1. bookVolume 18 (2017): Issue 1 (April 2017)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1647-659X
First Published
01 Mar 2016
Publication timeframe
3 times per year
Languages
English
Open Access

Anatomia da Linguagem: Podemos Compreender Jogos de Linguagem a Partir de Redes Corticais?

Published Online: 06 Jun 2017
Volume & Issue: Volume 18 (2017) - Issue 1 (April 2017)
Page range: 84 - 109
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1647-659X
First Published
01 Mar 2016
Publication timeframe
3 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

There is today much interest in research of neuronal substrata in metaphor processing. It has been suggested that the right hemisphere yields a key role in the comprehension of figurative language (non-literal) and, particularly, in metaphors. Figurative language is included in pragmatics, a branch of linguistics that researches the use of language, in opposition to the study of the system of language. There lingers, though, an open debate in respect to the identification of the specific aspects concerning semantics, as opposed to those dominated by pragmatics. Can studies from neuronal correlates clarify questions that relate to semantics/pragmatics representation? I shall analyze neuroscientific developments about implicit language to attempt to understand, in section 2, scientific techniques available and more suitable to the phenomenology of the act of understanding an implicit, figurative or implicated message in a certain language game. To do so, I shall start by reviewing the studies in philosophy of language, and accommodate the development of the research in pragmatics underlying metaphor, particularly, in Philosophical Investigations by Wittgenstein. Finally, I discuss the possibility of interpretative capabilities being socioculturally grounded. I expect this methodological analysis to contribute to the enlightenment of the problem of phenomenology of intersubjective pragmatics, and to its future experimental paradigms.

Keywords

Albertazzi, L. (Ed.). (2000). Meaning and cognition: A multidisciplinary approach. John Benjamins Publishing.10.1075/celcr.2Search in Google Scholar

Altmann, G.T.M. (2006). History of Psycholinguistics. in K. Brown (ed). The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics (2nd edition). Elsevier.10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/04157-2Search in Google Scholar

Austin, J.L. (1979). Philosophical papers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/019283021X.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Austin, J.L. (1962). Sense and Sensibilia. (Warnock, ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Beaty, R.E., Silvia, P.J., & Benedek, M. (2017). Brain networks underlying novel metaphor production. Brain and Cognition, 111, 163-170.10.1016/j.bandc.2016.12.004Search in Google Scholar

Baker, C.L., & McCarthy, J.J. (Eds). (1981). The logical problem of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Beeman, M.J., & Chiarello, C. (1998). Complementary right-and left-hemisphere language comprehension. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 7(1), 2-8.10.1111/1467-8721.ep11521805Search in Google Scholar

Borg, E. (2007). Minimalism versus contextualism in semantics (pp. 339-359). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Beeman, M., Friedman, R.B., Grafman, J., Perez, E., Diamond, S., & Lindsay, M.B. (1994). Summation priming and coarse semantic coding in the right hemisphere. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 6, 26-45.10.1162/jocn.1994.6.1.26Search in Google Scholar

Blumenthal, A.L. (1987). The emergence of psycholinguistics. Synthese, 72, 313–323.10.1007/BF00413749Search in Google Scholar

Bloomfield, L. (1914). Introduction to the study of language. New York: Henry Holt and Company.Search in Google Scholar

Bottini, G., Corcoran, R., Sterzi, R., Paulesu, E., Schenone, P., Scarpa, P., Frackowiak, R.S.J., & Frith, C.D. (1994). The role of the right hemisphere in the interpretation of figurative aspects of language: A positron emission tomography activation study. Brain, 117, 1241–1253.10.1093/brain/117.6.1241Search in Google Scholar

Brown, R. (1973). A first language: The early stages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.4159/harvard.9780674732469Search in Google Scholar

Brownell, H.H., Potter, H.H., Bihrle, A.M., & Gardner, H. (1986). Inference deficits in right brain-damaged patients. Brain and Language, 29, 310–321.10.1016/0093-934X(86)90022-2Search in Google Scholar

Buswell, G.T. (1922). Fundamental reading habits: A study of their development. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bransford, J.D., & Johnson, M.K. (1972). Contextual prerequisites for understanding: Some investigations of comprehension and recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 717-726.10.1016/S0022-5371(72)80006-9Search in Google Scholar

Cardillo, E.R., Watson, C., & Chatterjee, A. (2016). Stimulus needs are a moving target: 240 additional matched literal and metaphorical sentences for testing neural hypotheses about metaphor. Behavior research methods, 1-13.Search in Google Scholar

Catania, A.C. (1998). The taxonomy of verbal behavior. In: K.A. Lattal, & M. Perone (Eds), Handbook of research methods in human operant behavior (pp. 405–433). New York: Plenum.Search in Google Scholar

Caplan, R., & Dapretto, M. (2001). Making sense during conversation: An fMRI study. NeuroReport, 12, 3625–3632.10.1097/00001756-200111160-00050Search in Google Scholar

Cappelen, H., & LePore, E. (2005). Quotation, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2012 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2012/entries/quotation/>.Search in Google Scholar

Cattell, J. (1886). The time it takes to see and name objects. Mind, 11, 63–65.10.1093/mind/os-XI.41.63Search in Google Scholar

Delbrück, B. (1901). Grundfragen der Sprachforschung; mit rücksicht auf W. Wundt’s Sprachpsychologie. Strassburg: Trabner.10.1515/9783111457642Search in Google Scholar

Dronkers, N.F. (1996). A new brain region for coordinating speech articulation. Nature, 384 (6605), 159.10.1038/384159a0Search in Google Scholar

Elmer, S. (2016). Broca Pars Triangularis Constitutes a “Hub” of the Language-Control Network during Simultaneous Language Translation. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10.10.3389/fnhum.2016.00491Search in Google Scholar

Eviatar, Z., & Just., M.A. (2006). Brain correlates of discourse processing: An fMRI investigation of irony and conventional metaphor comprehension. Neurpsychologia, 44, 2348-2359.10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.05.007Search in Google Scholar

Ferstl, E.C., & Von Cramon, D.Y. (2001). The role of coherence and cohesion in text comprehension: An event-related fMRI study. Cognitive Brain Research, 11, 325–340.10.1016/S0926-6410(01)00007-6Search in Google Scholar

Frege, G. (1879). Concept script, a formal language of pure thought modelled upon that of arithmetic. In: J. Van Heijenoort (ed.) From Frege to Gödel: A Source Book in Mathematical Logic: 1879-1931. Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press, 1967.Search in Google Scholar

Frege, G. (1948 [1892]), Sense and reference. The philosophical review, 57(3), 209-230.10.2307/2181485Search in Google Scholar

Freud, S. (1975). The psychopathology of everyday life (Trans. A. Tyson). Harmondsworth, UK:Penguin (originally published 1901).Search in Google Scholar

Gallagher, S. (2016). On the limits of finding human identity in the brain. Modern Believing, 57(2), 121-130.10.3828/mb.2016.10Search in Google Scholar

Gallagher, H.L., & Frith, C.D. (2003). Functional imaging of ‘theory of mind’. Trends in Cognitive Neuroscience, 7, 77–83.10.1016/S1364-6613(02)00025-6Search in Google Scholar

Gallagher, S., & Hutto, D. (2008). Understanding others through primary interaction and narrative practice. The shared mind: Perspectives on intersubjectivity, 12, 17-38.10.1075/celcr.12.04galSearch in Google Scholar

Gernsbacher, M.A. (1990) Language comprehension as structure building. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.10.21236/ADA221854Search in Google Scholar

Giora, R. (1997). Understanding figurative and literal language: The graded salience hypothesis. Cognitive Linguistics, 7, 183–206.10.1515/cogl.1997.8.3.183Search in Google Scholar

Grice, H.P. (1991). Studies in the Way of Words. Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Huey, E.B. (1908). The psychology and pedagogy of reading. New York: Macmillan.Search in Google Scholar

Hutto, D.D. (2012). Folk psychological narratives: The sociocultural basis of understanding reasons. MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

King, J., & Stanley, J. (2005). Semantics, pragmatics, and the role of semantic content. Semantics versus pragmatics, 111-164.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199251520.003.0005Search in Google Scholar

Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95, 163–182.10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.163Search in Google Scholar

Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). The metaphorical structure of the human conceptual system. Cognitive science, 4(2), 195-208.10.1207/s15516709cog0402_4Search in Google Scholar

Lenneberg, E.H. (1967). Biological foundations of language. New York: Wiley.Search in Google Scholar

Levelt, W. (2014). A history of psycholinguistics: The pre-Chomskyan era. Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Maguire, E.A., Frith, C.D., & Morris, R.G.M. (1999). The functional neuroanatomy of comprehension and memory: The importance of prior knowledge. Brain, 122, 1839–1850.10.1093/brain/122.10.1839Search in Google Scholar

Mason, R.A., & Just, M.A. (2004). How the brain processes causal inferences in text: A theoretical account of generation and integration component processes utilizing both cerebral hemispheres. Psychological Science, 15, 1–7.10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.01501001.xSearch in Google Scholar

Mason, R.A., & Just, M.A. (2006). Neuroimaging contributions to the understanding of discourse processes. Handbook of psycholinguistics, 799.10.1016/B978-012369374-7/50020-1Search in Google Scholar

Minsky, M. (Ed.) (1968). Semantic information processing. Cambridge, MA: MIT.Search in Google Scholar

Murphy, G.L., & Medin, D.L. (1985). The role of theories in conceptual coherence. Psychological review, 92(3), 289.10.1037/0033-295X.92.3.289Search in Google Scholar

Quillian, M.R. (1968). Semantic memory. In: M. Minksy (Ed.), Semantic information processing. Cambridge, MA; MIT Press, 227–270.Search in Google Scholar

Myers, J.L., & O’Brien, E.J. (1998). Accessing the discourse representation during reading. Discourse Processes, 26, 131–157.10.1080/01638539809545042Search in Google Scholar

Myers, J.L., Shinjo, M., & Duffy, S.A. (1987). Degree of causal relatedness and memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 26(4), 453-465.10.1016/0749-596X(87)90101-XSearch in Google Scholar

Reber, A.S. (1987). The rise and (surprisingly rapid) fall of psycholinguistics. Synthese, 72: 325-339.Search in Google Scholar

Recanati, F. (2005). Literalism and contextualism: Some varieties. In: G. Preyer and G. Peter (eds.), Contextualism in philosophy: Knowledge, meaning, and truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 171-196.Search in Google Scholar

Reboul A. & Moeschler J. (1998), Pragmatique du discours. De l’interprétation de l’énoncé à l’interprétation du discours, Paris, Armand Colin (U linguistique).Search in Google Scholar

Reichle, E.D. & Mason, R.A. (2006). The neural signatures of causal inferences: A preliminary computational account of brain-imaging and behavioral data. In: F. Schmalhofer, & C.A. Perfetti (Eds), Higher level language processes in the brain: Inference and comprehension processes. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Search in Google Scholar

Robertson, D.A., Gernsbacher, M.A., Guidotti, S.J., Robertson, R.R.W., Irwin, W., Mock, B.J., & Campana, M.E. (2000). Functional neuroanatomy of the cognitive process of mapping during discourse comprehension. Psychological Science, 11, 255–260.10.1111/1467-9280.00251Search in Google Scholar

Russell, B. (2009). The philosophy of logical atomism. Routledge.10.4324/9780203864777Search in Google Scholar

Russell, B. (2005). On denoting. Mind, 114(456), 873-887.10.1093/mind/fzi873Search in Google Scholar

Searle, J.R. (1985). Expression and meaning: Studies in the theory of speech acts. Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Searle, J.R. (1965). What is a Speech Act?. England: Penguin books.Search in Google Scholar

Searle, J.R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language (Vol. 626). Cambridge university press.10.1017/CBO9781139173438Search in Google Scholar

Schmidt, G.L., & Seger, C.A. (2009). Neural correlates of metaphor processing: the roles of figurativeness, familiarity and difficulty. Brain and cognition, 71(3), 375-386.10.1016/j.bandc.2009.06.001Search in Google Scholar

Skinner, B.F. (1983). Verbal Behavior, 1957. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Search in Google Scholar

Sperber, D., Wilson, D., (1986). Relevance: Communication and cognition (Vol. 142). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Stanley, J., & Gendler Szabó, Z. (2000). On quantifier domain restriction. Mind & Language, 15(2-3), 219-261.10.1111/1468-0017.00130Search in Google Scholar

St George, M., Kutas, M., Martinez, A., & Sereno, M.I. (1999). Semantic integration in reading: engagement of the right hemisphere during discourse processing. Brain, 122(7), 1317-1325.10.1093/brain/122.7.1317Search in Google Scholar

Tinker, M.A. (1936). Reliability and validity of eye-movement measures of reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 19, 732–746.10.1037/h0060561Search in Google Scholar

Tomitch, L.M.B., Just, M.A., & Newman, S.D. (2004). Main idea identification: a functional imaging study of a complex language comprehension process. In C. Rodrigues, & L.M.B. Tomitch (Eds.), Linguagem e o Cérebro Humano: Contribuições multidisciplinares (pp. 167-175). ATMED editora, Portoalegre.Search in Google Scholar

Tremblay, P., & Dick, A.S. (2016). Broca and Wernicke are dead, or moving past the classic model of language neurobiology. Brain and Language, 162, 60-71.10.1016/j.bandl.2016.08.004Search in Google Scholar

Thompson, H.E., Henshall, L., & Jefferies, E. (2016). The role of the right hemisphere in semantic control: A case-series comparison of right and left hemisphere stroke. Neuropsychologia, 85, 44-61.10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.02.030Search in Google Scholar

Van Dijk, T., Kintsch, T., (1983). Strategies of Discourse Comprehension. New York: Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar

Xu, J., Kemeny, S., Park, G., Frattali, C., & Braun, A. (2005). Language in context: Emergent features of word, sentence, and narrative comprehension. NeuroImage, 25, 1002–1015.10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.12.013Search in Google Scholar

Winograd, T. (1972). Understanding natural language. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 1–191.10.1016/0010-0285(72)90002-3Search in Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, L. (1921). Tractatus logico-philosophicus (Trans, D.F. Pears & B.F. McGuinness, 1961). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Search in Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, L. (1999). Philosophical investigations, trans. GEM Anscombe. New York: The Macmillan Company.Search in Google Scholar

Zhang, Y., Fan, L., Caspers, S., Heim, S., Song, M., Liu, C. et al. (2017). Cross-cultural consistency and diversity in intrinsic functional organization of Broca's Region. NeuroImage, 150, 177-190.10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.02.042Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo