[Au, N. and D.W. Johnston. 2014. “Self-Assessed Health: What Does it Mean and What Does it Hide?” Social Science and Medicine 121: 21-28. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.10.007.10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.10.00725306406]Search in Google Scholar
[Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). 2014. Life Tables, States, Territories and Australia, 2011-2013. Canberra: ABS. Available at: http://www.abs.gov.au (accessed January 2015).]Search in Google Scholar
[Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. 2011. Comparing an SLK-Based and a Name- Based Data Linkage Strategy: An Investigation into the PIAC Linkage. Canberra: AIHW. Available at: http://www.aihw.gov.au/publication-detail/?id=10737418279 (accessed November 2015).]Search in Google Scholar
[Gouskova, E., S. Heeringa, K. McGonagle, R. Schoeni, and F. Stafford. 2008. “Panel Study of Income Dynamics Revised Longitudinal Weights 1993-2005.” PSID Technical Series Paper 08-05. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan. Available at: https://psidonline.isr.umich.edu/publications/Papers/tsp/2008-05_PSID_Revised_Longitudinal_Weights_1993-2005%20.pdf (accessed 30 June 2014).]Search in Google Scholar
[Green, F. 2011. “Unpacking the Misery Multiplier: How Employability Modifies the Impacts of Unemployment and Job Insecurity on Life Satisfaction and Mental Health.” Journal of Health Economics 30: 265-276. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2010.12.005.10.1016/j.jhealeco.2010.12.00521236508]Search in Google Scholar
[Hawkes, D. and I. Plewis. 2006. “Modelling Non-Response in the National Child Development Study.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A 169: 479-491. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-985X.2006.00401.x.10.1111/j.1467-985X.2006.00401.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Hayward, M.D. Undated. “Using the Health and Retirement Survey to investigate health discrepancies.” Health and Retirement Survey documentation. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan. Available at: http://hrsonline.isr.umich.edu/sitedocs/dmc/hrs_healthdisparities_hayward.pdf (accessed February 2015).]Search in Google Scholar
[Health and Retirement Survey (HRS). Undated. “Sampling Weights: Revised for Tracker 2.0 and Beyond.” Health and Retirement Survey documentation. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan. Available at: http://hrsonline.isr.umich.edu/sitedocs/wghtdoc.pdf (accessed February 2015).]Search in Google Scholar
[Kalton, G. and M. Brick. 2000. “Weighting in Household Panel Surveys.” In Researching Social and Economic Change: the Uses of Household Panel Studies, edited by D. Rose, 96-112. London: Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kroh, M. 2013. Documentation of Sample Sizes and Panel Attrition in the German Socio- Economic Panel (SOEP) (1984 until 2012). DIW Data Documentation 71. Berlin: DIW.]Search in Google Scholar
[LaRoche, S. 2007. Longitudinal and Cross-Sectional Weighting of the Survey of Labour and Income Dynamics. Income Research Paper Series, 75F0002MIE. Ottawa: Statistics Canada.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lynn, P. 2009. “Methods for Longitudinal Surveys.” In Methodology of Longitudinal Surveys, edited by P. Lynn, 1-19. Chichester: Wiley.10.1002/9780470743874.ch1]Search in Google Scholar
[Rabe-Hesketh, S. and A. Skrondal. 2006. “Multilevel Modelling of Complex Survey Data.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A 169: 805-827. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-985X.2006.00426.x.10.1111/j.1467-985X.2006.00426.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Sadig, H. 2014. Unknown Eligibility Whilst Weighting for Non-Response: The Puzzle of Who has Died and Who is Still Alive? ISER Working Paper 2014-35. Colchester: Institute for Social and Economic Research, University of Essex.]Search in Google Scholar
[Scholes, S., R. Taylor, H. Cheshire, K. Cox, and C. Lessof. 2008. Retirement, Health and Relationships of the Older Population in England: The 2004 English Longitudinal Study of Ageing, NatCen Technical Report P2808. London: National Centre for Social Research.]Search in Google Scholar
[SHARE. 2013. Release Guide 1.1.1 Wave 4. Munich: Munich Centre for the Economics of Ageing. Available at: http://www.share-project.org/fileadmin/pdf_documentation/SHARE_wave_4_release_guide_1.1.1.pdf (accessed February 2015).]Search in Google Scholar
[Skinner, C.J. and D.J. Holmes. 2003. “Random Effects Models for Longitudinal Survey Data.” In Analysis of Survey Data, edited by R. Chambers and C.J. Skinner, 205-219. Chichester: Wiley.10.1002/0470867205.ch14]Search in Google Scholar
[Smith, T.W. 2009. A Revised Review of Methods to Estimate the Status of Cases with Unknown Eligibility. Report of the Standard Definitions Committee for the American Association for Public Opinion Research. Available at: https://www.aapor.org/AAPOR_Main/media/MainSiteFiles/FindingE.pdf (accessed October 2016).]Search in Google Scholar
[Taylor, M.F., ed. 2010. British Household Panel Survey User Manual Volume A: Introduction, Technical Report and Appendices. Colchester: University of Essex.]Search in Google Scholar
[Valliant, R., J.A. Dever, and F. Kreuter. 2013. Practical Tools for Designing and Weighting Survey Samples. New York: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4614-6449-5]Search in Google Scholar
[Watson, N. 2012. Longitudinal and Cross-Sectional Weighting Methodology for the HILDA Survey. HILDA Technical Paper Series 2/12. Melbourne: Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, University of Melbourne.]Search in Google Scholar
[Watson, N. and M. Summerfield. 2014. Outcomes from Matching the HILDA Survey Sample to the Death Register, HILDA Technical Paper Series 2/14. Melbourne: Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, University of Melbourne.]Search in Google Scholar
[Weaver, B. 2011. Combined 2009 and 2010 Technical Weighting Report for the Swiss Household Panel. Lausanne: Swiss Foundation for Research in Social Sciences. Available at: http://forscenter.ch/en/our-surveys/swiss-household-panel/documentationfaq-2/methods/weighting/ (accessed February 2015). ]Search in Google Scholar