1. bookVolume 25 (2017): Issue 3 (September 2017)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2450-5781
First Published
30 Mar 2017
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

An Ecosystem Perspective On Asset Management Information

Published Online: 01 Aug 2017
Volume & Issue: Volume 25 (2017) - Issue 3 (September 2017)
Page range: 150 - 157
Received: 01 Oct 2016
Accepted: 01 Mar 2017
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2450-5781
First Published
30 Mar 2017
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

Big Data and Internet of Things will increase the amount of data on asset management exceedingly. Data sharing with an increased number of partners in the area of asset management is important when developing business opportunities and new ecosystems. An asset management ecosystem is a complex set of relationships between parties taking part in asset management actions. In this paper, the current barriers and benefits of data sharing are identified based on the results of an interview study. The main benefits are transparency, access to data and reuse of data. New services can be created by taking advantage of data sharing. The main barriers to sharing data are an unclear view of the data sharing process and difficulties to recognize the benefits of data sharing. For overcoming the barriers in data sharing, this paper applies the ecosystem perspective on asset management information. The approach is explained by using the Swedish railway industry as an example.

Keywords

[1] K. Rong, G. Hu, Y. Lin, Y. Shi and L. Liang, “Understanding business ecosystem using a 6C framework in internet-of-Things-based sectors“, International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 159, pp. 41-55, Jan. 2015.10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.09.003Search in Google Scholar

[2] I. Perko and P. Ototsky, “Big data for Business Ecosystem Players”, Our Economy, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 12-24, 2016.10.1515/ngoe-2016-0008Search in Google Scholar

[3] S. Dawes and T. Pardo, “Maximizing knowledge for program evaluation: critical issues and practical challenges of ICT strategies”, in Proc. of The 5th International Conference on Electronic Government (EGOV), Kraków, Poland, 2006, pp. 58-69.10.1007/11823100_6Search in Google Scholar

[4] S. Dawes. (2012). A realistic look at open data [Online]. Available: http://www.w3.org/2012/06/pmod/pmod2012_submission_38.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

[5] D.M. Strong, Y.W. Lee and R.Y. Wang, “10 potholes in the road to information quality”, Computer, vol. 30, no. 8, pp. 38-46, 1997.10.1109/2.607057Search in Google Scholar

[6] ISO 55000:2014 Asset management - Overview, principles and terminology, ISO, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

[7] N.A. Hastings, Physical asset management, vol. 2, London: Springer, 2010.10.1007/978-1-84882-751-6Search in Google Scholar

[8] ISO 55001:2014 Asset management - Management systems - Requirements, ISO, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

[9] M. Kans and A. Ingwald, ”Functionality Gaps in IT Systems for Maintenance Management”, International Journal of COMADEM, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 38-50, 2012.Search in Google Scholar

[10] ISO 55002:2014 Asset management - Management systems - Guidelines for the application of ISO 55001, ISO, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

[11] P. Murray-Rust, “Open data in science”, Serials Review, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 52-64, 2008.10.1080/00987913.2008.10765152Search in Google Scholar

[12] L. James. (2013), Defining Open Data [Online]. Available: http://blog.okfn.org/2013/10/03/defining-opendata/#sthash.k9hxc6ER.dpufSearch in Google Scholar

[13] M. Chernoff. (2010). What “open data” means - and what it doesn’t [Online]. Available: https://opensource.com/government/10/12/what-%22opendata%22-means-%E2%80%93-and-what-it-doesn%E2%80%99tSearch in Google Scholar

[14] J.C. Wallis, E. Rolando and C.L. Borgman, “If we share data, will anyone use them? Data sharing and reuse in the long tail of science and technology”, PloS ONE, vol. 8, no. 7, 2013.10.1371/journal.pone.0067332372077923935830Search in Google Scholar

[15] Y. Kim and J.M. Stanton, “Institutional and individual influences on scientists’ data sharing practices”, Journal of Computational Science Education, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 47-56, 2012.10.22369/issn.2153-4136/3/1/6Search in Google Scholar

[16] B.L. Strom, M. Buyse, J. Hughes and B.M. Knoppers, “Data sharing, year 1-access to data from industrysponsored clinical trials”, New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 371, no. 22, pp. 2052-2054, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

[17] C. Harrison, “GlaxoSmithKline opens the door on clinical data sharing”, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, vol. 11, no. 12, pp. 891-892, 2012.10.1038/nrd390723197021Search in Google Scholar

[18] M. Janssen, Y. Charalabidis and A. Zuiderwijk, “Benefits, adoption barriers and myths of open data and open government”, Information Systems Management, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 258-268, 2012.10.1080/10580530.2012.716740Search in Google Scholar

[19] D.S. Sayogo and T.A. Pardo, “Exploring the determinants of scientific data sharing: Understanding the motivation to publish research data”, Government Information Quarterly, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. S19-S31, Jan. 2013.10.1016/j.giq.2012.06.011Search in Google Scholar

[20] A. Ingwald and M. Kans, ”Service Management Models for Railway Infrastructure, an Ecosystem Perspective”, in Proc. of The 10th World Congress on Engineering Asset Management (WCEAM 2015), Tampere, Finland, 2016, pp. 289-303.10.1007/978-3-319-27064-7_28Search in Google Scholar

[21] P. Cousins, R. Lamming, B. Lawson and B. Squire, Strategic Supply Management. Principles, Theories and Practice. Essex: Pearson Education Limited, 2008.Search in Google Scholar

[22] J.F. Moore, “Predators and Prey”, Harvard Business Review, vol. 71, no. 3, pp. 75-86, 1993.Search in Google Scholar

[23] N-G. Olve, M. Cöster, E. Iveroth, C-J. Petri and A. Westelius, Prissättning - Affärsekologier, affärsmodeller, prismodeller. Lund: Studentlitteratur AB, 2013.Search in Google Scholar

[24] M. Hirsch, D. Opresnik, C. Zanetti and M. Taisch, “Leveraging Assets as a Service for Business Intelligence in Manufacturing Service ecosystems”, in 2013 IEEE 10th International Conference on e-Business Engineering (ICEBE), Los Alamitos, CA, USA.10.1109/ICEBE.2013.25Search in Google Scholar

[25] M. Kans, D. Galar and A. Thaduri, “Maintenance 4.0 in Railway Transportation Industry”, in Proc. of The 10th World Congress on Engineering Asset Management (WCEAM 2015), 2016, pp. 317-331.10.1007/978-3-319-27064-7_30Search in Google Scholar

[26] S. Lingegård, “Integrated product service offerings for rail and road infrastructure - reviewing applicability in Sweden”, Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Management and Engineering, Linköping University, Sweden, 2014.10.3384/diss.diva-110015Search in Google Scholar

[27] U. Ericson, “Drift- och underhållsstrategi”, Trafikverket, TDOK 2014:0165, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

[28] Open Knowledge International. (2005). The Open Definition [Online] Available: https://okfn.org/projects/open-definition/Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo