1. bookVolume 32 (2016): Issue 1 (March 2016)
Journal Details
First Published
01 Oct 2013
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Open Access

Sample Representation and Substantive Outcomes Using Web With and Without Incentives Compared to Telephone in an Election Survey

Published Online: 10 Mar 2016
Volume & Issue: Volume 32 (2016) - Issue 1 (March 2016)
Page range: 165 - 186
Received: 01 Feb 2014
Accepted: 01 Apr 2015
Journal Details
First Published
01 Oct 2013
Publication timeframe
4 times per year

.AAPOR (The American Association for Public Opinion Research). 2011. Standard definitions: Final dispositions of case codes and outcome rates for surveys, 7th ed. AAPOR.Search in Google Scholar

Alexander, G., G. Divine, M. Couper, J. McClure, M. Stopponi, K. Fortman, D. Tolsma, V. Strecher, and C. Johnson. 2008. “Effect of Incentives and Mailing Features on Online Health Program Enrolment.” American Journal of Preventive Medicine 34: 382-388. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2008. in Google Scholar

Ansolabehere, S. and B. Schaffner. 2014. “Does Survey Mode Still Matter? Findings From a 2010 Multi-Mode Comparison.” Political Analysis 22: 285-303. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpt025.10.1093/pan/mpt025Search in Google Scholar

Atkeson, L., A. Adams, and R. Alvarez. 2014. “Nonresponse and Mode Effects in Self-and Interviewer-Administered Surveys.” Political Analysis 22: 304-320. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpt049.10.1093/pan/mpt049Search in Google Scholar

Baker, R., S.J. Blumberg, J.M. Brick, M.P. Couper, M. Courtright, J.M. Dennis, D.Search in Google Scholar

Dillman, M.R. Frankel, P. Garland, R.M. Groves, C. Kennedy, J. Krosnick, P.J.Search in Google Scholar

Lavrakas, S. Lee, M. Link, L. Piekarski, K. Rao, R.K. Thomas, and D. Zahs. 2010. “Research Synthesis AAPOR Report on Online Panels.” Public Opinion Quarterly 74: 711-781. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfq048.10.1093/poq/nfq048Search in Google Scholar

Biemer, P. 1988. “Measuring Data Quality.” In Telephone Survey Methodology, edited by W. Nicholls II, R. Groves, P. Biemer, L. Lyberg, J. Massey, W. Nicholls II, and J. Waksberg, 273-283. New York: Wiley & Sons.Search in Google Scholar

Biemer, P. and L. Lyberg. 2003. Introduction to Survey Quality. New York: John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/0471458740Search in Google Scholar

Birnholtz, J., D. Horn, T. Finholt, and S. Bae. 2004. “The Effects of Cash, Electronic, and Paper Gift Certificates as Respondent Incentives for a Web-Based Survey of Technologically Sophisticated Respondents.” Social Science Computer Review 22: 355-362. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0894439304263147.10.1177/0894439304263147Search in Google Scholar

Blumberg, S. and J. Luke. 2013. Wireless Substitution: Early Release of Estimates from the National Health Interview Survey. July-December 2012. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhis/earlyrelease/wireless201306.pdf (accessed December 2014).Search in Google Scholar

Bosnjak, M. 2005. “Effects of Two Innovative Techniques to Apply Incentives in Online Access Panels.” Presentation at the General Online Research Conference (GOR), Zürich, March 22-23.Search in Google Scholar

Bosnjak, M. and T. Tuten. 2003. “Prepaid and Promised Incentives in Web Surveys: an Experiment.” Social Science Computer Review 21: 208-217. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0894439303021002006.10.1177/0894439303021002006Search in Google Scholar

Brandtzæg, P., J. Heim, and A. Karahasanovic. 2011. “Understanding the New Digital Divide - A Typology of Internet Users in Europe.” International Journal of Human- Computer Studies 69: 123-138. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2010. in Google Scholar

Braunsberger, K., H. Wybenga, and R. Gates. 2007. “A Comparison of Reliability Between Telephone and Web-Based Surveys.” Journal of Business Research 60: 758-764. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2007. in Google Scholar

Burden, B.C. 2000. “Voter Turnout and the National Election Studies.” Political Analysis 8: 389-398.10.1093/oxfordjournals.pan.a029823Search in Google Scholar

Busse, B. and M. Fuchs. 2012. “The Components of Landline Telephone Survey Coverage Bias. The Relative Importance of No-Phone and Mobile-Only Populations.” Quality and Quantity 46: 1209-1225. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11135-011-9431-3.10.1007/s11135-011-9431-3Search in Google Scholar

Callegaro, M. and C. DiSogra. 2008. “Computing Response Metrics for Online Panels.” Public Opinion Quarterly 72: 1008-1032. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfn065.10.1093/poq/nfn065Search in Google Scholar

Chang, L. and J. Krosnick. 2009. “National Surveys via RDD Telephone Interviewing Versus the Internet.” Public Opinion Quarterly 73: 641-678. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/346010.10.1086/346010Search in Google Scholar

Christian, L., D. Dillman, and J. Smith. 2008. “The Effects of Mode and Format on Answers to Scalar Questions in Telephone and Web Surveys.” In Advances in Telephone Surveys, edited by J.M. Lepkowski, 250-275. New York: Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9780470173404.ch12Search in Google Scholar

Cobben, F. and J. Bethlehem. 2005. “Adjusting Undercoverage and Nonresponse Bias in Telephone Surveys.” Discussion paper 05006. CBS, Statistics Netherlands, Voorburg/ Heerlen. Available at: http://www.cbs.nl/nr/rdonlyres/7fd00f42-15a3-4151-9daa-2d54-566cf59a/0/200506x10pub.pdf (accessed February, 2016).Search in Google Scholar

Curtin, R., E. Singer, and S. Presser. 2007. “Incentives in Random Digit Dial Telephone Surveys: a Replication and Extension.” Journal of Official Statistics 23: 91-105.Search in Google Scholar

De Leeuw, E. 2005. “To Mix or Not To Mix Data Collection Modes in Surveys.” Journal of Official Statistics 21: 233-255.Search in Google Scholar

Dillman, D. 2000. Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Tailored Design Method. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Search in Google Scholar

Dillman, D. 2011. Mail and Internet surveys: The Tailored Design Method - 2007 Update With New Internet, Visual, and Mixed-Mode Guide. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Search in Google Scholar

Dillman, D. and L. Christian. 2005. “Survey Mode as a Source of Instability in Responses Across Surveys.” Field Methods 17: 30-52. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1525822X04269550.10.1177/1525822X04269550Search in Google Scholar

Dillman, D., G. Phelps, R. Tortora, K. Swift, J. Kohrell, J. Berck, and B. Messer. 2009. “Response Rate and Measurement Differences in Mixed-Mode Surveys Using Mail, Telephone, Interactive Voice Response (IVR) and the Internet.” Social Science Research 28: 1-18. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2008.03.00.Search in Google Scholar

Ernst Stähli, M. 2012. “Telephone Surveys in Switzerland: Spotlight.” In Telephone Surveys in Europe: Research and Practice, edited by M. Häder, S. Häder and M. Kühne, 25-36. Berlin: Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-25411-6_3Search in Google Scholar

Fricker, S., M. Galesic, R. Tourangeau, and T. Yan. 2005. “An Experimental Comparison of Web and Telephone Surveys.” Public Opinion Quarterly 69: 370-392. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfi027.10.1093/poq/nfi027Search in Google Scholar

Göritz, A. 2004. “The Impact of Material Incentives on Response Quantity, Response Quality, Sample Composition, Survey Outcome, and Cost in Online Access Panels.” International Journal of Market Research 46: 327-345. Gö ritz, A. 2006. “Incentives in Web Studies: Methodological Issues and a Review.” International Journal of Internet Science 1: 58-70.Search in Google Scholar

Groves, R., R. Cialdini, and M. Couper. 1992. “Understanding the Decision to Participate in a Survey.” Public Opinion Quarterly 56: 475-493. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/269338.10.1086/269338Search in Google Scholar

Groves, R., F. Fowler, M. Couper, J. Lepkowski, E. Singer, and R. Tourangeau. 2004a. Survey Methodology, Wiley Series in Survey Methodology. New York: Wiley.Search in Google Scholar

Groves, R., S. Presser, and S. Dipko. 2004b. “The Role of Topic Interest in Survey Participation Decisions.” Public Opinion Quarterly 68: 2-31. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfh002.10.1093/poq/nfh002Search in Google Scholar

Holbrook, A.L. and J.A. Krosnick. 2010. “Social Desirability Bias in Voter Turnout Reports Tests Using the Item Count Technique.” Public Opinion Quarterly 74: 37-67. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfp065.10.1093/poq/nfp065Search in Google Scholar

Joye, C. 2012. “Srph-Castem.” FORS - SFSO workshop, June 21. Neuchâtel.Search in Google Scholar

Joye, D., A. Pollien, M. Sapin, and M. Ernst Stähli. 2012. “Who Can Be Contacted by Phone? Lessons from Switzerland.” In Telephone Surveys in Europe: Research and Practice, edited by M. Häder, S. Häder and M. Kühne, 85-102. Berlin: Springer- Verlag.10.1007/978-3-642-25411-6_8Search in Google Scholar

Karp, J.A. and D. Brockington. 2005. “Social Desirability and Response Validity: A Comparative Analysis of Overreporting Voter Turnout in Five Countries.” The Journal of Politics 67: 825-840. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2005.00341.x.10.1111/j.1468-2508.2005.00341.xSearch in Google Scholar

Kreuter, F., S. Presser, and R. Tourangeau. 2008. “Social Desirability Bias in CATI, IVR, and Web Surveys.” Public Opinion Quarterly 72: 847-865. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfn063.10.1093/poq/nfn063Search in Google Scholar

Krosnick, J. 1991. “Response Strategies for Coping With the Cognitive Demands of Attitude Measures in Surveys.” Applied Cognitive Psychology 5: 213-236. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acp.2350050305.10.1002/acp.2350050305Search in Google Scholar

Link, M. and M. Fahimi. 2008. “Telephone Survey Sampling.” In Sampling of Populations: Methods and Applications, edited by P.S. Levy and S. Lemeshow, 455-487. New York: Wiley.Search in Google Scholar

Lipps, O. and K. Kissau. 2012. “Nonresponse in an Individual Register Sample Telephone Survey in Lucerne (Switzerland).” In Telephone Surveys in Europe: Research and Practice, edited by M. Häder, S. Häder and M. Kühne, 187-208. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.10.1007/978-3-642-25411-6_13Search in Google Scholar

Lipps, O. and N. Pekari. 2013. Mode and Incentive Effects in an Individual Register Frame Based Swiss Election Study. FORS Working Paper Series, paper 2013-3. Lausanne: FORS.Search in Google Scholar

Lipps, O., N. Pekari, and C. Roberts. 2015. “Coverage and Nonresponse Errors in an Individual Register Frame Based Swiss Telephone Election Study.” Survey Research Methods 9: 71-82.Search in Google Scholar

Little, R.J. and S. Vartivarian. 2003. “On Weighting the Rates in Non-Response Weights.” Statistics in Medicine 22: 1589-1599. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sim.1513.10.1002/sim.151312704617Search in Google Scholar

Lozar Manfreda, K., M. Bosnjak, J. Berzelak, I. Haas, and V. Vehovar. 2008. “Web Surveys Versus Other Survey Modes: a Meta-Analysis Comparing Response Rates.” International Journal of Market Research 50: 79-104.10.1177/147078530805000107Search in Google Scholar

Malhotra, N. and J. Krosnick. 2007. “The Effect of Survey Mode and Sampling on Inferences About Political Attitudes and Behavior: Comparing the 2000 and 2004 ANES to Internet Surveys With Nonprobability Samples.” Political Analysis 15: 286-323. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpm003.10.1093/pan/mpm003Search in Google Scholar

McDonald, M.P. 2003. “On the Overreport Bias of the National Election Study Turnout Rate.” Political Analysis 11: 180-186. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpg006.10.1093/pan/mpg006Search in Google Scholar

Messer, B.L. and D.A. Dillman. 2011. “Surveying the General Public Over the Internet Using Address-Based Sampling and Mail Contact Procedures.” Public Opinion Quarterly 75: 429-457. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfr021.10.1093/poq/nfr021Search in Google Scholar

Mohorko, A., E. de Leeuw, and J. Hox. 2013a. “Internet Coverage and Coverage Bias in Europe: Developments Across Countries and Over Time.” Journal of Official Statistics 29: 609-622. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/jos-2013-0042.10.2478/jos-2013-0042Search in Google Scholar

Mohorko, A., E. de Leeuw, and J. Hox. 2013b. “Coverage Bias in European Telephone Surveys: Developments of Landline and Mobile Phone Coverage Across Countries and Over Time.” Survey Methods: Insights from the Field. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.13094/SMIF-2013-00002.Search in Google Scholar

Mood, C. 2010. “Logistic Regression: Why We Cannot Do What We Think We Can Do, and What We Can Do About It.” European Sociological Review 26: 67-82. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcp006.10.1093/esr/jcp006Search in Google Scholar

Nagelhout, G., M. Willemsen, M. Thompson, G. Fong, B. van den Putte, and H. de Vries. 010. “Is Web Interviewing a Good Alternative to Telephone Interviewing? Findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Netherlands Survey.” BMC Public Health 10: 351. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-10-351.10.1186/1471-2458-10-351289779620565838Search in Google Scholar

Omnibus 2010. Survey on Information and Communication Technology, Swiss Federal Statistical Office 2010. Excel result sheets (in German; accessed October 21, 2013). Available at: http://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/portal/de/index/themen/16/04/data.html (accessed December 2014).Search in Google Scholar

Parsons, N. and M. Manierre. 2014. “Investigating the Relationship Among Prepaid Token Incentives, Response Rates, and Nonresponse Bias in a Web Survey.” Field Methods 26: 191-204. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1525822X13500120.10.1177/1525822X13500120Search in Google Scholar

Peytchev, A. 2009. “Survey Breakoff.” Public Opinion Quarterly 73: 74-97. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfp014.10.1093/poq/nfp014Search in Google Scholar

Revilla, M.A. and W.E. Saris. 2013. “A Comparison of the Quality of Questions in a Face-to-Face and a Web Survey.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 25: 242-253. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/eds007.10.1093/ijpor/eds007Search in Google Scholar

Ryu, E., M. Couper, and R. Marans. 2006. “Survey Incentives: Cash vs. In-Kind, Face-to- Face vs. Mail, Response Rate vs. Nonresponse Error.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 18: 89-106. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edh089.10.1093/ijpor/edh089Search in Google Scholar

Sánchez-Fernández, J., F. Muñoz-Leiva, F.J. Montoro-Ríos, and J. Ángel Ibáñez-Zapata. 2010. “An Analysis of the Effect of Pre-Incentives and Post-Incentives Based on Draws on Response to Web Surveys.” Quality and Quantity 44: 357-373. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11135-008-9197-4.10.1007/s11135-008-9197-4Search in Google Scholar

Schaurer, I., B. Struminskaya, L. Kaczmirek, and W. Bandilla. 2012. “The Price We Have to Pay: Incentive Experiments in the Recruitment Process for a Probability-Based Online Panel.” Presentation at the General Online Research Conference (GOR) March 5-7, 2012, Mannheim.Search in Google Scholar

Scherpenzeel, A. and V. Toepoel. 2012. “Recruiting a Probability Sample for an Online Panel. Effects of Contact Mode, Incentives, and Information.” Public Opinion Quarterly 76: 470-490. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfs037.10.1093/poq/nfs037Search in Google Scholar

Schonlau, M., A. van Soest, A. Kapteyn, and M. Couper. 2009. “Selection Bias in Web Surveys and the Use of Propensity Scores.” Sociological Methods and Research 37: 291-318. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0049124108327128.10.1177/0049124108327128Search in Google Scholar

Selb, P. and S. Munzert. 2013. “Voter Overrepresentation, Vote Misreporting, and Turnout Bias in Postelection Surveys.” Electoral Studies 32: 186-196. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2012. in Google Scholar

Sinclair, M., J. O’Toole, M. Malawaraarachchi, and K. Leder. 2012. “Comparison of Response Rates and Cost-Effectiveness for a Community-Based Survey: Postal, Internet and Telephone Modes with Generic or Personalised Recruitment Approaches.” BMC Medical Research Methodology 12: 132. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-12-132.10.1186/1471-2288-12-132Search in Google Scholar

Singer, E. and R. Bossarte. 2006. “Incentives for Survey Participation. When are they ‘Coercive’?” American Journal of Preventive Medicine 31: 411-418. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2006. in Google Scholar

Singer, E. J. van Hoewyk, and M. Maher. 2000. “Experiments with Incentives in Telephone Surveys.” Public Opinion Quarterly 64: 171-188. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/317761.10.1086/317761Search in Google Scholar

Singer, E. and C. Ye. 2013. “The Use and Effects of Incentives in Surveys.” The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 645: 112-141. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0002716212458082.10.1177/0002716212458082Search in Google Scholar

Stephenson, L. and J. Creˆte. 2011. “Studying Political Behavior: A Comparison of Internet and Telephone Surveys.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 23: 24-55. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edq025.10.1093/ijpor/edq025Search in Google Scholar

Struminskaya, B., L. Kaczmirek, I. Schaurer, and W. Bandilla. 2014. “Assessing Representativeness of a German Probability-Based Panel.” In Online Panel Research: A Data Quality Perspective, edited by M. Callegaro, R. Baker, J. Bethlehem, A. Gö ritz, J. Krosnick, and P. Lavrakas, 61-85. New York: John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9781118763520.ch3Search in Google Scholar

Su, J., P. Shao, and J. Fang. 2008. “Effect of Incentives on Web-Based Surveys.” Tsinghua Science and Technology 13: 344-347. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1007-0214(08)70055-5.10.1016/S1007-0214(08)70055-5Search in Google Scholar

Teisl, M., B. Roe, and M. Vayda. 2006. “Incentive Effects on Response Rates, Data Quality, and Survey Administration Costs.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 18: 364-373. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edh106.10.1093/ijpor/edh106Search in Google Scholar

Vannieuwenhuyze, J. and G. Loosveldt. 2013. “Evaluating Relative Mode Effects in Mixed-Mode Surveys: Three Methods to Disentangle Selection and Measurement Effects.” Sociological Methods & Research 42: 82-104. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0049124112464868.10.1177/0049124112464868Search in Google Scholar

Van Veen, F., A. Göritz, and S. Sattler. 2011. “The Impact of Monetary Incentives on Completion and Data Quality in Online Surveys.” Presentation at the European Survey Research Association (ESRA) Conference, Lausanne, July 18-22 and General Online Research (GOR) Conference, Düsseldorf, March 14-16.Search in Google Scholar

Von der Lippe, E., P. Schmich, and C. Lange. 2011. “Advance Letters as a Way of Reducing Non-Response in a National Health Telephone Survey: Differences Between Listed and Unlisted Numbers.” Survey Research Methods 5: 103-116. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.18148/srm/2011.v5i3.4657#sthash.qLueRYqS.dpuf.Search in Google Scholar

Warren, J. and A. Halpern-Manners. 2012. “Panel Conditioning in Longitudinal Social Science Surveys.” Sociological Methods and Research 41: 491-534. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0049124112460374.10.1177/0049124112460374Search in Google Scholar

Yeager, D., J. Krosnick, L. Chang, H. Javitz, M. Levendusky, A. Simpser, and R. Wang. 2011. “Comparing the Accuracy of RDD Telephone Surveys and Internet Surveys Conducted with Probability and Non-Probability Samples.” Public Opinion Quarterly 75: 709-747. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfr020.10.1093/poq/nfr020Search in Google Scholar

Zickhur, K. and A. Smith. 2012. Digital Differences. Pew Internet & American Life Project 13. Available at: http://www.pewinternet.org/2012/04/13/digital-differences/ (accessed August 2014). Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo