1. bookVolume 4 (2015): Issue 3 (September 2015)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2336-9205
First Published
11 Mar 2014
Publication timeframe
3 times per year
Languages
English
Open Access

Ownership Concentration and Firm Performance in Transition Economies: Evidence from Montenegro

Published Online: 07 Oct 2015
Volume & Issue: Volume 4 (2015) - Issue 3 (September 2015)
Page range: 5 - 64
Received: 09 Jun 2015
Accepted: 30 Jun 2015
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2336-9205
First Published
11 Mar 2014
Publication timeframe
3 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

The relationship between ownership concentration and firm performance has been the focal point of corporate governance literature and the subject of rather rich empirical literature. However, the current literature lacks uniformity and consensus regarding the nature and direction of this relationship. This research aims to contribute to this literature by investigating the relationship in a small and open transition economy of Montenegro.

We use primary data1 from the period 2004-2008 to analyse, for the first time, the impact of ownership concentration on firm performance in Montenegro. The results support the hypothesis that high ownership concentration enables effective monitoring by investors to protect their interests; i.e. in the specific circumstances of transition, ownership structure may be (temporarily) used as a viable substitute for the still underdeveloped corporate governance framework.

Keywords

1. Aboody, D., Barth, M. E., and Kasznik, R. (1999) Revaluations of Fixed assets and future firm performance: Evidence from the UK, Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 26, No. 1-3, pp. 149-178.Search in Google Scholar

2. Aboody, D. and Kasznik, R. (2000) CEO stock option awards and the timing of corporate voluntary disclosures, Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp. 73-100.Search in Google Scholar

3. Alan, G. and Steve, M. (2005) Foreign acquisitions by UK limited companies: short- and long-run performance. Journal of Empirical Finance, Vol. 12, pp. 99- 125.Search in Google Scholar

4. Almazan, A., Hartzell, J. C. and Starks, L. T. (2005) Active Institutional Shareholders and Costs of Monitoring: Evidence from Executive Compensation, Financial Management, Vol. 34, No. 4, pp. 5-34.Search in Google Scholar

5. Anderson, J. H., Lee, Y., and Murrell, P. (2000) Competition and Privatization amidst Weak Institutions: Evidence from Mongolia, Economic Inquiry, Vol. 38, No. 4, pp. 527-549.Search in Google Scholar

6. Aukutsionek, S., Filatochev, I. Kapelyushnikov, R., and Zhukov, V. (1998) Dominant shareholders, restructuring, and performance of privatized companies in Russia: an analysis and some policy implications, Communist Economies and Economic Transformation, Vol. 10, No. 4, pp. 495-517.Search in Google Scholar

7. Ayedin, N., Sayim, M., and Yalama, A. (2007) Foreign Ownership and Firm Performance: Evidence from Turkey, International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, No. 11, pp. 103-111.Search in Google Scholar

8. Baert, L. and Vennet, R. V. (2009) Bank Ownership, Firm Value and Firm Capital Structure in Europe, German Institute for Economic Research Working Paper No. 2.2.10.2139/ssrn.1342566Search in Google Scholar

9. Balsmeier, B. and Czarnitzki, D. (2010) Ownership concentration, Institutional Development and Firm Performance in Central and Eastern Europe, ZEW Discussion Paper No. 10-096.Search in Google Scholar

10. Barbosa, N. and Louri, H. (2003) Corporate Performance: Does Ownership Matter? A Comparison of Foreign- and Domestic- Owned Firms in Greece and Portugal, NIMA Working Paper No. 26.Search in Google Scholar

11. Berger, P., Ofek, E., and Yermack, D. (1997) Managerial entrenchment and capital structure decisions, Journal of Finance, Vol. 52, pp. 1411-1437.Search in Google Scholar

12. Berger, A. N. and di Patti, E. (2002) Capital Structure and Firm Performance: A New Approach to Testing Agency Theory and an Application to the Banking Industry, Finance and Economics Discussion Series No.54.10.17016/FEDS.2002.54Search in Google Scholar

13. Blaszczyk, B. and Woodward, R. (2001) Secondary Privatisation: The Evolution of Ownership Structures of Privatised Enterprises, CASE Network Report No. 50.Search in Google Scholar

14. Bloom, N. and Van Reenen, J. (2002) Patents, Real Options and Firm Performance, Economic Journal, Vol. 112, No. 478, pp. 97-116.Search in Google Scholar

15. Boubakri, N., Cosset, J. C., and Guedhami, O. (2005) Post-privatization corporate governance: The role of ownership structure and investor protection. Journal of Financial Economics, No. 76, pp. 369-399.10.1016/j.jfineco.2004.05.003Search in Google Scholar

16. Carlin, W., Reenen, J. V., and Wolfe, T. (1995) Enterprise Restructuring in Early Transition :The Case Study Evidence from Central and Eastern Europe, Economics of Transition, Vol. 13, No. 4, pp. 427-458.Search in Google Scholar

17. Carlin, W., Fries, S., Schaffer, M. E., and Seabright, P. (2001) Competition and Enterprise Performance in Transition Economies: Evidence from a Cross-Country Survey, EBRD Working Paper No. 63.Search in Google Scholar

18. Castaneda, G. (2006) Economic Growth and Concentrated Ownership in Stock Markets, Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization, Vol. 59, No. 2, pp. 249-286.Search in Google Scholar

19. Cerovic, B. (2010) Impact of initial conditions on transition progress: the case of Montenegro, South-Eastern Europe Journal of Economics, Vol. 2, pp. 153-169.Search in Google Scholar

20. Chang, E. and Wong, S. M. L. (2004) Political Control and Performance in China’s Listed Frms, Journal of Comparative Economics, Vol. 32, No. 4, pp. 617-636.Search in Google Scholar

21. Chhibber, P. and Majumdar, S. K. (1998) State as Investor and State as Owner: Consequences for Firm Performance in India, Economic Development and Cultural Change, Vol. 46, No. 3, pp. 561-580.Search in Google Scholar

22. Couderc, N. (2005) Corporate cash holdings: financial determinants and consequences, Working Paper, University of Paris.Search in Google Scholar

23. Damijan, J. and Gregoric, A., and Prasnikar, J. (2004) Ownership Concentration and Firm Performance in Slovenia, LICOS Centre for Transition Economics Discussion Paper No. 142.Search in Google Scholar

24. De Miguel, A., Pindado, J., and de la Torre, C. (2004) Ownership Structure and Firm Value: New Evidence from Spain, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 25, No. 12, pp. 1199-1207.Search in Google Scholar

25. Demsetz, H. and Lehn, K. (1985) The Structure of Corporate Ownership, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 93, No. 6, pp. 1155-1177.Search in Google Scholar

26. Demsetz, H. and Villalonga, B. (2001) Ownership Structure and Corporate Performance, Journal of Corporate Finance, Vol. 7, No. 3, pp. 209−233.Search in Google Scholar

27. Dharwadkar, R., George, G., and Brandes, P. (2000) Privatization in emerging economies: an agency theory perspective, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 25, No. 3, pp. 650-669. Search in Google Scholar

28. Djankov, S. and Hoekman B. (1998) Determinants of Foreign Investment in Czech Firms, World Bank Economic Review.Search in Google Scholar

29. Djankov, S. (1999) Restructuring of Insider-Dominated Firms, Policy Research Working Paper No. 2046.Search in Google Scholar

30. Djankov, S., and Murrell, P. (2000) The Determinants of Enterprise Restructuring in Transition: An Assessment of the Evidence, World Bank, Report No. 20942.Search in Google Scholar

31. Djankov, S. and Murrell, P. (2002) Enterprise Restructuring in Transition: A Quantitative Survey, Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 40, No. 3, pp. 739-792.Search in Google Scholar

32. Djankov, S., McLiesh, C., Nenova, T. and Shleifer, A. (2003) Who Owns the Media?, Journal of Law and Economics, Vol. 46, No. 2, pp. 341-381.Search in Google Scholar

33. Douma, S., George, R., and Kabir, R (2006). Foreign and Domestic Ownership, Business Groups, and Firm Performance: Evidence from a Large Emerging Market, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 27, No. 7, pp. 637-57.Search in Google Scholar

34. Dyck, A. (2000) Ownership Structure, Legal Protections, and Corporate Governance, the paper has been prepared for the Annual Bank Conference on Development Economics.Search in Google Scholar

35. Dyck, A. and Zingales, L. (2004) Private Benefits of Control: An International Comparison, The Journal of Finance, Vol. 59, No. 2, pp. 537-600.Search in Google Scholar

36. Dzanic, A. (2012) Concentration of Ownership and Corporate Performance: Evidence from the Zagreb Stock Exchange, Financial Theory and Practice, Vol. 36, No. 1, pp. 29-52.Search in Google Scholar

37. Earle, J. S. and Estrin, S. (1997) Privatization Versus Competition: Changing Enterprise Behaviour in Russia, William Davidson Institute, Working Paper No. 70.Search in Google Scholar

38. Earle, J. and Telgedy, A. (2001) Productivity and Ownership Structure in Romania: Matter? Central European University, Budapest, Hungary.Search in Google Scholar

39. Earle, J.S., Kuscera, G., and Telegdy, A. (2004) Ownership Concentration and Corporate Performance on the Budapest Stock Exchange: Do Too Many Cooks Spoil the Goulash?, Upjohn Institute Working Paper No. 03-93.Search in Google Scholar

40. Ellerman, D. (1993) Management and Employee Buy-Outs as a Technique of Privatization, in Ellerman, D. (eds) (1993) Management and Employee Buy-Outs as a Technique of Privatization, Ljubljana: Central and Eastern European Privatization Network.Search in Google Scholar

41. Ellerman, D. (1998) Voucher privatization and investment funds: An institutional analysis, Working Paper No. 1924, World Bank, Washington. 10.1596/1813-9450-1924Search in Google Scholar

42. Ellerman, D. (1999) Global Institutions: Transforming International Development Agencies into Learning Organizations, The Academy of Management: Executive, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 25-35.Search in Google Scholar

43. Lebahar-Friedman (1999) Analyzing Financial Statements, Eric Press.Search in Google Scholar

44. Estrin, S. (1994) (eds) Privatization in Central and Eastern Europe, London: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

45. Estrin, S., Nuti, M. and Uvalic, M. (1999) The impact of investment funds on corporate governance in mass privatization schemes: Czech Republic, Poland, Slovenia, MOCT-MOST, Vol. 9, pp. 137-162.Search in Google Scholar

46. Estrin, S. and Rosevear. A (1999) Enterprise Performance and Corporate Governance in Ukraine. Journal of Comparative Economics. Vol. 27, No.3, pp.442-458.10.1006/jcec.1999.1605Search in Google Scholar

47. Estrin, S. and Wright, M. (1999) Corporate Governance in the Former Soviet Union: An Overview, Journal of Comparative Economics,Vol. 27, No. 3, pp. 398-421.Search in Google Scholar

48. Estrin, S. (2000) Self-Management, Employee Ownership and Transition, in Equality, Participation, Transition: Essays in Honour of Branko Horvat, Macmillan Press, Basingstoke, UK.10.1057/9780230523098_9Search in Google Scholar

49. Estrin, S. and Stone, R. (2001) A Taxonomy of Mass Privatisation, in Beyond Transition: The Newsletter About Reforming Economies, World Bank, Washington.Search in Google Scholar

50. Estrin, S. (2002) Competition and corporate governance in transition, Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 101-124.Search in Google Scholar

51. Estrin, S. and Rosevear, A. (2003) Privatization in Ukraine, in David Parker, David Saal, International handbook on privatization, Edward Elgar Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

52. Estrin, S., Ionascu, D. and Meyer, E. (2005) Formal and Informal Institutional Distance, and International Entry Strategies, William Davidson Institute Working Paper No. 728.Search in Google Scholar

53. Estrin, S., Meyer, K. E. and Bytchkova, M. (2006) Entrepreneurship in transition economies, in Mark C. Casson, Bernard Yeung, Anuradhu Basu, Nigel Wadeson, Oxford Handbook of Entrepreneurship, Oxford University Press, pp. 693-725.Search in Google Scholar

54. Estrin, S., Kolodko, G. W., and Uvalic, M. (2007) Transition and beyond, Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230590328Search in Google Scholar

55. Estrin, S., Hanousek, J., Kocenda, E., and Svejnar, J. (2009) The Effects of Privatization and Ownership in Transition Economies, Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 47, No. 3, pp. 699-728. Search in Google Scholar

56. Fishman, J., Gannon, G., and Vinning, R. (2008) Ownership Structure and Corporate Performance: Australian Evidence, Corporate Ownership and Control, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 114-131.Search in Google Scholar

57. Friedman, M. (1962) Capitalism and Freedom, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

58. Frydman, R. and Rapaczynski, A. (1991) Markets and Institutions in Large-Scale Privatization, in Corbo, V., Coricelli, F., and Bossak, J. (1991) Reforming Central and Eastern European Economies, World Bank.Search in Google Scholar

59. Frydman, R., Phelps, E. S., Rapaczynski, A., and Shleifer, A. (1993) Needed Mechanisms of Corporate Governance and Finance in Eastern Europe, Economics of Transition, Volume 1, No. 2, pp. 171-207.Search in Google Scholar

60. Frydman, R. and Rapaczynski, A. (1994) Privatization in Eastern Europe: Is the State Withering Away?, Budapest, Central European University Press.10.7829/j.ctv280b7d1Search in Google Scholar

61. Frydman, R., Gray, C., and Rapaczynski, A. (1997) Private Ownership and Corporate Performance: Some Lessons from Transition Economies, New York University Working Paper 9827.Search in Google Scholar

62. Frydman, R., Gray, C., Hessel, M. and Rapaczynski, A. (1999) When Does Privatization Work? The Impact of Private Ownership on Corporate Performance in the Transition Economies,Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 114, No. 4, pp. 1153-1191.Search in Google Scholar

63. Gale, B. T. (1972) Market Share and Rate of Return, Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 54, No. 4, pp. 412-423.Search in Google Scholar

64. Gitman, L.J. (1984) Personal Finance, Dryden Press.Search in Google Scholar

65. Gray, C. W. (1996) In Search Of Owners Privatization And Corporate Governance In Transition economies, World Bank Research Observer, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 179-197.Search in Google Scholar

66. Griliches, Z. (1979) Assessing the Contribution of Research and Development to Productivity Growth, Bell Journal of Economics, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 92-116.Search in Google Scholar

67. Griliches, Z. and Hausman, J. A. (1986) Errors in Variables in Panel Data, Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 31, No. 1, pp. 93-118.Search in Google Scholar

68. Grosfeld, I. and Hashi, I. (2001) The Evolution of Ownership Structure in Firms Privatized through Wholesale Schemes in the Czech Republic and Poland, CASE Network Report No. 0049.Search in Google Scholar

69. Grosfeld, I. and Hashi, I. (2003) Mass Privatisation, Corporate Governance and Endogenous Ownership Structure, William Davidson Institute Working Paper No. 596.Search in Google Scholar

70. Grosfeld, I. and Hashi, I. (2004) The Emergence of Large Shareholders in Mass Privatized Firms: Evidence from Poland and the Czech Republic, Working paper 126. 10.2139/ssrn.588906Search in Google Scholar

71. Grosfeld, I. (2006) Ownership concentration and firm performance: Evidence from an emerging market, Paris-Jourdan Sciences Economiques, Working Paper No. 2006-18.Search in Google Scholar

72. Grosfeld, I. and Hashi, I. (2007) Changes in Ownership Concentration in Mass Privatised Firms: Evidence from Poland and the Czech Republic, Corporate Governance: An International Review, Vol. 15, Issue 4, pp. 520-523.Search in Google Scholar

73. Grossman, S. J. and Hart, O. D. (1980) Takeover Bids, the Free-Rider Problem, and the Theory of the Corporation, Bell Journal of Economics, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 42-64.Search in Google Scholar

74. Grossman, S. J. and Hart, O. D. (1982) Corporate Financial Structure and Managerial Incentives, NBER Chapters, in The Economics of Information and Uncertainty, National Bureau of Economic Research, pp. 107-140.Search in Google Scholar

75. Grossman, S. J. and Hart O. D. (1986) The Costs and Benefits of Ownership: A Theory of Vertical and Lateral Integration, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 94, No. 4, pp. 691-719.Search in Google Scholar

76. Grossman, S. J. and Hart, O. (1988) One Share - One Vote and the Market for Corporate Control, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 20, No. 1-2, pp. 175-202.Search in Google Scholar

77. Grossman G., and Helpman E. (1991) Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy, Cambridge: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

78. Gugler, K. and Weigand, J. (2003) Is ownership really endogenous?, Applied Economics Letters, Vol. 10, No. 8, pp. 483-486.Search in Google Scholar

79. Gugler, K. and Yurtoglu, B. B. (2003) Average q, marginal q, and the relation between ownership and performance, Economics Letters,Vol. 78, No. 3, pp. 379-384.Search in Google Scholar

80. Gugler, K. E. and Weigand, J. (2003) Is ownership really endogenous? Applied Economics Letters, Vol. 10, No. 8, pp. 483-486.Search in Google Scholar

81. Gugler, K. E., Mueller, D. C., Yurtoglu, B. B., and Zulehner, C. (2003) The effects of mergers: an international comparison, International Journal of Industrial Organization, Vol. 21, No. 5, pp. 625-653.Search in Google Scholar

82. Gugler, K. E., Mueller, D. C., and Yurtoglu, B. B. (2004) Marginal q, Tobin’s q, cash flow and investment, Southern Economic Journal, Vol. 70, No. 3, pp. 512-531.Search in Google Scholar

83. Gugler K. E., Mueller, D. C., and Yurtoglu, B. B. (2008) Insider ownership, ownership concentration and investment performance: An international comparison, Journal of Corporate Finance, Vol. 14, No. 5, pp. 688-705.Search in Google Scholar

84. Gupta, N., Ham, J. C., and Svejnarc, J. (2008) Priorities and Sequencing in Privatization: Evidence from Czech Firm Panel Data, European Economic Review, Vol. 52, No. 2, pp. 183-208. Search in Google Scholar

85. Hall, M. and Weiss, L. W.(1967) Firms size and profitability, The Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 49, No. 3, pp. 319-331.Search in Google Scholar

86. Hamm, P; King L., and Stuckler. D. (2012) Mass privatization, state capacity, and economic growth in Post-Communist countries, American Sociological Review, Vol. 77, No. 2, pp. 295-324.Search in Google Scholar

87. Harhoff, D. (1998) Vertical Organization, Technology Flows and R&D Incentives: An Exploratory Analysis, CIG Working Paper No. 98-02.Search in Google Scholar

88. Himmelberg, C. P, Hubbard, G. R., and Palia, D. (1999) Understanding the determinants of managerial ownership and the link between ownership and performance, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 53, No. 3, pp. 353-384.Search in Google Scholar

89. Hu, Y. and Izumida, S. (2008) Ownership Concentration and Corporate Performance: A Causal Analysis with Japanese Panel Data, Corporate Governance: An International Review, Vol. 16, No. 4, pp. 342-358.Search in Google Scholar

90. Hymer, S. and Pashigian, P. (1962) Firm Size and Rate of Growth, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 70, No. 4, pp. 556-569.Search in Google Scholar

91. Jensen, M. C. and Meckling, W. H (1976) Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behaviour, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 305-360.Search in Google Scholar

92. Jensen, M. C. (1983) Organization Theory and Methodology, Accounting Review, Vol. 58, No. 2, pp. 319-339.Search in Google Scholar

93. Jensen, M. C. and Ruback, R. S. (1983) The Market for Corporate Control: The Scientific Evidence, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 11, No. 1-4, pp. 5-50.Search in Google Scholar

94. Jensen, M. C. (1986) Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance, and Takeovers, American Economic Review, Vol. 76, No. 2, pp. 323-329.Search in Google Scholar

95. Jensen, M. C. and. Warner, J. B (1988) The Distribution of Power Among Corporate Managers, Shareholders, and Directors, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 20, No. 1/2, pp. 3-24.Search in Google Scholar

96. Jensen, M. C., Fama E. F., Long J., Ruback, R. S., Schwert, W. G., Smith, C., and Warner, J.(1989) Clinical papers and their role in the development of financial economics, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 3-6.Search in Google Scholar

97. Jensen, M. C. and Murphy, K. J. (1990) Performance Pay and Top- Management Incentives, The Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 98, No. 2, pp. 225-264.Search in Google Scholar

98. Jones, D. C., Klinedinst M. and Rock, C. (1998) Productive Efficiency during Transition: Evidence from Bulgarian Panel data, Journal of Comparative Economics, Vol. 26, pp. 446-64.Search in Google Scholar

99. Jones, D.C. and Mygind, N. (1999) The Nature and Determinants of Ownership Changes after Privatization: Evidence from Estonia, Journal of Comparative Economics, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp. 422-441. Search in Google Scholar

100. Jones, D. C. and Mygind, N (2002) Ownership and Productive Efficiency: Evidence from Estonia’, Review of Development Economics, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 284-301.Search in Google Scholar

101. Kapopoulos, P. and Lazaretou, S. (2007) Corporate Ownership Structure and Firm Performance: Evidence from Greek Firms, Corporate Governance: An International Review,Vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 144-158.Search in Google Scholar

102. Kocenda, E. (2001) Development of Ownership Structure and its Effect on Performance: Czech Firms from Mass Privatization, CERGE-EI Working Paper No. 188.Search in Google Scholar

103. Kocenda, E. and Valachy, J. (2001) Secondary Privatization in the Czech Republic: Changes in Ownership and Enterprise Performance in Voucher- Privatized Firms, CASE Network Report No.0045.Search in Google Scholar

104. Konings, J. (2001) The Effects of Foreign Direct Investment on Domestic Firms, Economics of Transition, Vol. 9, No. 3, pp. 619-633.Search in Google Scholar

105. Kumar, J. (2004) Does Ownership Structure Influence Firm Value? Evidence from India, The Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance and Business Ventures, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 61-93.Search in Google Scholar

106. Kumar, N. and Singh, J. P. (2012) Outside Directors, Corporate Governance and Firm Performance: Empirical Evidence from India, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 39-55.10.5296/ajfa.v4i2.1737Search in Google Scholar

107. Kuznetsov, B., Dolgopyatova, T., Golikova, V. Gonchar, K., Yakovlev, A. and Yasin Y. (2011), Russian Manufacturing Revisited: Industrial Enterprises at the Start of the Crisis, Post-Soviet Affairs, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp. 366-386.Search in Google Scholar

108. La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., and Vishny, R. W. (1998) Agency Problems and Dividend Policies around the World, NBER Working Paper No. 6594.Search in Google Scholar

109. La Porta, R., Lopez-De-Silanes, F., and Shleifer, A. (1999) Corporate Ownership Around the World, Journal of Finance, Vol. 54, No. 2, pp. 471-517.Search in Google Scholar

110. La Porta, R., Lopez-de Silanes F., Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R. (1999) The quality of government, Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 222-279.Search in Google Scholar

111. La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., and Vishny, R. W. (2000) Investor protection and corporate governance, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 58, No. 1-2, pp. 3-27.Search in Google Scholar

112. La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F. and Shleifer, A. (2007) The Economic Consequences of Legal Origins, NBER Working Paper No. 13608.Search in Google Scholar

113. Mancinelli, L. and Ozkan, A. (2006) Ownership Structure and Dividend Policy: Evidence from Italian Firms, The European Journal of Finance, Vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 265-282. Search in Google Scholar

114. Mandelker, G. (1974) Risk and return: The case of merging firms, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 1, No. 4, pp. 303-335.Search in Google Scholar

115. Mansfield, E. (1962) Entry, Gibrat’s Law, Innovation, and the Growth of Firms, American Economic Review, Vol. 52, No. 5, pp. 1023-1051.Search in Google Scholar

116. Marcus, M. (1969) Profitability and the Size of the Firm: Some Further Evidence, Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 51, No. 1, pp. 104-107.Search in Google Scholar

117. Megginson, W., Nash, R. and Randenborgh, M. (1994) The financial and operating performance of newly privatized firms: An international empirical analysis, Journal of Finance, Vol. 49, pp. 403-452.Search in Google Scholar

118. Megginson, W. and Boutchkova, M. (2000) The impact of privatization on capital market development and individual share ownership, Financial Management, Vol. 29, pp. 31-76.Search in Google Scholar

119. Megginson, W. and Netter, J. (2001) From state to market: A survey of empirical studies on privatization, Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 39, No. 2, pp. 321-389.Search in Google Scholar

120. Megginson, W. L. (eds) (2005) The Financial Economics of Privatization, Oxford University Press.10.1093/0195150627.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

121. Mickiewicz, T., Gerry, C., and Bishop, K. (2005) Privatisation, Corporate Control and Employment Growth: Evidence from a Panel of Large Polish Firms, 1996-2002, Economic Systems, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp. 98-119.Search in Google Scholar

122. Miller, J. (2006) Evaluation of Mass Privatization in Bulgaria, William Davidson Institute Working Paper 814.10.2139/ssrn.906596Search in Google Scholar

123. Mura, R. (2007) Firm Performance: Do Non-Executive Directors Have Minds of their Own? Evidence from UK Panel Data, Financial Management, Vol. 36, No. 3, pp. 81-112.Search in Google Scholar

124. Myers, S. C. (1984) The capital structure puzzle, Journal of Finance, Vol. 39, pp. 575-92Search in Google Scholar

125. Myers, S. C. and Majluf, S. N. (1984) Corporate Financing and Investment Decisions When Firms Have Information That Investors Do Not Have, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 187-221.Search in Google Scholar

126. Nellis, J. (1999) Time to Rethink Privatization in Transition Economies?, Finance and Development, Vol. 36, No. 2, pp. 3-29.Search in Google Scholar

127. O’Mahony, M. and Vecchi, M. (2008) R&D knoweledge spillovers and company productivity performance, Research Policy, Vol. 38, No. 1, pp. 35-44.Search in Google Scholar

128. Pedersen, T. and Thomsen, S. (1997) European Patterns of Corporate Ownership: a Twelve-Country Study, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp. 759-778.Search in Google Scholar

129. Pedersen, T. and Thomsen, S. (1999) Business Systems and Corporate Governance, International Studies of Management and Organization, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp. 43-59. Search in Google Scholar

130. Pervan, M, Pervan, I., and Todoric, M (2012) Firm Ownership and Performance: Evidence for Croatian Listed Firms, World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, Vol. 61, pp. 964-70.Search in Google Scholar

131. Piscitello, L. and Rabbiosi, L. (2005) The Impact of Inward FDI on Local Companies’ Labour Productivity: Evidence rom the Italian Case, International Journal of the Economics of Business, Taylor and Francis Journals, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 35-51.Search in Google Scholar

132. Pistor, K. and Spicer, A. (1997) Investment Funds in Mass Privatization and Beyond, in Ira W. Lieberman, Stiplon S. Nelson, and Raj M. Desai, Between State and Market: Mass Privatization in Transition Economies, The World Bank, Washington.Search in Google Scholar

133. Punnose, E. M. (2008) A profitability analysis of business group firms vs. individual firms in the Indian electrical machine manufacturing industry, The ICFAI Journal of Management Research, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 52-76.Search in Google Scholar

134. Rajan, R. G. (1992) Insiders and Outsiders: The Choice Between Informed and Arm’s-Length Debt, The Journal of Finance, Vol. 47, No. 4, pp. 1367-1400.Search in Google Scholar

135. Rajan, R. G. and Zingales, L. (1995) What Do We Know about Capital Structure? Some Evidence from International Data, The Journal of Finance, Vol. 50, No. 5, pp. 1421-1460.Search in Google Scholar

136. Rajan, R. G. and Wulf, J. (2006) Are perks purely managerial excess?, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 79, No. 1, pp. 1-33.Search in Google Scholar

137. Roberts, B., Gorkov, Y. and Madigan, J. (1999) Is Privatization a Free Lunch? New Evidence on Ownership Status and Firm Performance, University of Miami Working Paper.Search in Google Scholar

138. Romer, P. M. (1986) Increasing Returns and Long Run Growth, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 94, No. 5, pp. 1002-1037.Search in Google Scholar

139. Roodman, D. (2006) How To Do xtabond2: An Introduction to “Difference” and “System” GMM in Stata, Center for Global Development Working Paper No. 103.Search in Google Scholar

140. Roodman, D. (2007) A Short Note on the Theme of Too Many Instruments, Center for Global Development, Working Paper No. 125.Search in Google Scholar

141. Roodman, D. (2008) Through the Looking-Glass, and What OLS Found There: On Growth, Foreign Aid, and Reverse Causality, Working Paper No. 137, Center for Global Development.10.2139/ssrn.1100142Search in Google Scholar

142. Roodman, D. (2009) How to do xtabond2: An introduction to difference and system GMM in Stata, The Stata Journal, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 86-136.Search in Google Scholar

143. Schmid, M. M. and Zimmermann, H. (2008) Leadership Structure and Corporate Governance in Switzerland, Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 109-120. Search in Google Scholar

144. Shepherd, W. S. (1972) The Elements of Market Structure, The Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 54, No. 1, pp. 25-37.Search in Google Scholar

145. Shleifer, A. and Blasi, J. R. (1996) Corporate Governance in Russia: An Initial Look. In Frydman R., Gray, C. W., and Rapaczynski, A., Corporate Governance in Central Europe and Russia: Vol. 2. Insiders and the State, Budapest, Central European University Press.Search in Google Scholar

146. Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R. W. (1998) The Quality of Government, Harvard Institute of Economic Research, Working Paper No. 1847.Search in Google Scholar

147. Smith, A. (1776) An Inquiry Into The Nature and Causes of The Wealth of Nations, Oxford: Clarendon Press.10.1093/oseo/instance.00043218Search in Google Scholar

148. Smith, S. C., Cin, B., and Vodopivec, M. (1997) Privatization Incidence, Ownership Forms, and Firm Performance: Evidence from Slovenia, Journal of Comparative Economics, Vol. 25, No. 2, pp. 158-179.Search in Google Scholar

149. Smith, J. (2010) Applied Econometrics - Panel Data 2, lecture notes, Warwick University, available at: http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/economics/staff/jcsmith/panel/. Search in Google Scholar

150. Suljkanovic, M. (2010) Corporate Governance in Post-Privatized Bosnia and Herzegovina, VDM Verlag Dr. Mueller publishing.Search in Google Scholar

151. Welch, E. (2003) The relationship between ownership structure and performance in listed Australian companies, Australian Journal of Management, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp. 287-305.Search in Google Scholar

152. Williams, J. T. (1987) Perquisites, Risk, and Capital Structure, Journal of Finance, Vol. 42, No. 1, pp. 29-48.Search in Google Scholar

153. Willmore, N.L (1986) The Comparative Performance of Foreign and Domestic Firms in Brazil, World Development, Vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 489-502.Search in Google Scholar

154. Yu, H. and Liang, J. (2011) Management Ownership and Corporate Performance, African Journal of Business Management, Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 1441-1453. Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo