Open Access

Bayesian belief network for assessing impact of factors on army’s lean–agile replenishment system


Cite

Figure 1

Methodology.
Methodology.

Figure 2

Bayesian network.
Bayesian network.

Figure 3

Mutual information of factors affecting a dynamic lean–agile system (refer Table 4 for details of the factors).
Mutual information of factors affecting a dynamic lean–agile system (refer Table 4 for details of the factors).

Summary of literature review.

LiteratureFactorsLeanAgileCapability to switch
Chase et al. (2009)Demand analytics and reportingX
Chase et al. (2009)Inclusion of causal factors into forecastsX
Lockamy and McCormack (2004),Lee et al. (2000), and Chen et al. (2000)Integrated collaborative forecasts with customersX
Chase et al. (2009)Scientific demand forecasting
Lee et al. (2000)Visibility of point-of-sales data
Chen et al. (2000)Customer demand visibility
Achabal et al. (2000) and Yao et al. (2007)Vendor-managed inventoryXX
Heinrich (2005), Sahin (2004),Rekik et al. (2008) and Lee et al. (2005)Use of RFId, bar coding, etc.XX
Sahin (2004), Rekik et al. (2008), and Vuyk (2003)Correct warehousing
Bollapragada and Morton (1999) and Vuyk (2003)Fewer random-yield problemsXX
Chiou (2008)Lateral inventory trans-shipmentXX
Paul and Anantharaman (2004)Development-oriented appraisals of employeesXX
Paul and Anantharaman (2004) and Harel and Tzafrir (1999)Comprehensive trainingXX
Thakkar et al. (2009) and Dench (1997)Technical competence of employeesXX
Hopp and Van Oyen (2004) and Herzenberg et al. (1998)Multi-skilling of workforceXX
Harel and Tzafrir (1999)Motivation of employeesXX
Sherehiy et al. (2007)Mechanistic/organic design of organizationX
Sun et al. (2008)Inventory visibility
Bhatia (2008)Selective inventory controlX
Hanna et al. (2000)Employee involvementXX
Perry and Sohal (2000)Proximity of suppliersX

Logistics applications of BBN.

LiteratureContents
Soberanis and Elizabeth (2010)Uses an extended BBN approach to analyse supply chain disruptions. The study is aimed at developing strategies that can reduce the adverse effects of disruptions and hence improve overall system reliability.
Li et al. (2006)Model the supply chain as a BBN that depicts the operations centres, material, and material flow; use the network to ascertain the time and cost of a disruption.
Li and Gao (2010)Use BBN to solve the collaborative efficiency of enterprises in a supply chain.
Anderson et al. (2004)Use BBN to model a service-profit chain in the context of transportation service satisfaction. The BBN is used to arrive at probabilistic inferences concerning customer loyalties, service input variables and service recovery.
Sutrisnowati et al. (2015)Analyse the lateness probability using a BBN by considering various factors in container handling. By this method, one can infer the activities' lateness probabilities and provide recommendations sequentially to port managers for improving existing activities.

Factors affecting a dynamic lean–agile spare part replenishment system.

Factor No./NameStatesInfluenced byDefinition
F1/Forecasting[Good, Average, Poor]Collaborative Forecasting, Scientific Forecasting, Inclusion of Causal Events, Information and Communication Technology, Duration of each training, Frequency of each trainingAbility to forecast the requirement of spare parts
F2/Collaborative Forecasting[Yes, No]Information and Communication TechnologyUse of inputs from all stakeholders for forecasting
F3/Scientific Forecasting[Yes, No]N/AUse of scientific methods to forecast
F4/Inclusion of Causal Events[Yes, No]N/AInclusion of causal events like training exercise into forecasts
F5/Information and Communication Technology[Yes, No]N/APresence for ICT for real time flow of information
F6/Inventory Management[Good, Average, Poor]Inventory Visibility, Use of Technology in Inventory ManagementUse of correct inventory management techniques
F7/Inventory Visibility[Yes, No]Information and Communication TechnologyVisibility of inventory to all stakeholders
F8/Use of Technology in Inventory Management[Yes, No]N/AUse of modern technologies like RFId, Bar code scanning for warehousing
F9/Processes[Good, Average, Poor]Use of local suppliers, Vendor Managed Inventory, Lateral Trans-shipment, Human Resource ManagementUse of industry best practices in supply management
F10/Use of local suppliers[Yes, No]N/ALocal suppliers for supply of spares
F11/Vendor Managed Inventory[Yes, No]N/AUse of competitive advantage of using VMI
F12/LateralTrans-shipment[Yes, No]N/AAbility of parallel shifting of spare parts
F13/Human Resource Management[Good, Average, Poor]Motivation, Technical competence of Workforce, Training, Duration of each training, Frequency of each training, Qualification, Working Environment, Salary, Job Security, IncentivesStatus of human resource
F14/Motivation[High, Mid, Low]Salary, Job Security, IncentivesLevel of motivation of the workforce
F15/Technical competence of Workforce[High, Mid, Low]Qualification, Working EnvironmentAbility of the workforce to stay technologically aware
F16/Training[High, Mid, Low]Duration of each training, Frequency of each trainingLevel of expertise of the workforce
F17/Duration of each training[Short, Mid, Long]N/ATime period of each of the training capsule
F18/Frequency of each training[Frequent, Rare]N/AFrequency of training for each of the worker
F19/Qualification[High, Low]N/ATechnical qualification of the workforce
F20/Working Environment[Tech, Non Tech]N/APresence of conducive technical learning environment at the workplace
F21/Salary[High, Mid, Low]N/AMonetary remuneration to the workforce as compared to equivalent industry
F22/Job Security[Yes, No]N/APermanency of the job
F23/Incentives[Yes, No]N/ARecognitions, Bonuses etc to reward better workers

Military applications of BBNs.

LiteratureContents
Johansson and Falkman (2008)Develop a threat evaluation system in an air defence scenario. The BBN-based approach makes it possible to handle imperfect observations.
Wang et al. (2012) and Hou et al. (2010)Use a dynamic BBN for Air Defence threat assessment. The advantage of using BBN is that it can modify the threat assessment knowledge repository dynamically, which enables the assessment model to possess better adaptability for producing more accurate assessment results.
Hudson et al. (2001)Describe a software tool Site Profiler that assists antiterrorism planners at military installations to draw inferences about the risk of terrorist attack.
Jha (2009)Develops a model to predict the likelihood of future terrorist activities at critical transportation infrastructure facilities.
Kruger et al. (2012)Uses BBN for identification of a tracked object and assessment of its affiliation and threat potential in maritime surveillance.
Xiang et al. (2008)Develop an intelligent decision support system for military situation assessment. Use BBN models as decision models that have the ability to model and reason under uncertainties. BBN is updated as the situation develops and fresh inputs are available.
Laskey et al. (2000) and Wright et al. (2002)Develop a model to solve a common dilemma in the minds of military planners to segregate important information from within a large volume of available information from diverse sources during conflicts.
Gillies et al. (2010)Introduce modelling and analysis techniques for sensor-enabled missions that quantify the uncertainty in the data and provide a means to estimate the quality of information using BBNs.
Falzon (2006)Describes a centre of gravity (COG) analysis by military commanders. COG is affected by a number of critical capabilities (CCs), with each CC having a number of critical requirements (CRs), which in turn have critical vulnerabilities (CVs) that are targeted through a proper course of action. The authors use causal probabilistic networks to represent the relationships among the CCs and CRs for a COG construct.
eISSN:
1799-3350
Language:
English
Publication timeframe:
Volume Open
Journal Subjects:
History, Topics in History, Military History, Social Sciences, Political Science, Military Policy