[
Cienciala, E., Černý, M., Tatarinov, F., Apltauer, J., Exnerová, Z., 2006: Biomass functions applicable to Scots pine. Trees, 20:483–495.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dale, V. H., Joyce, L. A., McnNulty, S., Neilson, R. P., Ayres, M. P., Flanningan, M. D. et al., 2001: Climate change and forest disturbances. BioSciences, 51:723–734.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dutca, I., Abrudan, I. V., Stancioiu, P. T., Blujdea, V., 2010: Biomass conversion and expansion factors for young Norway spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst.) trees planted on non-forest lands in Eastern Carpathians. Notuale Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca, 38:286–292.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gardiner, B., Schuck, A. S., Schelgaas, M. J., Orazio, Ch., Blennow, K., Nicoll, B. et al., 2011: Living with storm damage to forests. European Forest Institute, Joensuu, 129 p.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gubka, A. et al. 2014: Vetrová kalamita Žofia z 15. 5. 2014. Usmernenie Lesníckej ochranárskej služby, NLC, Zvolen, 8 p.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chroust, L., 1985: Above–ground biomass of young pine forests (Pinus sylvestris) and its determination. Communicationes Instituti Forestalis Čechosloveniae, 14 :127–145.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chroust, L., Tesařová, 1985: Quantification of above-ground components of 20 years old Norway spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst.). Communicationes Instituti Forestalis Čechosloveniae, 14:111–126.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kho, L. K., Malhi, Y., Tan, S. K. S., 2013: Annual budget and seasonal variation of aboveground and belowground net primary productivity in a lowland dipterocarp forest in Borneo. Biogeosciences, 118:1282–1296.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kaštier, P., Bučko, J., 2010: Analýza intenzity a dislokácie škôd spôsobených raticovou zverou na iniciálnych štádiách lesa po kalamite roku 2004 vo Vysokých Tatrách. In: Výskum smrečín destabilizovaných škodlivými činiteľmi. NLC Zvolen, p. 198–205.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Konôpka, B., 2003: Needle traces as indicators of growing conditions in Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.). Journal of Forest Science, 49:1–10.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Konôpka, B., Pajtík, J., Moravčík, M., Lukac, M., 2010: Biomass partitioning and growth efficiency in four naturally regenerated forest tree species. Basic and Applied Ecology, 11:234–243.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Konôpka, B., Pajtík, J., Noguchi, K., Lukac, M., 2013: Replacing Norway spruce with European beech: A comparison of biomass and net primary production patterns in young stands. Forest Ecology and Management, 302:185–192.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Konôpka, B., Pajtík, J., 2014: Similar foliage area but contrasting foliage biomass between young beech and spruce stands. Lesnícky časopis - Forestry Journal, 60:205–213.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Konôpka, B., Pajtík, J., Šebeň, V., 2015: Biomass functions and expansion factors for young trees of European ash and Sycamore maple in the Inner Western Carpathians. Austrian Journal of Forest Science, 132:1–60.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Koreň, M., 2005: Čo sa stalo 19. novembra 2004 v tatranskej oblasti? Tatry, 44:4–6.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kurz, W. A., Apps, M. J., 1999: A 70-year retrospective analysis of carbon fluxes in the Canadian forest sector. Ecological Applications, 9:526–547.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lal, R., Follett, R.F., 2009: Soil carbon sequestration and greenhouse effects. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, 366 p.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Liu, S., Bond-Lamberty, B., Hicke, J. A., Vargas, R., Zhao, S., Chen, J. et al., 2011: Simulating the impacts of disturbances on forest carbon cycling in North America: Processes, data, models, and challenges. Journal of Geographical Research, 16:1–22.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Marklund, L. G., 1987: Biomass functions for Norway spruce (Picea abies L. Karst.) in Sweden. Umeå, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 27 p.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nikolov, Ch., Konôpka, B., Kajba, M., Galko, J., Kunca, A., Janský, L., 2014: Post-disaster management and bark beetle outbreak in Tatra National Park, Slovakia. Mountain Research and Development, 34: 326–335.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pajtík, J., Konôpka, B., Lukac, M., 2008: Biomass functions and expansion factors in young Norway spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst) trees. Forest Ecology and Management, 256:1096–1103.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pajtík, J., Konôpka, B., Lukac, M., 2011a: Individual biomass factors for beech, oak and pine in Slovakia: a comparative study in young naturally regenerated stands. Trees, 25:277–288.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pajtík, J., Konôpka, B., Priwitzer, T., 2011b: Alokácia dendromasy v mladých porastoch buka obyčajného a duba zimného. Zprávy lesnického výzkumu, 56:291–300.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pajtík, J., Konôpka, B., Marušák, R., 2013: Above-ground net primary productivity in young stands of beech and spruce. Lesnícky časopis - Forestry Journal, 59:154–162.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pajtík, J., Konôpka, B., 2015: Quantifying edible biomass on young Salix caprea and Sorbus aucuparia trees for Cervus elaphus: estimates by regression models. Austrian Journal of Forest Science, 132:61–80.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pajtík, J., Konôpka, B., Bošeľa, M., Šebeň, V., Kaštier, P., 2015a: Modelling forage potential for red deer: A case study in post-disturbance young stands of rowan. Annals of Forest Research, 58:91–107.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pajtík, J., Konôpka, B., Šebeň, V., Michelčík, P., Fleischer, P., 2015b: Alokácia biomasy smrekovca opadavého prvého vekového stupňa vo Vysokých Tatrách. Štúdie TANAP-u, 11:229–241.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schmidt-Vogt, H., 1977: Die Fichte. Band I. Taxomomie - Verbre-Band I. Taxomomie – Verbreitung – Morphologie Ökologie - Waldgesellschaften. Hamburg and Berlin, Verlag Paul Parey 472 p.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Seidl, R., Rammer, W., Bellos, P., Hochbichler, E., Lexer, M.J., 2010: Testing generalized allometries in allocation modeling within an individual-based stimulation framework. Trees, 24:139–150.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Skovsgaard, J. P., Bald, C., Nord-Larsen, T., 2011: Functions for biomasss and basic denisty of stem, crown and root system of Norway spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst.) in Denmark. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 26:3–20.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Šebeň, V., 2011a: Prirodzená obnova po kalamite z novembra 2004 vo Vysokých Tatrách. In: Výskum smrečín destabilizovaných škodlivými činiteľmi. Zvolen, Národné lesnícke centrum, p. 297–308.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Šebeň, V., 2011b: Podiel a skladba prežívajúcej umelej obnovy na kalamitisku vo Vysokých Tatrách. In: Výskum smrečín destabilizovaných škodlivými činiteľmi. Zvolen, Národné lesnícke centrum, p. 309–321.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Šebeň, V., Konôpka, B., Bošeľa, M., Pajtík, J., 2015: Contrasting development of declining and living larch-spruce stands after a disturbance event: A case study in High Tatra Mts. Lesnícky časopis - Forestry Journal, 61:157-166.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tateno, R., Hishi, T., Takeda, H., 2004: Above- and belowground biomass and net primary production in a cool-temperate deciduous forest in relation to topographical changes in soil nitrogen. Forest Ecology and Management, 193:297–306.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tobin, B., Nieuwenhuis, M., 2007: Biomass expansion factors for Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis (Bong) Carr.) in Ireland. European Journal of Forest Research 126: 198–196.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vološčuk, I. et al., 1994: Tatranský národný park. Gradus, Martin, 557 p.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Waring, R. H., Lansberg, J. J., Williams, M., 1998: Net primary production of forests: a constant fraction of gross primary production? Tree Physiology, 18:129–134.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wirth, C., Schumacher, J., Schulze, E. D., 2004: Generic biomass functions for Norway spruce in central Europe – a meta-analysis approach toward prediction and uncertainty estimation. Tree Physiology, 24:121–139.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Xiao, Ch.-W., Yuste, J. C., Janssens, I., Roskams, P., Nachtergale, L., Carrara, A. et al., 2003: Above- and belowground biomass and net primary production in a 73-year-old Scots pine forest. Tree Physiology, 23:505–516.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Yuste, J. C., Konôpka, B., Janssens, I., Coenen, K., Xiao, C. W., Ceulemans, R., 2005 Contrasting net primary productivity and carbon distribution between neighbouring stands of Quercus robur and Pinus sylvestris. Tree Phyiology, 25:701–712.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zianis, D., Muukkonene, P., Mäkipää, R., Mencuccini, M., 2005: Biomass and stem volume equations for tree species in Europe. Silva Fennica, 4:1–63.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zianis, D., Mencuccini, M., 2005: Aboveground net primary productivity of a beech (Fagus moesiaca) forest: a case study of Naousa forest, north Greece. Tree Physiology, 25:713–722.
]Search in Google Scholar
