CT Determination of Fractional Flow Reserve in Coronary Lesions

1. Meijboom WB, Meijs MF, Schuijf JD, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography: a prospective, multi-center, multivendor study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52:2135-2144.10.1016/j.jacc.2008.08.058Search in Google Scholar

2. Pijls NH, De Bruyne B, Peels K, et al. Measurement of fractional flow reserve to assess the functional severity of coronary-artery stenoses. N Engl J Med. 1996;334:1703-1708.10.1056/NEJM199606273342604Search in Google Scholar

3. Windecker S, Kolh P, Alfonso F, et al. 2014 ESC/EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularization: the task force on myocardial revascularization of the European society of cardiology (ESC) and the European association for cardio-thoracic surgery (EACTS)developed with the special contribution of the European association of percutaneous cardiovascular interventions (EAPCI). Eur Heart J. 2014;35:2541-2619.10.1093/eurheartj/ehu278Search in Google Scholar

4. Pijls NH, van Schaardenburgh P, Manoharan G, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention of functionally nonsignificant stenosis: 5-year follow-up of the DEFER study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49:2105-2111.10.1016/j.jacc.2007.01.087Search in Google Scholar

5. Pijls NH, Fearon WF, Tonino PA, et al. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: 2-year follow-up of the FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;56:177-184.10.1016/j.jacc.2010.04.012Search in Google Scholar

6. van Nunen LX, Zimmermann FM1, Tonino PA, et al. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guidance of PCI in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (FAME): 5-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. Lancet. 2015;386:1853-1860.10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00057-4Search in Google Scholar

7. De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Kalesan B, et al. Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI versus medical therapy in stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:991-1001.10.1056/NEJMoa120536122924638Search in Google Scholar

8. De Bruyne B, Fearon WF, Pijls NH, et al. FAME 2 Trial Investigators Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI for stable coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:1208-1217.10.1056/NEJMoa140875825176289Search in Google Scholar

9. Toth GG, Johnson NP, Jeremias A, et al. Standardization of Fractional Flow Reserve Measurements. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;68:742-753.10.1016/j.jacc.2016.05.06727515335Search in Google Scholar

10. Benedek I, Benedek T. Multislice Angio Computed Tomography in the Diagnosis of Cardiovascular Diseases. Editura Universitatii, Oradea; 2014.Search in Google Scholar

11. Stefanini GG, Windecker S. Can Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Replace Invasive Angiography? Circulation. 2015;131:418-426.Search in Google Scholar

12. Chow BJ, Freeman MR, Bowen JM, et al. Ontario multidetector computed tomographic coronary angiography study: field evaluation of diagnostic accuracy. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171:1021-1029.10.1001/archinternmed.2011.7421403014Search in Google Scholar

13. Montalescot G, Sechtem U, Achenbach S, et al. 2013 ESC guidelines on the management of stable coronary artery disease: the Task Force on the management of stable coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J. 2013;34:2949-3003.10.1093/eurheartj/eht29623996286Search in Google Scholar

14. Hamon M, Biondi-Zoccai GG, Malagutti P, et al. Diagnostic performance of multislice spiral computed tomography of coronary arteries as compared with conventional invasive coronary angiography: a meta-anatylis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48:1896-1910.10.1016/j.jacc.2006.08.02817084268Search in Google Scholar

15. Pontone G, Andreini D, Bartorelli AL, et al. A long-term prognostic value of CT angiography and exercise ECG in patients with suspected CAD. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013;6:641-650.10.1016/j.jcmg.2013.01.01523764093Search in Google Scholar

16. Maurovich-Horvat P, Schlett CL, Alkadhi H, et al. The napkin-ring sign indicates advanced atherosclerotic lesions in coronary CT angiography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;5:1243-1252.10.1016/j.jcmg.2012.03.01923236975Search in Google Scholar

17. Tonino PA, Fearon WF, De Bruyne B, et al. Angiographic versus functional severity of coronary artery stenoses in the fame study fractional flow reserve versus angiography in multivessel evaluation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55:2816-2821.10.1016/j.jacc.2009.11.09620579537Search in Google Scholar

18. Toth G, Hamilos M, Pyxaras S, et al. Evolving concepts of angiogram: fractional flow reserve discordances in 4000 coronary stenoses. Eur Heart J. 2014;35:2831-2838.10.1093/eurheartj/ehu09424644308Search in Google Scholar

19. Rossi A, Papadopoulou SL, Pugliese F, et al. Quantitative computed tomographic coronary angiography: does it predict functionally significant coronary stenoses? Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014;7:43-51.Search in Google Scholar

20. Meijboom WB, Van Mieghem CA, van Pelt N, et al. Comprehensive assessment of coronary artery stenoses: computed tomography coronary angiography versus conventional coronary angiography and correlation with fractional flow reserve in patients with stable angina. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52:636-643.10.1016/j.jacc.2008.05.02418702967Search in Google Scholar

21. Zarins CK, Taylor CA, Min JK. Computed fractional flow reserve (FFRCT) derivated from coronary CT angiography. J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2013;6:708-714.10.1007/s12265-013-9498-4379091623934536Search in Google Scholar

22. Nakanishi R, Budoff MJ. Noninvasive FFR derived from coronary CT angiography in the management of coronary artery disease: technology and clinical update. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2016;12:269-278.Search in Google Scholar

23. Taylor CA, Fonte TA, Min JK. Computational fluid dynamics applied to cardiac computed tomography for noninvasive quantification of fractional flow reserve: scientific basis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61:2233-2241.10.1016/j.jacc.2012.11.08323562923Search in Google Scholar

24. Pang CL, Alcock R, Pilkington N, et al. Determining the haemodynamic significance of arterial stenosis: the relationship between CT angiography, computational fluid dynamics, and noninvasive fractional flow reserve. Clin Radiol. 2016;71:750-757.10.1016/j.crad.2016.03.00127061041Search in Google Scholar

25. Koo BK, Erglis A, Doh JH, et al. Diagnosis of Ischemia-Causing Coronary Stenoses by Noninvasive Fractional Flow Reserve Computed From Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiograms. Results from the Prospective Multicenter DISCOVER-FLOW Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58:1989-1997.10.1016/j.jacc.2011.06.06622032711Search in Google Scholar

26. Min JK, Leipsic J, Pencina MJ, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of fractional flow reserve from anatomic CT angiography. JAMA. 2012;308:1237-1245.10.1001/2012.jama.11274428147922922562Search in Google Scholar

27. Nørgaard BL, Leipsic J, Gaur S, et al. NXT Trial Study Group. Diagnostic performance of noninvasive fractional flow reserve derived from coronary computed tomography angiography in suspected coronary artery disease: the NXT trial (analysis of coronary blood flow using CT angiography: next steps). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63:1145-1155.10.1016/j.jacc.2013.11.04324486266Search in Google Scholar

28. Li S, Tang X, Peng L, Luo Y, et al. The diagnostic performance of CT-derived fractional flow reserve for evaluation of myocardial ischaemia confirmed by invasive fractional flow reserve: a meta-analysis. Clin Radiol. 2015;70:476-486.10.1016/j.crad.2014.12.01325623512Search in Google Scholar

29. Arbab-Zadeh A, Miller JM, Rochitte CE, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography coronary angiography according to pretest probability of coronary artery disease and severity of coronary arterial calcification. the core-64 (coronary artery evaluation using 64-row multidetector computed tomography angiography) international multicenter study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;59:379-387.10.1016/j.jacc.2011.06.079334858922261160Search in Google Scholar

30. Abdulla J, Pedersen KS, Budoff M, Kofoed KF. Influence of coronary calcification on the diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;28:943-953.10.1007/s10554-011-9902-621667273Search in Google Scholar

31. Nørgaard BL, Gaur S, Leipsic J, et al. Influence of coronary calcification on the diagnostic performance of CT angiography derived FFR in coronary artery disease: a substudy of the NXT trial. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;9:1045-1055.10.1016/j.jcmg.2015.06.00326298072Search in Google Scholar

32. Kim KH, Doh JH, Koo BK, et al. A novel noninvasive technology for treatment planning using virtual coronary stenting and computed tomography-derived computed fractional flow reserve. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;7:72-78.10.1016/j.jcin.2013.05.02424332418Search in Google Scholar

33. Wang R, Renker M, Schoepf UJ, et al. Diagnostic value of quantitative stenosis predictors with coronary CT angiography compared to invasive fractional flow reserve. Eur J Radiol. 2015;84:1509-1515.10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.05.01026022519Search in Google Scholar

34. Renker M, Schoepf UJ, Wang R, et al. Comparison of diagnostic value of a novel noninvasive coronary computed tomography angiography method versus standard coronary angiography for assessing fractional flow reserve. Am J Cardiol. 2014;114:1303-1308.10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.07.06425205628Search in Google Scholar

35. Douglas PS, Pontone G, Hlatky MA, et al. Clinical outcomes of fractional flow reserve by computed tomographic angiography-guided diagnostic strategies vs. Usual care in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: the prospective longitudinal trial of FFRCT: outcome and resource impacts study. Eur Heart J. 2015;36:3359-3367.10.1093/eurheartj/ehv444467727326330417Search in Google Scholar

36. Marwick TH, Cho I, Hartaigh B, Min JK. Finding the Gatekeeper to the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory: Coronary CT Angiography or Stress Testing? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;65:2747-2756.Search in Google Scholar

37. Hlatky MA, De Bruyne B, Pontone G, et al. Quality-of-Life and Economic Outcomes of Assessing Fractional Flow Reserve With Computed Tomography Angiography: PLATFORM. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;66:2315-2323.10.1016/j.jacc.2015.09.05126475205Search in Google Scholar