[Almutairi, H. and S. Elhedhli. 2014. “Modeling, Analysis, and Evaluation of a Carbon Tax Policy Based on the Emission Factor.” Computers & Industrial Engineering 77, 88 - 102.]Search in Google Scholar
[Andersen, M. S., S. Speck and O. Mautone. 2011. “Environmental Fiscal Reform: Illustrative Potential in Italy.” Conference Environmentally Related Taxation and Fiscal Reform, 15 December, Ministry of Economy and Finance, Rome.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ash, M. 2010. Taxation, Innovation and the Environment. Paris: OECD.]Search in Google Scholar
[Atkinson, A. B. and J. E. Stiglitz. 1976. “Th e Design of Tax Structure: Direct versus Indirect Taxation.” Journal of Public Economics 6, 55 - 75.10.1016/0047-2727(76)90041-4]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Bovenberg, A. L. 1995. “Environmental Taxation and Employment.” De Economist 143, 111 - 140.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bovenberg, A. L. and L. H. Goulder. 1996. “Optimal Environmental Taxation in the Presence of other Taxes: General-Equilibrium Analyses.” The American Economic Review 86, 985 - 1000.]Search in Google Scholar
[Brizga, J. and M. Jurušs. 2013. Pētījums par iespējām noteikt diferencētas dabas resursu nodokļa likmes par atkritumu apglabāšanu poligonos. Rīga: Zaļā brīvība.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cottrell, J. et al. 2008. Environmental Fiscal Reform in Developing, Emerging and Transition Economies: Progress and Prospects. Eschborn: Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ).]Search in Google Scholar
[Cox, A. 2007. Easing Subsidy Reform for Producers, Consumers and Communities, Subsidy Reform and Sustainable Development. Paris: OECD.10.1787/9789264019379-6-en]Search in Google Scholar
[CSDD, 2014. Statistics of registered vehicles.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dresner, S., L. Dunne, P. Clinch and C. Beuermann. 2006a. “Social and Political Responses to Ecological Tax Reform in Europe: An Introduction to the Special Issue.” Energy Policy 34, 895 - 904.10.1016/j.enpol.2004.08.043]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Dresner, S., T. Jackson and N. Gilbert. 2006b. “History and Social Responses to Environmental Tax Reform in the United Kingdom.” Energy Policy 34, 930 - 939.10.1016/j.enpol.2004.08.046]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Druckman, A. and T. Jackson. 2009. “Th e Carbon Footprint of UK Households 1990 - 2004: A Socio-Economically Disaggregated, Quasi-Multi-Regional Input-Output Model.” Ecological Economics 68, 2066 - 2077.]Search in Google Scholar
[EEA. 2014. Monitoring CO2 Emissions from Passenger Cars and Vans in 2013. Copenhagen: European Environment Agency.]Search in Google Scholar
[EEA. 2015. Th e European Environment: State and Outlook 2015. Copenhagen: European Environment Agency.]Search in Google Scholar
[Eurostat. 2016. “Environmental Tax Revenues: % of GDP.” Available at http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/tgm/table.do?tab=table&init=1&language=en&pcode=ten00065&plugin=1 (last accessed 12. 10. 2016.).]Search in Google Scholar
[Felder, S. and R. Schleiniger. 2002. “Environmental Tax Reform: Efficiency and Political Feasibility.” Ecological Economics 42, 107 - 116.10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00109-X]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Filipović, S., Golušin, M., 2015. Environmental taxation policy in the EU-new methodology approach. Journal of Cleaner Production 88, 308 - 317.10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.03.002]Search in Google Scholar
[Hsu, S.-L., J. Walters and A. Purgas. 2008. “Pollution Tax Heuristics: An Empirical Study of Willingness to Pay Higher Gasoline Taxes.” Energy Policy 36, 3612 - 3619.10.1016/j.enpol.2008.06.010]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Jacobs, B. and R. A. de Mooij. 2015. “Journal of Environmental Economics and Management.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 71, 90 - 108.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jaffe, A. B., R. G. Newell and R. N. Stavins. 2003. “Technological Change and the Environment.” Handbook of Environmental Economics 1, 461 - 516.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kallbekken, S. and M. Aasen. 2010. “Th e Demand for Earmarking: Results from a Focus Group Study.” Ecological Economics 69, 2183 - 2190.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kampas, A. and R. Horan. 2015. “Second-Best Pollution Taxes: Revisited and Revised.” Environmental Economics and Policy Studies 18(4), 1 - 21.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lagzdiņa, Ē., R. Bendere, A. Ozola, J. Brizga and J. Kauliņš. 2010. Vides komunikācija un vides politikas integrācijai. Rīga: REC Latvia.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lin, B. and X. Li. 2011. “Th e Eff ect of Carbon Tax on per Capita CO2 Emissions.” Energy Policy 39, 5137 - 5146.]Search in Google Scholar
[Loganathan, N., M. Shahbaz and R. Taha. 2014. “Th e Link between Green Taxation and Economic Growth on CO2 Emissions: Fresh Evidence from Malaysia.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 38, 1083 - 1091.]Search in Google Scholar
[Markandya, A. 2005. Environmental Fiscal Reform: What Should be Done and How to Achieve It. Washington, DC: World Bank.]Search in Google Scholar
[Metcalf, G. E. and D. Weisbach. 2009. “Th e Design of a Carbon Tax.” Harvard Environmental Law Review 33, 499.]Search in Google Scholar
[Montag, J. 2015. “Th e Simple Economics of Motor Vehicle Pollution: A Case for Fuel Tax.” Energy Policy 85, 138 - 149.]Search in Google Scholar
[Murray, B. and N. Rivers. 2015. “British Columbia’s Revenue-Neutral Carbon Tax: A Review of the Latest ‘Grand Experiment’ in Environmental Policy.” Energy Policy 86, 674 - 683.10.1016/j.enpol.2015.08.011]Search in Google Scholar
[OECD. 1991. Recommendation of the Council on the Use of Economic Instruments in Environmental Policy. Paris: OECD.]Search in Google Scholar
[OECD. 1997. Evaluating Economic Instruments for Environmental Policy. Paris: OECD.]Search in Google Scholar
[OECD. 2005. Environmental Fiscal Reform for Poverty Reduction. Paris: OECD.]Search in Google Scholar
[OECD. 2011. Towards Green Growth. Paris: OECD.]Search in Google Scholar
[OECD. 2013. Environmental Fiscal Reform, Scaling-up Finance Mechanisms for Biodiversity. Place: OECD.]Search in Google Scholar
[OECD. 2015. OECD Economic Surveys: Latvia. Paris: OECD.]Search in Google Scholar
[Olson, M. 2009. Th e Logic of Collective Action. Harvard: Harvard University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ozoliņa, L. and M. Rošā. 2012. “A Review of Energy Efficiency Policy and Measures for Industries in Latvia.” Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal 23, 517 - 526.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pigou, A. C. 1932. Th e Economics of Welfare, 1920. London: McMillan.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pizer, W. A. and S. Sexton. 2017. Distributional Impacts of Energy Taxes. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research.10.3386/w23318]Search in Google Scholar
[Rosiek, J. 2014. “Th e Impact of the EU Climate Policy on Green Jobs Creation.” Economics and Management 18, 697 - 714.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sælen, H. and S. Kallbekken. 2011. “A Choice Experiment on Fuel Taxation and Earmarking in Norway.” Ecological Economics 70, 2181 - 2190.10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.06.024]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Sandmo, A. 1975. “Optimal Taxation in the Presence of Externalities.” The Swedish Journal of Economics, 86 - 98.10.2307/3439329]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Sjögren, T. 2009. Optimal Taxation and Environmental Policy in a Decentralized Economic Federation with Environmental and Labor Market Externalities. Umea: Umea University, Department of Economics. State Revenue Service. 2014. Annual Report. Riga: State Revenue Service.]Search in Google Scholar
[Steg, L., L. Dreijerink and W. Abrahamse. 2006. “Why are Energy Policies Acceptable and Effective ?” Environment and Behavior 38, 92 - 111.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sterner, T. and J. Coria. 2012. Policy Instruments for Environmental and Natural Resource Management. New York / London: Routlage.10.4324/9781315780894]Search in Google Scholar
[Ščasný, M., V. Piša, H. Pollitt and U. Chewpreecha. 2009. “Analyzing Macroeconomic Effects of Environmental Taxation in the Czech Republic with the Econometric E3ME Model.” Finance a Uver: Czech Journal of Economics & Finance 59(2), 460 - 491.]Search in Google Scholar
[Weber, C. L. and H. S. Matthews. 2008. “Quantifying the Global and Distributional Aspects of American Household Carbon Footprint.” Ecological Economics 66, 379 - 391.10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.09.021]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar