[1. Algan, Y., Murtin, F., Beasley E., Higa, K., Senik, C. (2019). Correction: Well-Being Through the Lens of the Internet // PLoS ONE. Vol. 14, No. 1, e0211586. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.021158610.1371/journal.pone.0211586]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Bailey, S. J. (2011). The Evolving Governance of Public Services in England: Extending Competition, Choice, Co-design and Co-production // Innovation and Public Sector. Vol. 15: Innovations in Public Governance, pp. 68-88. doi: 10.3233/978-1-60750-727-7-6810.3233/978-1-60750-727-7-68]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[3. Bel, G., Hebdon, R., Warner, M. (2018). Beyond Privatisation and Cost Savings: Alternatives for Local Government Reform // Local Government Studies. doi: 10.1080/03003930.2018.142819010.1080/03003930.2018.1428190]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[4. Bovaird, T., Loeffler, E. (2012). From Engagement to Co-production: The Contribution of Users and Communities to Outcomes and Public Value // Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations. Vol. 23, No. 4, pp. 1119–1138. doi: 10.1007/s11266-012-9309-610.1007/s11266-012-9309-6]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[5. Brudney, J. L. (1987). Coproduction and Privatization: Exploring the Relationship and Its Implications // Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly. Vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 11–21. doi: 10.1177/08997640870160030310.1177/089976408701600303]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[6. Danish Competition and Consumer Authority (2016). Public sector activities in commercial markets. Internet access: <https://www.en.kfst.dk/analyser/kfst/publikationer/engelsk/2016/20160526-regulation-for-public-players-on-commercial-markets/>, [accessed May 6, 2019].]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Dehkordy, S. F., Carlos, R. C., Hall, K. S., Dalton, V. K. (2014). Novel Data Sources for Women’s Health Research: Mapping Breast Screening Online Information Seeking Through Google Trends // Acad Radiol. Vol. 21, No. 9, pp. 1172–1176. doi:10.1016/j.acra.2014.05.00510.1016/j.acra.2014.05.005]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[8. European Commission (2016). State-Owned Enterprises in the EU: Lesson Learnt and Ways Forward in a Post-Crisis Context. Institutional Paper 031. Internet access: <https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/file_import/ip031_en_2.pdf>, [accessed May 7, 2019].]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Lindgren, S. (2010). YouTube Gunmen? Mapping Participatory Media Discourse on School Shooting Videos // Media, Culture & Society. Vol. 33, No. 1, pp. 1–14. doi: 10.1177/016344371038652710.1177/0163443710386527]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[10. Maas, B. (2019). Short-Term Forecasting of the US Unemployment Rate. MPRA Paper No. 94066.10.1002/for.2630]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Mellon, J. (2014). Internet Search Data and Issue Salience: The Properties of Google Trends as a Measure of Issue Salience // Journal of Elections, Public Opinion & Parties. Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 45–72. doi: 10.1080/17457289.2013.84634610.1080/17457289.2013.846346]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[12. Mira, J. J., Carrillo, I., Navarro I. M., Guilabert, M., Vitaller, J., Pérez-Jover, V., Aguado H. (2018). Public Participation in Health. A Review of Reviews // Anales del Sistema Sanitario de Navarra. Vol. 41, No. 1, pp. 91–106. doi: 10.23938/ASSN.017210.23938/ASSN.0172]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Nuti, S. V., Wayda, B., Ranasinghe, I., Wang, S., Dreyer, R. P., Chen, S. I., et al. (2014). The Use of Google Trends in Health Care Research: A Systematic Review // PLoS ONE. Vol. 9, No. 10. e109583. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.010958310.1371/journal.pone.0109583]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Osborne, S. P., Radnor, Z., Strokosch, K. (2016). Co-Production and the Co-Creation of Value in Public Services: A Suitable Case for Treatment? // Public Management Review. Vol. 18, No. 5, pp. 639–653. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2015.111192710.1080/14719037.2015.1111927]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[15. Pestoff, V. (2014). Collective Action and the Sustainability of Co-Production // Public Management Review. Vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 383–401. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2013.84146010.1080/14719037.2013.841460]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[16. Ramírez-Montoya, M. S., García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2018). Co-creation and Open Innovation: Systematic Literature Review // Comunicar. Vol. 26, No. 54. doi:10.3916/C54-2018-0110.3916/C54-2018-01]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[17. Sicilia, M., Guarini, E., Sancino, A., Andreani, M., Ruffini, R. (2016). Public Services Management and Co-Production in Multi-Level Governance Settings // International Review of Administrative Science. Vol. 82, No. 1, pp. 8–27. doi: 10.1177/002085231456600810.1177/0020852314566008]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[18. Sorrentino, M., Sicilia, M., Howlett, M. (2018). Understanding Co-Production as a New Public Governance Tool // Policy and Society. Vol. 37, No. 3, pp. 277–293. doi: 10.1080/14494035.2018.152167610.1080/14494035.2018.1521676]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[19. Talbot, C. R. (2011). Paradoxes and Prospects of ‘Public Value’ // Public Money & Management. Vol. 31, No. 1, pp. 27–34. doi. 10.1080/09540962.2011.54554410.1080/09540962.2011.545544]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[20. Vanleene, D., Verschuere, B., Voets, J. (2015). Benefits and Risks of Co-Production. A Preliminary Literature Review. – Paper for the IIAS Conference on co-production of public services.]Search in Google Scholar
[21. Voorberg, W., Bekkers, V., Flemig, S., Timeus, K., Tõnurist, P., Tummers, L. (2017). Does Co-creation Impact Public Service Delivery? The Importance of State and Governance Traditions // Public Money & Management. Vol. 37, No. 5, pp. 365–372. doi: 10.1080/09540962.2017.132879810.1080/09540962.2017.1328798]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[22. Wang, H., Xiong, W., Wu, G., Zhu, D. (2018). Public–Private Partnership in Public Administration Discipline: A Literature Review // Public Management Review. Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 293–316. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2017.131344510.1080/14719037.2017.1313445]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[23. Xue, M., Harker, P. T. (2003). Service Co-Production, Customer Efficiency and Market Competition. – Working paper, Wharton School Center for Financial Institutions, University of Pennsylvania.]Search in Google Scholar