1. bookVolume 20 (2017): Issue 1 (June 2017)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1027-5207
First Published
11 Dec 2014
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

Offering Authentic Learning Activities in the Context of Open Resources and Real-World Goals: A Study of Self-motivated Online Music Learning

Published Online: 23 Jan 2018
Volume & Issue: Volume 20 (2017) - Issue 1 (June 2017)
Page range: 112 - 126
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1027-5207
First Published
11 Dec 2014
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

Many users of online open education resources (OERs) are learners seeking insights into problems encountered as they pursue their everyday interests and activities. As well as benefitting from intrinsic motivation, such authentic learning activity provides context that helps the learner absorb and integrate the meaning of the knowledge. The purpose of this study was to explore barriers that prevent some online learners from using OERs in this way. Participants had experienced difficulties using music theory OERs to pursue personal music-making goals. Provided with online tutoring through an action research methodology, they appeared to benefit particularly from five aspects of active guidance: additional motivation, connections between generalized knowledge and personal experience, relevant learning activities, focus of attention, and goal-oriented feedback. In an environment rich in open content, providing these supports, in activities oriented towards learners’ goals, may be a particularly valuable use of teaching time.

Keywords

1. Boitshwarelo, B. (2011). Proposing an integrated research framework for connectivism: Utilising theoretical synergies. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(3), 161-179.10.19173/irrodl.v12i3.881Search in Google Scholar

2. Bresler, L. (1993). The social organization of achievement: A case study of a music theory class. The Curriculum Journal, 4(1), 37-58.10.1080/0958517930040104Search in Google Scholar

3. Brown, J. S., & Adler, R. P. (2008). Minds on fire: Open education, the long tail, and learning 2.0. Educause Review, 43(1), 17-32. Retrieved from http://www.educause.eduSearch in Google Scholar

4. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-42.10.3102/0013189X018001032Search in Google Scholar

5. Burnard, P. (2007). Reframing creativity and technology: Promoting pedagogic change in music education. Journal of Music, Technology and Education, 1(1), 37-55. doi: https://doi.org/10.1386/jmte.1.1.37_1Search in Google Scholar

6. Cape Town Open Education Declaration (2007). Read the Declaration. Retrieved from http://www.capetowndeclaration.org/read-the-declarationSearch in Google Scholar

7. Carson, S. (2006). 2005 Program evaluation findings report. MIT OpenCourseWare. Retrieved from https://ocw.mit.edu/ans7870/global/05_Prog_Eval_Report_Final.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

8. Carson, S. (2009). 2009 Program Evaluation Findings Summary. MIT OpenCourseWare. Retrieved from http://ocw.mit.edu/ans7870/global/09_Eval_Summary.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

9. Crawford, R. (2014). A multidimensional/non-linear teaching and learning model: Teaching and learning music in an authentic and holistic context. Music Education Research, 16(1), 50-69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14613808.2013.81262710.1080/14613808.2013.812627Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

10. Fletcher, G., Schaffhauser, D, & Levin, D. (2012). Out of Print: Reimagining the K-12 Textbook in a Digital Age. Washington, DC: State Educational Technology Directors Association (SETDA).Search in Google Scholar

11. Godin, S. (2012). Stop stealing dreams: (What is school for?). Retrieved from http://www.squidoo.com/seth#module157797563Search in Google Scholar

12. Green, L. (2002). How popular musicians learn: A way ahead for music education. Farnham, England: Ashgate Publishing Limited.Search in Google Scholar

13. Hargreaves, D. J., & Marshall, N. A. (2003). Developing identities in music education. Music Education Research, 5(3), 263-274.10.1080/1461380032000126355Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

14. Harley, D. (2008). Why understanding the use and users of open education matters. In J. S. Brown, T. Iiyoshi, & M. S. V. Kumar (Eds.), Opening up education: The collective advancement of education through open technology, open content, and open knowledge (pp. 197-211). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

15. Heron, J., & Reason, P. (2006). The practice of co-operative inquiry: Research ‘with’ rather than ‘on’ people. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of action research (Concise paperback ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Search in Google Scholar

16. Herr, K., & Anderson, G. L. (2005). The action research dissertation: A guide for students and faculty. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Search in Google Scholar

17. Knowles, M., & Associates. (1984). Andragogy in Action: Applying Modern Principles of Adult Learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Inc.Search in Google Scholar

18. Kop, R., Fournier, H., & Mak, J. S. F. (2011). A pedagogy of abundance or a pedagogy to support human beings: Participant support on massive open online courses. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(7), 74-9310.19173/irrodl.v12i7.1041Search in Google Scholar

19. Lee, S. D. (2008). The gates are shut: Technical and cultural barriers to open education. In T. Iiyoshi & M.S.V. Kumar (Eds.), Opening Up Education: The Collective Advancement of Education through Open Technology, Open Content, and Open Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

20. Leontiev, A. N. (1978). Activity, Consciousness, and Personality (M. J. Hall, Trans.). Retrieved from http://www.marxists.org/archive/leontev/works/1978/Search in Google Scholar

21. Lilliestam, L. (1996). On Playing by Ear. Popular Music, 15(2), 195-216.10.1017/S0261143000008114Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

22. Lysloff, R. T. A. (2003). Musical community on the Internet: An on-line ethnography. Cultural Anthropology, 18(2), 233-263.10.1525/can.2003.18.2.233Search in Google Scholar

23. McAndrew, P., dos Santos, A. I., Lane, A., Godwin, S., Okada, A., Wilson, T., Connolly, T., Ferreira, G., Buckingham Shum, S., Bretts, J., & Webb, R. (2008). OpenLearn: Research Report 2006-2008. Milton Keynes: OpenLearn, The Open University. Retrieved from http://www3.open.ac.uk/events/6/2009727_62936_o1.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

24. Nardi, B. A. (1996). Activity theory and human-computer-interaction. In Nardi (Ed.), Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction (pp. 7-16). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

25. Nettl, B. (1985). The Western impact on world music: Change, adaptation, and survival. New York, NY: Schirmer Books.Search in Google Scholar

26. Peters, J. M., Taylor, J. E., & Doi, M. M. (2009). Self-directed learning and action research. International Journal of Self-Directed Learning, 6(2), 23-39.Search in Google Scholar

27. Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. (Eds.). (2006). Handbook of Action Research (concise paperback ed.) London: Sage Publications Ltd.Search in Google Scholar

28. Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

29. Rosell-Aguilar, F. (2013). Podcasting for language learning through iTunes U: The learner’s view. Language Learning & Technology, 17(3), 74-93.Search in Google Scholar

30. Schmidt-Jones, C. (2012). An open education resource supports a diversity of inquiry-based learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 13(1), 1-16.10.19173/irrodl.v13i1.1141Search in Google Scholar

31. Schmidt-Jones, C. (2016a). An online participatory action research inquiry into online inquiry-based music learning (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/handle/2142/90449Search in Google Scholar

32. Schmidt-Jones, C. (2016b). Barriers to self-motivated conceptual music learning: Activity theory as a framework for comparing dissimilar cases. Music Education Research, 16(2), doi: 10.1080/14613808.2016.1249362Search in Google Scholar

33. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman. Eds. A. R. Luria, M. Lopez-Morillas, M. Cole, & J. Wertsch, Trans.) Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

34. Waldron, J. (2009). Exploring a virtual music ‘community of practice’: Informal music learning on the Internet. Journal of Music, Technology and Education, 2(2-3), 97-112. doi: 10.1386/jmte.2.2-3.97_1Search in Google Scholar

35. Welch, G. F. (2007). Addressing the multifaceted nature of music education: An activity theory research perspective. Research Studies in Music Education, 28, 23-37. 10.1177/1321103X070280010203Search in Google Scholar

36. Wells, G. (2001). Action, Talk, and Text: Learning and Teaching through Inquiry. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.Search in Google Scholar

37. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511803932Search in Google Scholar

38. Woody, R. H., & Lehmann, A. C. (2010). Student Musicians’ Ear-Playing Ability as a Function of Vernacular Music Experiences. Journal of Research in Music Education, 58(2), 101-115. doi: 10.1177/0022429410370785Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo