[ARSO, 2014. http://vode.arso.gov.si/hidarhiv/pov_arhiv_tab.php Accessed: 1.2.2014.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bacova-Mitkova, V., Halmová, D. 2014. Joint modeling of flood peak discharges, volume and duration: a case study of the Danube River in Bratislava. Journal of Hydrology and Hydromechanics, 62, 186-196.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bavec, M., Novak, M., Poljak, M. 2013. Geological Map of Slovenia 1: 1.000.000. Geological Survey of Slovenia- GeoZS. Accessed: 15.12.2014. http://www.geozs.si/UserFiles/677/File/Monograf_PDF/OGE_knjiznica.pdf.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bell, F.C., Kar, S.O., 1969. Characteristics response times in design flood estimation. Journal of Hydrology, 8, 173-196.10.1016/0022-1694(69)90120-6]Search in Google Scholar
[Beniston, M., 2012. Is snow in the Alps receding or disappearing? Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews-Climate Change, 3, 349-358.10.1002/wcc.179]Search in Google Scholar
[Blume, T., Zehe, E., Bronstert, A., 2007. Rainfall-runoff response, event-based runoff coefficients and hydrograph separation. Hydrological Sciences Journal-Journal Des Sciences Hydrologiques, 52, 843-862.10.1623/hysj.52.5.843]Search in Google Scholar
[Burn, D.H., 1997. Catchment similarity for regional flood frequency analysis using seasonality measures. Journal of Hydrology, 202, 212-230.10.1016/S0022-1694(97)00068-1]Search in Google Scholar
[Chapman, T., 1999. A comparison of algorithms for stream flow recession and baseflow separation. Hydrological Processes, 13, 701-714.10.1002/(SICI)1099-1085(19990415)13:5<701::AID-HYP774>3.0.CO;2-2]Search in Google Scholar
[Chapman, T.G., 1991. Evaluation of automated techniques for base flow and recession analyses - comment. Water Resources Research, 27, 1783-1784.10.1029/91WR01007]Search in Google Scholar
[De Michele, C., Salvadori, G., 2003. A Generalized Pareto intensity-duration model of storm rainfall exploiting 2- Copulas. Journal of Geophysical Research-Atmospheres, 108(D2).10.1029/2002JD002534]Search in Google Scholar
[Eckhardt, K., 2005. How to construct recursive digital filters for baseflow separation. Hydrological Processes, 19, 507-515.10.1002/hyp.5675]Search in Google Scholar
[Eckhardt, K., 2008. A comparison of baseflow indices, which were calculated with seven different baseflow separation methods. Journal of Hydrology, 352, 168-173.10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.01.005]Search in Google Scholar
[Falkenmark, M., Chapman, T.G., 1989. Comparative hydrology: an ecological approach to land and water resources. Paris: Unesco.]Search in Google Scholar
[Frantar, P., Hrvatin, M., 2005. Pretocni rezimi v Sloveniji med letoma 1971 in 2000. [Discharge regimes in Slovenia from 1971 to 2000]. Geografski vestnik, 77, 115-127. (In Slovenian.) ]Search in Google Scholar
[Furey, P.R., Gupta, V.K., 2001. A physically based filter for separating base flow from streamflow time series. Water Resources Research, 37, 2709-2722.10.1029/2001WR000243]Search in Google Scholar
[Gaal, L., Bloeschl, G., Szolgay, J., Karabova, B., Valent, P., Parajka, J., 2011. Regional analysis of peak-volume relationships of floods in Austria - time scales and correlations. Geophysical Research Abstracts, Vol. 13, EGU2011-10722.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gaal, L., Szolgay, J., Kohnova, S., Parajka, J., Merz, R., Viglione, A., Bloeschl, G., 2012. Flood timescales: Understanding the interplay of climate and catchment processes through comparative hydrology. Water Resources Research, 48, doi: 10.1029/2011WR011509.10.1029/2011WR011509]Search in Google Scholar
[Gaal, L., Szolgay, J., Kohnova, S., Hlačova, K., Parajka, J., Viglione, A. Merz, R., , Bloeschl, G., 2014. Dependence between flood peaks and volumes - A case study on climate and hydrological controls. Hydrological Sciences Journal, doi: 10.1080/02626667.2014.951361.10.1080/02626667.2014.951361]Search in Google Scholar
[Gonzales, A.L., Nonner, J., Heijkers, J., Uhlenbrook, S., 2009. Comparison of different base flow separation methods in a lowland catchment. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 13, 2055-2068.10.5194/hess-13-2055-2009]Search in Google Scholar
[Grimaldi, S., Serinaldi, F., 2006. Asymmetric copula in multivariate flood frequency analysis. Advances in Water Resources, 29, 1155-1167.10.1016/j.advwatres.2005.09.005]Search in Google Scholar
[Hantel, M., Hirtl-Wielke, L.M., 2007. Sensitivity of Alpine snow cover to European temperature. International Journal of Climatology, 27, 1265-1275.10.1002/joc.1472]Search in Google Scholar
[Horvat, A., 2009. Vloga snega v hidroloskem krogu na porecje Save : magistrsko delo. [The role of snow in the hydrological cycle on the Sava River basin]. MSc Thesis. A. Horvat, Ljubljana. (In Slovenian.) ]Search in Google Scholar
[Hosking, J.R.M., Wallis, J.R., 1997. Regional Frequency Analysis: an Approach Based on L-moments. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9780511529443]Search in Google Scholar
[Koffler, D., Laaha, G., 2012. LFSTAT - an R-package for lowflow analysis. Geophysical Research Abstracts, Vol. 14, EGU General Assembly, Vienna, 22-27.4.2012.]Search in Google Scholar
[McNamara, J.P., Kane, D.L., Hinzman, L.D., 1997. Hydrograph separations in an Arctic watershed using mixing model and graphical techniques. Water Resources Research, 33, 1707-1719.10.1029/97WR01033]Search in Google Scholar
[Merz, R., Blöschl, G., 2003. A process typology of regional floods. Water Resources Research, 39, doi: 10.1029/2002WR001952.10.1029/2002WR001952]Search in Google Scholar
[Nathan, R.J., McMahon, T.A., 1990. Evaluation of automated techniques for base flow and recession analyses. Water Resources Research, 26, 1465-1473.10.1029/WR026i007p01465]Search in Google Scholar
[Parajka, J., Viglione, A., Rogger, M., Salinas, J.L., Sivapalan, M., Bloeschl, G., 2013. Comparative assessment of predictions in ungauged basins - Part 1: Runoff-hydrograph studies. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 17, 1783-1795.10.5194/hess-17-1783-2013]Search in Google Scholar
[Salinas, J.L., Laaha, G., Rogger, M., Parajka, J., Viglione, A., Sivapalan, M., Bloeschl, G., 2013. Comparative assessment of predictions in ungauged basins - Part 2: Flood and low flow studies. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 17, 2637-2652.10.5194/hess-17-2637-2013]Search in Google Scholar
[Sawicz, K., Wagener, T., Sivapalan, M., Troch, P.A., Carrillo, G., 2011. Catchment classification: empirical analysis of hydrologic similarity based on catchment function in the eastern USA. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 15, 2895-2911.10.5194/hess-15-2895-2011]Search in Google Scholar
[Schoner, W., Auer, I., Bohm, R., 2009. Long term trend of snow depth at Sonnblick (Austrian Alps) and its relation to climate change. Hydrological Processes, 23, 1052-1063.10.1002/hyp.7209]Search in Google Scholar
[Sivapalan, M., 2009. The secret to 'doing better hydrological science': change the question! Hydrological Processes, 23, 1391-1396.10.1002/hyp.7242]Search in Google Scholar
[Šraj, M., Bezak, N., Brilly, M., 2015. Bivariate flood frequency analysis using the copula function: a case study of the Litija station on the Sava River. Hydrological Processes, 29, 225-238, doi: 10.1002/hyp.10145.10.1002/hyp.10145]Search in Google Scholar
[Viglione, A., Parajka, J., Rogger, M., Salinas, J.L., Laaha, G., Sivapalan, M., Bloeschl, G., 2013. Comparative assessment of predictions in ungauged basins - Part 3: Runoff signatures in Austria. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 17, 2263-2279.10.5194/hess-17-2263-2013]Search in Google Scholar
[Ward, J.H., 1963. Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 58, 236-244.10.1080/01621459.1963.10500845]Search in Google Scholar
[WMO, 2008. Manual on low-flow estimation and prediction. Geneva, Switzerland: World Meteorological Organization.]Search in Google Scholar
[Zhang, J., Ding, Z., You, J., 2014. The joint probability distribution of runoff and sediment and its change characteristics with multi-time scales. Journal of Hydrology and Hydromechanics, 62, 218-225. 10.2478/johh-2014-0024]Search in Google Scholar