1. bookVolume 27 (2019): Issue 1 (March 2019)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2450-5781
First Published
30 Mar 2017
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

Engineering Risk of Series Production in Automotive Industry

Published Online: 28 Mar 2019
Volume & Issue: Volume 27 (2019) - Issue 1 (March 2019)
Page range: 5 - 11
Received: 01 Jul 2018
Accepted: 01 Nov 2018
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2450-5781
First Published
30 Mar 2017
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

The global objective of this paper is to analyze engineering risk of series production in Automotive Industries based on problems caused by supplied chain of products when a strong process to avoid engineering risk problems is missing. Automotive Industries Companies in Romania use just some theoretical tools like as D-FMEA (Design – Failure Mode and Effect Analysis) for engineering risk in their design products in ADAS domein. The main causes appear after the production starts and sometimes it brings the production to a halt. The risks reveal details of different levels and high risk can be caused by unforeseen challenges during of series production. On this paper, the method for engineering risk of management used is based on project management guide by Paul Roberts adapted to causes identification and risk plan.

Keywords

[1] C.G. Lixandru. “Supplier Quality Management for Component Introduction in the Automotive Industry”, in Proc. of 13th International Symposium in Management, Management During and After the Economic Crisis, vol. 221, 2016, pp. 423-432.10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.132Search in Google Scholar

[2] S. Lacy and I. Macfarlane. Service Transition. London: The Stationery Office, 2007.Search in Google Scholar

[3] S. Volker and G. Prostean. “Research of Automotive Change Management and Combined Risk- Management Models”, in Proc. of 13th International Symposium in Management, Management During and After the Economic Crisis, vol. 221, 2016, pp. 395-404.10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.129Search in Google Scholar

[4] L. Margineanu, G. Prostean and S. Popa. “Conceptual model of management in automotive projects”, in Proc. of 7th World Conference on Educational Sciences, vol. 197, 2015, pp. 1399- 1402.10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.085Search in Google Scholar

[5] D.M. Popa. “Case study of engineering risk in automotive industry”. Management Systems in Production Engineering, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 27-30, 2018.10.2478/mspe-2018-0004Search in Google Scholar

[6] G. Macher, E. Armengaud, E. Brenner and C. Kreiner. “Threat and Risk Assessment Methodologies in the Automotive Domain”, in Proc. of 1st Workshop on Safety & Security Assurance for Critical Infrastructures Protection (S4CIP), vol. 83, 2016, pp. 1288-1294.10.1016/j.procs.2016.04.268Search in Google Scholar

[7] T. Dörfler. “Testing ADAS sensors in early development phases”. ATZelektronik worldwide, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 54-57, Feb. 2018.10.1007/s38314-017-0094-2Search in Google Scholar

[8] J.K. Baruah, R. Bera and S. Dhar. “Ranking of Sensors for ADAS-An MCDM-Based Approach”, in Advances in Communication, Devices and Networking. R. Bera, S.K. Sarkar and S. Chakraborty, Eds. Singapore: Springer, 2018, pp. 563- 571.10.1007/978-981-10-7901-6_61Search in Google Scholar

[9] K. Zimmer, M. Fröhling, P. Breun and F. Schultmann. “Assessing social risks of global supply chains: a quantitative analytical approach and its application to supplier selection in the German automotive industry”. Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 149, pp. 96-100, 2017.10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.041Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo