Open Access

Towards Strengths-Based Planning Strategies for Rural Localities in Finland

European Countryside's Cover Image
European Countryside
Special Issue: Planning in the Rural Space Issue Editors: Antonín Vaishar, Hana Vavrouchová

Cite

[1] Aarrevaara, E., ed. (2015). Suomalaiset maaseututaajamat 2010-luvulla- tutkimushankkeen loppuraportti [research project]. Lahti: Lahden ammattikorkeakoulu.Search in Google Scholar

[2] Aarrevaara, E. & Rönkkö, E. (2015). Maaseututaajamien muutosprosessit aluehistorian ja kulttuuriperinnön näkökulmista. Maaseudun uusi aika –verkkolehti. Maaseutututkimuksen ja –politiikan aikakauslehti 23, 5–19.Search in Google Scholar

[3] Auclair, E. & Fairclough, G., eds. (2015). Theory and Practice in Heritage and Sustainability. Between past and future. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781315771618Search in Google Scholar

[4] Axelsson, R., Angelstam, P., Degerman, E. et al. (2013). Social and Cultural Sustainability: Criteria, Indicators, Verifier Variables for Measurement and Maps for Visualization to Support Planning. AMBIO 42(2), 215–228. DOI: 10.1007/s13280-012-0376-0.10.1007/s13280-012-0376-0359303523475657Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[5] Blomstedt, Y. (1982). Asikkalan historia. Asikkala: Asikkalan kunta.Search in Google Scholar

[6] Campbell, S. (1996). Green Cities, Growing Cities, Just Cities? Urban Planning and the Contradictions of Sustainable Development. Journal of the American Planning Association 62(3), 296–312. DOI: 10.1080/01944369608975696.10.1080/01944369608975696Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[7] Davoudi, S. (2015). Planning as a practice of knowing. Planning Theory 14(3), 1–16. DOI: 10.1177/1473095215575919.10.1177/1473095215575919Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[8] Dopico, E. & Garcia-Vazquez, E. (2011). Leaving the classroom: a didactic framework for education in environmental sciences. Cultural Studies of Science Education 6, 311–326. DOI: 10.1007/s11422-010-9271-9.10.1007/s11422-010-9271-9Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[9] Elliott, C. (1999). Locating the Energy for Change: An Introduction to Appreciative Inquiry. Winnipeg: International Institute for Sustainable Development.Search in Google Scholar

[10] Hambleton, R. (2014). Leading the Inclusive City. Place-Based Innovation for a Bounded Planet. Bristol: Policy Press.Search in Google Scholar

[11] Ghaye, T., Melander-Wikman, A., Kisare, M., Chambers, P., Bergmark, U., Kostenius, C. & Lillyman, S. (2008). Participatory and appreciative action and reflection (PAAR) – democratizing reflective practices. Reflective Practice 9:4, 361–397. DOI: 10.1080/14623940802475827.10.1080/14623940802475827Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[12] Hawkes, J. (2001). The Fourth Pillar of Sustainability. Culture’s Essential Role in Public Planning. Melbourne: Cultural Development Network.Search in Google Scholar

[13] Healey, P. (1997). Collaborative Planning–Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies. London: Macmillan.10.1007/978-1-349-25538-2Search in Google Scholar

[14] Helminen, V., Tiitu, M., Nurmio, K. & Ristimäki, M. (2016). Suomen taajamarakenne. Taajamien seututason luokittelu. Suomen ympäristökeskuksen raportteja 32 / 2016, Helsinki: Suomen ympäristökeskus.Search in Google Scholar

[15] Janssens, N. (2008). Designerly thinking & research. In Hendrick, A., Janssens, N., Martens, S., Nollet, T., Van Den Berghe, J. & Verbeke, J., eds. Reflections 7 (pp. 203–211). Brussel: Sint-Lucas School of Architecture.Search in Google Scholar

[16] Knox, P. L. & Mayer, H. (2009). Small Town Sustainability. Economic, Social and Environmental Innovation. Basel, Boston & Berlin: Birkhäuser.Search in Google Scholar

[17] Kuhmonen, T. & Kuhmonen, I. (2015). Rural futures in developed economies: The case of Finland. Technological Forecasting & Social Change 101, 366–374. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2015.07.028.10.1016/j.techfore.2015.07.028Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[18] Kraaijenbrink, J., Spender, JC. & Groen, A. (2010). The resource based view: A review and assessment of its critiques. Journal of Management 36:1, 349–372. DOI: 10.1177/0149206309350775.10.1177/0149206309350775Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[19] LaGro, J. (2008). Site Analysis. A Contextual Approach to Sustainable Land Planning and Site Design. 2nd Ed. Hoboken: Wiley & Sons.Search in Google Scholar

[20] Mathie, A. & Cunningham, G. (2003). From clients to citizens: Asset-based Community Development as a strategy for community-driven development. Development in Practice 13:5, 474–486. DOI: 10.1080/0961452032000125857.10.1080/0961452032000125857Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[21] McCammon, S. (2012). Systems of Care as Asset-Building Communities: Implementing Strengths-Based Planning and Positive Youth Development. American Journal of Community Psychology 49, 556–565. DOI: 10.1007/s10464-012-9514-x.10.1007/s10464-012-9514-xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

[22] Moseley, M. (2003). Rural development. Principles and practice. London: Sage.Search in Google Scholar

[23] Niiniluoto, I. (2001). Futures studies: science or art? Futures 33(5), 371–377. DOI: 10.1016/S0016-3287(00)00080-X.10.1016/S0016-3287(00)00080-XOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

[24] Oliver, H. (2014). Exploratory scenario planning. Planning 80(11), 46–47.Search in Google Scholar

[25] Quay, R. (2012). Brave new world of scenario planning. Planning 78(9), 52.Search in Google Scholar

[26] Rittel, H. & Webber, M. (1973). Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning. Policy Sciences 4, 155–169. DOI: 10.1007/BF01405730.10.1007/BF01405730Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[27] Roney, C. W. (2010). Intersections of strategic planning and futures studies: methodological complementarities. Journal of Future Studies 15(2), 71–100.Search in Google Scholar

[28] Rönkkö, E. (2012). Kulttuuriympäristöselvitykset. Tieto, taito ja ymmärrys maaseudun maankäytön suunnittelussa [PhD Dissertation]. Oulu: University of Oulu.Search in Google Scholar

[29] Rönkkö, E. (2015). Maaseudun kirkonkylien ja kulttuuriympäristöjen muutos 1970-luvun lopulta 2010-luvulle. In Aarrevaara, E. ed., Suomalaiset maaseututaajamat 2010-luvulla-tutkimushankkeen loppuraportti (pp. 20–33). Lahti: Lahden ammattikorkeakoulu.Search in Google Scholar

[30] Rönkkö, E. (2017). Healthy Urban Planning – new approaches for strategic land use planning in the North. In Lankila, T. & Tervo-Kankare, K., eds., Geographies of well-being in the North (pp. 53–65). Oulu: Nordia Geographical Publications.Search in Google Scholar

[31] Rönkkö, E., Luusua, A., Aarrevaara, E., Herneoja, A. & Muilu, T. (2017). New Resource-wise planning strategies for Smart urban-rural development in Finland. Systems 5:1, 10. DOI: 10.3390/systems5010010.10.3390/5010010Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[32] Sevaldson, B. (2010). Discussions & Movements in Design Research. A systems approach to practice research in design. FORMakademisk 3(1), 8–35.10.7577/formakademisk.137Search in Google Scholar

[33] Sneck, T. (1983). Skenaariomenetelmä aluesuunnittelussa. Vaiheittaisen skenaariomenetelmän kehittelyä ja käyttökelpoisuuden tarkastelua. Helsinki: Seutusuunnittelun keskusliitto.Search in Google Scholar

[34] Soini, K. & Birkeland, I. (2014). Exploring the scientific discourse on cultural sustainability. Geoforum 51, 213–223. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.12.001.10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.12.001Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[35] Soini, K. & Dessein, J. (2016). Culture-Sustainability Relation: Towards a Conceptual Framework. Sustainability 8(2), 167. DOI: 10.3390/su8020167.10.3390/su8020167Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[36] Waylen, KA., Martin-Ortega, J., Blackstock, KL. et al. (2015). Can scenario-planning support community-based natural resource management? Experiences from three countries in Latin America. Ecology and Society 20(4):28. DOI: 10.5751/ES-07926-200428.10.5751/ES-07926-200428Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[37] Asikkala. 2017. Available at: https://www.asikkala.fi. [accessed 26.1.2017].Search in Google Scholar

[38] Council of the European Union. (2014). Conclusions on cultural heritage as a strategic resource for a sustainable Europe. Education, youth, culture and sport council meeting Brussels, 20 may 2014. Available at: https://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/educ/142705.pdf [accessed 30.1.2017].Search in Google Scholar

[39] Harava. A survey tool for smart planning. Available at: https://www.eharava.fi/en/ [accessed 30.1.2017].Search in Google Scholar

[40] Hirvonen, S. & Lohtander, L. (2017). Kansalaisyhteiskunta kulttuuriympäristötyössä. Helsinki: Finnish Local Heritage Federation. Available at: http://www.kotiseutuliitto.fi/julkaisut-ja-tuotteet/kansalaisyhteiskunta-kulttuuriymparistotyossa [accessed 20.4.2017].Search in Google Scholar

[41] Järvien ja harjun solmukohta. Vääksyn kulttuuriympäristöohjelma – nykytila ja tavoitteet. 2017. Lahti University of Applied Sciences. Unpublished draft.Search in Google Scholar

[42] Land Use and Building Act. (1999). Available at: http://www.finlex.fi/en/laki/kaannokset/1999/en19990132.pdf [accessed 26.1.2017].Search in Google Scholar

[43] Ministry of the Environment. (2014). Arviointi maankäyttöja rakennuslain toimivuudesta 2013 [Assessment of the effectiveness of the Land Use and Building Act in 2013]. Suomen ympäristö, 1/2014, Helsinki: Ministry of the Environment.Search in Google Scholar

[44] Myllykylä, T. (1991). Suomen kanavien historia. Keuruu.Search in Google Scholar

[45] National Cultural Environment Strategy 20142020. Government Resolution 20 March 2014. Helsinki: Ministry of Education and Culture and Ministry of the Environment. Available at: https://helda.helsinki.fi/bitstream/handle/10138/135508/Cultural%20Environment%20Strategy_2014.pdf?sequence= [accessed 19.4.2017].Search in Google Scholar

[46] OECD (2017). OECD Territorial Reviews: Northern Sparsely Populated Areas, Paris: OECD Publishing. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264268234-en.10.1787/9789264268234-enOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

[47] Statistics Finland. Vieremä. Available at: http://www.stat.fi/tup/alue/kuntienavainluvut.html#?year=2016&active1=925 [accessed 25.1.2017].Search in Google Scholar

[48] Tulonen, A. (1998). Asikkalan kulttuuriympäristöohjelma. Helsinki: Ympäristöministeriö.Search in Google Scholar

[49] UNESCO. (2001). UNESCO universal declaration on cultural diversity. Records of the general conference, 31st session, 15 October – 3 November 2001, Paris, France. Paris: UNESCO.Search in Google Scholar

[50] Valtakunnallisesti arvokas rakennettu ympäristö, RKY. [Nationally Valuable Built Environment, RKY]. Available at: http://www.rky.fi/read/asp/r_kohde_det.aspx?KOHDE_ID=1895 [accessed 26.1.2017].Search in Google Scholar

[51] Vanha Vääksy. [Old Vääksy]. Available at: http://vanhavaaksy.fi/?page_id=829 [accessed 27.1.2017].Search in Google Scholar

[52] Wager, H. (2006). Päijät-Hämeen rakennettu kulttuuriympäristö. Lahti: Päijät-Hämeen liitto.Search in Google Scholar

[53] WCCD (1995). Our Creative Diversity. France: EGOPRIM.Search in Google Scholar

[54] Vääksyn vesimyllymuseon naapuriin kerrostalo. Yle Online News 20.7.2010. Available at: http://yle.fi/uutiset/3-5599639 [accessed 27.1.2017].Search in Google Scholar

[55] Wilenius, M. (2015). Pieni tulevaisuuskirja. Helsinki: Otava.Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
1803-8417
Language:
English
Publication timeframe:
4 times per year
Journal Subjects:
Life Sciences, Ecology, other