[Afuah, A. (2003). Redefining firm boundaries in the face of the Internet: Are firms really shrinking? Academy of Management Review, 28(1), 34-53. doi: 10.5465/AMR.2003.8925207 ]Search in Google Scholar
[Ahmadjian, C., & Oxley, J. (2005). Using hostages to support exchange: Dependence balancing and partial equity stakes in Japanese automotive supply relationships. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 22(1), 213-233. doi: 10.1093/jleo/ewj003]Search in Google Scholar
[Allen, D. K., Colligan, D., Finnie, A., & Kern, T. (2000). Trust, power and interorganizational information systems: the case of the electronic trading community Trans- Lease. Information Systems Journal, 10(1), 21-40. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2575.2000.00078.x ]Search in Google Scholar
[Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977). Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 396-402. doi: 10.2307/3150783]Search in Google Scholar
[Bensaou, M., & Anderson, E. (1999). Buyer-supplier relations in industrial markets: when do buyers risk making idiosyncratic investments? Organization Science, 10(4), 460-481. doi: 10.1287/orsc.10.4.460]Search in Google Scholar
[Blut, M., Evanschitzky, H., Backhaus, C., Rudd, J., & Marck, M. (2016). Securing business-to-business relationships: the impact of switching costs. Industrial Marketing Management, 52, 82-90. doi: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2015.05.010]Search in Google Scholar
[Bogers, M. (2011). The open innovation paradox: knowledge sharing and protection in R&D collaborations. European Journal of Innovation Management, 14(1), 93-117. doi: 10.1108/14601061111104715]Search in Google Scholar
[Burnham, T. A., Frels, J. K., & Mahajan, V. (2003). Consumer switching costs: A typology, antecedents, and consequences. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 31(2), 109-126. doi: 10.1177/0092070302250897]Search in Google Scholar
[Buvik, A., & John, G. (2000). When does vertical coordination improve industrial purchasing relationships? Journal of Marketing, 64(4), 52-64. doi: 10.1509/jmkg.64.4.52.18075]Search in Google Scholar
[Choon Tan, K., Kannan, V. R., Hsu, C. C., & Keong Leong, G. (2010). Supply chain information and relational alignments: mediators of EDI on firm performance. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 40(5), 377-394. doi: 10.1108/09600031011052831]Search in Google Scholar
[Deutsch, M. (1962). Cooperation and trust: Some theoretical notes. In M. R. Jones (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (pp. 275-319). Lincoln, USA: University of Nebraska Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dorsch, M. J., Carlson, L., Raymond, M. A., & Ranson, R. (2001). Customer equity management and strategic choices for sales managers. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 21(2), 157-166. doi: 10.1080/08853134.2001.10754266]Search in Google Scholar
[Geiger, I., Durand, A., Saab, S., Kleinaltenkamp, M., Baxter, R., & Lee, Y. (2012). The bonding effects of relationship value and switching costs in industrial buyer- seller relationships: An investigation into role differences. Industrial Marketing Management, 41(1), 82-93. doi: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2011.11.013]Search in Google Scholar
[Gemser, G., & Wijnberg, N. M. (2001). Effects of reputational sanctions on the competitive imitation of design innovations. Organization Studies, 22(4), 563-591. doi: 10.1177/0170840601224002]Search in Google Scholar
[Han, K., Kauffman, R. J., & Nault, B. R. (2008). Relative importance, specific investment and ownership in interorganizational systems. Information Technology and Management, 9(3), 181-200. doi: 10.1007/s10799- 008-0039-9]Search in Google Scholar
[Hannas, G. (2007). Vertical electronic coordination and specific IT investments in business-to-business relationships [Ph.D. dissertation]. Molde, Norway: Molde University College.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hart, O., & Moore, J. (1990). Property Rights and the Nature of the Firm. Journal of Political Economy, 98(6), 1119-1158. doi: 10.1086/261729]Search in Google Scholar
[Heide, J. B., & John, G. (1992). Do norms matter in marketing Relationships? The Journal of Marketing, 58(2), 32-44. doi: 10.2307/1252040]Search in Google Scholar
[Heide, J. B., & John, G. (1990). Alliances in industrial purchasing: The determinants of joint action in buyersupplier relationships. Journal of Marketing Research, 27(1), 24-36. doi: 10.2307/3172548]Search in Google Scholar
[Heide, J. B., & Miner, A. S. (1992). The shadow of the future: Effects of anticipated interaction and frequency of contact on buyer-seller cooperation. Academy of Management Journal, 35(2), 265-291. doi: 10.2307/256374]Search in Google Scholar
[Hunt, S. D., Sparkman Jr., R. D., & Wilcox, J. B. (1982). The pretest in survey research: Issues and preliminary findings. Journal of Marketing Research, 19(2), 269-273. doi: 10.2307/3151627]Search in Google Scholar
[Ibbott, C. J., & O'Keefe, R. M. (2004). Trust, planning and benefits in a global interorganizational system. Information Systems Journal, 14(2), 131-152. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2575.2004.00167.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Johnston, H. R., & Vitale, M. R. (1988). Creating competitive advantage with interorganizational information systems. MIS Quarterly, 12(2), 153-165. doi: 10.2307/248839]Search in Google Scholar
[Joshi, A. W., & Stump, R. L. (1999). The contingent effect of specific asset investments on joint action in manufacturer- supplier relationships: An empirical test of the moderating role of reciprocal asset investments, uncertainty, and trust. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 27(3), 291-305. doi: 10.1177/00920]Search in Google Scholar
[70399273001]Search in Google Scholar
[Kembro, J., Selviaridis, K., & Naslund, D. (2014). Theoretical perspectives on information sharing in supply chains: a systematic literature review and conceptual framework. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 19(5/6), 609-625. doi: 10.1108/SCM-12-2013-0460]Search in Google Scholar
[Kim, K. K., Park, S. H., Ryoo, S. Y., & Park, S.K. (2010). Interorganizational cooperation in buyer-supplier relationships: Both perspectives. Journal of Business Research, 63(8), 863-869. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.04.028]Search in Google Scholar
[Klein, R., Rai, A., & Straub, D. W. (2007). Competitive and cooperative positioning in supply chain logistics relationships. Decision Sciences, 38(4), 611-646. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5915.2007.00172.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Levinthal, D. A., & Fichman, M. (1988). Dynamics of interorganizational attachments: Auditor-client relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33(3) 345-369. doi: 10.2307/2392713]Search in Google Scholar
[Malone, T. W., Yates, J., & Benjamin, R. I. (1987). Electronic markets and electronic hierarchies. Communications of the ACM, 30(6), 484-497. doi: 10.1145/214762.214766]Search in Google Scholar
[Ménard, C., & Valceschini, E. (2005). New institutions for governing the agri-food industry. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 32(3), 421-440. doi: 10.1093/eurrag/jbi013]Search in Google Scholar
[Novak, S., & Eppinger, S. D. (2001). Sourcing by design: Product complexity and the supply chain. Management Science, 47(1), 189-204. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.47.1.189.10662]Search in Google Scholar
[Nyaga, G. N., Whipple, J. M., & Lynch, D. F. (2010). Examining supply chain relationships: do buyer and supplier perspectives on collaborative relationships differ? Journal of Operations Management, 28(2), 101-114. doi: 10.1016/j.jom.2009.07.005]Search in Google Scholar
[Porterfield, T. E., Bailey, J. P., & Evers, P. T. (2010). B2B eCommerce: an empirical investigation of information exchange and firm performance. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 40(6), 435-455. doi: 10.1108/09600031011062182]Search in Google Scholar
[Premkumar, G. P. (2000). Interorganization systems and supply chain management. Information Systems Management, 17(3), 1-14. doi: 10.1201/1078/43192.17.3.20000601/31241.8]Search in Google Scholar
[Saeed, K. A., Malhotra, M. K., & Grover, V. (2005). Examining the impact of interorganizational systems on process efficiency and sourcing leverage in buyer-supplier dyads. Decision Sciences, 36(3), 365-396. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5414.2005.00077.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Sahaym, A., Steensma, H. K., & Schilling, M. A. (2007). The influence of information technology on the use of loosely coupled organizational forms: An industrylevel analysis. Organization Science, 18(5), 865-880. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1070.0285]Search in Google Scholar
[Schoonhoven, C. B. (1981). Problems with contingency theory: testing assumptions hidden within the language of contingency “theory”. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26(3), 349-377.10.2307/2392512]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Skjoett-Larsen, T. (2000). European logistics beyond 2000. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 30(5), 377-387. doi: 10.1108/09600030010336144]Search in Google Scholar
[Stevens, J. P. (1992). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. Hillsdale, USA: Erlbaum.]Search in Google Scholar
[Stump, R. L. (1995). Antecedents of purchasing concentration: A transaction cost explanation. Journal of Business Research, 34(2), 145-157. doi: 10.1016/0148-2963(94)00114-T]Search in Google Scholar
[Subramani, M. (2004). How do suppliers benefit from information technology use in supply chain relationships? MIS Quarterly, 28(1), 45-73.10.2307/25148624]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Vijayasarathy, L. R. (2010). Supply integration: an investigation of its multi-dimensionality and relational antecedents. International Journal of Production Economics, 124(2), 489-505. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.01.010]Search in Google Scholar
[Wathne, K. H., & Heide, J. B. (2000). Opportunism in interfirm relationships: forms, outcomes, and solutions. Journal of Marketing, 64(4), 36-51. doi: 10.1509/jmkg. 64.4.36.18070]Search in Google Scholar
[Williamson, O. E. (1983). Credible commitments: Using hostages to support exchange. The American Economic Review, 73(4), 519-540.]Search in Google Scholar
[Williamson, O.E. (1985). The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. New York, USA: Free Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Zaheer, A., & Venkatraman, N. (1995). Relational governance as an interorganizational strategy: An empirical test of the role of trust in economic exchange. Strategic Management Journal, 16(5), 373-392. doi: 10.1002/smj.4250160504]Search in Google Scholar