<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p> The New Zealand early childhood curriculum, Te Whāriki (Ministry of Education [MoE],1996), is frequently hailed as a community inspired curriculum, praised nationally and internationally for its collaborative development, emancipatory spirit and bicultural approach. In its best form community can be collaborative, consultative, democratic, responsive and inclusive. But community and collaboration can also be about exclusion, alienation and loss. This paper engages with Te Whāriki as a contestable political document. It explores this much acclaimed early childhood curriculum within a politics of community, collaboration and control. Driving the direction of the paper is a call for a revitalised understanding of curriculum as practices of freedom, raising issues of how to work with difference and complexity in a democratic and ethical manner. The paper concludes that although official curriculum is unavoidably about control, there is a world of difference in the ways such control might be exercised. The real curriculum exists where teachers are working with children - it is in the everyday micro-practices that impacts are felt and freedoms played out.</p></abstract>

The New Zealand early childhood curriculum, Te Whāriki (Ministry of Education [MoE],1996), is frequently hailed as a community inspired curriculum, praised nationally and internationally for its collaborative development, emancipatory spirit and bicultural approach. In its best form community can be collaborative, consultative, democratic, responsive and inclusive. But community and collaboration can also be about exclusion, alienation and loss. This paper engages with Te Whāriki as a contestable political document. It explores this much acclaimed early childhood curriculum within a politics of community, collaboration and control. Driving the direction of the paper is a call for a revitalised understanding of curriculum as practices of freedom, raising issues of how to work with difference and complexity in a democratic and ethical manner. The paper concludes that although official curriculum is unavoidably about control, there is a world of difference in the ways such control might be exercised. The real curriculum exists where teachers are working with children - it is in the everyday micro-practices that impacts are felt and freedoms played out.

New Zealand early childhood curriculum: The politics of collaboration

University of Auckland, Faculty of Education and Social Work, School of Learning, Development and Professional Practice, 78 Epsom Avenue, Auckland, 1035, New Zealand

Journal of Pedagogy

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

{"article-title":"New Zealand early childhood curriculum: The politics of collaboration"}

The New Zealand early childhood curriculum, Te Whāriki (Ministry of Education [MoE],1996), is frequently hailed as a community inspired curriculum, praised...

New Zealand early childhood curriculum: The politics of collaboration

Published Online: Mar 05, 2016

Page range: 57 - 70

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jped-2015-0013

Keywords
early childhood, curriculum, politics, practices of freedom, New Zealand

© by Sandy Farquhar

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

New Zealand early childhood curriculum: The politics of collaboration

Published Online: Mar 05, 2016

Page range: 57 - 70

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jped-2015-0013

Keywordsearly childhood, curriculum, politics, practices of freedom, New Zealand

© by Sandy Farquhar

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Keywords
early childhood, curriculum, politics, practices of freedom, New Zealand