[Bethlehem, J., F. Cobben, and B. Schouten. 2011. Handbook of Nonresponse in Household Surveys. Hoboken: Wiley.10.1002/9780470891056]Search in Google Scholar
[Bruin, L., N. Mushkudiani, and B. Schouten. 2016. “A Bayesian Analysis of Mixed-Mode Data Collection.” Paper presented at the 71st Annual Conference of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, Austin TX, May 12–15. Available at: http://hummedia.manchester.ac.uk/institutes/cmist/BADEN/workshop-2016/AAPOR_Bruin-Mushkudiani-Schouten.pdf (accessed June 2017).]Search in Google Scholar
[Calaway, R., Revolution Analytics, and S. Weston. 2015a. “Package ‘foreach.” Available at: https://cran.r-project.org/package=foreach (accessed June 2017).]Search in Google Scholar
[Calaway, R., Revolution Analytics, S. Weston, and D. Tenenbaum. 2015b. “Package ‘doParallel’.” Available at: https://cran.r-project.org/package=doParallel (accessed June 2017).]Search in Google Scholar
[Calinescu, M. and B. Schouten. 2015. “Adaptive Survey Designs to Minimize Survey Mode Effects––a Case Study on the Dutch Labor Force Survey.” Survey Methodology 41: 403–425.]Search in Google Scholar
[Calinescu, M. and B. Schouten. 2016. “Adaptive Survey Designs for Nonresponse and Measurement Error in Multi-Purpose Surveys.” Survey Research Methods 10: 35–47. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.18148/srm/2016.v10i1.6157.]Search in Google Scholar
[Calinescu, M., S. Bhulai, and B. Schouten. 2013. “Optimal Resource Allocation in Survey Designs.” European Journal of Operational Research 226: 115–121. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2012.10.046.10.1016/j.ejor.2012.10.046]Search in Google Scholar
[CBS. 2015. Onderzoek Verplaatsingen in Nederland 2015. Onderzoeksbeschrijving. The Hague/Heerlen: Statistics Netherlands. Available at: https://www.cbs.nl/-/media/_pdf/2016/38/2016ep27.pdf (accessed June 2017).]Search in Google Scholar
[Chesnut, J. 2013. Model-Based Mode of Data Collection Switching from Internet to Mail in the American Community Survey. Washington: US Census Bureau. Available at: https://census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/working-papers/2013/acs/2013_Chesnut_01.pdf (accessed June 2017).]Search in Google Scholar
[Deming, W.E. and F.F. Stephan. 1940. “On a Least Squares of Adjustment of a Sampled Frequency Table When the Expected Totals Are Known.” Annals of Mathematical Statistics 11: 427–444. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177731829.10.1214/aoms/1177731829]Search in Google Scholar
[Groves, R.M. and S.G. Heeringa. 2006. “Responsive Design for Household Surveys: Tools for Actively Controlling Survey Errors and Costs.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A 169: 439–457. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-985X.2006.00423.x.10.1111/j.1467-985X.2006.00423.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Johnson, S.G. 2016. “The NLopt Nonlinear-Optimization Package.” Available at: http://ab-initio.mit.edu/wiki/index.php/NLopt (accessed June 2017).]Search in Google Scholar
[Kish, K. 1987. “Weighting in Deft2.” The Survey Statistician 17: 26–30.]Search in Google Scholar
[Laflamme, F. and M. Karaganis. 2010. “Implementation of Responsive Collection Design for CATI Surveys at Statistics Canada.” Paper presented at the European Conference on Quality in Official Statistics (Q2010), Helsinki, May 4–6. Available at: https://q2010.stat.fi/sessions/session-29 (accessed June 2017).]Search in Google Scholar
[Perryck, K. 2015. Assessing the Impact of Inaccuracy in Design Parameters on the Performance of Adaptive Survey Designs. Utrecht: Utrecht University. (MSc thesis.)]Search in Google Scholar
[Peytchev, A., S. Riley, J. Rosen, J. Murphy, and M. Lindblad. 2010. “Reduction of Nonresponse Bias through Case Prioritization.” Survey Research Methods 4: 21–29. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.18148/srm/2010.v4i1.3037.]Search in Google Scholar
[Powell, M.J.D. 1994. “A Direct Search Optimization Method that Models the Objective and Constraint Functions by Linear Interpolation.” In Advances in Optimization and Numerical Analysis, edited by S. Gomez and J.-P. Hennart, 51–67. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.10.1007/978-94-015-8330-5_4]Search in Google Scholar
[R Core Team. 2014. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available at: http://www.r-project.org/ (accessed June 2017).]Search in Google Scholar
[Särndal, C.-E. and P. Lundquist. 2013. “Aspects of Responsive Survey Design with Applications to the Swedish Living Conditions Survey.” Journal of Official Statistics 29: 557–582. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/jos-2013-0040.10.2478/jos-2013-0040]Search in Google Scholar
[Särndal, C.-E., B. Swensson, and J. Wretman. 1992. Model Assisted Survey Sampling. New York: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4612-4378-6]Search in Google Scholar
[Schouten, B. and N. Shlomo. 2015. Selecting Adaptive Survey Design Strata with Partial R-indicators. The Hague/Heerlen: Statistics Netherlands. (Discussion paper 201521.)10.1111/insr.12159]Search in Google Scholar
[Schouten, B., M. Calinescu, and A. Luiten. 2013a. “Optimizing Quality of Response Through Adaptive Survey Designs.” Survey Methodology 39: 29–58.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schouten, B., J. van den Brakel, B. Buelens, J. van der Laan, and Th. Klausch. 2013b. “Disentangling Mode-Specific Selection and Measurement Bias in Social Surveys.” Social Science Research 42: 1555–1570. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2013.07.005.10.1016/j.ssresearch.2013.07.00524090851]Search in Google Scholar
[Schouten, B., F. Cobben, P. Lundquist, and J. Wagner. 2016. “Does More Balanced Survey Response Imply Less Non-Response Bias?” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A 179: 727–748. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/rssa.12152.10.1111/rssa.12152]Search in Google Scholar
[Sutton, R.S. and A.G. Barto. 2012. Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction. Second edition. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tourangeau, R., J.M. Brick, S. Lohr, and J. Li. 2017. “Adaptive and Responsive Survey Designs: a Review and Assessment.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A 180: 203–223. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/rssa.12186.10.1111/rssa.12186]Search in Google Scholar
[Wagner, J. 2008. Adaptive Survey Design to Reduce Nonresponse Bias. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan. (Doctoral thesis.)]Search in Google Scholar
[Wagner, J. 2013. “Adaptive Contact Strategies in Telephone and Face-to-face Surveys.” Survey Research Methods 7: 45–55. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.18148/srm/2013.v7i1.5037.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ypma, J. 2015. “Package ‘nloptr’.” Available at: https://cran.r-project.org/package=nloptr (accessed June 2017).]Search in Google Scholar