Hybrid Imaging in the Assessment of Myocardial Ischemia and Viability

1. World Health Organization, Cardiovascular disease (CVDs), 2016. Available from: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs317/en/#Search in Google Scholar

2. Townsend N, Nichols M, Scarborough P, Rayner M. Cardiovascular disease in Europe — epidemiological update 2015. Eur Heart J. 2015;36:2673-2674.10.1093/eurheartj/ehv428Search in Google Scholar

3. Nichols M, Townsend N, Scarborough P, Rayner M. Cardiovascular disease in Europe 2014: epidemiological update. Eur Heart J. 2014;35:2950-2959.10.1093/eurheartj/ehu299Search in Google Scholar

4. Camici PG, Prasad SK, Rimoldi OE. Stunning, hibernation, and assessment of myocardial viability. Circulation. 2008;117:103-114.10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.702993Search in Google Scholar

5. Tarakji KG, Brunken R, McCarthy PM, et al. Myocardial viability testing and the effect of early intervention in patients with advanced left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Circulation. 2006;113:230-237.10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.541664Search in Google Scholar

6. Schinkel AF, Bax JJ, Poldermans D, Elhendy A, Ferrari R, Rahimtoola SH. Hibernating myocardium: diagnosis and patient outcomes. Curr Probl Cardiol. 2007;32:375-410.10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2007.04.001Search in Google Scholar

7. Brauwald E, Kloner RA. The stunned myocardium: prolonged, postischemic ventricular dysfunction. Circulation. 1982;66:1146-1149.10.1161/01.CIR.66.6.1146Search in Google Scholar

8. Cleland JG, Pennell DJ, Ray SG, et al. Myocardial viability as a determinant of the ejection fraction response to carvedilol in patients with heart failure (CHRISTMAS trial): randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2003;362:14-21.10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13801-9Search in Google Scholar

9. Partington SL, Kwong RY, Dorbala S. Multimodality imaging in the assessment of myocardial viability. Heart Failure Reviews. 2011;16:381-395.10.1007/s10741-010-9201-7395452021069458Search in Google Scholar

10. Yamauchi T, Tamaki N, Kasanuki H, et al. Optimal initial diagnostic strategies for the evaluation of stable angina patients: a multicenter, prospective study on myocardial perfusion imaging, computed tomographic angiography, and coronary angiography. Circ J. 2012;76:2832-2839.10.1253/circj.CJ-12-0222Search in Google Scholar

11. Nikolaou K, Knez A, Rist C, et al. Accuracy of 64-MDCT in the diagnosis of ischemic heart disease. Am J Roentgenol. 2006;187:111-117.10.2214/AJR.05.169716794164Search in Google Scholar

12. Ehara M, Surmely JF, Kawai M, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography for detecting angiographically significant coronary artery stenosis in an unselected consecutive patient population: comparison with conventional invasive angiography. Circ J. 2006;70:564-571.10.1253/circj.70.56416636491Search in Google Scholar

13. Ropers D, Pohle FK, Kuettner A, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography in patients after bypass surgery using 64-slice spiral computed tomography with 330-ms gantry rotation. Circulation. 2006;114:2334-2341.10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.63105117088461Search in Google Scholar

14. Raff GL, Gallagher MJ, O’Neill WW, Goldstein JA. Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46:552-557.10.1016/j.jacc.2005.05.05616053973Search in Google Scholar

15. Lardo AC, Cordeiro MA, Silva C, et al. Contrast-enhanced multidetector computed tomography viability imaging after myocardial infarction characterization of myocyte death, microvascular obstruction, and chronic scar. Circulation. 2006; 24;113:394-404.10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.521450341056216432071Search in Google Scholar

16. Bax JJ, Delgado V. Myocardial viability as integral part of the diagnostic and therapeutic approach to ischemic heart failure. J Nucl Cardiol. 2015;22:229-245.10.1007/s12350-015-0096-5449017725733105Search in Google Scholar

17. Wellnhofer E, Olariu A, Klein C, et al. Magnetic resonance low-dose dobutamine test is superior to SCAR quantification for the prediction of functional recovery. Circulation. 2004;109:18:2172-2174.10.1161/01.CIR.0000128862.34201.7415117834Search in Google Scholar

18. Motoyasu M, Sakuma H, Ichikawa Y, et al. Prediction of regional functional recovery after acute myocardial infarction with low dose dobutamine stress cine MR imaging and contrast enhanced MR imaging. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2003;5:563-574.10.1081/JCMR-12002523314664134Search in Google Scholar

19. Van Hoe L, Vanderheyden M. Ischemic cardiomyopathy: value of different MRI techniques for prediction of functional recovery after revascularization. Am J Roentgenol. 2004;182:95-100.10.2214/ajr.182.1.182009514684520Search in Google Scholar

20. Klein C, Nekolla SG, Bengel FM, et al. Assessment of myocardial viability with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging comparison with positron emission tomography. Circulation. 2002;105:162-167.10.1161/hc0202.10212311790695Search in Google Scholar

21. Li Dy, Hao J, Xia Y, et al. Clinical usefulness of low-dose dobutamine stress real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography for detection of viable myocardium. J Clin Ultrasound. 2012;40:272-279.10.1002/jcu.2089122407931Search in Google Scholar

22. Wang C, Han S, Xu T, et al. Evaluation of myocardial viability in old myocardial infarcted patients with CHF: delayed enhancement MRI vs. low-dose dobutamine stress speckle tracking echocardiography. American Journal of Translational Research. 2016;8:3731-3743.Search in Google Scholar

23. Al Moudi M, Sun Z-H. Diagnostic value of 18F-FDG PET in the assessment of myocardial viability in coronary artery disease: A comparative study with 99mTc SPECT and echocardiography. Journal of Geriatric Cardiology. 2014;11:229-236.Search in Google Scholar

24. Masuda A, Yamaki T, Kunii H, et al. Simultaneous Assessment of Myocardial Viability With 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose Uptake and Late Gadolinium Enhancement by PET/MRI. Circulation. 2016;134:A11929Search in Google Scholar

25. Danad I, Raijmakers PG, Appelman YE, et al. Hybrid imaging using quantitative H2 15O PET and CT-based coronary angiography for the detection of coronary artery disease. J Nucl Med. 2013;54:55-63.10.2967/jnumed.112.10468723232274Search in Google Scholar

26. Kajander S, Joutsiniemi E, Saraste M, et al. Cardiac positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging accurately detects anatomically and functionally significant coronary artery disease. Circulation. 2010;122:603-613.10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.91500920660808Search in Google Scholar

27. Schenker MP, Dorbala S, Hong EC, et al. Interrelation of Coronary Calcification, Myocardial Ischemia, and Outcomes in Patients With Intermediate Likelihood of Coronary Artery Disease A Combined Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Study. Circulation. 2008;117:1693-1700.10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.717512395502918362235Search in Google Scholar

28. Kaufmann PA. Cardiac hybrid imaging: state-of-the-art. Ann Nucl Med. 2009;23:325-331.10.1007/s12149-009-0245-519360454Search in Google Scholar