1. bookVolume 35 (2017): Issue 1 (March 2017)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2083-134X
First Published
16 Apr 2011
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
Open Access

Effect of magnesium substitution on structural and dielectric properties of LiNiPO4

Published Online: 24 Feb 2017
Volume & Issue: Volume 35 (2017) - Issue 1 (March 2017)
Page range: 66 - 80
Received: 31 Mar 2016
Accepted: 28 Nov 2016
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2083-134X
First Published
16 Apr 2011
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

The aim of this paper is to study the effect of Mg2+ doping in place of Ni in LiNiPO4 compounds synthesized by solid state reaction method. As Mg is a relatively light and cheap, and is expected to stabilize the structure, it has been considered as a substituent for Ni. The structural and conductivity studies of the substituted phases are discussed in comparison with LiNiPO4. In this study, we have proposed cation-substituted compounds, LiNi1–xMgxPO4 (x = 0, 0.05, 0.1 and 0.15) where a part of the divalent state of Ni2+ is replaced with the corresponding amount of Mg2+ and where the charge compensation is maintained by lithium deficiency. It is possible to obtain the mentioned compounds because the pristine LiNiPO4 compound is stable in ambient atmosphere, which differs considerably from the LiCoPO4 compound.

Keywords

Introduction

Energy is a fundamental component in the daily lives of human society, and it can be used in different forms in our day-to-day activities. In recent years, energy demand has increased due to high energy consumption in different fields such as industry, transportation and household [14]. In this context, lithium-ion battery technology currently plays an important role in producing alternative energy storage devices, because of its inherent outstanding characteristics [58]. The technology offers the greatest development potential for automobile industry, particularly for electric vehicles (EV) and hybrid electric vehicles (HEV), which substitute electricity for a portion of petroleum used to power the vehicles. One of the challenges for improving the performance of lithium ion batteries to meet the demanding requirements for energy storage is the development of suitable cathode materials. Cathode materials must be able to accept lithium ions repeatedly (for recharging) and release lithium ions quickly (for high current). Transition metal oxides based on spinel and olivine structures have been shown to be promising but improvements are needed to reduce their cost and extend effective lifetime [911]. Particularly, olivine structured materials (LiMPO4) are expected to bring an improvement in cycling stability and enhance the power due to the reduction of the lithium-ion diffusion length. The performance of cathode materials can be improved by doping, but the interpretation of doping effects can be complicated due to the interrelations between doping, microstructure and morphology, since the microstructure formed can be affected by the dopant addition [1215].

This paper deals with the synthesis and characterization of LiNi1–xMgxPO4 (x = 0, 0.05, 0.1 and 0.15) obtained by solid state reaction method. The materials were characterized for phase purity and cation environment by X-ray diffraction. Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy was used to study the local order. Electrical properties were studied by impedance spectroscopy. The structural and conductivity studies of the substituted phases were discussed in comparison with LiNiPO4.

Experimental

The cathode compositions were synthesized by a solid-state reaction method from stoichiometric amounts of Li2CO3 (Merck 99.9 %), NiO (Merck 99.9 %), MgO (Merck 99.9 %) and (NH4)3PO4 (Merck 99.9 %). The solid state reaction synthesis method involved three steps. First, the precursors, as raw materials, were well mixed and thoroughly ground, then subjected to heat treatment at a temperature of 120 °C for 12 hours and 500 °C for 4 hours to obtain the samples free of gases. Finally, the mixture was reground and sintered at a temperature of 850 °C for 20 hours to complete the chemical reaction.

The powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) data of the sample was collected on a Rigaku CuKα diffractometer with diffraction angles of 10° to 50° in increments of 0.02°. The unit cell lattice parameter was obtained by the unit cell software from the 2θ and (h k l) values. The particle morphology of the powders was observed using field effect scanning electron microscopy images taken from Carl Zeiss, EVOMA 15, Oxford Instruments, Inca Penta FETx3.JPG. Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectra were obtained on a Shimadzu FT-IR-8900 spectrometer using KBr pellet technique in the wave number range between 400 cm– 1 and 1300 cm−1. The impedance study was performed by a Hioki 3532-50 LCR Hitester in the frequency range of 50 Hz to 5 MHz at the temperature range from room temperature to 150 °C.

X-ray diffraction

The X-ray diffraction was used to obtain information about the structure, composition and the state of polycrystalline materials. Fig. 1 shows the X-ray diffraction patterns of the LiNi1–xMgxPO4 (x = 0, 0.05, 0.1 and 0.15) cathode materials synthesized by solid state reaction method. It was found that all the peaks could be indexed to a single phase of ordered olivine type structure belonging to orthorhombic Pnma space group. No peaks related to alternative phases have been detected in the pattern. Thus, it can be concluded that the series of high purity LiNi1–xMgxPO4 (x = 0, 0.05, 0.1 and 0.15) cathode materials was synthesized from the LiNiPO4 material described previously. Similar to the pure LiNiPO4, in the doped LiNi1–xMgxPO4 (x = 0, 0.05, 0.1, and 0.15) samples, the transition metal ion still occupied the octahedral M2+ site homogeneously, in a ratio determined by the precursor material. All diffraction peaks are sharp and distinguishable [1618].

XRD spectra of LiNi1–xMgxPO4 (x = 0, 0.05, 0.1 and 0.15).

Based on the XRD graphs, lattice parameters for prepared compounds were calculated using Unit cell (1991) software and summarized in Table 1. A linear correlation between lattice parameters and the content of magnesium in the composition has been found. Lattice parameters a and b decreased linearly with the increasing ratio of magnesium due to the smaller Shannon radii of Ni (0.69 Å) compared to Mg (0.71 Å). The lattice parameter c remained unchanged. For the magnesium doped LiNi1–xMgxPO4 (x = 0, 0.05, 0.1 and 0.15) cathode materials, lattice parameters a and b are slightly larger than those of pure LiNiPO4 sample with the same composition [1922].

Lattice parameters, space group and cell volume for different compounds.

Compounda[Å]b [Å]c [Å]Space groupCell volume [Å]3
LiNiPO410.03455.85244.6629Pnma273.8411
LiNi0.95Mg0.05PO410.03415.87624.6669Pnma275.1785
LiNi0.90Mg0.10PO410.05335.85614.6554Pnma274.0853
LiNi0.85Mg0.15PO410.04015.85984.6682Pnma275.1785

SEM with EDS

The powder morphology of the samples at different magnifications was determined for a series of olivine structures of LiNi1–xMgxPO4 (x = 0, 0.05, 0.1 and 0.15) prepared by solid-state reaction method. As shown in Fig. 2, the powder samples exhibit relatively uniform grain size distribution, revealing the well-developed crystallinity, confirmed also by the XRD patterns. In addition, the synthesized samples exhibit porous structure, which facilitates faster penetration of the electrolyte through the cathode material.

SEM image of LiNi1–xMgxPO4 (x = 0, 0.05, 0.1 and 0.15); (a) LiNiPO4; (b) LiNi0.95Mg0.05PO4; (c) LiNi0.90Mg0.10PO4; (d) LiNi0.85Mg0.15PO4.

However, some exceptionally large particles are observed in addition to the smaller ones. From the grain size, morphological changes resulting from the variation of the composition of the substituted cations Li and Mg in the samples are clearly seen [2325]. The average grain size is in the range of 10 µm for all samples. It has also been revealed that when the amount of substituted Mg increases, the grain size decreases, which is consistent with the crystallinity nature observed by XRD.

The compositional homogeneity of nickel, magnesium, oxygen and phosphorous has been examined by EDS. As shown in Fig. 3, there are no other impurity peaks in the spectra besides Ni, P, Mg and O. Since the titration of the light element lithium is difficult with this spectroscopic technique, it was not possible to assess the lithium content.

EDS spectra for LiNi1–xMgxPO4 (x = 0, 0.05, 0.1 and 0.15); (a) LiNiPO4; (b) LiNi0.95Mg0.05PO4; (c) LiNi0.90Mg0.10PO4; (d) LiNi0.85Mg0.15PO4.

FT-IR

Fig. 4 shows the FT-IR spectra of the LiNi1–xMgxPO4 (x = 0, 0.05, 0.1 and 0.15) compounds.

FT-IR spectra for LiNi1–xMgxPO4 (x = 0, 0.05, 0.1 and 0.15).

From the Fourier transform study, we observe that the fundamental frequencies of PO4 polyanions are split due to the correlation effect which, in turn, is induced by the coupling of M–O bonds. As a result, the vibrational spectra of LiNi1–xMgxPO4 (x = 0, 0.05, 0.1 and 0.15) are dominated by the fundamental vibrations of PO4 polyanions, which is not unusual. Fig. 4 shows four fundamental vibrations of PO4, such as stretching mode around ν1: 940 cm–1, a doublet at around ν2: 525 cm–1 and two triplets viz., ν3 and ν4 in the region of 1059 cm–1 to 1102 cm–1 and at 732 cm–1. Further, the peaks observed at the 547 cm–1 and 580 cm–1 region are attributed to the asymmetric stretching modes of NiO6 octahedra, thus, confirming the formation of LiNi1–xMgxPO4 (x = 0, 0.05, 0.1 and 0.15). Basically, ν1 and ν3 modes involve the symmetric and antisymmetric stretching vibration of the P–O bonds, where as ν2 and ν4 modes involve mainly O-P–O symmetric and antisymmetric bending modes with a small contribution of P vibration [26]. The vibrational modes and band assignments in LiNi1–xMgxPO4 (x = 0, 0.05, 0.1 and 0.15) are presented in Table 2.

Vibrational spectra data (cm–1) and band assignments in LiNi1–xMgxPO4(x = 0, 0.05, 0.1 and 0.15).

Infrared wave number [cm–1]
x = 0x = 0.05x = 0.1x = 0.15Assignment
477457446446v (Li–O)
525525529527v (Ni–O)
547548548548v2 (PO4)3–
580569568568v2 (PO4)3–
653649649649v4 (PO4)3–
940937949949v1 (PO4)3–
1057106010641035v3 (PO4)3–
1100109110901094v3 (PO4)3–
1150113911401134v3 (PO4)3–

Impedance analysis

The complex impedance spectroscopy (CIS), sometimes called AC impedance spectroscopy, is a useful characterization technique for investigating the electrical properties of materials. Moreover, the CIS measurement technique is also useful to investigate the temperature and frequency dependent behavior of AC conductivity and dielectric constant. The results obtained from these analyses can provide information about the electrical behavior of the samples [27, 28]. In the present study, the electrical properties of LiNi1–xMgxPO4 (x = 0, 0.05, 0.1 and 0.15) compounds were studied in the temperature range of 30 °C to 150 °C in the frequency range of 50 Hz to 5 MHz. The measured impedance data can be represented in different forms, using the inter relations as follows:

– complex impedance Z* = Z′ - jZ″,

– complex modulus M* = M′ +jM″ = jωC0Z*,

– complex permittivity ε* = ε′ – jε″

where j=1,${\text{j}} = \sqrt { - 1} ,$ C0 is the vacuum capacitance and ω = 2πf is the angular frequency. (Z′, M′, ε′) and (Z″, M″, ε″) are the real and imaginary components of impedance, modulus and permittivity.

Nyquist plots

The cole-cole/Nyquist plots of LiNi1–xMgxPO4 (x = 0, 0.05, 0.1 and 0.15) samples measured at various temperatures are shown in Fig. 5.

Nyquist plots for the compounds LiNi1–xMgxPO4 (a) x = 0, (b) x = 0.05, (c) x = 0.1, (d) x = 0.15.

There are two semicircles in each impedance spectrum. The low frequency semicircle is due to the grain boundary and the high frequency semicircle depicts the bulk (grain) effect. The obtained curves for each sample appear in the form of single semicircles at various temperatures. No other curves are observed in the lower frequency region. Therefore, the semicircles of each sample are attributed to bulk conductivity, suggesting that the conductivity is of mixed electronic and ionic character. As shown in the figure, in the plots of Z′ (the real part of the impedance) against Z″ (the imaginary part of the impedance), each arc begins from lower frequencies to the right direction of the Z′-axis and ends to the left direction of Z′-axis at higher frequencies. It is observed that resistivity of the samples dramatically decreases with the increase in temperature. As a result, the diameter of the semicircle decreases with increasing temperature. On the other hand, it is observed that all arcs in the impedance plots are not perfect semicircles, which means that the highest frequency arcs do not intersect with the Z′ axis [2931].

The variations of real (Z′) and imaginary (Z″) part of impedance with frequency at different temperatures of LiNi1–xMgxPO4 (x = 0, 0.05, 0.1 and 0.15) are shown in Fig. 6 and Fig. 7.

Variation of Z′ with frequency for the compounds LiNi1–xMgxPO4 (a) x = 0, (b) x = 0.05, (c) x = 0.1, (d) x = 0.15.

Variation of Z″ with frequency for the compounds LiNi1–xMgxPO4 (a) x = 0, (b) x = 0.05, (c) x = 0.1, (d) x = 0.15.

The value of Z′ decreases with an increase in frequency at low temperatures. The peak position shifts towards higher frequency side with a rise in temperature, as well as the width of the peak is also broadened with increasing temperature. The asymmetric broadening of the peaks in Z′ with frequency suggests that there is a spread of relaxation time. Also the shifting of relaxation peak indicates the existence of a temperature dependent electrical relaxation phenomenon in the material. The use of the imaginary part of the impedance (Z″) is particularly appropriate for resistivity and/or conductivity analysis (when the long range conductivity is dominant) [32, 33].

Dielectric constant (∊′)

The variation of the dielectric constant (ε′) as a function of frequency (50 Hz to 5 MHz) at room temperature to 150 °C for LiNi1–xMgxPO4 (x = 0, 0.05, 0.1 and 0.15) samples is shown in Fig. 8.

Variation of real part of dielectric permittivity (ε′) with frequency for the compounds LiNi1–xMgxPO4 (a) x = 0, (b) x = 0.05, (c) x = 0.1, (d) x = 0.15.

From the frequency dependent plot of ε′, it is observed that the value of ε′ decreases sharply as the frequency increases and attains a constant limiting value, at which ε′ becomes almost frequency independent. The higher values of dielectric constant at low frequencies can be due to pile-up of charges at the interfaces between the sample and the electrode. This can be explained based on the behavior of dipole movement as follows. Dielectric behavior of samples with frequency is related to the applied electric field. An alternating electric field changes its direction with time. With each direction reversal, the polarization components are required to follow the field reversal. So, the polarization depends on the ability of dipoles to orient themselves in the direction of the field during each alternative change of the field. At low frequency regions the dipoles will get sufficient time to orient themselves completely along the direction of the field, resulting in larger values of ε′ of the samples. As the frequency increases further, the dipoles in the sample cannot reorient themselves fast enough to respond to the applied electric field, resulting in the decrease in ε′ of the samples and becoming almost constant [34, 35].

Dielectric permittivity (ε″) and dielectric loss (tanδ)

The dielectric loss can be divided into three parts: conduction losses, dipole losses and vibrational losses. The loss that is attributed to conduction presumably involves the migration of ions over large distances. This motion is the same as that occurring under direct current conduction. The variation of dielectric permittivity (ε″) with frequency is shown in Fig. 9. The variation of the dielectric loss tanδ with the frequency at different temperatures is shown in Fig. 10 for the compound LiNi1–xMgxPO4 (x = 0, 0.05, 0.1 and 0.15). The magnitude of the dielectric loss increases with an increase in temperature. At low temperature, conduction losses have minimum value. As the temperature increases AC conductivity also increases, so the conduction losses increase. This leads to an increase of the value of tanδ with temperature. The increase of the dielectric loss at low frequency is due to dipole polarization [3638].

Variation of imaginary part of dielectric permittivity (ε″) with frequency for the compounds LiNi1–xMgxPO4 (a) x = 0, (b) x = 0.05, (c) x = 0.1, (d) x = 0.15.

Variation of tanδ with frequency for the compounds LiNi1–xMgxPO4 (a) x = 0, (b) x = 0.05, (c) x = 0.1, (d) x = 0.15.

AC conductivity (σac)

The electrical conductivity studies of the synthesized compounds have been carried out over a frequency range of 50 Hz to 5 MHz in the temperature range of 30 °C to 150 °C. The conductivities are found to be ~10–6 S/cm at room temperature and higher temperature respectively for all the doped samples. The AC conductivity is calculated from dielectric data using the relation: σac=ωεrε0tanδ$$\begin{align}{\sigma _{ac}} = \omega {\varepsilon _r}{\varepsilon _0}\tan \delta\end{align}$$ where ω = 2πf.

The calculated conductivity results for all samples at different temperature ranges are compared in Table 3. The obtained results are found to be dependent on temperature as well as concentration of substituted Mg ions. It is observed that the conductivity of each sample increases with an increase in temperature, indicating that the electrical conduction in the samples is a thermally activated process. Thus, the observed electrical conductivity is found to occur due to the hopping of small polarons associated with the behavior of changeable oxidation state of the transition metal ions. As the temperature increases, the polarons have sufficient thermal energy to get activated and jump over the barrier and that is why larger values of conductivity of the samples are observed at higher temperatures. Also, the room temperature conductivity is found to be 9.47 × 10–10, 2.95 × 10–9, 9.62 × 10–10, 9.80 × 10–10 S/cm for LiNi1–xMgxPO4 (x = 0, 0.05, 0.1 and 0.15), respectively. These results are in the range of the electrical conductivity of semiconductors (10–10 S/cm to 10–9 S/cm), indicating the semiconductor behavior of the samples [39, 40].

Activation energies for different compounds at 100 kHz.

CompoundAC conductivity [S/cm]Activation energy [eV]
LiNiPO49.47 × 10–100.47
LiNi0.95Mg0.05PO42.95 × 10–90.56
LiNi0.90Mg0.10PO49.62 × 10–100.52
LiNi0.85Mg0.15PO49.80 × 10–100.66

The variation of the AC conductivity as a function of frequency (from 50 Hz to 5 MHz) at room temperature to 150 °C for LiNi1–xMgxPO4 (x = 0, 0.05, 0.1 and 0.15) samples is shown in Fig. 11. It is clearly observed that the AC conductivity curves show two distinct regions. The first one is the low frequency region in which the conductivity is almost frequency independent, which corresponds to the random hopping of charges. The second one is the high frequency region in which the conductivity increases rapidly and reaches the highest value at 5 MHz, corresponding to frequency dependent conductivity. This behavior is characteristic of hopping of charges between the trap levels situated in the band gap. These two types of conductivities are observed in all samples.

Variation of AC conductivity with frequency for the compounds LiNi1–xMgxPO4 (a) x = 0, (b) x = 0.05, (c) x = 0.1, (d) x = 0.15.

Electric modulus

The electric modulus data were calculated using the real and imaginary parts of the measured impedance data and the pellet dimensions. The relaxation behavior was analyzed using the complex electric modulus (M* = M′ + jM″) formalism. The calculated M as a function of frequency for LiNi1–xMgxPO4 (x = 0, 0.05, 0.1, and 0.15) samples were fitted to the Kohlrausch-William-Watts (KWW) expression. Fig. 12 shows the imaginary part of electric modulus M′ vs. logf spectra obtained from RT to 150 °C for the synthesized compounds. From the figure, it is observed that the shape of each curve is of asymmetric non-Lorentzian type, exhibiting a peak at the relaxation frequency with a long tail extending in the region of shorter relaxation time and a shift in peak height and frequency.

Variation of M′ with frequency for the compounds LiNi1–xMgxPO4 (a) x = 0, (b) x = 0.05, (c) x = 0.1, (d) x = 0.15.

A comparison of the experimental data in the M* and ε* formalism is useful to distinguish the long-range conduction process from the localized dielectric relaxation. To visualize this, we have plotted the imaginary part of complex dielectric permittivity (ε″) and modulus (M′) as a function of frequency for olivine LiNi1–xMgxPO4 (x = 0, 0.05, 0.1 and 0.15) cathode materials. Dielectric relaxation is a result of the reorientation process of dipoles in the metal-ion chains, which shows a peak in ε″ spectra. For cathode materials (with higher ionic concentration), the movement of ions from one site to another will perturb the electric potential of the surroundings. Motion of the other ions in this region will be affected by the perturbed potential. Such a cooperative motion of ions will lead to non-exponential decay, or a conduction processes with distribution of relaxation time. It has been observed that in the real part of modulus spectra, a relaxation peak occurs for the conductivity processes, whereas no peak is observed in the dielectric spectra. This suggests that the ionic motion and electronic segmental motion are strongly coupled, manifesting as a single peak in the M′ spectra with no corresponding feature in dielectric spectra. So, the conduction in cathode materials takes place through charge migration of ions between coordinated sites of the polymer along with the segmental relaxation of polymer. An enhanced ionic conduction is a natural consequence of a type of cathode material [41, 42].

Activation energy (Ea)

The increase in conductivity with increasing temperature indicates a characteristic activated behavior in the studied temperature range. Analysis of the frequency-dependent conductivity suggests that the electrical conduction in lithium orthophosphates is presumably caused by the hopping of lithium ions between octahedral sites of the olivine framework. At room temperature, conductivity is found to be 10–8 S/cm, since the increased repulsion between Li+ and M2+ cations reduces the strength of the Li–O bonds resulting in higher conductivity. From impedance measurements, the activation energies Ea was derived from Arrhenius equation, yielding activation energy in the range of 4 eV for LiNi1–xMgxPO4 (x = 0, 0.05, 0.1 and 0.15). Fig. 13 shows that the activation energy decreases with the increasing magnesium concentration. The change in the activation energy is due to the lattice shrinkage [43].

Arrhenius plots for LiNi1–xMgxPO4 (a) x = 0, (b) x = 0.05, (c) x = 0.1, (d) x = 0.15.

Conclusions

The magnesium substituted olivine LiNi1–xMgxPO4 (x = 0, 0.05, 0.1 and, 0.15) cathode materials have been successfully synthesized by solid-state reaction method at low temperature. Different properties of the materials were studied using different techniques. The XRD studies confirmed that all the synthesized samples belong to the Pnma space group. It was also observed that an increase of the Mg content x = 0, 0.05, 0.1 and 0.15 caused the decrease in lattice parameter, unit cell volume and crystallite size. The porosity nature of the samples was also observed in SEM studies. An increase in wave number for most of the bands indicated that both the P–O and M–O (Ni or Mg) bonds strengthened as a result of substitution of Mg in LiNi1–xMgxPO4 due to the transverse asymmetric mode of vibration. Both the dielectric constant (ε′) and dielectric loss (ε″) increased with temperature and decreased with frequency through the studied ranges. The dielectric constant may be attributed to orientation and space charge polarization respectively, as the temperature dependence of the dielectric loss is associated with the conduction loss.

XRD spectra of LiNi1–xMgxPO4 (x = 0, 0.05, 0.1 and 0.15).
XRD spectra of LiNi1–xMgxPO4 (x = 0, 0.05, 0.1 and 0.15).

SEM image of LiNi1–xMgxPO4 (x = 0, 0.05, 0.1 and 0.15); (a) LiNiPO4; (b) LiNi0.95Mg0.05PO4; (c) LiNi0.90Mg0.10PO4; (d) LiNi0.85Mg0.15PO4.
SEM image of LiNi1–xMgxPO4 (x = 0, 0.05, 0.1 and 0.15); (a) LiNiPO4; (b) LiNi0.95Mg0.05PO4; (c) LiNi0.90Mg0.10PO4; (d) LiNi0.85Mg0.15PO4.

EDS spectra for LiNi1–xMgxPO4 (x = 0, 0.05, 0.1 and 0.15); (a) LiNiPO4; (b) LiNi0.95Mg0.05PO4; (c) LiNi0.90Mg0.10PO4; (d) LiNi0.85Mg0.15PO4.
EDS spectra for LiNi1–xMgxPO4 (x = 0, 0.05, 0.1 and 0.15); (a) LiNiPO4; (b) LiNi0.95Mg0.05PO4; (c) LiNi0.90Mg0.10PO4; (d) LiNi0.85Mg0.15PO4.

FT-IR spectra for LiNi1–xMgxPO4 (x = 0, 0.05, 0.1 and 0.15).
FT-IR spectra for LiNi1–xMgxPO4 (x = 0, 0.05, 0.1 and 0.15).

Nyquist plots for the compounds LiNi1–xMgxPO4 (a) x = 0, (b) x = 0.05, (c) x = 0.1, (d) x = 0.15.
Nyquist plots for the compounds LiNi1–xMgxPO4 (a) x = 0, (b) x = 0.05, (c) x = 0.1, (d) x = 0.15.

Variation of Z′ with frequency for the compounds LiNi1–xMgxPO4 (a) x = 0, (b) x = 0.05, (c) x = 0.1, (d) x = 0.15.
Variation of Z′ with frequency for the compounds LiNi1–xMgxPO4 (a) x = 0, (b) x = 0.05, (c) x = 0.1, (d) x = 0.15.

Variation of Z″ with frequency for the compounds LiNi1–xMgxPO4 (a) x = 0, (b) x = 0.05, (c) x = 0.1, (d) x = 0.15.
Variation of Z″ with frequency for the compounds LiNi1–xMgxPO4 (a) x = 0, (b) x = 0.05, (c) x = 0.1, (d) x = 0.15.

Variation of real part of dielectric permittivity (ε′) with frequency for the compounds LiNi1–xMgxPO4 (a) x = 0, (b) x = 0.05, (c) x = 0.1, (d) x = 0.15.
Variation of real part of dielectric permittivity (ε′) with frequency for the compounds LiNi1–xMgxPO4 (a) x = 0, (b) x = 0.05, (c) x = 0.1, (d) x = 0.15.

Variation of imaginary part of dielectric permittivity (ε″) with frequency for the compounds LiNi1–xMgxPO4 (a) x = 0, (b) x = 0.05, (c) x = 0.1, (d) x = 0.15.
Variation of imaginary part of dielectric permittivity (ε″) with frequency for the compounds LiNi1–xMgxPO4 (a) x = 0, (b) x = 0.05, (c) x = 0.1, (d) x = 0.15.

Variation of tanδ with frequency for the compounds LiNi1–xMgxPO4 (a) x = 0, (b) x = 0.05, (c) x = 0.1, (d) x = 0.15.
Variation of tanδ with frequency for the compounds LiNi1–xMgxPO4 (a) x = 0, (b) x = 0.05, (c) x = 0.1, (d) x = 0.15.

Variation of AC conductivity with frequency for the compounds LiNi1–xMgxPO4 (a) x = 0, (b) x = 0.05, (c) x = 0.1, (d) x = 0.15.
Variation of AC conductivity with frequency for the compounds LiNi1–xMgxPO4 (a) x = 0, (b) x = 0.05, (c) x = 0.1, (d) x = 0.15.

Variation of M′ with frequency for the compounds LiNi1–xMgxPO4 (a) x = 0, (b) x = 0.05, (c) x = 0.1, (d) x = 0.15.
Variation of M′ with frequency for the compounds LiNi1–xMgxPO4 (a) x = 0, (b) x = 0.05, (c) x = 0.1, (d) x = 0.15.

Arrhenius plots for LiNi1–xMgxPO4 (a) x = 0, (b) x = 0.05, (c) x = 0.1, (d) x = 0.15.
Arrhenius plots for LiNi1–xMgxPO4 (a) x = 0, (b) x = 0.05, (c) x = 0.1, (d) x = 0.15.

Vibrational spectra data (cm–1) and band assignments in LiNi1–xMgxPO4(x = 0, 0.05, 0.1 and 0.15).

Infrared wave number [cm–1]
x = 0x = 0.05x = 0.1x = 0.15Assignment
477457446446v (Li–O)
525525529527v (Ni–O)
547548548548v2 (PO4)3–
580569568568v2 (PO4)3–
653649649649v4 (PO4)3–
940937949949v1 (PO4)3–
1057106010641035v3 (PO4)3–
1100109110901094v3 (PO4)3–
1150113911401134v3 (PO4)3–

Activation energies for different compounds at 100 kHz.

CompoundAC conductivity [S/cm]Activation energy [eV]
LiNiPO49.47 × 10–100.47
LiNi0.95Mg0.05PO42.95 × 10–90.56
LiNi0.90Mg0.10PO49.62 × 10–100.52
LiNi0.85Mg0.15PO49.80 × 10–100.66

Lattice parameters, space group and cell volume for different compounds.

Compounda[Å]b [Å]c [Å]Space groupCell volume [Å]3
LiNiPO410.03455.85244.6629Pnma273.8411
LiNi0.95Mg0.05PO410.03415.87624.6669Pnma275.1785
LiNi0.90Mg0.10PO410.05335.85614.6554Pnma274.0853
LiNi0.85Mg0.15PO410.04015.85984.6682Pnma275.1785

Tarascon J.M., Armand M., Nature, 414 (2001), 359.TarasconJ.M.,ArmandM.,Nature414200135910.1038/35104644Search in Google Scholar

Morgan D., van der Ven A., Ceder G., Electrochem. Solid St., 7 (2004), A30.MorganD.,van der VenA.,CederG.,Electrochem. Solid St72004A3010.1149/1.1633511Search in Google Scholar

Okada S., Sawa S., Egashira M., Yamaki J., Tabuchi M., Kageyama H., Konishi T., Yoshino A., J. Power Sources, 97 – 98 (2001), 430.OkadaS.,SawaS.,EgashiraM.,YamakiJ.,TabuchiM.,KageyamaH.,KonishiT.,YoshinoA.,J. Power Sources, 9798200143010.1016/S0378-7753(01)00631-0Search in Google Scholar

Fisher C.A.J., Hart Prieto V.M., Saiful Islam M., Chem. Mater., 20 (2008), 5907.FisherC.A.J.,Hart PrietoV.M.,Saiful Islam M., Chem. Mater202008590710.1021/cm801262xSearch in Google Scholar

Bhuvaneswari D., Gangulibabu, Doh C.H., Kalaiselvi N., Int. J. Electrochem. Sc., 6 (2011), 3714.BhuvaneswariD.,Gangulibabu DohC.H.,KalaiselviN.,Int. J. Electrochem. Sc620113714Search in Google Scholar

Koleva V., Stoyanova R., Zhecheva E., Eur. J. Inorg. Chem., 1 (2010), 127.KolevaV.,StoyanovaR.,ZhechevaE.,Eur. J. Inorg. Chem1201012710.1002/ejic.200900736Search in Google Scholar

Minakshi M., Singh P., Appadoo D., Martin D.E., Electrochim. Acta, 56 (2011), 4356.MinakshiM.,SinghP.,AppadooD.,MartinD.E.,Electrochim. Acta562011435610.1016/j.electacta.2011.01.017Search in Google Scholar

Yang G., Ni H., Liu H., Gao P., JI H., Roy S., Pinto J., Jiang X., J. Power Sources, 196 (2011), 4747.YangG.,NiH.,LiuH.,GaoP.,JiH.,RoyS.,PintoJ.,JiangX.,J. Power Sources1962011474710.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.01.064Search in Google Scholar

Shanmukaraj D., Murugan R., Ionics, 10 (2004), 88.ShanmukarajD.,MuruganR.,Ionics1020048810.1007/BF02410312Search in Google Scholar

Julien C., Camacho Lopez M.A., Mohan T., Chitra S., Kalyani P., Gopukumar S., Solid State Ionics, 135 (2000), 241.JulienC.,Camacho LopezM.A.,MohanT.,ChitraS.,KalyaniP.,GopukumarS.,Solid State Ionics135200024110.1016/S0167-2738(00)00370-2Search in Google Scholar

Padhi A.K., Nanjundaswamy K.S., Goodenough J.B., J. Electrochem. Soc., 144 (1997), 1188.PadhiA.K.,NanjundaswamyK.S.,Goode-noughJ.B.,J. Electrochem. Soc1441997118810.1149/1.1837571Search in Google Scholar

Wolfenstine J., Allen J., J. Power Sources, 142 (2005) 389.WolfenstineJ.,AllenJ.,J. Power Sources142200538910.1016/j.jpowsour.2004.11.024Search in Google Scholar

Muralidharan P., Venkateswarlu M., Satyanarayana N., Solid State Ionics, 166 (2004), 27.MuralidharanP.,VenkateswarluM.,SatyanarayanaN.,Solid State Ionics16620042710.1016/j.ssi.2003.10.011Search in Google Scholar

Su J., Wei B.Q., Rong J.P., Yin W.Y., Ye Z.X., Tian X.Q., Ren L., Cao M.H., Hu C.W., J. Solid State Chem., 184 (2011), 2909.SuJ.,WeiB.Q.,RongJ.P.,YinW.Y.,YeZ.X.,TianX.Q.,RenL.,CaoM.H.,HuC.W.,J. Solid State Chem1842011290910.1016/j.jssc.2011.08.042Search in Google Scholar

Broussely M., Biensan P., Simon B., Electrochim. Acta, 45 (1999), 3.BrousselyM.,BiensanP.,SimonB.,Electrochim. Acta451999310.1016/S0013-4686(99)00189-9Search in Google Scholar

Chen J., Vacchio M.J., Wang S., Chernova N., Zavalij P.Y., Wittingham M.S., Solid State Ionics, 178 (2008), 1676.ChenJ.,VacchioM.J.,WangS.,ChernovaN.,ZavalijP.Y.,WittinghamM.S.,Solid State Ionics1782008167610.1016/j.ssi.2007.10.015Search in Google Scholar

Sanusi A., Navaratnam S., Basirun W.J., Malays. J. Anal. Sci., 18 (2014), 522.SanusiA.,NavaratnamS.,BasirunW.J.,Malays. J. Anal. Sci182014522Search in Google Scholar

Gangulibabu, Bhuvaneswari D., Kalaiselvi N., Jayaprakash N., Periasamy P., J. Sol-Gel Sci. Techn., 49 (2009), 137.GangulibabuBhuvaneswariD.,KalaiselviN.,JayaprakashN.,PeriasamyP.,J. Sol-Gel Sci. Techn49200913710.1007/s10971-008-1870-5Search in Google Scholar

Qinga R., Yang M.C., Meng Y.S., Sigmund W., Electrochim. Acta, 108 (2013), 827.QingaR.,YangM.C.,MengY.S.,SigmundW.,Electrochim. Acta108201382710.1016/j.electacta.2013.07.032Search in Google Scholar

Takahashi M., Tobishima S., Takei K., Sakurai Y., J. Power Sources, 97-98 (2001), 508.TakahashiM.,TobishimaS.,TakeiK.,SakuraiY.,J. Power Sources9798200150810.1016/S0378-7753(01)00728-5Search in Google Scholar

Kim S.W., Kim J., Gwon H., Kang K., J. Electrochem. Soc., 156 (2009), A635.KimS.W.,KimJ.,GwonH.,KangK.,J. Electrochem. Soc1562009A63510.1149/1.3138705Search in Google Scholar

Iriyama Y., Kako T., Yada C., Abe T., Ogumi Z., Solid State Ionics, 176 (2005), 2395.IriyamaY.,KakoT.,YadaC.,AbeT.,OgumiZ.,Solid State Ionics1762005239510.1016/j.ssi.2005.06.026Search in Google Scholar

Muraliganth T., Manthiram A., J. Phys. Chem. C, 114 (2010), 15530.MuraliganthT.,ManthiramA.,J. Phys. Chem. C11420101553010.1021/jp1055107Search in Google Scholar

Amine K., Yasuda H., Yamachi M., Solid State Lett., 3 (2000), 178.AmineK.,YasudaH.,YamachiM.,Solid State Lett3200017810.1149/1.1390994Search in Google Scholar

Ait Salah A., Jozwiak P., Garbarczyk J., Benkhouja K., Zaghib K., Gendron F., Julien C.M., J. Power Sources, 140 (2005), 370.Ait SalahA.,JozwiakP.,GarbarczykJ.,BenkhoujaK.,ZaghibK.,GendronF.,JulienC.M.,J. Power Sources140200537010.1016/j.jpowsour.2004.08.029Search in Google Scholar

Rouier A., Nazri G.A., Julian C., Ionics, 3 (1997), 170.RouierA.,NazriG.A.,JulianC.,Ionics3199717010.1007/BF02375613Search in Google Scholar

MacDonald J. R., Impedance Spectroscopy, Wiley, New York, 1987.MacDonaldJ. R.,Impedance SpectroscopyWiley, New York1987Search in Google Scholar

Irvine J.T.C., Sinclair D.C., West A.R., Adv. Mater., 2 (1990) 138-140.IrvineJ.T.C.,SinclairD.C.,WestA.R.,Adv. Mater2199013814010.1002/adma.19900020304Search in Google Scholar

Ellis B., Herle P.S., Rho Y.H., Nazar L.F., Dunlap R., Perry L.K., Ryan D.H., Faraday Discuss., 134 (2007) 119.EllisB.,HerleP.S.,RhoY.H.,NazarL.F.,DunlapR.,PerryL.K.,RyanD.H.,Faraday Discuss134200711910.1039/B602698BSearch in Google Scholar

Wilk P., Marzec J., Molenda J., Solid State Ionics, 157 (2003), 109.WilkP.,MarzecJ.,MolendaJ.,Solid State Ionics157200310910.1016/S0167-2738(02)00196-0Search in Google Scholar

Bohnke O., Emery J., Fourquet J.L., Solid State Ionics, 158 (2003), 119.BohnkeO.,EmeryJ.,FourquetJ.L.,Solid State Ionics158200311910.1016/S0167-2738(02)00720-8Search in Google Scholar

Rissouli K., Benkhouja K., Ramos-Barrado J.R., Julien C., Mater. Sci. Eng. B-Adv., 98 (2003), 185.RissouliK.,BenkhoujaK.,Ramos-BarradoJ.R.,JulienC.,Mater. Sci. Eng. B-Adv98200318510.1016/S0921-5107(02)00574-3Search in Google Scholar

Ben Bechir M., Ben Rhaiem A., Guidara K., B. Mater. Sci., 37 (2014)1.Ben BechirM.,Ben RhaiemA.,GuidaraK.,B. Mater. Sci372014110.1007/s12034-014-0622-0Search in Google Scholar

Julien C.M., Mauger A., Zaghib K., Veillette R., Groult H., Ionics, 18 (2012)625.JulienC.M.,MaugerA.,ZaghibK.,VeilletteR.,GroultH.,Ionics18201262510.1007/s11581-012-0671-6Search in Google Scholar

Aranda M.A.G., Bruque S., Ramos Barrado J.R., Attfield J.P., Solid State Ionics, 63 – 65 (1993), 407.ArandaM.A.G.BruqueS.,Ramos BarradoJ.R.,AttfieldJ.P.,Solid State Ionics6365199340710.1016/0167-2738(93)90136-QSearch in Google Scholar

Prabhu M., Selvasekarapandian S., Kulkarni A.R., Karthikeyan S., Sanjeeviraja C., T. Nonferr. Metal. Soc., 22 (2012), 342.PrabhuM.,SelvasekarapandianS.,KulkarniA.R.,KarthikeyanS.,SanjeevirajaC.,T. Nonferr. Metal. Soc22201234210.1016/S1003-6326(11)61181-3Search in Google Scholar

Ben Rhaiem A., Hlel F., Guidara K., Gargouri M., J. Alloy. Compd., 485 (2009), 718.Ben RhaiemA.,HlelF.,GuidaraK.,GargouriM.,J. Alloy. Compd485200971810.1016/j.jallcom.2009.06.062Search in Google Scholar

Jin B., Gu H.B., Solid State Ionics, 178 (2008), 1907.JinB.,GuH.B.,Solid State Ionics1782008190710.1016/j.ssi.2007.12.057Search in Google Scholar

Bharadwaja S.S.N., Krupanidhi S.B., Thin Solid Films, 391 (2001), 126.BharadwajaS.S.N.,KrupanidhiS.B.,Thin Solid Films391200112610.1016/S0040-6090(01)00911-7Search in Google Scholar

Orliukas A., Dindune A., Kanepe Z., Solid State Ionics, 157 (2003), 177.OrliukasA.,DinduneA.,KanepeZ.,Solid State Ionics157200317710.1016/S0167-2738(02)00206-0Search in Google Scholar

Prabu M., Selvasekarapandian S., Kulkarni A.R., Karthikeyan S., Hirankumar G., Sanjeeviraja C., Ionics, 17 (2011), 201.PrabuM.,SelvasekarapandianS.,KulkarniA.R.,KarthikeyanS.,HirankumarG.,SanjeevirajaC.,Ionics17201120110.1007/s11581-011-0535-5Search in Google Scholar

Moynihan C.T., Bosech L.P., Laberge N.L., Phys. Chem. Glass-B, 14 (1973), 122.MoynihanC.T.,BosechL.P.,LabergeN.L.,Phys. Chem. Glass-B141973122Search in Google Scholar

Selwin Joseyphus R., Viswanathan E., Justin Dhanaraj C., Joseph J., J. K. Saudi Univ. Sc., 24 (2012), 233.Selwin JoseyphusR.,ViswanathanE.,Justin DhanarajC.,JosephJ.,J. K. Saudi Univ. Sc24201223310.1016/j.jksus.2011.03.004Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo