1. bookVolume 25 (2017): Issue 3 (September 2017)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2450-5781
First Published
30 Mar 2017
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
Open Access

Bottom to Top Approach for Railway KPI Generation

Published Online: 01 Aug 2017
Volume & Issue: Volume 25 (2017) - Issue 3 (September 2017)
Page range: 191 - 198
Received: 01 Oct 2016
Accepted: 01 Apr 2017
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2450-5781
First Published
30 Mar 2017
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

Railway maintenance especially on infrastructure produces a vast amount of data. However, having data is not synonymous with having information; rather, data must be processed to extract information. In railway maintenance, the development of key performance indicators (KPIs) linked to punctuality or capacity can help planned and scheduled maintenance, thus aligning the maintenance department with corporate objectives. There is a need for an improved method to analyse railway data to find the relevant KPIs. The system should support maintainers, answering such questions as what maintenance should be done, where and when. The system should equip the user with the knowledge of the infrastructure’s condition and configuration, and the traffic situation so maintenance resources can be targeted to only those areas needing work. The amount of information is vast, so it must be hierarchized and aggregated; users must filter out the useless indicators. Data are fused by compiling several individual indicators into a single index; the resulting composite indicators measure multidimensional concepts which cannot be captured by a single index. The paper describes a method of monitoring a complex entity. In this scenario, a plurality of use indices and weighting values are used to create a composite and aggregated use index from a combination of lower level use indices and weighting values. The resulting composite and aggregated indicators can be a decision-making tool for asset managers at different hierarchical levels.

Keywords

[1] U. Kumar, D. Galar, A. Parida, C. Stenstron and L. Berges, “Maintenance performance metrics: a state of the art review”, Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 233-277, 2013.10.1108/JQME-05-2013-0029Search in Google Scholar

[2] UNE-EN 15341:2008 Mantenimiento. Indicadores clave de rendimiento del mantenimiento, UNE AENOR, 2008.Search in Google Scholar

[3] V. Boisevert, N. Holec et al., “Economic and Environmental Information for Sustainability. Valuation for sustainable development: methods and policy indicators”, in Valuation for Sustainable Development: Methods and Policy Indicators, S. Faucheux and M. O'Connor, Eds. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 1998, pp. 99-119.Search in Google Scholar

[4] T.J. Wilmering, A.V. Ramesh, Mar. “Assessing the Impact of Health Management Approaches on System Total Cost of Ownership”, in IEEE Aerospace Conference, Big Sky, MT, USA, 2005, pp. 1-11.10.1109/AERO.2005.1559697Search in Google Scholar

[5] A. Parida and U. Kumar, “Maintenance Productivity and Performance Measurement”, in Handbook of Maintenance Management and Engineering, part I, M. Ben-Daya, S.O. Duffuaa, A. Raouf, J. Knezevic and D. Ait-Kadi, Eds., 2009, pp. 17-41.Search in Google Scholar

[6] A. Parida and G. Chattopadhyay, “Development of a multi-criteria hierarchical framework for maintenance performance measurement (MPM)”, Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 241-258, 2007.10.1108/13552510710780276Search in Google Scholar

[7] A. Parida and U. Kumar, “Maintenance performance measurement (MPM): issues and challenges”, Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 239-225, 2006.10.1108/13552510610685084Search in Google Scholar

[8] T. Wireman, Developing performance indicators for managing maintenance. New York: Industrial Press, 1998.Search in Google Scholar

[9] D. Mata, J.M. Aller and A. Bueno, “Análisis Probabilístico del Mantenimiento Predictivo y Correctivo de Máquinas Eléctricas Rotativas en una Planta Siderúrgica”, Universidad, Ciencia y Tecnología, vol. 12, no. 49, 2008.Search in Google Scholar

[10] J. Woodhouse. (2004). Asset Management - An Introduction. Institute of Asset Management [Online]. Available: http://www.iamuk.org/iam_publications.htmSearch in Google Scholar

[11] J.D. Campbell, Uptime: Strategies for Excellence in Maintenance Management, 1st ed., Portland: Productivity Press, 1995.Search in Google Scholar

[12] R.S. Kaplan and D.P. Norton, “The Balanced Scorecard - Measures that Drive Performance”, Harvard Business Review, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 71-79, 1992.Search in Google Scholar

[13] R.S. Kaplan and D.P. Norton, The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action, 1st ed, Boston: Harvard Business Press, 1996.Search in Google Scholar

[14] A. Parida, “Managing Information is the key to Maintenance Effectiveness”, in e-Proc. of Intelligent Maintenance System, Arles, France, 2004, pp. 15-17.Search in Google Scholar

[15] D. Galar et al., “Maintenance decision making based on different types of data fusion”, Eksploatacja i niezawodność - Maintenance and Reliability, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 135-144, 2012.Search in Google Scholar

[16] D. Galar et al., “Integration of disparate data sources to perform maintenance prognosis and optimal decision making”, Insight: Non-Destructive Testing and Condition Monitoring, vol. 54, no. 8, pp. 440-445, 2012.10.1784/insi.2012.54.8.440Search in Google Scholar

[17] L. Soibelman and H. Kim, “Data preparation process for construction knowledge generation through knowledge discovery in databases”, Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 39-48, 2002.10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(2002)16:1(39)Search in Google Scholar

[18] W. Tianhao, F.M. Khan, T.A. Fisher, L.A. Shuler and W.M. Pottenger, “Posting Act Tagging Using Transformation- Based Learning”, in Proc. of the Workshop on Foundations of Data Mining and Discovery, 1992.Search in Google Scholar

[19] C. Stenström, A. Parida, J. Lundberg and U. Kumar, ”Development of an integrity index for benchmarking and monitoring rail infrastructure: application of composite indicators”, International Journal of Rail Transportation, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 61-80, 2015.10.1080/23248378.2015.1015220Search in Google Scholar

[20] C. Stenström and A. Parida, Link and Effect Model for Maintenance of Railway Infrastructure, Research report, Luleå University of Technology, Luleå, 2013.Search in Google Scholar

[21] C. Stenström, “Maintenance performance measurement of railway infrastructure with focus on the Swedish network”, Technical report, Luleå University of Technology, Luleå, 2012.Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo