[1] Afzal H., Waqas M. and Naz T., OWLMap: Fully Automatic Mapping of Ontology into Relational Database Schema. (IJACSA) International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, vol. Vol. 7, no. No. 11, 2016, 7-15.10.14569/IJACSA.2016.071102Search in Google Scholar

[2] Athanasiadis I. N., Villa F. and Rizzoli A.-E., Ontologies, JavaBeans and Relational Databases for enabling semantic programming, in 31st Annual International Computer Software and Applications Conference (COMPSAC 2007), Beijing, China, 2007.10.1109/COMPSAC.2007.160Search in Google Scholar

[3] Gasevic D., Djuric D., Devedzic V., and Violeta D., Converting UML to OWL ontologies, in Proceedings of the 13th international World Wide Web conference on Alternate track papers & posters (WWW Alt. ‘04). ACM, New York, NY, 2004, 488-489.10.1145/1013367.1013539Search in Google Scholar

[4] Hacherouf M. and Bahloulb S. N., DTD2OWL2: A New Approach for the Transformation of the DTD to OWL, Procedia Computer Science, vol. Vol. 62, 2015, 457-466.10.1016/j.procs.2015.08.506Search in Google Scholar

[5] Hillairet G., ATL Use Case - ODM Implementation (Bridging UML and OWL). SIDo Group from the L3I lab in La Rochelle, 2007. [Accessed 5 April 2018].Search in Google Scholar

[6] Hnatkowska B., Automatic SUMO to UML translation, e-Informatica Software Engineering Journal, vol. 10, nr 1, 2016, 51-67.Search in Google Scholar

[7] Hnatkowska B. and Woroniecki P., Transformation of OWL2 property axioms to Groovy. In Tjoa A., Bellatreche L., Biffl S., van Leeuwen J., Wiedermann J. (eds) SOFSEM 2018: Theory and Practice of Computer Science. SOFSEM 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 10706, Edizioni della Normale, Cham, 2018, 269-282.Search in Google Scholar

[8] Horrige M. and Bechhofer S., The OWL API: A Java API for OWL ontologies. Semantic Web, Vol. 2, Issue 1, 2011, 11-21.10.3233/SW-2011-0025Search in Google Scholar

[9] Knublauch H., Case Study: Using Protege to Convert the Travel Ontology to UML and OWL. In: Evaluation of Ontology-based Tools, 2nd International Workshop, Sanibel Island, Florida, USA, 2003.Search in Google Scholar

[10] Meditskos G. and Bassiliades N., CLIPS-OWL: A framework for providing object-oriented extensional ontology queries in a production rule engine, Data & Knowledge Engineering, Vol. 70, Issue 7, 2011, 661-681.10.1016/j.datak.2011.04.001Search in Google Scholar

[11] Musen, M.A., The Protégé project: A look back and a look forward. AI Matters. Association of Computing Machinery Specific Interest Group in Artificial Intelligence, 1(4), June 2015. DOI: 10.1145/1557001.2575700310.1145/1557001.25757003Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[12] Nasser V., Du W., and MacIsaac D., An ontology-based software test generation framework, in: The 22nd International Conference on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, SEKE, San Francisco Bay, USA, 2010.Search in Google Scholar

[13] Niles I. and Pease A., Towards a Standard Upper Ontology, in: Proc. of the International Conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems - Volume 2001, FOIS’01, ACM, New York, USA, 2001, 2-9.10.1145/505168.505170Search in Google Scholar

[14] Nyulas C., O’Connor M. and Tu S. W., DataMaster – a Plug-in for Importing Schemas and Data from Relational Databases into Protégé. In in Proc. 10th International Protg Conference,, Budapest, Hungary, 2007.Search in Google Scholar

[15] Rao R., Lecture 20: Topo-Sort and Dijkstra’s Greedy Idea, [Accessed 30 May 2018].Search in Google Scholar

[16] Riehle D. and Gross T., Role Model Based Framework Design and Integration, in Proceedings of the 13th ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Object-oriented Programming, Systems, Languages, and Applications, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, 1998.10.1145/286936.286951Search in Google Scholar

[17] Stevenson G. and Dobson S., Sapphire: Generating Java Runtime Artefacts from OWL Ontologies, In: Salinesi C., Pastor O. (eds) Advanced Information Systems Engineering Workshops. CAiSE 2011. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 83. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2011.10.1007/978-3-642-22056-2_46Search in Google Scholar

[18] Volker J., Hitzler P. and Cimiano P., Acquisition of OWL DL Axioms from Lexical Resources. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 4519, 670-685.10.1007/978-3-540-72667-8_47Search in Google Scholar

[19] Vyšniauskas E., Nemuraitė L. and Paradauskas B., Preserving Semantics of OWL 2 Ontologies in Relational Databases Using Hybrid Approach, Information Technology and Control, Vol. 41, No. 2, 2012, 103-115.10.5755/j01.itc.41.2.833Search in Google Scholar

[20] Woroniecki P., OWL2 to Groovy Converter, [Accessed 3 June 2018].Search in Google Scholar

[21] Yabloko L., OntoBase, [Accessed 3 June 2018].Search in Google Scholar

[22] Zedlitz J., Jörke J. and Luttenberger N., From UML to OWL 2, In: Lukose D., Ahmad A.R., Suliman A. (eds) Knowledge Technology. Communications in Computer and Information Science, Berlin, Heidelberg, Springer, 2012, 154-163.10.1007/978-3-642-32826-8_16Search in Google Scholar

[23] “Framework.”, WebFinance, Inc., [Accessed 3 June 2018].Search in Google Scholar

[24] “Framework”. Techopedia, [Accessed 3 June 2018].Search in Google Scholar

[25] OWL 2 Web Ontology Language. Document Overview (Second Edition), W3C, 11 December 2012, [Accessed 3 June 2018].Search in Google Scholar

[26] Spring Context, MvnRepository, [Accessed 9 May 2018].Search in Google Scholar

[27] The Sigma knowledge engineering environment, [Accessed 3 June 2018].Search in Google Scholar

[28] OSGi Alliance, The Dynamic Module System for Java, [Accessed 30 September 2018].Search in Google Scholar

[29] Spring Framework, [Accessed 30 September 2018].Search in Google Scholar

[30] Apache Felix, [Acessed 30 September 2018].Search in Google Scholar

Publication timeframe:
4 times per year
Journal Subjects:
Computer Sciences, Artificial Intelligence, Software Development