[1. Vasileva P. Problems of corneal transplantation in our country. Yearbook Euro Atlantic Transplant Alliance. 2006. p. 67-71. [In Bulgarian]]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Whitcher JP, Srinivasan M, Upadhyay MP. Corneal blindness: a global perspective. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2001 ;79:214-21.]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Sinha R, Sharma N, Vajpayee RB. Corneal blindness - present status. Cataract & Refractive Surgery Today. Oct 2005;59-61.]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Mannis MJ, Krachmer JH. Keratoplasty: a historical perspective. Surv Ophthalmol. 1981;25(5):333-8.10.1016/0039-6257(81)90159-4]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Patel NP, Kim T, Rapuano CJ, Cohen EJ, Laibson PR. Indications for and outcomes of repeat penetrating keratoplasty, 1989-1995. Ophthalmology. 2000; 107(4):719-24.10.1016/S0161-6420(00)00003-8]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Edwards M, Clover GM, Brookes N, Pendergrast D, Chaulk J, McGhee CN. Indications for corneal transplantation in New Zealand: 1991-1999. Cornea. 2002;21(2): 152-5.10.1097/00003226-200203000-0000411862084]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Yahalom C, Mechoulam H, Solomon A, Raiskup FD, Peer J, Frucht-Pery J. Forty years of changing indications in penetrating keratoplasty in Israel. Cornea, 2005;24(3):256-8.10.1097/01.ico.0000148310.63755.7415778594]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Chen WL, Hu FR, Wang IJ. Changing Indications for penetrating keratoplasty inTaiwan from 1987 to 1999. Cornea. 2001 ;20(2): 141-4.10.1097/00003226-200103000-0000411248815]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Dorrepaal SJ, Cao KY, Slomovic AR. Indications for penetrating keratoplasty in a tertiary referral centre in Canada, 1996-2004. Can J Ophthalmol. 2007;42(2):244-50.]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Kirkness CM, Ezra E, Rice NS, Steele AD. The success and survival of repeat comeal grafts. Eye (Lond). 1990;4(Pt l):58-64. 10.1038/eye.1990.62323478]Search in Google Scholar