[Bakker M.R., Turpault M.P., Huet S., Nys C. 2008. Root distribution of Fagus sylvatica in a chronosequence in western France. Journal of Forest Research, 13 (3), 176-184.]Search in Google Scholar
[Böhm W. 1985. Metody badań systemów korzeniowych. PWRiL, Warszawa.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bolte A., Villanueva I. 2006. Interspecific competition impacts on the morphology and distribution of fine roots in European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) and Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.). European Journal of Forest Research, 125, 15-26.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bulletin of the Institute of Meteorology and Water Management. 2000-2006. IMGW, Poland.]Search in Google Scholar
[Claus A., George E. 2005. Effect of stand age on fine- -root biomass and biomass distribution in three three European forest chronosequences. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 36, 1617-1625.]Search in Google Scholar
[Curt T., Prevosto B. 2003.Root biomass and rooting profile of naturally regenerated beech in mid-elevation Scots pine woodlands. Plant Ecology, 167, 269-282.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dobrowolska D. 2015. Vitality of European Beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) at the limit of its natural range in Poland. Polish Journal of Ecology, 63 (1), 173-185.]Search in Google Scholar
[Farfał D. 2011.The effect of habitat on European ash root growth in the topsoil layers. Forest Research Papers, 72 (2), 109-114.]Search in Google Scholar
[Finér L., Helmisaari H.S., Lõhmus K., Majdi H., Brunner I., Borja I., Eldhuset T., Godbold D., Grebenc T., Konôpka B., Kraigher H., Möttönen M.R., Ohashi M., Oleksyn J., Ostonen I., Uri V., Vanguelova E. 2007. Variation in fine root biomass of three European tree species: beech (Fagus sylvatica L.), Norway spruce (Picea abies L. Karst.), and Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.). Plant Biosystems, 141 (3), 394-405.]Search in Google Scholar
[Finér L., Ohashi M., Noguchi K., HiranoY. 2011. Fine root production and turnover in forest ecosystems in relation to stand and environmental characteristics. Forest Ecology and Management, 262, 2008-2023.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gill R.A., Jackson R.B. 2000.Global patterns of root turnover for terrestrial ecosystems. New Phytologist, 147, 13-31.]Search in Google Scholar
[Godbold D.L., Brunner I. 2007. The platform for European root science, COST action E38: An introduction and overview. Plant Biosystems, 141, 390-393.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hertel D., Leuschner Ch. 2002. A comparison of four different fine root production estimates with ecosystem carbon balance data in a Fagus-Quercus mixed forest. Plant and Soil, 239, 237-251.]Search in Google Scholar
[Idol T.W., Pope P.E., Ponder F. Jr. 2000. Fine root dynamics a chronosequence of upland temperate deciduous forests. Forest Ecology and Management, 127, 153-167.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jackson R.B., Canadell J., Ehleringer J.R., Mooney H.A., Sala O.E., Schulze E.D. 1996. A global analysis of root distributions for terrestrial biomes. Oecologia, 108, 389-411.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jagodzinski A.M., Ziółkowski J., Warnkowska A., Prais H. 2016. Tree age effects on fine root biomass and morphology over chronosequences of Fagus sylvatica, Quercus robur and Alnus glutinosa stands. PLoS ONE 11 (2): e0148668.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jaworski A. 1995.Charakterystyka hodowlana drzew leśnych. Gutenberg, Kraków. Kundzewicz Z.W., Juda-Rezler K. 2010. Climate change related risk. Nauka, 4, 69-76.]Search in Google Scholar
[Leuschner Ch., Backes K., Hertel D., Schipka F., Schmitt U., Terborg O., Runge M. 2001. Drought responses at leaf, stem and fine root levels of competitive Fagus sylvatica L. and Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl. trees in dry and wet years. Forest Ecology and Management, 149, 33-46.]Search in Google Scholar
[Leuschner Ch., Hertel D. 2002. Fine root biomass of temperate forests in relation to soil acidity and fertility, climate, age and species. Progress in Botany, 64, 405-438.]Search in Google Scholar
[Leuschner Ch., Hertel D., Schmid I., Koch O., Muhs A., Hölscher D. 2004. Stand fine root and fine root morphology in old-growth beech forests as function of precipitation and soil fertility. Plant and Soil, 258 (1/2), 43-56.]Search in Google Scholar
[Le Goff N., Ottorini J. 2001. Root biomass and biomass increment in a beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) stand in North-East France. Annals of Forest Science, 58, 1-13.]Search in Google Scholar
[Meinen C., Hertel D., Leuschner Ch. 2009. Biomass and morphology of fine roots in temperate broad-leaved forests differing in tree species diversity: is there evidence of below-ground overyielding? Oecologia, 161 (1), 99-111.10.1007/s00442-009-1352-7270087119415337]Search in Google Scholar
[Norby R.J., Jackson R.B. 2000. Root dynamics and global change: seeking an ecosystem perspective. New Phytologist, 147, 3-12.]Search in Google Scholar
[Olesinski J., Lavigne M.B., Krasowski M.J. 2011. Effects of soil moisture manipulations on fine root dynamics in a mature balsam fir (Abies balsamea L. Mill.) forest. Tree Physiology, 31 (3), 339-348.]Search in Google Scholar
[Olesinski J., Krasowski M.J., Lavigne M.B., Kershaw J.A. Jr., Bernier P.Y. 2012. Fine root production varies with climate in balsam fir (Abies balsamea). Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 42 (2), 364-374.]Search in Google Scholar
[Olszowska G. 2011. Biochemical variability of forest soils at the range edge of European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) in Poland. Forest Research Papers, 72 (4), 321-328.]Search in Google Scholar
[Santantonio D., Grace J.C. 1987. Estimating fine-root production and turnover from biomass and decomposition data: a compartment-flow model. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 17, 900-908.]Search in Google Scholar
[Stykes M.T., Prentice I.C. 1995. Boreal forest futures: modeling the controls on tree species range limits and transient responses to climate change. Water, Air and Soil Pollution, 82, 415-428.]Search in Google Scholar
[Vogt K.A., Moore E.E., Vogt D.J., Redlin M.J., Edmonds R.L. 1983. Conifer fine root and mycorrhizal root biomass within the forest floors of Douglas- fir stands of different ages and site productivities. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 13, 429-437.]Search in Google Scholar
[Vogt K.A., Grier C.C., Vogt D.J. 1986. Production, turnover, and nutrient dynamics of above- and belowground detritus of world forests. Advances in Ecological Research, 15, 303-378.]Search in Google Scholar
[Vogt K.A., Vogt D.J., Palmiotto P.A., Boon P., O’Hara J., Asbjornsen H. 1996. Review of root dynamics in forest ecosystems grouped by climate, climatic forest type and species. Plant and Soil, 187, 159-219.]Search in Google Scholar
[Yuan Z.Y., Chen Y.H. 2010. Fine root biomass, production, turnover rates, and nutrient contents in boreal forest ecosystems in relation to species, climate, fertility, and stand age: literature review and meta- analyses. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 29 (4), 204-221.]Search in Google Scholar
