Phantasie, Interaktion und Perspektivenübernahme in Als-ob-Situationen. Eine phänomenologische Analyse / Fantasy, Interaction and Perspective-Taking in Pretense Situations. A Phenomenological Analysis

Anscombe, G.E.M. (1958). Pretending. The Aristotelian Society (supplementary volume), 32, 279-294.Search in Google Scholar

Austin, J.L. (1958). Pretending. The Aristotelian Society (supplementary volume), 32, 261-278.10.1093/aristoteliansupp/32.1.261Search in Google Scholar

Bernet, R. (2004). Conscience et existence. Paris: PUF.10.3917/puf.berne.2004.01Search in Google Scholar

Casey, E. (2000). Imagining. A Phenomenological Study. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Currie, G. & Ravenscroft, I. (2002). Recreative Minds. Oxford: Clarendon Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198238089.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Fink, E. (1957). Oase des Glücks. München: Alber.Search in Google Scholar

Fink, E. (1960). Spiel als Weltsymbol. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.Search in Google Scholar

Fonagy, P. & Target, M. (1997). Attachment and reflective function: Their role in self-organization. Development and Psychopathology, 9, 679-700.10.1017/S0954579497001399Search in Google Scholar

Friedman, O. & Leslie A. (2007). The conceptual underpinnings of pretense: Pretending is not ‘behaving as if ’. Cognition, 105, 103-124.10.1016/j.cognition.2006.09.00717094955Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Gallagher, S. (2007). Simulation trouble. Social Neuroscience, 2, 353-365.10.1080/1747091060118354918633823Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Gallagher, S. (2012). Neurons, neonates and narrative: From empathic resonance to empathic understanding. In A. Foolen, U.M. Lüdtke, T.P. Racine & J. Zlatev (Eds.). Moving Ourselves, Moving Others (S. 167-196). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Search in Google Scholar

Gallese, V. (2001). The ‘shared manifold’ hypothesis. From mirror neurons to empathy. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 8, 33-50.Search in Google Scholar

Goldman, A. (1989). Interpretation psychologized. Mind & Language, 4 (3), 161-185.10.1111/j.1468-0017.1989.tb00249.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

Goldman, A. (2006). Simulating Minds. The Philosophy, Psychology, and Neuroscience of Mindreading. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0195138929.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Gordon, R.M. (1986). Folk psychology as simulation. Mind & Language, 1 (2), 158-171.10.1111/j.1468-0017.1986.tb00324.xSearch in Google Scholar

Gordon, R.M. & Barker J.A. (1994). Autism and the ‘theory of mind’ debate. In G. Graham & G. L. Stephen (Eds.). Philosophical Psychopathology. A Book of Readings (S. 163-181). Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Harris, P. (2000). The Work of the Imagination. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Husserl, E. (1950). Cartesianische Meditationen und Pariser Vorträge. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.Search in Google Scholar

Husserl, E. (1980). Phantasie, Bildbewusstsein, Erinnerung. Zur Phänomenologie der anschaulichen Vergegenwärtigungen. Texte aus dem Nachlass (1898-1925). Dordrecht/Boston/London: Martinus Nijhoff.Search in Google Scholar

Husserl, E. (1984). Logische Untersuchungen. Untersuchungen zur Phänomenologie und Theorie der Erkenntnis. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.10.1007/978-94-009-6068-8Search in Google Scholar

Husserl, E. (1999). Erfahrung und Urteil. Untersuchungen zur Genealogie der Logik. Hamburg: Meiner.10.28937/978-3-7873-2546-7Search in Google Scholar

Husserl, E. (2009). Untersuchungen zur Urteilstheorie. Dordrecht: Springer.Search in Google Scholar

Husserl, E. (2006). Späte Texte über Zeitkonstitution (1929-1934). Die C-Manuskripte. Dordrecht: Springer.Search in Google Scholar

Jansen, J. (2010). Phenomenology, imagination and interdisciplinary Research. In S. Gallagher & D. Schmicking (Eds.). Handbook of Phenomenology and Cognitive Sciences (S. 141-158). Dordrecht: Springer.Search in Google Scholar

Jansen, J. (2013). Imagination, embodiment and situatedness: Using Husserl to dispel (some) notions of ‘offline thinking. In R.T. Jensen & D. Moran (Eds.). The Phenomenology of Embodied Intersubjectivity (S. 63-79). Dordrecht: Springer.Search in Google Scholar

Leslie, A.M. (1987). Pretense and representation: The origins of ‘theory of mind’. Psychological Review, 94 (4), 412-426.10.1037/0033-295X.94.4.412Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Lohmar, D. (2008). Phänomenologie der schwachen Phantasie. Untersuchungen der Psychologie, Cognitive Sciences, Neurologie und Phänomenologie zur Funktion der Phantasie in der Wahrnehmung. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4020-6831-7Search in Google Scholar

Mercolli, L. (2012). So tun, als ob. Analyse und Systematik eines ungewöhnlichen Begriffs mit einer Anwendung auf Theorien der Fiktionalität. Paderborn: Mentis.10.30965/9783897859418Search in Google Scholar

Nichols, S. & Stich, S. (2000). A cognitive theory of pretense. Cognition, 74, 115-147.10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00070-0Search in Google Scholar

Perner, J. (1991). Understanding the Representational Mind. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Piaget, J. (1972). La formation du symbole chez l’enfant. Neuchatel: Delachaux et Niestlé.Search in Google Scholar

Rakoczy, H. (2008). Pretence as individual and collective intentionality. Mind & Language, 23 (5), 449-517.10.1111/j.1468-0017.2008.00357.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

Rakoczy, H. (2006). Pretend play and the development of collective intentionality. Cognitive Systems Research, 7, 113-127.10.1016/j.cogsys.2005.11.008Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Rakoczy, H. (2008a). Pretence as individual and collective intentionality. Mind & Language, 23 (5), 449-517.10.1111/j.1468-0017.2008.00357.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

Rakoczy, H. (2008b). Taking fiction seriously: Young children understand the normative structure of joint pretence games. Developmental Psychology, 44 (4), 1195-1201.10.1037/0012-1649.44.4.119518605846Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Rakoczy, H., Tomasello, M. & Striano. T. (2006). The role of experience and discourse in children’s developing understanding of pretend play actions. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 24, 305-335.10.1348/026151005X36001Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Scheler, M. (1973). Wesen und Formen der Sympathie. Bern/München: Francke.Search in Google Scholar

Summa, M. (2016). Imaginative dimensions of reality: Pretense, knowledge, and sociality. In R. Sebold & J. Reynolds (Eds.). Phenomenology and Sciences (S. 205-224). New York: Palgrave MacMillan.Search in Google Scholar

Summa, M. (2016). Pretence and the inner. Reflections on Expressiveness and the experience of self and other. In S. Rinofner-Kreidl & H. Wiltsche (Eds.). Proceedings of the 37. International Wittgenstein Symposium“ Analytic and Continental Philosophy: Methods and Perspectives” (S. 309-322). Berlin: De Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Summa, M. (2017). Experiencing reality and fiction. Discontinuity and permeability. In M. Summa, T. Fuchs & L. Vanzago (Eds.). Imagination and Social Perspectives. Approaches from Phenomenology and Psychopathology (S. 45-64). London/New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Vygotsky, L.S. (1974). Mind in Society. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Walton, K.L. (1990). Mimesis as Make Belief. On the Foundations of the Representational Arts. Cambridge MA, London: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Zahavi, D. (2008). Simulation, projection, and empathy. Consciousness and Cognition, 17 (2), 514-522.10.1016/j.concog.2008.03.01018411058Open DOISearch in Google Scholar