1. bookVolume 8 (2015): Issue 2 (December 2015)
    Issue Title: Towards Meaningful Measurement: Performance Management at the Crossroads of Internal Efficiency and Social Impacts, Issue Editors: Juraj Nemec, Gyorgy Hajnal Wouter van Dooren Jarmo Vakkuri Aleksander Aristovnik
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1338-4309
ISSN
1337-9038
First Published
03 Aug 2009
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

The Implementation of Performance Management in European Central Governments: More a North-South than an East-West Divide

Published Online: 29 Jan 2016
Volume & Issue: Volume 8 (2015) - Issue 2 (December 2015) - Issue Title: Towards Meaningful Measurement: Performance Management at the Crossroads of Internal Efficiency and Social Impacts, Issue Editors: Juraj Nemec, Gyorgy Hajnal Wouter van Dooren Jarmo Vakkuri Aleksander Aristovnik
Page range: 49 - 68
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1338-4309
ISSN
1337-9038
First Published
03 Aug 2009
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

This article presents the first country-comparative evidence on the importance and use of performance management in European central governments, based on an executive survey conducted in 17 countries. The data confirm that performance management has made its way into European central governments and continues to constitute a major reform trend. At the organizational level of ministries and agencies we find a consistently strong use of strategic planning, performance appraisal and management objectives, along with only a partial institutionalization of a performance-management logic. Scepticism towards measurement and the difficulty of acting upon performance information are persistent challenges. We also find that performance-management implementation is significantly stronger in agencies and larger organizations, and that it varies strongly between different countries. Implementation is substantially higher in Scandinavian countries and Anglo-Saxon countries than in Continental and Southern European countries, with a rather varied pattern for Central and Eastern European countries. The findings thereby confirm the need for a more context-sensitive understanding of performance management, along with the need for more extensive research and evidence to further develop this cross-comparative European perspective.

Keywords

Aberbach, J. D., R. D. Putnam and B. A. Rockman. 1981. Bureaucrats and Politicians in Western Democracies. Cambridge, MA / London: Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674020047Search in Google Scholar

Andrews, R. and G. A. Boyne. 2010. “Capacity, Leadership, and Organizational Performance: Testing the Black Box Model of Public Management.” Public Administration Review 70, 443 - 454.Search in Google Scholar

Askim, J. 2009. “The Demand Side of Performance Measurement: Explaining Councillors’ Utilization of Performance Information in Policymaking.” International Public Management Journal 12, 24 - 47.Search in Google Scholar

Behn, R. D. 2003. “Why Measure Performance ? Diff erent Purposes Require Diff erent Measures.” Public Administration Review 63, 586 - 606.Search in Google Scholar

Bouckaert, G. and J. Halligan. 2008. Managing Performance: International Comparisons. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203935958Search in Google Scholar

Bouckaert, G., V. Nakrošis and J. Nemec. 2011. “Public Administration and Management Reforms in CEE: Main Trajectories and Results.” NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy 4, 9 - 29.Search in Google Scholar

Bouckaert, G., and W. Van Dooren 2009. “Performance Management in Public Sector Organisations.” In T. Bovaird and E. Loffl er (ed.). Public Management and Governance. 2nd edition. London: Routledge, 151 - 164.10.4324/9780203030806Search in Google Scholar

Boyne, G. A. 2002. “Concepts and Indicators of Local Authority Performance: An Evaluation of the Statutory Framework in England and Wales”, Public Money and Management 22, 17 - 24.Search in Google Scholar

Boyne, G. A. 2010a. “Public and Private Management: What’s the Diff erence ?” Journal of Management Studies 39, 97 - 122.Search in Google Scholar

Boyne, G. A. 2010b. “Performance Managament: Does it Work ?” In R. Walker, G. A.10.1017/CBO9780511760587.009Search in Google Scholar

Boyne and G. A. Brewer (eds). Public Management and Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 207 - 226.Search in Google Scholar

Boyne, G. A., K. J. Meier, L. J. O’Toole and R. M. Walker. 2006. Public Service Performance: Perspectives on Measurement and Management. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511488511Search in Google Scholar

Enticott, G. 2004. “Multiple Voices of Modernization: Some Methodological Implications.” Public Administration 82, 743 - 756.Search in Google Scholar

Enticott, G., G. A. Boyne and R. M. Walker. 2009. “The Use of Multiple Informants in Public Administration Research: Data Aggregation Using Organizational Echelons.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 19, 229 - 253.Search in Google Scholar

Frazier, A. and J. Swiss. 2008. “Contrasting Views of Results-Based Management Tools from Different Organizational Levels.” International Public Management Journal 11, 214 - 234.Search in Google Scholar

Hammerschmid, G., A. Oprisor and V. Štimac. 2013b. COCOPS Executive Survey on Public Sector Reform in Europe. Research Report. Berlin. Available at http://www.cocops.eu/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/COCOPS-WP3-Research-Report.pdf (last accessed 01. 10. 2015).Search in Google Scholar

Hammerschmid G., V. Štimac, A. Oprisor and S. Van de Walle. 2014. “Antecedents of Performance Information Use: Explaining Different Uses of Performance Information by Public Managers in 17 European Countries.” Paper presented at the APPAM annual conference, 7 November, in Albuquerque, NM, USA.Search in Google Scholar

Hammerschmid, G., S. Van de Walle and V. Štimac. 2013a. “Internal and External Use of Performance Information in Public Organisations: Results from an International Executive Survey.” Public Money and Management 33, 1 - 16.Search in Google Scholar

Ingraham, P. W., P. G. Joyce and A. K. Donahue. 2003. Government Performance: Why Management Matters. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kickert, W. 2011. “Distinctiveness of Administrative Reform in Greece, Italy, Portugal and Spain: Common Characteristics of Context, Administrations and Reforms.” Public Administration 89, 801 - 818.10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01862.xSearch in Google Scholar

Kroll, A. 2015. “Drivers of Performance Information Use: Systematic Literature Review and Directions for Future Research.” Public Performance & Management Review 38, 459 - 486.Search in Google Scholar

Kroll, A. 2012. Why Public Managers Use Performance: Information Concepts, Theory, and Empirical Analysis. Doctoral dissertation, University of Potsdam.Search in Google Scholar

Kuhlmann, S. and H. Wollmann. 2014. Introduction to Comparative Public Administration: Administrative Systems and Reforms in Europe. Cheltenham / Northhampton: Edward Elgar.Search in Google Scholar

Lodge, M. and C. Hood. 2012. “Into an Age of Multiple Austerities ? Public Management and Public Service Bargains across OECD Countries.” Governance 25, 79 - 101.Search in Google Scholar

March, J. G. and J. P. Olsen. 1989. Rediscovering Institutions. New York: Free Press.Search in Google Scholar

Meyer, R. E. and G. Hammerschmid. 2010. “The Degree of Decentralization and Individual Decision Making in Central Government Human Resource Management: A European Comparative Perspective.” Public Administration 88, 455 - 478. 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2009.01798.xSearch in Google Scholar

Meyer-Sahling, J. H. 2012. “Civil Service Professionalisation in the Western Balkans.” SIGMA Paper 48. Paris: OECD Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Moynihan, D. P. 2008. The Dynamics of Performance Management: Constructing Information and Reform. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Moynihan, D. P. and P. W. Ingraham. 2004. “Integrative Leadership in the Public Sector: A Model of Performance-Information Use.” Administration and Society 36, 427 - 453.Search in Google Scholar

Moynihan, D. P. and S. K. Pandey. 2010. “The Big Question for Performance Management: Why do Managers Use Performance Information ?” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 20, 849 - 866.Search in Google Scholar

Moynihan, D. P. and S. K. Pandey. 2005. “Testing how Management Matters in an Era of Government by Performance Management.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 15, 421 - 439.Search in Google Scholar

Moynihan, D. P., S. K. Pandey and B. E. Wright. 2012. “Prosocial Values and Performance Management Theory: Linking Perceived Social Impact and Performance Information Use.” Governance 25, 463 - 483.Search in Google Scholar

Nemec, J. 2010. “New Public Management and its Implementation in CEE: What do we Know and where do we Go ?” NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy 3, 31 - 52.Search in Google Scholar

OECD. 2005. Modernising Government: The Way Forward. Paris: OECD.Search in Google Scholar

Olsen, J. P. 2003. “Towards a European Administrative Space ?” Journal of European Public Policy 10, 506 - 531.Search in Google Scholar

Painter, M. J. and B. G. Peters. 2010. Tradition and Public Administration. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230289635Search in Google Scholar

Pollitt, C. 2013. “The Logics of Performance Management.” Evaluation 19, 346 - 363.Search in Google Scholar

Pollitt, C. and G. Bouckaert. 2011. Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis - New Public Management, Governance, and the Neo-Weberian State. 3rd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Radin, B. A. 2006. Challenging the Performance Movement: Accountability, Complexity, and Democratic Values. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Randma-Liiv, T. and R. Savi. Forthcoming. “Managing the Public Sector under Fiscal Stress.” In G. Hammerschmid, S. Van de Walle, R. Andrews and P. Bezes (eds). Public Administration Reforms in Europe: The View from the Top. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Search in Google Scholar

Talbot, C. 2005. “Performance Management.” In E. Ferlie, L. E. Lynn and C. Pollitt (eds). The Oxford Handbook of Public Management. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 491 - 517. Taylor, J. 2011. “Factors Infl uencing the Use of Performance Information for Decision Making in Australian State Agencies.” Public Administration 89, 1316 - 1334.Search in Google Scholar

Van Dooren, W., G. Bouckaert and J. Halligan. 2010. Performance Management in the Public Sector. London / New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203030806Search in Google Scholar

Van Dooren, W. and S. Van de Walle, S. 2008. Performance Information in the Public Sector: How it is Used. London: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1007/978-1-137-10541-7Search in Google Scholar

Walker, R. M., G. A. Boyne and G. A. Brewer. 2010. Public Management and Performance: Research Directions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511760587Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo