1. bookVolume 19 (2016): Issue 1 (July 2016)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1027-5207
First Published
11 Dec 2014
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

Exploration of Teaching Preferences of Instructors’use of Social Media

Published Online: 26 Jul 2016
Volume & Issue: Volume 19 (2016) - Issue 1 (July 2016)
Page range: 1 - 18
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1027-5207
First Published
11 Dec 2014
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

With the excessive use of social media in the 21st century, attempts to integrate social media within higher education have also increased. In this area, research has been particularly focused on the aspects of students, rather than the instructors. This study puts the emphasis on the instructors with the aim to explore their use of social media in educational settings. Their respective teaching preferences were explored, from a pedagogical perspective, with the help of a Social Media Toolkit. The toolkit was developed to guide instructors that want to integrate social media in their teaching. This study was designed as a descriptive study and quantitative data was collected from 583 instructors from 39 countries. The participants responded to four main questions in an online environment. Results revealed that instructors mostly prefer to teach their subject at the applying and understanding levels. They frequently use text-based materials and design their courses as problem-based or on a presentation model. They mostly prefer to assess students using alternative methods based on their performance, like portfolios, group works, etc. whilst classical methods were also preferred. Overall findings indicated that any instructor from any discipline or culture can transform courses onto a social media platform thanks to many different and varied features provided by social media tools.

Keywords

1. Ainin, S., Naqshbandi, M. M., Moghavvemi, S., & Jaafar, N. I. (2015). Facebook usage, socialization and academic performance. Computers & Education, 83, 64-73.10.1016/j.compedu.2014.12.018Search in Google Scholar

2. Ajjan, H., & Hartshorne, R. (2008). Investigating faculty decisions to adopt Web 2.0 technologies: Theory and empirical tests. The internet and higher education, 11(2), 71-80.Search in Google Scholar

3. Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Pintrich, P. R., Raths, J., & Wittrock, M. C. (2000). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching and Assessment: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Pearson Education.Search in Google Scholar

4. Arends, R. (2011). Learning to Teach (9th revised ed.). McGraw-Hill Higher Education.Search in Google Scholar

5. Baran, B. (2010). Facebook as a formal instructional environment. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(6), E146-E149.10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01115.xSearch in Google Scholar

6. Borich, G. D. (2013). Effective Teaching Methods: Research-Based Practice (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall.Search in Google Scholar

7. Bower, M., Hedberg, J. G., & Kuswara, A. (2010). A framework for Web 2.0 learning design. Educational Media International, 47(3), 177-198.Search in Google Scholar

8. Burden, P. R., & Byrd, D. M. (2013). Methods for Effective Teaching: Meeting the Needs of All Students (6th ed.). Boston: Pearson/Allyn & Bacon.Search in Google Scholar

9. Çoklar, A. N. (2012). Evaluations of Students on Facebook as an Educational Environment. Online Submission, 3(2), 42-53.Search in Google Scholar

10. Deng, L., & Yuen, A. H. (2011). Towards a framework for educational affordances of blogs. Computers & Education, 56(2), 441-451.10.1016/j.compedu.2010.09.005Search in Google Scholar

11. Ebner, M., Lienhardt, C., Rohs, M., & Meyer, I. (2010). Microblogs in Higher Education - A chance to facilitate informal and process-oriented learning? Computers & Education, 55(1), 92-100.10.1016/j.compedu.2009.12.006Search in Google Scholar

12. Ferdig, R. E., & Trammell, K. D. (2004). Content delivery in the ‘Blogosphere’. THE Journal (Technological Horizons in Education), 31(7), 12-16.Search in Google Scholar

13. Ferris, D. R. (2003). Response to student writing: Implications for second language students. Routledge.10.4324/9781410607201Search in Google Scholar

14. Garrison, C., & Ehringhaus, M. (2011). Formative and Summative Assessments in the Classroom. Paper presented at the NMSA Annual Conference and Exhibit. Retrieved from http://ccti.colfinder.org/sites/default/files/formative_and_summative_assessment_in_the_classroom.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

15. Glass, G. V., & Hopkins, K. D. (1984). Statistical methods in education and psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Search in Google Scholar

16. Kilis, S., Rapp, C., & Gülbahar, Y. (2014). Validation of Social Media Toolkit. Proceedings of the Ireland International Conference on Education, Dublin, October 27-30, 2014, 27-29. Retrieved from http://www.somecat.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Kilis-Rapp-G%C3%BClbahar-Reliability-and-Validity-of-Social-Media-Toolkit.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

17. Halic, O., Lee, D., Paulus, T., & Spence, M. (2010). To blog or not to blog: Student perceptions of blog effectiveness for learning in a college-level course. The Internet and higher education, 13(4), 206-213.10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.04.001Search in Google Scholar

18. Hung, H. T., & Yuen, S. C. Y. (2010). Educational use of social networking technology in higher education. Teaching in higher education, 15(6), 703-714.10.1080/13562517.2010.507307Search in Google Scholar

19. Kessler, G. (2009). Student-initiated attention to form in wiki-based collaborative writing. Language Learning & Technology, 13(1), 79-95.Search in Google Scholar

20. Kessler, G., & Bikowski, D. (2010). Developing collaborative autonomous learning abilities in computer mediated language learning: Attention to meaning among students in wiki space. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 23(1), 41-58.10.1080/09588220903467335Search in Google Scholar

21. Lundin, R. W. (2008). Teaching with wikis: Toward a networked pedagogy. Computers and Composition, 25(4), 432-448.10.1016/j.compcom.2008.06.001Search in Google Scholar

22. Macdonald, J., & Poniatowska, B. (2011). Designing the professional development of staff for teaching online: an OU (UK) case study. Distance Education, 32(1), 119-134.10.1080/01587919.2011.565481Search in Google Scholar

23. Madge, C., Meek, J., Wellens, J., & Hooley, T. (2009). Facebook, social integration and informal learning at university: ‘It is more for socialising and talking to friends about work than for actually doing work’. Learning, Media and Technology, 34(2), 141-155.10.1080/17439880902923606Search in Google Scholar

24. Mak, B., & Coniam, D. (2008). Using wikis to enhance and develop writing skills among secondary school students in Hong Kong. System, 36(3), 437-455. 10.1016/j.system.2008.02.004Search in Google Scholar

25. McLean, R., Richards, B. H., & Wardman, J. (2007). The effect of Web 2.0 on the future of medical practice and education: Darwikinian evolution or folksonomic revolution? Medical Journal of Australia, 187(3), 174.Search in Google Scholar

26. McLoughlin, C., & Lee, M. (2007). Social software and participatory learning: Pedagogical choices with technology affordances in the Web 2.0 era. Proceedings of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education (ASCILITE) Annual Conference, 664-675.Search in Google Scholar

27. Nystrand, M., & Brandt, D. (1989). Response to writing as a context for learning to write. In C. Anson (Ed.), Writing and response: Theory, practice, and research (pp. 209-230). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.Search in Google Scholar

28. OECD (2007). Participative Web and User-Created Content: Web 2.0, Wikis and Social Networking. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/sti/ieconomy/participativewebandusercreatedcontentweb20wikisandsocialnetworking.htmSearch in Google Scholar

29. Panitz, T. (2011). A definition of collaborative vs cooperative learning, 1996. Retrieved from http://colccti.colfinder.org/sites/default/files/a_definition_of_collaborative_vs_cooperative_learning.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

30. Pempek, T. A., Yermolayeva, Y. A., & Calvert, S. L. (2009). College students’ social networking experiences on Facebook. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 30(3), 227-238.10.1016/j.appdev.2008.12.010Search in Google Scholar

31. Pineda, M. V. G. (2007). Videos, Blogs and Podcasts: Leverage Instruments of Teaching and Learning Assets. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on eLearning for Knowledge-Based Society, 15(3), 32.1-32.5.Search in Google Scholar

32. Presley, M., & McCormick, C. (2007). Cognition, Teaching, and Assessment. Harper Collins College Publishers.Search in Google Scholar

33. Richter, A., & Koch, M. (2008). Functions of social networking services. Proceedings of the International Conference on the Design of Cooperative Systems, 87-98.Search in Google Scholar

34. Rinaldo, S. B., Tapp, S., & Laverie, D. A. (2011). Learning by tweeting: Using Twitter as a pedagogical tool. Journal of Marketing Education, 33(2), 193-203. doi: 10.1177/0273475311410852.10.1177/0273475311410852Search in Google Scholar

35. Rowe, M., Bozalek, V., & Frantz, J. (2013). Using Google Drive to facilitate a blended approach to authentic learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(4), 594-606.10.1111/bjet.12063Search in Google Scholar

36. Safko, L. (2010). The Social Media Bible Tactics, Tools, and Strategies for Business Success. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.Search in Google Scholar

37. Stiler, G. M., & Philleo, T. (2003). Blogging and blogspots: An alternative format for encouraging reflective practice among preservice teachers. Academic Research Library, 123(4), 789-798.Search in Google Scholar

38. Storch, N. (2005). Collaborative writing: Product, process, and students’ reflections. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14(3), 153-173.10.1016/j.jslw.2005.05.002Search in Google Scholar

39. Sykes, J. M., Oskoz, A., & Thorne, S. L. (2013). Web 2.0, synthetic immersive environments, and mobile resources for language education. Calico Journal, 25(3), 528-546.Search in Google Scholar

40. Tekinarslan, E. (2008). Blogs: A qualitative investigation into an instructor and undergraduate students’ experiences. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24(4), 402-412.10.14742/ajet.1200Search in Google Scholar

41. University of Cincinnati (2013). University of Cincinnati Social Media Strategy. Retrieved from http://www.uc.edu/content/dam/uc/ucomm/docs/UC-Social-Media-Strategy.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

42. Yang, S. H. (2009). Using blogs to enhance critical reflection and community of practice. Educational Technology & Society, 12(2), 11-21.Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo