[Amateis, R.L., Burkhart, H.E. 2011. Growth of young loblolly pine trees following pruning. – Forest Ecology and Management, 262(12), 2338–2343.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bergström, B., Gref, R., Ericsson, A. 2004. Effects of pruning on heartwood formation in Scots pine trees. – Journal of Forest Science, 50(1), 11–16.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bergström, R., Vikberg, M. 1992. Winter browsing on pine and birch in relation to moose population density. – Alces, 1, 127–131.]Search in Google Scholar
[Blomqvist, A.G. 1879. On growing of trees. (Om uppqvistning af träd). – Finska Forstföreningens Meddelanden, 1, 1–18. (In Swedish).]Search in Google Scholar
[Čermák, P., Strejček, M. 2007. Stem decay by Stereum sanguinolentum after red deer damage in the Českomoravská vrchovina highlands. – Journal of Forest Science, 53, 567–572.]Search in Google Scholar
[Christiansen, E., Krokene, P., Berryman, A.A., Franceschi, V.R., Krekling, T., Lieutier, F., Lönnborg, A., Solheim, H. 1999. Mechanical injury and fungal infection induce acquired resistance in Norway spruce. – Tree Physiology, 19, 399–403.10.1093/treephys/19.6.39912651562]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Coder, K.D. 1998. Pruning effects on tree growth: Growth regulation consequences (Tree growth control systems series). Athens, University of Georgia Service of Forest Resources. 3 pp.]Search in Google Scholar
[Deal, R.L., Barbour, R.J., Mcclellan, M.H., Parry, D.L. 2003. Development of epicormic sprouts in Sitka spruce following thinning and pruning in southeast Alaska. – Forestry, 76(4), 401–412.10.1093/forestry/76.4.401]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Edenius, L., Bergman, M., Ericsson, G., Danell, K. 2002. The role of moose as a disturbance factor in managed boreal forests. – Silva Fennica, 36, 57–67.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fight, R.D., Bolon, N.A., Cahill, J.M. 1993. Financial analysis of pruning Douglas-fir and ponderosa pine in the Pacific Northwest. – Western Journal of Applied Forestry, 8(2), 58–61.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gill, R.M.A. 1992. A review of damage by mammals in north temperate forests: 1. Deer. – Forestry, 65(2), 145–169.10.1093/forestry/65.2.145]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Gill, R.M.A. 2003. The economic implications of deer damage in woodlands and forests. – The future for deer: The Deer Initiative Conference, 28–29 March 2003. Peterborough, English Nature Research Reports, 548, 26–31.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gill, R.M.A., Webber, J., Peace, A. 2000. The economic implications of deer damage: a review of current evidence. Final report for The Deer Commission for Scotland. Surrey, Alice Holt Lodge. 49 p.]Search in Google Scholar
[Grönvall, A. 1908. A little about pruning of Norway spruce. (Vähän näreitten karsimisesta). – Tapio, 1(9), 378–379. (In Finnish).]Search in Google Scholar
[Heikinheimo, O. 1953 Artificial pruning of trees. (Puiden keinollisesta karsimisesta). – Metsätaloud Aikak, 76(12), 399–402. (In Finnish with English summary).]Search in Google Scholar
[Hein, S., Weiskittel, A.R., Kohnle, U. 2008. Branch characteristics of widely spaced Douglas-fir in south-western Germany: Comparisons of modelling approaches and geographic regions. – Forest Ecology and Management, 256(5), 1064–1079.]Search in Google Scholar
[Heiskanen, V. 1959. Studies on pruning of birch. Helsinki. 68 pp.]Search in Google Scholar
[Heräjärvi, H. 2002. Internal knottiness with respect to sawing patterns in Betula pendula and B. pubescens. – Baltic Forestry, 8(1), 42–50.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hörnberg, S. 2001. Changes in population density of moose (Alces alces) and damage to forests in Sweden. – Forest Ecology and Management, 149, 141–151.]Search in Google Scholar
[Houllier, F., Leban, J.M., Colin, F. 1995. Linking growth modelling to timber quality assessment for Norway spruce. – Forest Ecology and Management, 74, 91–102.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hyvän metsänhoidon suositukset. 2006. (Finnish Guidelines for Good Silviculture). Helsinki, Metsätalouden kehittämiskeskus Tapio. 59 pp. (In Finnish).]Search in Google Scholar
[Ikonen, V.P., Kellomäki, S., Peltola, H. 2009. Sawn timber properties of Scots pine as affected by initial stand density, thinning and pruning: a simulation based approach. – Silva Fennica, 43(3), 411–431.10.14214/sf.197]Search in Google Scholar
[Jactel, H., Branco, M., Gonzalez-Olabarria, J.R., Grodzki, W., Langstom, B., Moreira, F., Netherer, S., Orazio, C., Piou, D., Santos, H., Schelhaas, M.J., Tojic, K., Vodde, F. 2011. Forest stands management and vulnerability to biotic and abiotic hazards. Technical Report 64. European Forest Institute, Finland. 88 pp.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jäppinen, A. 2000. Automatic sorting of sawlogs by grade. Summary. PhD Thesis, Uppsala, Acta Universitatis Agriculturae Sueciae. 41 pp.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kraft, G. 1884. Contributions to the science of thinnings, coupe designs and interventions for light management. (Beiträge zur Lehre von den Durchforstungen, Schlagstellungen und Lichtungshieben). Hannover, Klindworth’s Verlag. 147 pp. (In German).]Search in Google Scholar
[Krigul T. 1961. Pine and spruce stands pruning. (Männi-ja kuusepuistute laasimine). Tartu, Loodusuurijate Selts. 194 pp. (In Estonian).]Search in Google Scholar
[Lakari, O.J. 1920. Studies on pruning of Norway spruce. (Tutkimuksia kuusen karsimisesta). – Communicationes Instituti Forestalis Fenniae, 2, 1–43. (In Finnish with German summary).]Search in Google Scholar
[Liepa, I. 1996. Theory of increment. (Pieauguma mācība). Jelgava, LLU. 124 pp. (In Latvian).]Search in Google Scholar
[Liepa, I., Zalkalns, O. 2014. The Diversity of the environmental impact in Kurzeme. – Journal of Life Science, 8(7), 570–581.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lyly, O., Saksa, T. 1992. The effect of stand density on moose damage in young Pinus sylvestris stands. – Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 7, 393–403.10.1080/02827589209382732]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Macdonald, E., Hubert, J. 2001. A review of the effects of silviculture on timber quality of Sitka spruce. – Forestry, 75(2), 107–138.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mäkinen, H. 1999. Growth, suppression, death, and self-pruning of branches of scots pine in southern and central Finland. – Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 29, 585–594.10.1139/x99-026]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Mäkinen, H., Ojansuu, R., Sairanen, P., Yli-Kojola, H. 2003. Predicting branch characteristics of Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) from simple stand and tree measurements. – Forestry, 76(5), 525–546.10.1093/forestry/76.5.525]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Mattheck, C., Kubler, H. 1995. Wood: The internal optimization of trees. Berlin, Springer Verlag. 129 pp.]Search in Google Scholar
[McLaughlin, W., Šica, L. 1996. Bark striping caused by moose and an its related fungal infection. (Aļņu radītie mizas plēsumi parastai eglei un ar tiem saistītās trupes izraisitaju infekcijas). – Mežzinātne, 39(6), 26–37. (In Latvian).]Search in Google Scholar
[Metzler, B. 1996. Fungal infection rate and healing process after green pruning in Norway spruce. Forest Planning and Management Tools (EEC-Project AIR1-CT92-0715). Final Report. Germany, 200–208.]Search in Google Scholar
[Metzler, B. 1997. Quantitative assessment of fungal colonization in Norway spruce after green pruning. – European Journal of Forest Pathology, 27, 1–11.10.1111/j.1439-0329.1997.tb00848.x]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Metzler, B., Hecht, U., Nill, M., Brüchert, F., Fink, S., Kohnle, U. 2012. Comparing Norway spruce and silver fir regarding impact of bark wounds. – Forest Ecology and Management, 274, 99–107.]Search in Google Scholar
[Meyers, S.P. 1995. Profit potential from pruning: a look from down under. – The economics of commercial pruning and certification in New Zealand. School of Forestry. Auburn, Auburn University. p 15.]Search in Google Scholar
[O’Hara, K.L. 1991. A biological justification for pruning in coastal Douglas-fir stands. – Western Journal of Applied Forestry, 6(3), 59–63.]Search in Google Scholar
[O’Hara, K.L. 2007. Pruning wounds and occlusion: A long-standing conundrum in forestry. – Journal of Forestry, 105(3), 131–138.]Search in Google Scholar
[Paterson, A. 1938. The occlusion of pruning wounds in Norway spruce (Picea excelsa). – Annals Botany, 2(3), 681–698.10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a084026]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Petruncio, M., Briggs, D., Barbour, R.J. 1997. Predicting pruned branch stub occlusion in young, coastal Douglas-fir. – Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 27(7), 1074–1082.10.1139/x97-037]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Philips, H. 2004. Pruning adds value to plantations. [WWW document]. URL http://www.coford.ie/media/coford/content/publications/projectreports/cofordconnects/Pruning.pdf [Accessed 1 March 2017].]Search in Google Scholar
[Pinkard, E.A., Beadle, C.L. 2000. A physiological approach to pruning. – International Forestry Review, 2(4), 295–305.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pruning Your Forest Trees. 2006. [WWW document]. URL http://www.shelterwoodmaine.com/pdf/pruning%20trees.pdf [Accessed 1 March 2017].]Search in Google Scholar
[R Development Core Team. 2011. R: A language and environment for statistical computing, Vienna, R Foundation for Statistical Computing ISBN 3-900051-07-0. [WWW document]. – URL http://www.R-project.org/. [Accessed 21 February 2017].]Search in Google Scholar
[Rinn, F. 1996. TSAP Reference Manual: computer program for tree ring analysis and presentation. Version 3.0. Heidelberg. 262 pp.]Search in Google Scholar
[Romell, L.G. 1937. Results of natural and artificial pruning in Scots pine. (Kvistrensning och över-vallning hos okvistad och torrkvistad tall). – Journal of Swedish Forest Society, 35, 299–328, (In Swedish with English summary).]Search in Google Scholar
[Rytter, L., Jansson, G. 2009. Influence of pruning on wood characters in hybrid aspen. – Silva Fennica, 43, 689–698.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schatz, U., Herajarvi, H., Kannisto, K., Rantatalo, M. 2008. Influence of saw and secateur pruning on stem discolouration, wound cicatrisation and diameter growth of Betula pendula. – Silva Fennica, 42, 295–305.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schwerdtfeger, F. 1955. Pathogenese der Borkenkiifer-Epidemie 1946–1950 in Nordwestdeutschland. (Pathogenesis of bark beetle epidemic 1946–1950 in north-wetern Germany). G. Göttingen, Schriftenreihe der Forstlichen Fakultt der Universität Göttingen. 135 pp. (In German).]Search in Google Scholar
[Šmits, A., Striķe, Z., Liepa, I. 2008. Effect of defoliation caused by European pine sawfly Neodiprion sertifer Geoffr. on Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.). (Priežu rūsganās zāģlapsenes (Neodiprion sertifer Geoffr.) izraisītās defoliācijas ietekme uz priežu (Pinus sylvestris L.) pieaugumu). – Mežzinātne, 18(51), 53–73. (In Latvian).]Search in Google Scholar
[State Forest Service. 2015. State Forest Service, Annual Report 2015. (Valsts Meža Dienests. 2015. Gada pārskats). [WWW document]. – URL https://www.zm.gov.lv/public/files/CMS_Static_Page_Doc/00/00/00/84/06/Publiskaisparskats2015.pdf [Accessed 18 July 2017]. (In Latvian).]Search in Google Scholar
[Tomppo, E. 1996. Multi-source national forest inventory of Finland. – Proceedings of the Subject Group S4.02-00 “Forest Resource Inventory and Monitoring” and Subject Group S4.12-00 Remote Sensing Technology, Joensuu, Finland, 1996. – European Forestry Institute Proceedings, 7, 27–41.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tong, Q., Duchesne, I., Belley D., Beaudoin, M., Swift, E. 2013. Characterization of knots in plantation white spruce. – Wood and Fiber Science, 45(1), 1–14.]Search in Google Scholar
[Vasiliauskas, R. 2001. Damage to trees due to forestry operations and its pathological significance in temperate forests: a literature review. – Forestry, 74(4), 319–336.10.1093/forestry/74.4.319]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Venho, B. 1915. Observations on decay defects caused by pruning in Norway spruce. (Havaintoja karsimisen aiheuttamista lahovioista kuusessa). – Metsätaloud Aikak, 2(11), 332–339. (In Finnish).]Search in Google Scholar
[Víquez, E., Pérez, D. 2005. Effect of pruning on tree growth, yield, and wood properties of Tectona grandis plantations in Costa Rica. – Silva Fennica, 39(3), 381–390.]Search in Google Scholar
