. C. (1975-1976). Organic compounds. In R. C. Weast (Ed.), Handbooks of chemistry and physics (C-259). Cleveland, Ohio: CRC Press.Search in Google Scholar

29. Ekberg, C., Aneheim, E., Fermvik, A., Foreman, M., Löfström-Engdahl, E., Retegan, T., & Spendlikova, I. (2010). Thermodynamics of dissolution for bis (triazine)-bipyridine-class ligands in different diluents and its refl ection on extraction. J. Chem. Eng. Data, 55, 5133-5137.10.1021/je1005246Search in Google Scholar

30. Retegan, T., Ekberg, C., Dubois, I., Fermvik, A., Skarnemark, G., & Wass, T. J. (2007). Extraction of actinides with different 6,6ʹ-bis(5,6-dialkyl-[1,2,4]- triazin-3-yl)-[2,2ʹ]-bipyridines (BTBPs). Solvent Extr. Ion Exch., 25, 417-431.10.1080/07366290701416000Search in Google Scholar

31. Okushita, H., Yoshikawa, M., & Shimidzu, T. (1995). Pervaporation of cyclohexane/cyclohexanone/ cyclohexanol mixture through polyoxyethylene grafting nylon 6 membrane. J. Membrane Sci., 105, 51-53.10.1016/0376-7388(95)00056-ISearch in Google Scholar

32. Riddick, J. A., Bunger, W. B., & Sakano, T. (1970). Techniques of chemistry. In Organic solvents. Vol. 2. New York: Wiley-Interscience.Search in Google Scholar

33. Ambrose, M., & Hamblet, C. (1951). U.S. Patent No. 2,557,282. Soltzberg.Search in Google Scholar

34. Löfström-Engdahl, E., Aneheim, E., Ekberg, C., & Skarnemark, G. (2013). A reinterpretation of C5- -BTBP extraction data, performed in various alcohols. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem., 296, 733-737.10.1007/s10967-012-1976-7Search in Google Scholar

35. Law, J., Herbst, R., Todd, T., Romanovskiy, V., Babain, V., Esimantovskiy, V., Smirnov, I., & Zaitsev, B. (2001). The universal solvent extraction (UNEX) process. II. Flowsheet development and demonstration of the UNEX process for the separation of cesium, strontium, and actinides from actual acidic radioactive waste. Solvent Extr. Ion Exch., 19, 23-36.10.1081/SEI-100001371Search in Google Scholar

36. Sinha, P., Kumar, S., Kamachi Mudali, U., & Natarajan, R. (2011). Thermal stability of UNEX/ HCCD-PEG diluent FS-13. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem., 289, 899-901.10.1007/s10967-011-1179-7Search in Google Scholar

37. Rzhekhina, E., Karkozov, V., Alyapyshev, M. Y., Babain, V., Smirnov, I., Todd, P., Law, J., & Herbst, R. (2007). Reprocessing of spent solvent of the UNEX process. Radiochemistry, 49, 493-498.10.1134/S1066362207050086Search in Google Scholar

38. Romanovskiy, V., Smirnov, I., Babain, V., Todd, T., Herbst, R., Law, J., & Brewer, K. (2001). The universal solvent extraction (UNEX) process. I. Development of the UNEX process solvent for the separation of cesium, strontium, and the actinides from acidic radioactive waste. Solvent Extr. Ion Exch., 19, 1-21.10.1081/SEI-100001370Search in Google Scholar

39. Bart, H. J., & Stevens, G. (2004). Reactive solvent extraction. In Y. Marcus, & A. K. SenGupta (Eds.), Ion exchange and solvent extraction. (A Series of Advances, Vol. 17, pp. 37-84). Boca Raton: CRC Press Inc.Search in Google Scholar

40. Blass, E. F. (2004). Engineering design and calculation of extractors for liquid liquid systems. In J. Rydberg, M. Cox, C. Musikas, & G. Choppin (Eds.), Solvent extraction principles and practice (pp. 367-414). New York: Marcel Dekker Inc.Search in Google Scholar

41. Foreman, M., Hudson, M., Drew, M., Hill, C., & Madic, C. (2006). Complexes formed between the quadridentate, heterocyclic molecules 6,6ʹ-bis-(5,6- dialkyl-1,2,4-triazin-3-yl)-2,2ʹ-bipyridine (BTBP) and lanthanides(III): implications for the partitioning of actinides(III) and lanthanides(III). Dalton Trans., 13, 1645-1653.10.1039/B511321KSearch in Google Scholar

42. Aneheim, E., Mabile, N., & Ekberg, C. (2011). Exchange of TBP for a monoamide extraction ligand in a Ganex solvent-advantages & disadvantages. In 19th International Solvent Extraction Conference, 3-7 October 2011 (pp. 65-72). Santiago, Chile: Gecamin Ltd.Search in Google Scholar

43. Aneheim, E., Ekberg, C., Foreman, M. R., Löfström- -Engdahl, E., & Mabile, N. (2012). Studies of a solvent for GANEX applications containing CyMe4BTBP and DEHBA in cyclohexanone. Separ. Sci. Technol., 47, 663-669.10.1080/01496395.2011.627908Search in Google Scholar

44. Huizenga, J., & Magnusson, L. (1951). Oxidation-reduction reactions of neptunium (IV) and (V). J. Am. Chem. Soc., 73, 3202-3206.10.1021/ja01151a061Search in Google Scholar

45. Aneheim, E., Ekberg, C., Modolo, G., & Wilden, A. (2015). Single centrifugal contactor test of a proposed group actinide extraction process for partitioning and transmutation purposes. Separ. Sci. Technol., 50, 1554-1559. 10.1080/01496395.2014.975364Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo