1. bookVolume 8 (2015): Issue 2 (December 2015)
    Issue Title: Towards Meaningful Measurement: Performance Management at the Crossroads of Internal Efficiency and Social Impacts, Issue Editors: Juraj Nemec, Gyorgy Hajnal Wouter van Dooren Jarmo Vakkuri Aleksander Aristovnik
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1338-4309
ISSN
1337-9038
First Published
03 Aug 2009
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

Benchmarking in Czech Higher Education

Published Online: 29 Jan 2016
Volume & Issue: Volume 8 (2015) - Issue 2 (December 2015) - Issue Title: Towards Meaningful Measurement: Performance Management at the Crossroads of Internal Efficiency and Social Impacts, Issue Editors: Juraj Nemec, Gyorgy Hajnal Wouter van Dooren Jarmo Vakkuri Aleksander Aristovnik
Page range: 101 - 124
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1338-4309
ISSN
1337-9038
First Published
03 Aug 2009
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

The first part of this article surveys the current experience with the use of benchmarking at Czech universities specializing in economics and management. The results indicate that collaborative benchmarking is not used on this level today, but most actors show some interest in its introduction. The expression of the need for it and the importance of benchmarking as a very suitable performance-management tool in less developed countries are the impetus for the second part of our article. Based on an analysis of the current situation and existing needs in the Czech Republic, as well as on a comparison with international experience, recommendations for public policy are made, which lie in the design of a model of a collaborative benchmarking for Czech economics and management in higher-education programs. Because the fully complex model cannot be implemented immediately – which is also confirmed by structured interviews with academics who have practical experience with benchmarking –, the final model is designed as a multi-stage model. This approach helps eliminate major barriers to the implementation of benchmarking.

Keywords

Agasistia, T. and F. Bonomia. 2014. “Benchmarking Universities’ Efficiency Indicators in the Presence of Internal Heterogeneity.” Studies in Higher Education 39(7), 1237 - 1255.Search in Google Scholar

Alstette, J. 1995. Benchmarking in Higher Education: Adapting Best Practises To Improve Quality. Washington, D.C.: Association for Study of Higher Education.Search in Google Scholar

Arnaboldi, M. and G. Azzone. 2004. “Benchmarking University Activities: An Italian Case Study.” Financial Accountability and Management 20(2), 205 - 220.Search in Google Scholar

Burquel, N. and F. Van Vught. 2010. “Benchmarking in European Higher Education: A Step beyond Current Quality Models.” Tertiary Education and Management 16(3), 243 - 255.Search in Google Scholar

Cahlík, T. and J. Marková. 2009. “Řízení kvality vzdělávacího procesu.” Politická ekonomie 57(1), 3 - 20.Search in Google Scholar

European Centre for Strategic Management of Universities. 2010. A University Benchmarking Handbook: Benchmarking in Higher Education. Brussels: ESMU.Search in Google Scholar

European Centre for Strategic Management of Universities. 2008a. A Practical Guide Benchmarking in European Higher Education. Brussels: ESMU.Search in Google Scholar

European Centre for Strategic Management of Universities. 2008b. Benchmarking in European Higher Education: Findings of a Two Year EU-Funded Project. Brussels: ESMU.Search in Google Scholar

European Network for Quality Assurance in Higher Education. 2002. Benchmarking in the Improvement of Higher Education. Workshop report. Helsinki: European Network for Quality Assurance in Higher Education.Search in Google Scholar

Higher Education Statistics Agency. 2010. Benchmarking to Improve Effi ciency: Status Report 2010. Cheltenham: Higher Education Statistics Agency.Search in Google Scholar

Hoffman, A. M. and J. Holzhuter. 2012. “Benchmarking.” In A. M. Hoff man and S. D. Spangehl (eds). Innovations in Higher Education. Washington, D.C.: American Council on Education, pp. 3 - 15.Search in Google Scholar

Honingh, M. and J. Urbanovič. 2013. “School Autonomy and Leadership in Lithuania: Can School Leaders Help Schools to Take a Step forward.” NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy 6(1), 61 - 78.Search in Google Scholar

Jackson, N. 2001. “Benchmarking in UK HE: An Overview.” Quality Assurance in Education 9(4), 218 - 230.Search in Google Scholar

Kelly, A. 2001. Benchmarking for School Improvement: A Practical Guide for Comparing and Achieving Eff ectiveness. Abingdon: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Levy, D. and L. S. Ronco. 2012. “How Benchmarking and Higher Education Came together.” New Direction on Institutional Research 12(156), 5 - 13.Search in Google Scholar

McKinnon, R. K., H. S. Walker and D. Davis. 2000. Benchmarking: A Manual for Australian Universities. Canberra: Higher Education Division.Search in Google Scholar

Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports. 2015. Breakdown of Universities Budget 2015. Praha. Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports. Available on: http://www.msmt.cz/vzdelavani/vysoke-skolstvi/rozpis-rozpoctu-vysokych-skolna-rok-2015. Search in Google Scholar

Murdock, A., R. Tekula and C. Parra. 2014. “Responding to Challenge: Comparing Nonprofit Programmes and Pedagogy at Universities in the United Kingdom, Spain, and the United States.” NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy 6(2), 69 - 95.Search in Google Scholar

Naufal, D. 2012. “Benchmarking and Implications for Universities: In Depth Look inside Universities.” Paper presented at the regional workshop Lessons Learned from Benchmarking University Governance in MENA. 11 - 12 December 2012, Rabbat, Marocco.Search in Google Scholar

Nazarko, J. et al. 2009. “The General Concept of Benchmarking and its Application in Higher Education in Europe.” Higher Education in Europe 34(3 - 4), 497 - 510.Search in Google Scholar

Nemec, J, F. Ochrana and M. Sumpikova. 2008. “Czech and Slovak Lessons for Public Administration Performance Evaluation, Management and Finance.” Ekonomicky casopis 56(4), 353 - 369.Search in Google Scholar

Ossiannilsson, E. 2012. Benchmarking Elearning in Higher Education: Lessons Learned from International Projects. Doctoral dissertation, Oulu University, Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, Finland (120227).Search in Google Scholar

Plaček, M. 2014. “Benchmarking ve vysokém školství: Současná zkušenost.” Scientia et Societas 10(1), 97 - 122.Search in Google Scholar

Plaček, M., F. Ochrana and M. Půček. 2015. “Benchmarking in Czech Higher Education: The Case of Schools of Economics.” Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 37(4), 374 - 384.Search in Google Scholar

Plaček, M., M. Puček and M. Jetmar. 2014. “Collaborative Benchmarking of Municipalities in the Czech Republic: Present Experience.” NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy 7(1), 63 - 83.Search in Google Scholar

Ruben, B. D. 2007. Excellence in Higher Education Guide: An Integrated Approach to Assessment, Planning, and Improvement in College and Universities. Washington, D.C.: National Association of College and University Business Offi cers.Search in Google Scholar

Secolsky, D. and B. Denison (eds). 2012. Handbook on Measurement, Assessment, and Evaluation in Higher Education. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203142189Search in Google Scholar

Stella, A. and D. Woodhouse. 2007. Benchmarking in Australian Higher Education: A Thematic Analysis of AUQA Report. AUQA Occassional Publication Series. Melbourne: Australian Universities Quality Agency.Search in Google Scholar

Špaček, D. 2014. “Coordination of and through E-Government: The Case of the Czech Republic.” NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy 7(1), 83 - 106. Search in Google Scholar

Unesco New Papers on Higher Education. 1998. Benchmarking in Higher Education: A Study Conducted by the Commonwealth Higher Education Management Service. New Papers on Higher Education: Studies and Research. Paris: UNESCO.Search in Google Scholar

Van Helden, G. J. and S. Tillema. 2005. “In Search of a Benchmarking Theory for the Public Sector.” Financial Accountability & Management 21, 337 - 361.Search in Google Scholar

Vries, M. and J. Nemec. 2013. “Public Sector Reform: An Overview of Recent Literature and Research on NPM and Alternative Paths.” International Journal of Public Sector Management 36(1), 4–16.Search in Google Scholar

Závada, J., H. Šebková and M. Munsterová. 2006. “Benchmarking v hodnocení kvality vysokých škol.” Aula 14, 83–96. Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo