1. bookVolume 27 (2019): Issue 2 (June 2019)
    Special Issue: Technological Innovations in the Socio-Humanistic Context
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2450-5781
First Published
30 Mar 2017
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

Adaptation of the Idea of Phronesis in Contemporary Approach to Innovation

Published Online: 03 Jun 2019
Volume & Issue: Volume 27 (2019) - Issue 2 (June 2019) - Special Issue: Technological Innovations in the Socio-Humanistic Context
Page range: 84 - 87
Received: 01 Nov 2018
Accepted: 01 Mar 2019
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2450-5781
First Published
30 Mar 2017
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

The article is devoted to the importance of the virtue of prudence and attempts to adapt it in the contemporary discourse on innovation and sustainable development. The authors come from ancient roots, recalling the positions of Socrates, Plato and, above all, Aristotle. They point to the renewed interest of contemporary researchers in the ethics of virtues and point to the important roles of prudence, prudence and responsibility in the approach to innovation. Innovations are captured as an instrumental value and a tool to shape better living conditions, work, study, rest, all forms of human activity and environmental protection. Therefore, their positive character has been exposed, although the authors also pay attention to the risk and possibility of negative effects if the virtues of nature, such as prudence, caution and responsibility are not well-formed. The authors point out that this is particularly important in the education of engineers who shape the innovative landscape of the present, and prove that this applies to mechatronics or robotics specialists, as well as production engineering specialists, because the ethical approach allows for the appropriate design of the entire team of activities from recognizing the need to satisfy it through an efficient, well-prepared, organized and properly managed production process, taking into account the basic principles of sustainable development.

Keywords

[1] G. E. M. Anscombe, „Modern Moral Philosophy”, Philosophy. The Journal of the Royal Institute of Philosophy, Vol. 33, No. 124. (Jan., 1958), pp. 1-19. http://stevewatson.info/readings/philosophical_notes/Anscombe-mmp.pdf:Available (December 9, 2018)Search in Google Scholar

[2] I. Bywater. (Ed.). Aristotelis Ethica Nicomachea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2010.10.1017/CBO9780511697890Search in Google Scholar

[3] P. Aubenque. La prudence chez Aristote. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1963.Search in Google Scholar

[4] K. Boháček. Phronesis and Free Decision. Filozofia, 71, 2016, No. 5, pp. 391.Search in Google Scholar

[5] R. Brázda. “Ctnost” in: Filosofický slovník. Kolektiv autorů, Ed. Olomouc: Nakladatelství Olomouc, 2002, p. 72.Search in Google Scholar

[6] S. Broadie. Ethics with Aristotle. New York: Oxford University Press, 1991.Search in Google Scholar

[7] I. Bywater. (Ed.). Aristotelis Ethica Nicomachea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2010.10.1017/CBO9780511697890Search in Google Scholar

[8] J. Cepko.”Fronésis v Platónovom dialógu „Menón”“. Filosofický časopis, vol. 5 pp. 691-705, 2017.Search in Google Scholar

[9] H. Ciążela, “Etyka odpowiedzialności Hansa Jonasa a „trwały i zrównoważony rozwój” (Imperatywy i dylematy)”, Problemy Ekorozwoju, vol. 1 No 2, pp. 107-114, 2006.Search in Google Scholar

[10] J. M. Cooper. Reason and Human Good in Aristotle. Cambridge, Mass. and London: Harvard University Press, 1975.Search in Google Scholar

[11] T. Engberg-Pedersen. Aristotle’s Theory of Moral Insight. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1983.Search in Google Scholar

[12] J. Filek. Ontologizacja odpowiedzialności: analityczne i historyczne wprowadzenie w problematykę. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Baran i Suszczyński, 1996.Search in Google Scholar

[13] Fraňo, P. Prudentia in the Writings of Marcus Tullius Cicero, Filozofia, 71, 2016, No. 5, pp. 406.Search in Google Scholar

[14] Χ. Γιανναράς, Η Ευρώπη γεννήθηκε από το „σχίσμα”. Αθήνα: Ίκαρος, 2018.Search in Google Scholar

[15] T. Irwin. Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics (translation and notes). Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company, 1985.Search in Google Scholar

[16] H. Jonas. Zasada odpowiedzialności: etyka dla cywilizacji technologicznej. Kraków: Platan, 1996.Search in Google Scholar

[17] H. Jonas. The Imperative of Responsibility, in Search of an Ethics for the Technological Age. Chicago – Londyn: University of Chicago Press, 1984.Search in Google Scholar

[18] Γ. Καραμανώλης, “Η σχέση ηθικής αρετής και φρόνησις στην αριστοτελική ηθική. Υπόμνημα στη Φιλοσοφία”. Αθήνα, vol. 8, pp. 51-78, June 2009.Search in Google Scholar

[19] A. Kiepas. Filozofia techniki w dobie nowych mediów. Katowice: Wydaw. Uniwersytetu Śląskiego, 2017.Search in Google Scholar

[20] V. Konrádová, “Fronésis a problém zvažování”. Filosofický časopis, vol. 5, pp. 707-719, 2017.Search in Google Scholar

[21] A. Kuzior. Aksjologia zrównoważonego rozwoju. Bańska Bystrzyca: Belianum, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

[22] A. Pawłowski. “Wielowymiarowość rozwoju zrównoważonego”. Problemy Ekorozwoju, vol. 1, No 1, pp. 23-32, 2006.Search in Google Scholar

[23] G. Ropohl. “Etyka techniki”, in: Człowiek, technika, środowisko. Człowiek współczesny wobec wyzwań końca wieku, 1nd ed., A. Kiepas, Ed. Katowice: Uniwersytet Śląski. Instytut Filozofii, 1999, pp. 93-107.Search in Google Scholar

[24] L. Skowroński. “Dlaczego konieczne jest nowe polskie tłumaczenie Etyki nikomachejskiej Arystotelesa?” Archiwum Historii Filozofii I Myśli Społecznej, Archive of the History of Philosophy and Social Thought, vol. 56/2011, pp. 53-68.Search in Google Scholar

[25] N. Szutta. (2004, September) “Status współczesnej etyki cnót”. Diametros [Online] 1, pp. s. 70-84. Available: https://www.diametros.iphils.uj.edu.pl/index.php/diametros/article/view/17/13 [Dec. 2018]. DOI https://doi.org/10.13153/diam.1.2004.17Search in Google Scholar

[26] W. Tatarkiewicz. Historia filozofii, t. I. Warszawa: Pań-stwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe, 1988, s. 118-119.Search in Google Scholar

[27] R. R. Walzer, J. M. Mingay (edd.). Aristotelis Ethica Eudemia. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991.Search in Google Scholar

[28] U. Wollner. Opposition Sophrosyne – Phronesis in Plato’s Callicles. Filozofia, 71, 2016, No. 5, pp. 370.Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo