[Ekiert, G. and S. E. Hanson. 2003. Capitalism and Democracy in Central and Eastern Europe: Assessing the Legacy of Communist Rule. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Goetz, K. H. and H. Wollman. 2001. “Governmentalizing Central Executives in Post-Communist Europe: A Four Country Comparison.” Journal of European Public Policy 8(6), 864–887.]Search in Google Scholar
[Láštic, E. 2010. “Can’t Have it Both Ways? Administrative Capacity of European Affairs.” In D. Malová et al. (eds). From Listening to Action? New Member States in the European Union. Bratislava: FiFUK, pp 145–166.]Search in Google Scholar
[Meyer-Sahling, J. H. 2004. “Civil Service Reform in Post-Communist Europe: The Bumpy Road to Depoliticisation.” West European Politics 27(1), 71–103.]Search in Google Scholar
[Meyer-Sahling, J. H. 2009a. “Varieties of Legacies: A Critical Review of Legacy Explanations of Public Administration Reform in East Central Europe.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 753), 509–528.]Search in Google Scholar
[Meyer-Sahling, J. H. 2009b. The Sustainability of Civil Service Reform in Central and Eastern Europe Five Years after Accession. SIGMA Paper 44. Paris: OECD Publications.]Search in Google Scholar
[Meyer-Sahling, J. H. and K. Yesilkagit. 2011. “Differential Legacy Effects: Three Propositions on the Impact of Administrative Traditions on Public Administration Reform in Europe East and West.” Journal of European Public Policy 18(2), 311–322.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nunberg, B. 1999. The State after Communism: Administrative Transitions in Central and Eastern Europe. Washington, D.C.: World Bank Publications.10.1596/0-8213-4205-3]Search in Google Scholar
[Painter, M. and B. G. Peters (eds). 2010. Administrative Traditions: Inheritences and Transplants in Comparative Perspective. Basingtone: Palgrave.]Search in Google Scholar
[Peters, G. and J. Pierre (eds). 2004. Politicization of the Civil Service in Comparative Perspective. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203799857]Search in Google Scholar
[Peters, G. 1999. Institutional Theory in Political Science. The New Institutionalism. London: Pinter.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rauch, J. E. and P. B. Evans. 2000. “Bureaucratic Structure and Bureaucratic Performance in Less Developed Countries.” Journal of Public Economics 75, 49–71.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sigma. 1998. Preparing Public Administrations for the European Administrative Space. SIGMA Paper 23. Paris: SIGMA.]Search in Google Scholar
[Staroňová, K. 2014. “Innovative Elements in Civil Service Reform of Slovakia.” Paper Presented at the 21st NISPAcee Annual Conference 2013, Regionalisation and Inter-regional Cooperation, Belgrade, 16–18 May 2013.]Search in Google Scholar
[Staroňová, K. and G. Gajduschek. 2013. “Civil Service Reform in Slovakia and Hungary: The Road to Professionalisation.” In C. Neuhold, S. Vanhoonacker and L. Verhey (eds). Civil Servants and Politics: A Delicate Balance. London: Palgrave, 123–151.]Search in Google Scholar
[Staroňová, K. and E. Láštic. 2011. “Regulácia politicko-administratívnych vzťahov na Slovensku v rokoch 1990–2010” [Regulation of politico-administrative relation in Slovakia 1990–2010]. In M. Beblavý, E. Beblavá et al. (eds). Koaličná zmluva či zákon? Právna úprava a realita politicko-administratívnych vzťahov na Slovensku. Prešov: Michal Vaško, 33–83.]Search in Google Scholar
[Staroňová, K. and E. Láštic. 2012. “Into the Labyrinth: The Rewards for High Public Office in Slovakia.” In: B. G. Peters and M. Brans (eds). Rewards for High Public Office in Europe and North America. London: Routledge, 248–268.]Search in Google Scholar
[Verheijen, T. (ed.). 1999. Civil Service Systems in Central and Eastern Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.10.4337/9781035304004]Search in Google Scholar
[Verheijen, T. (ed.). 2001. Politico-administrative Relations: Who Rules? Bratislava: NISPAcee.]Search in Google Scholar
[Verheijen, T. 2010. “The New Member States of the European Union: Constructed and Historical Traditions and Reform Trajectories.” In: M. Painter, G. Peters (eds). Tradition and Public Administration. London: Palgrave Macmillian, Pp. 217–233.]Search in Google Scholar
[World Bank. 2007. EU-8: Administrative Capacity in the New Member States: The Limits of Innovation? Washington, DC: World Bank.]Search in Google Scholar