1. bookVolume 19 (2016): Issue 1 (July 2016)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1027-5207
First Published
11 Dec 2014
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

The Pygmalion Effect in Distance Learning: A Case Study at the Hellenic Open University

Published Online: 26 Jul 2016
Volume & Issue: Volume 19 (2016) - Issue 1 (July 2016)
Page range: 36 - 52
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1027-5207
First Published
11 Dec 2014
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

The Pygmalion Effect is the positive form of self-fulfilling prophecy and shows how teacher expectations influence student performance. According to this phenomenon, higher expectations can lead to an increase in performance. In this research qualitative methodology was adopted both in data collection, and in analysis, in order to investigate the impact of the Pygmalion Effect in distance adult learning. Observation was held in two Contact Sessions of the Postgraduate Module for Open and Distance Education (EKP65) of the School of Humanities at the Hellenic Open University (HOU). Also, 22 interviews were conducted, 6 with Tutors/Advisors and 16 with students of the same Postgraduate Module. The data analysis indicates that both Tutors/Advisors and postgraduate students shape form their expectations based on the behaviour as reflected in their first contact (telephone contact, face-to-face contact, written contact through the CV). Expectations originally are positive, though this could change due to mismatched following behaviour. Tutor’s expectations are expressed in verbal and non-verbal ways both in written and face-to-face communication. However, it is the non-verbal behaviour - and mainly the encouragement and the support towards the students - that influences their positive mood and attitude towards the learning object and distance learning itself. In conclusion, not to reject the educational trend according to which the adult learner has developed selfmotivation, we accept that Tutor’s expectations reflected in encouragement and support towards the student may influence the learning process.

Keywords

1. Blakey, M. L. (1970). The Relationship between Teacher Prophecy and Teacher Verbal Behavior and Their Effect upon Adult Student Achievement. Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov, No ED 051125 (19/10/2012)Search in Google Scholar

2. Brophy, J. (1982). Research on the Self-Fulfilling Prophecy and Teacher Expectations. Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov, No ED 221530 (15/11/2010)Search in Google Scholar

3. Coleman, L., & Jussim, L. (1983). Perusing Teacher Expectations: A Closer Look at Affect- Attribution Links. Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov, No ED 239161 (15/11/2010).Search in Google Scholar

4. Cooper, J. (1971). Self-Fulfilling Prophecy in the Classroom: An Attempt to Discover the Progress by Which Expectations Are Communicated. Final Report. Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov, No ED 063453 (15/10/2012).Search in Google Scholar

5. Cooper, H., Good, T., Blakey, S., Hinkel, G., Burger, J., Sterling, J., & Baron, R. (1979). Understanding Pygmalion: The Social Psychology of Self-Fulfilling Classroom Expectations. Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov, No ED 182642 (10/10/2012).Search in Google Scholar

6. Dominguez, P. S., & Ridley, D. R. (2001). Education; Psychology and mental health. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 28(1), 15-19.Search in Google Scholar

7. Giannoudis, C., Digelidis, N., & Papaioannou, A. (2009). Climate Motivation and Perceived Behavior of physical education teachers to disciplined - unruly students. Inquiries in Physical Education & Sport, 7(1), 10-21Search in Google Scholar

8. Good, T., & Brophy, J. (1973). Looking in Classrooms. New York: Harper and RowSearch in Google Scholar

9. Hecht, M., & Strum, I. (1974). The Self-Fulfilling Prophecy: An Adaption. Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov, No ED 135464 (19/10/2012).Search in Google Scholar

10. Lavoie, J., & Adams, G. R. (1973). Pygmalion in the Classroom: An Experimental Investigation of the Characteristics of Children on Teacher Expectancy. Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov, No ED 088973 (15/10/2012).Search in Google Scholar

11. Mallet, M.-A. (2006). Quelle estime de soi chez les élèves bons, moyens et en difficulté? Paper presented at the 8e Biennale de l’ éducation et de la formation, Lyon, 11-14 avril, 2006.Search in Google Scholar

12. Manzoni, J. F., & Barsoux, J. L. (1998). Inside the Golem Effect: How bosses can kill their subordinates motivation. Fontainebleau: INSEADSearch in Google Scholar

13. Meena, L. I. (2007). Overcoming barriers in developing conversation skills: A pedagogical perspective. Proceedings of the 2007 Association for Business Communication Annual Convention, Association for Business Communication.Search in Google Scholar

14. Merle, P., (2004). Mobilisation et découragement scolaires: l’expérience subjective des élèves. Education et Sociétés, 13, 193-208.10.3917/es.013.0193Search in Google Scholar

15. Moore, M. G. (1972). Leamer autonomy: The second dimension of independent leaming. Convergence, 2, 76-88.Search in Google Scholar

16. Moore, M. G. (1993). Theory of transactional distance. In D. Keegan, (Ed.), Theoretical principles of distance education. New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

17. Prihadi, K., Hairul, N. I., & Hazri, J. (2010). Students’ Self-Esteem and their Perception of Teacher Behavior: A Study of Between-Class Ability Grouping. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 8(2), 707-724.Search in Google Scholar

18. Rathert, G., & Reed, D. (2001). The Effectiveness of Electronically Communicated Encouragement on Student Performance. Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov, No ED 471187 (12/10/2012).Search in Google Scholar

19. Rhem, J. (1999). Pygmalion In The Classroom. The National Teaching & Learning Forum, 8(2).Search in Google Scholar

20. Rist, R. C. (1977). On Understanding the Process of Schooling: The Contributions of Labeling Theory. In J. Karabel & A. H. Hasley (Εds.), Power and Ideology in Education (p. 292-305). New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

21. Rosenthal, H. P. (1975). The Effect of Teacher Expectancy Upon the Achievement and Intelligence Test Scores of Adult Students. Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov, No ED 110850 (9/10/2012).Search in Google Scholar

22. Rosenthal, R., & Babad, E. Y. (1985). Pygmalion in the gymnasium. Educational Leadership, 43(1), 36-39.Search in Google Scholar

23. Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968). Pygmalion in the Classroom. The Urban Review, 3(1), 16-20.10.1007/BF02322211Search in Google Scholar

24. Skilbeck, W., & Collins, B. (1976). Transmission and Compliance with Expectations in a Simulated Supervisor - Worker Interaction. Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov, No ED 140137 (15/11/2012).Search in Google Scholar

25. Sprouse, J., & Webb J. (1994). The Pygmalion Effect and Its Influence on the Grading and Gender Assignment on Spelling and Essay Assessments. Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov, No ED 374096 (20/10/2012).Search in Google Scholar

26. Suplicz, S. (2005). Psychological Aspects of E-learning. Paper presented at the VELVITT Conference, 6th Meeting, Heraklion, 9-12 October 2005.Search in Google Scholar

27. Trouilloud, D., & Sarrazin, P. (2003). Les connaissances actuelles sur l’ effet Pygmalion: processus, poids et modulateurs. Revue Française de Pédagogie, 145, 89-119.10.3406/rfp.2003.2988Search in Google Scholar

28. Zanna, M., Sheras, P., Cooper, J., & Shaw, C. (1975). Pygmalion and Galatea: The Interactive Effect of Teacher and Student Expectancies. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 11, 279-287.10.1016/S0022-1031(75)80028-XSearch in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo