[1. Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). Available at: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs317/en/]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Measuring and Improving Quality of Care A Report From the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology First Scientific Forum on Assessment of Healthcare Quality in Cardiovascular Disease and Stroke. Circulation. 2000;101:1483-1493. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.101.12.1483.10.1161/01.CIR.101.12.1483]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[3. Kreatsoulas C, Anand SS. The impact of social determinants on cardiovascular disease. The Canadian Journal of Cardiology. 2010;26:8C-13C.10.1016/S0828-282X(10)71075-8]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[4. Kozinski M, Pstragowski K, Kubica JM, et al. ACS networkbased implementation of therapeutic hypothermia for the treatment of comatose out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survivors improves clinical outcomes: the first European experience. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2013;21:22. doi:10.1186/1757-7241-21-22.]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Tubaro M, Danchin N, Goldstein P, et al. Pre-hospital treatment of STEMI patients. A scientific statement of the Working Group Acute Cardiac Care of the European Society of Cardiology. Acute Card Care. 2011;13:56-67. doi: 10.3109/17482941.2011.581292.]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Rizzello V, Lucci D, Maggioni AP, et al. Clinical epidemiology, management and outcome of acute coronary syndromes in the Italian network on acute coronary syndromes (INACS Outcome study). Acute Card Care. 2012;14:71-80. doi: 10.3109/17482941.2012.655296.]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Scholz KH, von Knobelsdorff G, Ahlersmann D, et al. Optimizing systems of care for patients with acute myocardial infarction. STEMI networks, telemetry ECG, and standardized quality improvement with systematic data feedback. Herz. 2008;33:102-109. doi: 10.1007/s00059-008-3120-6.]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Claeys MJ, Sinnaeve PR, Convens C, et al. STEMI mortality in community hospitals versus PCI-capable hospitals: results from a nationwide STEMI network programme. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2012;1:40-47. doi:10.1177/2048872612441579.]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Rokos I, Henry T, Weittenhiller B, et al. Mission: Lifeline STEMI Networks Geospatial Information Systems (GIS) Maps. Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2013;13:43-44. doi:10.1097/ HPC.0b013e31828cfe1b.]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Bagai A, Al-Khalidi HR, Sherwood M, et al. Regional systems of care demonstration project: Mission: Lifeline STEMI Systems Accelerator: Design and methodology. Am Heart J. 2014;167:15-21. doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2013.10.005.]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Masci PG, Bogaert J. Post myocardial infarction of the left ventricle: the course ahead seen by cardiac MRI. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2012;2:113-127. doi:10.3978/j.issn.2223-3652.2012.04.06.]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Bonow RO, Maurer G, Lee KL, et al. Myocardial Viability and Survival in Ischemic Left Ventricular Dysfunction. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:1617-1625. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1100358.]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Bonow RO, Castelvecchio S, Panza JA, et al. Ischemic Left Ventricular Dysfunction: Severity of Remodeling, Myocardial Viability and Survival After Surgical Revascularization. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;8:1121-1129. doi:10.1016/j.jcmg.2015.03.013.]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Montalescot G, Andersen HR, Antoniucci D, et al. Recommendations on percutaneous coronary intervention for the reperfusion of acute ST elevation myocardial infarction. Heart. 2004;90:e37.10.1136/hrt.2003.016014]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Windecker S, Kohl P, Alfonso F, et al. The Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio- Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) Developed with the special contribution of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI). Eur Heart J. 2014;35:2541-2619. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehu278.10.1093/eurheartj/ehu278]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[16. McLeod SL, Iansavichene A, Cheskes S. Remote Ischemic Preconditioning to Reduce Reperfusion Injury During Acute ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017;6:e005522. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.005522.]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Ibanez B, James S, Agewall S, et al. 2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J. 2017. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx393. [Epub ahead of print]]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Terkelsen CJ, Sorensen JT, Maeng M, et al. System delay and mortality among patients with STEMI treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention. JAMA. 2010;304:763-771. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.1139.]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Fordyce C, Al-Khalidi H, Jollis J, et al. Association of Rapid Care Process Implementation on Reperfusion Times Across Multiple ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Networks. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;pii:e004061. doi:10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Stowens JC, Sonnad SS, Rosenbaum RA. Using EMS dispatch to trigger STEMI alerts decreases door-to-balloon times. West J Emerg Med. 2015;16:472-480. doi: 10.5811/ westjem.2015.4.24248.]Search in Google Scholar
[21. Nallamothu BK, Normand SL, Wang Y, et al. Relation between door-to-balloon times and mortality after primary percutaneous coronary intervention over time: a retrospective study. Lancet. 2015;385:1114-1122. ttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ S0140-6736(14)61932-2.10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61932-2]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[22. Welsh RC, Chang W, Goldstein P, et al. Time to treatment and the impact of a physician on prehospital management of acute ST elevation myocardial infarction: insights from the ASSENT-3 PLUS trial. Heart. 2005;91:1400-1406. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2004.054510.]Search in Google Scholar
[23. Henry TD, Sharkey SW, Burke MN, et al. A regional system to provide timely access to percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2007;116:721-728. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.694141.]Search in Google Scholar
[24. Benedek I, Gyongyosi M, Benedek T. A prospective regional registry of ST-elevation myocardial infarction in central Romania. Impact of the Stent for Life initiative recommendations on patient outcomes. Am Heart J. 2013;166:457-465. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2013.03.033.]Search in Google Scholar
[25. Bajka B, Orzan M, Jakó B, Kovács I. Distance-related differences in critical times, protocol activation and mortality in a regional STEMI network. Journal of Cardiovascular Emergencies. 2016;2:122-128. doi: 10.1515/jce-2016-0019.]Search in Google Scholar
[26. Orzan M, Benedek T, Bajka B, Pál K, Rat N, Benedek I. Impact of a preexisting STEMI network in improving STEMI diagnostic and treatment in the community after the introduction of a national program of interventional treatment in acute myocardial infarction. Journal of Cardiovascular Emergencies. 2015;1:23-28. doi: 10.1515/jce-2015-0004.]Search in Google Scholar
[27. García-García C, Ribas N, Recasens LL, et al. In-hospital prognosis and long-term mortality of STEMI in a reperfusion network. "Head to head" analysis: invasive reperfusion vs. optimal medical therapy. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2017;17:139. doi: 10.1186/s12872-017-0574-6.]Search in Google Scholar
[28. Cequier Á, Ariza-Solé A, Elola FJ, et al. Impact on Mortality of Different Network Systems in the Treatment of STsegment Elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction. The Spanish Experience. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2017;70:155-161. doi: 10.1016/j.rec.2016.07.005.]Search in Google Scholar
[29. Haller PM, Jäger B, Farhan S, et al. Impact of age on shortand long-term mortality of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction in the VIENNA STEMI network. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2017. doi: 10.1007/s00508-017-1250-7. [Epub ahead of print]]Search in Google Scholar
[30. Dharma S, Andriantoro H, Purnawan I, et al. Characteristics, treatment and in-hospital outcomes of patients with STEMI in a metropolitan area of a developing country: an initial report of the extended Jakarta Acute Coronary Syndrome registry. BMJ Open. 2016;6:e012193. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012193.]Search in Google Scholar
[31. Regueiro A, Fernández-Rodríguez D, et al. False Positive STEMI Activations in a Regional Network: Comprehensive Analysis and Clinical Impact. Results From the Catalonian Codi Infart Network. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2017;pii:S1885-5857(17)30305-5. doi: 10.1016/j.rec.2017.06.001. [Epub ahead of print]]Search in Google Scholar
[32. Kontos MC, Wang TY, Chen AY, et al. The effect of high-risk ST elevation myocardial infarction transfer patients on riskadjusted in-hospital mortality: A report from the American Heart Association Mission: Lifeline program. Am Heart J. 2016;180:74-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2016.07.010.]Search in Google Scholar
[33. Park JJ, Yoon CH, Suh JW, et al. Reduction of Ischemic Time for Transferred STEMI Patients Using a Smartphone Social Network System. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;68:1490-1492. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.07.733.]Search in Google Scholar
[34. Wong GC, van Diepen S, Ainsworth C, et al. Canadian Cardiovascular Society/Canadian Cardiovascular Critical Care Society/Canadian Association of Interventional Cardiology Position Statement on the Optimal Care of the Postarrest Patient. Can J Cardiol. 2017;33:1-16. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2016.10.021.]Search in Google Scholar
[35. Bărcan A, Chițu M, Benedek E, et al. Predictors Of Mortality In Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction And Resuscitated Out-Of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest. J Crit Care Med. 2016;2:22-30. doi: 10.1515/jccm-2016-0001.]Search in Google Scholar
[36. Huang Y, He Q, Yang LJ, Liu GJ, Jones A. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) plus delayed defibrillation versus immediate defibrillation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;9:CD009803. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009803.pub2.]Search in Google Scholar
[37. Peek GJ. Community extracorporeal life support for cardiac arrest - when should it be used? Resuscitation. 2011;82:1117. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.06.006.]Search in Google Scholar
[38. Strapazzon G, Plankensteiner J, Mair P, et al. Prehospital management and outcome of avalanche patients with out-ofhospital cardiac arrest: a retrospective study in Tyrol, Austria. Eur J Emerg Med. 2016. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000390. [Epub ahead of print].]Search in Google Scholar
[39. Hwang WS, Park JS, Kim SJ, Hong YS, Moon SW, Lee SW. A system-wide approach from the community to the hospital for improving neurologic outcomes in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients. Eur J Emerg Med. 2017;24:87-95. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000313.]Search in Google Scholar
[40. Grunau B, Reynolds J, Scheuermeyer F, et al. Relationship between Time-to-ROSC and Survival in Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest ECPR Candidates: When is the Best Time to Consider Transport to Hospital? Prehosp Emerg Care. 2016;20:615-622. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2016.1149652.]Search in Google Scholar
[41. Spangenberg T, Meincke F, Brooks S, et al. ”Shock and Go?” extracorporeal cardio-pulmonary resuscitation in the goldenhour of ROSC. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;88:691-696. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26616.]Search in Google Scholar
[42. Johnson NJ, Acker M, Hsu CH, et al. Extracorporeal life support as rescue strategy for out-of-hospital and emergency department cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2014;85:1527-1532. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.08.028.]Search in Google Scholar
[43. Grunau B, Scheuermeyer FX, Stub D, et al. Potential Candidates for a Structured Canadian ECPR Program for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest. CJEM. 2016:1-8. doi: 10.1017/cem.2016.8.]Search in Google Scholar
[44. Ha TS, Yang JH, Cho YH, et al. Clinical outcomes after rescue extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for out-ofhospital cardiac arrest. Emerg Med J. 2017;34:107-111. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2015-204817.]Search in Google Scholar
[45. Sharma AS, Pijls RW, Weerwind PW, et al. Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: the prospect of E-CPR in the Maastricht region. Neth Heart J. 2016;24:120-126. doi: 10.1007/s12471-015-0782- 6.]Search in Google Scholar
[46. Avalli L, Mauri T, Citerio G, et al. New treatment bundles improve survival in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients: a historical comparison. Resuscitation. 2014;85:1240-1244. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.06.014.]Search in Google Scholar
[47. Leick J, Liebetrau C, Szardien S, et al. Door-to-implantation time of extracorporeal life support systems predicts mortality in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Clin Res Cardiol. 2013;102:661-669. doi: 10.1007/s00392-013-0580-3.]Search in Google Scholar
[48. Sarzyńska-Długosz I, Skowrońska M, Członkowska A. Organization of acute stroke services in Poland - Polish Stroke Unit Network development. Neurol Neurochir Pol. 2013;47:3-7.10.5114/ninp.2013.3293423487288]Search in Google Scholar
[49. Rymer MM, Thrutchley DE. Stroke Team at the Mid America Brain and Stroke Institute. Organizing regional networks to increase acute stroke intervention. Neurol Res. 2005;27:9-16. doi: 10.1179/016164105X25315.]Search in Google Scholar
[50. Muengtaweepongsa S, Dharmasaroja P, Kummark U. Outcomes of intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute ischemic stroke with an integrated acute stroke referral network: initial experience of a community-based hospital in a developing country. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2012;21:42-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2010.03.017.]Search in Google Scholar
[51. Widimsky P, Hopkins LN. Catheter-based interventions for acute ischaemic stroke. Eur Heart J. 2016;37:3081-3089. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehv521.]Search in Google Scholar
[52. Alonso de Leciñana-Cases M, Gil-Núñez A, Díez-Tejedor E. Relevance of stroke code, stroke unit and stroke networks in organization of acute stroke care - the Madrid acute stroke care program.]Search in Google Scholar
[53. Leys D, Ringelstein EB, Kaste M, et al. The main components of stroke unit care: results of a European expert survey. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2007;23:344-352. doi: 10.1159/000099133.]Search in Google Scholar
[54. Fuentes B, Díez-Tejedor E. Stroke units: many questions, some answers. Int J Stroke. 2009;4:28-37. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-4949.2009.00244.x. ]Search in Google Scholar
[55. Berkhemer OA, Fransen PS, Beumer D, et al. the MR CLEAN Investigators. A randomized trial of intraarterial treatment for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:11-20. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1411587.]Search in Google Scholar
[56. Campbell BC, Mitchell PJ, Kleinig TJ, et al. Endovascular therapy for ischemic stroke with perfusion-imaging selection. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:1009-1018. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1414792.]Search in Google Scholar
[57. Saver JL, Goyal M, Bonafe A, et al. Stent-retriever thrombectomy after intravenous t-PA vs. t-PA alone in stroke. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:2285-2295. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1415061.]Search in Google Scholar
[58. Saver JL, Goyal M, Bonafe A, et al. Solitaire™ with the Intention for Thrombectomy as Primary Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke (SWIFT PRIME) trial: protocol for a randomized, controlled, multicenter study comparing the Solitaire revascularization device with IV tPA with IV tPA alone in acute ischemic stroke. Int J Stroke. 2015;10:439-448. doi: 10.1111/ijs.12459.]Search in Google Scholar
[59. Peisker T, Koznar B, Stetkarova I, Widimsky P. Acute stroke therapy: A review. Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2017;27:59-66. doi: 10.1016/j.tcm.2016.06.009.]Search in Google Scholar
[60. Bellon RJ, Putman CM, Budzik RF, Pergolizzi RS, Reinking GF, Norbash AM. Rheolytic thrombectomy of the occluded internal carotid artery in the setting of acute ischemic stroke. Am J Neuroradiol. 2001;22:526-530.]Search in Google Scholar
[61. Abelson M, Roos J, Rymer M. Mechanical thromboembolectomy in acute ischaemic stroke: a local experience. Cardiovasc J Afr. 2008;19:204-207.]Search in Google Scholar
[62. DeVries JT, White CJ, Collins TJ, et al. Acute stroke intervention by interventional cardiologists. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2009;73:692-8. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21927.]Search in Google Scholar
[63. Hopkins N. Management of Acute Stroke by Cardiologists. Interventional Cardiology Review. 2011;6:86-88. http://dx.doi.org/10.15420/icr.2011.6.1.86.10.15420/ICR.2011.6.1.86]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[64. Abelson M, Roos J. Mechanical embolectomy for large vessel ischemic strokes: a cardiologist's experience. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2010;76:309-315. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22621.]Search in Google Scholar
[65. Heuser RR. We are ready, willing, and able: the interventional cardiology community: but we have two hands tied behind our back. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2009;73:699-700. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22037. ]Search in Google Scholar
[66. Lanzer P, Camm J, Widimský P. Stroke in cardiovascular interventions. Eur Heart J. 2017;38:1278-1280. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx193.]Search in Google Scholar
[67. Lanzer P, Haude M, Widimsky P. Stroke management by cardiologists. Eur Heart J. 2017;38:2389-2390. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx411.]Search in Google Scholar
[68. Widimsky P, Koznar B, Peisker T, et al. Feasibility and safety of direct catheter-based thrombectomy in the treatment of acute ischaemic stroke. Cooperation among cardiologists, neurologists and radiologists. Prospective registry PRAGUE-16. EuroIntervention. 2017;13:131-136. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-16-00979.]Search in Google Scholar
[69. Froehler MT, Saver JL, Zaidat OO, et al. Interhospital Transfer Prior to Thrombectomy is Associated with Delayed Treatment and Worse Outcome in the STRATIS Registry. Circulation. 2017;pii:CIRCULATIONAHA.117.028920. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.028920. [Epub ahead of print]]Search in Google Scholar
[70. Mueller-Kronast NH, Zaidat OO, et al. Systematic Evaluation of Patients Treated With Neurothrombectomy Devices for Acute Ischemic Stroke: Primary Results of the STRATIS Registry. Stroke. 2017;48:2760-2768. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.016456.]Search in Google Scholar
[71. Switzer JA, Demaerschalk BM, Xie J, Fan L, Villa KF, Wu EQ. Cost-effectiveness of hub-and-spoke telestroke networks for the management of acute ischemic stroke from the hospitals' perspectives. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2013;6:18-26. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.112.967125.]Search in Google Scholar
[72. Demaerschalk BM, Switzer JA, Xie J, Fan L, Villa KF, WuEQ. Cost utility of hub-and-spoke telestroke networks from societal perspective. Am J Manag Care. 2013;19:976-985.]Search in Google Scholar
[73. Tatlisumak T, Soinila S, Kaste M. Telestroke networking offers multiple benefits beyond thrombolysis. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2009;27:21-27. doi: 10.1159/000213055.]Search in Google Scholar
[74. Audebert H. Telestroke: effective networking. Lancet Neurol. 2006;5:279-282. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(06)70378-7.]Search in Google Scholar
[75. Müller-Barna P, Schwamm LH, Haberl RL. Telestroke increases use of acute stroke therapy. Curr Opin Neurol. 2012;25:5-10. doi: 10.1097/WCO.0b013e32834d5fe4.]Search in Google Scholar
[76. Zerna C, Siepmann T, Barlinn K, et al. Association of time on outcome after intravenous thrombolysis in the elderly in a telestroke network. J Telemed Telecare. 2016;22:18-24. doi: 10.1177/1357633X15585241.]Search in Google Scholar
[77. Zanaty M, Chalouhi N, Starke RM, et al. Epidemiology of a large telestroke cohort in the Delaware valley. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2014;125:143-147. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2014.06.006.]Search in Google Scholar
[78. Sanders KA, Patel R, Kiely JM, Gwynn MW, Johnston LH. Improving Telestroke Treatment Times in an Expanding Network of Hospitals. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2016;25:288-291. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2015.09.030.]Search in Google Scholar
[79. Kepplinger J, Barlinn K, Deckert S, Scheibe M, Bodechtel U, Schmitt J. Safety and efficacy of thrombolysis in telestroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurology. 2016;87:1344-1351. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000003148.]Search in Google Scholar
[80. Pervez MA, Silva G, Masrur S, et al. Remote supervision of IVtPA for acute ischemic stroke by telemedicine or telephone before transfer to a regional stroke center is feasible and safe. Stroke. 2010;41:e18-e24. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.560169.]Search in Google Scholar
[81. Heffner DL, Thirumala PD, Pokharna P, Chang YF, Wechsler L. Outcomes of Spoke-Retained Telestroke Patients Versus Hub- Treated Patients After Intravenous Thrombolysis: Telestroke Patient Outcomes After Thrombolysis. Stroke. 2015;46:3161-3167. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.009980.]Search in Google Scholar
[82. Nardetto L, Giometto B, Moretto G, Mantoan D, Saia M. Huband- spoke stroke network in the Veneto region: a retrospective study investigating the effectiveness of the stroke pathway and trends over time. Neurol Sci. 2017. doi: 10.1007/s10072- 017-3118-z. [Epub ahead of print]]Search in Google Scholar
[83. Chalouhi N, Dressler JA, Kunkel ES, et al. Intravenous tissue plasminogen activator administration in community hospitals facilitated by telestroke service. Neurosurgery. 2013;73:667-771. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000000073.]Search in Google Scholar
[84. Klingner CM, Brodoehl S, Funck L, et al. Transfer of Patients in a Telestroke Network: What Are the Relevant Factors for Making This Decision? Telemed J E Health. 2017. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2017.0087. [Epub ahead of print]]Search in Google Scholar
[85. Ranta A, Lanford J, Busch S, et al. Impact and implementation of a sustainable regional telestroke network. Intern Med J. 2017. doi: 10.1111/imj.13557. [Epub ahead of print]]Search in Google Scholar
