Cite

Fig. 1

SEM images and mapping of elements distribution on the surface of studied sample after the reduction process.
SEM images and mapping of elements distribution on the surface of studied sample after the reduction process.

Fig. 2

XRD patterns of investigated samples (1, 2, 3, 5, 6, designation as in Fig. 3) and reference sample 0 (not subjected to nitriding).
XRD patterns of investigated samples (1, 2, 3, 5, 6, designation as in Fig. 3) and reference sample 0 (not subjected to nitriding).

Fig. 3

The dependence of nitriding degree on logarithm of nitriding potential for the iron nitriding (solid line) and iron nitrides reduction (dashed line). Phase composition obtained from XRD measurements is indicated on both vertical axes.
The dependence of nitriding degree on logarithm of nitriding potential for the iron nitriding (solid line) and iron nitrides reduction (dashed line). Phase composition obtained from XRD measurements is indicated on both vertical axes.

Fig. 4

Experimental (symbols) and fitted (solid line) magnetic resonance spectra of samples 1 to 6.
Experimental (symbols) and fitted (solid line) magnetic resonance spectra of samples 1 to 6.

Fig. 5

Graphical presentation of two spectral parameters (resonance field, linewidth) for each component in all investigated samples. Each rectangle collects components arising from the same phase.
Graphical presentation of two spectral parameters (resonance field, linewidth) for each component in all investigated samples. Each rectangle collects components arising from the same phase.

Values of the FMR/EPR parameters (Ai – amplitude, H0i – resonance field, ΔHi – linewidth) for four components (two in case of sample 3) of the observed spectra. Each component has been attributed to a specific phase detected in XRD measurements. In each case (except for sample 3 with Lorentzian lineshape) the Dysonian lineshape of a particular component was assumed. Subscripts L and h stand for low and high field components of a specific phase, respectively.

SampleParameter
A1[a.u]H01[G]ΔH1[G]A2[a.u]H02[G]ΔH2[G]A3[a.u]H03[G]ΔH3[G]A4[a.u]H04[G]ΔH4[G]
18.8(1)285(5)(α-Fe(N))L3840(9)1.1(1)4225(5)(α-Fe(N))h2600(5)6.7(1)1890(5)(γ′-Fe4−xN)L4390(5)2.7(1)3250(5)γ′-Fe4−xN)h3270(5)
26.9(1)260(5)(α-Fe(N))L3900(5)1.4(1)4560(5)(α-Fe(N))h3045(5)6.1(1)1920(5)(γ′-Fe4−xN)L4540(5)3.2(1)3410(5)(γ′-Fe4−xN)h3710(5)
330(1)3340(5)(ε-Fex(N))h320(5)1.7(1)2910(5)(ε-Fex(N))L1960(5)
47.1(1)155(5)(α-Fe(N))L4665(5)1.9(1)5260(5)(α-Fe(N))h3680(5)6.5(1)2210(5)(γ′-Fe4−xN)L5185(5)4.1(5)3890(5)(γ′-Fe4−xN)h4370(5)
52.2(1)4770(5)(α-Fe(N))h4195(5)6.0(1)3370(5)(γ′-Fe4−xN)h5015(5)11.2(1)1385(5)(γ′-Fe4−xN)L6490(5)1.8(1)~ 0(20)(α-Fe(N))L2135(5)
65.2(1)3355(5)(γ′-Fe4−xN)h6180(5)2.2(1)5300(5)(α-Fe(N))h5475(5)7.8(1)1090(5)(γ′-Fe4−xN)L5690(5)2.7(1)45(5)(α-Fe(N))L3000(5)

Values of the effective uniaxial anisotropy field of different phases in investigated samples and relative integrated intensity ratio of α-Fe(N)/γ′-Fe4−xN phases calculated from FMR spectra.

Sample
123456
Effective uniaxial anisotropy fieldPhase
α−Fe(N)2630(8)2860(8)3401(7)3182(8)3506(8)
Ha [G]γ′-Fe4−xN905(5)995(5)1123(5)1324(6)1512(6)
Relative integrated intensity ratio of α−Fe(N)/ γ′-Fe4−xN phases from FMR spectra0.86(2)0.70(2)0.71(2)0.08(1)0.20(2)
eISSN:
2083-134X
Language:
English
Publication timeframe:
4 times per year
Journal Subjects:
Materials Sciences, other, Nanomaterials, Functional and Smart Materials, Materials Characterization and Properties