Open Access

Evaluation of Environmental Hazard During Shale Gas Exploration Process in Poland in the Years 2012-2014


Cite

[1] Unconventional Gas, Topic Paper #29: Working Doc. of the NPC Global Oil & Gas Study, National Petroleum Council Unc. Gas Subgroup of the Technology Task Group of the NPC Committee on Global Oil and Gas. 2007; 18 July. http://www.npc.org/Study_Topic_Papers/29-TTG-Unconventional-gas.Search in Google Scholar

[2] Shonkoff SB, Hays J, Finkel ML. Environmental public health dimensions of shale and tight gas development. Environ Health Perspect. 2014;122:787-795. DOI: 10.1289/ehp.1307866.10.1289/ehp.1307866412303324736097Search in Google Scholar

[3] MIT. The Future of Natural Gas, An Interdisciplinary MIT Study. Massachusetts Institute of Technology Energy Initiative. June 2011. https://energy.mit.edu/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/MITEI-The-Future-of-Natural-Gas.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

[4] Jenner S, Lamadrid AJ. Shale gas vs. coal: Policy implications from environmental impact comparisons of shale gas, conventional gas, and coal on air, water, and land in the United States. Energy Policy. 2013;53: 442-453. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.11.010.10.1016/j.enpol.2012.11.010Search in Google Scholar

[5] Modern Shale Gas Development in the United States: A Primer. U.S. Department of Energy. Oklahoma City; 2009. http://energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2013/03/f0/ShaleGasPrimer_Online_4-2009.Search in Google Scholar

[6] King GE. Hydraulic Fracturing 101: What Every Representative, Environmentalist, Regulator, Reporter, Investor, University Researcher, Neighbor and Engineer Should Know about Estimating Frac Risk & Improving Fracturing Performance in Unconventional Gas & Wells, SPE 152596-MS, SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference, 6-8 February, The Woodlands, Texas, USA, 2012. DOI: 10.2118/152596-MS.10.2118/152596-MSSearch in Google Scholar

[7] Hartmann D, Meylan B. Fracking in der Schweiz aus Sicht des Grund- und Trinkwasserschutzes. Swiss Bull Angew Geol. 2014;19(2):109-113. http://www.saseg.ch/cms/images/pdf/Publikationen/Medien/SwissBulletin_2-2014-lr.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

[8] Stamford L, Azapagic A. Life cycle environmental impacts of UK shale gas. Appl Energy. 2014;134:506-518. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.08.063.10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.08.063Search in Google Scholar

[9] IEA. Golden Rules for a Golden Age of Gas. World Energy Outlook, Special Report on Unconventional Gas. Report IEA. 2012. http://www.worldenergyoutlook.org/media/weowebsite/2012/goldenrules/weo2012_goldenrulesreport.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

[10] EPA. Study of the Potential Impacts of Hydraulic Fracturing on Drinking Water Resources. Progress Report EPA 601/R-12/011, December 2012. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/documents/hf-report20121214.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

[11] EPA. Assessment of the Potential Impacts of Hydraulic Fracturing for Oil and Gas on Drinking Water Resources. External Review Draft EPA/600/R-15/047a, June 2015. https://cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/hfstudy/recordisplay.cfm?deid=244651.Search in Google Scholar

[12] Babko R, Jaromin-Gleń K, Łagód G, Pawłowska M, Pawłowski A. Effect of drilling mud addition on activated sludge and processes in sequencing batch reactors, Desalin Water Treat. 2016;57(3):1490-1498. DOI: 10.1080/19443994.2015.1033137.10.1080/19443994.2015.1033137Search in Google Scholar

[13] EIA. World Shale Gas Resources: An Initial Assessment of 14 Regions Outside of the United States. Washington D.C.: U.S Department of Energy; April 2011. http://www.documentcloud.org/documents/741346-eia-2011-report.html.Search in Google Scholar

[14] EIA. Technically Recoverable Shale Oil and Shale Gas Resources: An Assessment of 137 Shale Formations in 41 Countries Outside the United States. Washington D.C.: U.S Department of Energy; June 2013. https://www.eia.gov/analysis/studies/worldshalegas/archive/2013/pdf/fullreport_2013.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

[15] IEA. World Energy Outlook 2011. Report IEA 2011. https://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/WEO2011_WEB.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

[16] Siemek J, Nagy S, Siemek P. Challenges for sustainable development: the case of shale gas exploitation in Poland. Problemy Ekorozwoju - Problems Sust Development. 2013;8(1):91-104. http://ekorozwoj.pol.lublin.pl/no15/j.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

[17] Pöyry. Macroeconomic Effects of European Shale Gas Production; A report to the International Association of Oil and Gas Producers (OGP), November 2013. http://www.poyry.co.uk/sites/poyry.co.uk/files/public_report_ogp__v5_0.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

[18] PGI. Assessment of Shale Gas and Shale Oil Resources of the Lower Paleozoic Baltic-Podlasie-Lublin Basin in Poland. First Report. Warszawa: PGI-NRI; March 2012. https://www.pgi.gov.pl/docman-dokumenty-pig-pib/docman/aktualnosci-2012/zasoby-gazu/769-raport-en/file.html.Search in Google Scholar

[19] Cotton M, Rattle I, Alstine JV. Shale gas policy in the United Kingdom: An argumentative discourse analysis. Energy Policy. 2014;73:427-438. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2014.05.031.10.1016/j.enpol.2014.05.031Search in Google Scholar

[20] ENVI. Impacts of shale gas and shale oil extraction on the environment and on human health. Report ENVI EP. 2011. https://europeecologie.eu/IMG/pdf/shale-gas-pe-464-425-final.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

[21] Rahm BG, Bates JT, Bertoia LR, Galford AE, Yoxtheimer DA, Riha SJ. Wastewater management and Marcellus Shale gas development: trends, drivers, and planning implications. J Environ Manage. 2013;120:105-113. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.02.029.10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.02.02923507249Search in Google Scholar

[22] Kargbo DM, Wilhelm RG, Campbell DJ. Natural gas plays in the Marcellus Shale: Challenges and potential opportunities. Environ Sci Technol. 2010;44(15):5679-5684. DOI: 10.1021/es903811p.10.1021/es903811p20518558Search in Google Scholar

[23] Konieczyńska M, Adamczak-Biały T, Brodecki A, Brzezińska A, Janica R, Dziekan-Kamińska E, et al. The Environment and Shale Gas Exploration. Results of Studies on the Soil-Water Environment, Ambient Air, Acoustic, Climate, Process Fluids and Wastes. Warszawa: Directorate General for Environmental Protection; 2015. http://www.gdos.gov.pl/files/artykuly/38173/The_environment_and_shale_gas_exploration_RESULTS_OF_STUDIES_ON_THE_SOIL_WATER_ENVIRONMENT_AMBIENT_AIR_ACOUSTIC_CLIMATE_PROCESS_FLUIDS_AND_WASTES.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

[24] Bogacki M, Macuda J. The influence of shale rock fracturing equipment operation on atmospheric air quality. Archiv Mining Sci. 2014;59(4):897-912. DOI: 10.2478/amsc-2014-0062.10.2478/amsc-2014-0062Search in Google Scholar

[25] Vengosh A, Jackson RB, Warner N, Thomas H, Darrah TH, Kondash AA. Critical review of the risks to water resources from unconventional shale gas development and hydraulic fracturing in the United States. Environ Sci Technol. 2014;48(15):8334-8348. DOI: 10.1021/es405118y.10.1021/es405118y24606408Search in Google Scholar

[26] Connor JA, Molofsky LJ, Richardson SD, Bianchi-Mosquera GC. Environmental Issues and Answers Related to Shale Gas Development. SPE Latin American and Caribbean Health, Safety, Environment and Sustainability Conference, 7-8 July, 2015, Bogota, Colombia, DOI: 10.2118/174164-MS.10.2118/174164-MSSearch in Google Scholar

[27] Nicot JP, Scanlon BR, Reedy RC, Costley RA. Source and fate of hydraulic fracturing water in the Barnett Shale: a historical perspective. Environ Sci Technol. 2014;48(4):2464-2471. DOI: 10.1021/es404050r.10.1021/es404050r24467212Search in Google Scholar

[28] Nicot JP, Scanlon BR. Water use for Shale-gas production in Texas, U.S. Environ Sci Technol. 2012;46(6):3580-3586. DOI: 10.1021/es204602t.10.1021/es204602t22385152Search in Google Scholar

[29] Olsson O, Weichgrebe D, Rosenwinkel K-H. Hydraulic fracturing wastewater in Germany: composition, treatment, concerns. Environ Earth Sci. 2013;70:3895-3906. DOI: 10.1007/s12665-013-2535-4.10.1007/s12665-013-2535-4Search in Google Scholar

[30] Burri P. Unconventionals in Europe: Best practice vs. worst case - the conflict between facts and public perception. Ecol Chem Eng S. 2016;23(3):377-386. DOI: 10.1515/eces-2016-0026.10.1515/eces-2016-0026Search in Google Scholar

[31] Vidic RD, Brantley SL, Yoxtheime DA, Abad JD. Impact of shale gas development on regional water quality. Science. 2013;340(6134). DOI: 10.1126/science.1235009.10.1126/science.123500923687049Search in Google Scholar

[32] Wszołek W, Macuda J, Wszołek T. The analysis of the environmental influence of drilling installation. J Acoust Soc Amer. 2000;108(5):2475-2476. DOI: 10.1121/1.4743128.10.1121/1.4743128Search in Google Scholar

[33] Warner NR., Christie CA, Jackson RB, Vengosh A. Impacts of shale gas wastewater disposal on water quality in western Pennsylvania. Environ Sci Technol. 2013;47(20):11849-11857. DOI: 10.1021/es402165b.10.1021/es402165b24087919Search in Google Scholar

[34] Reichetseder P. The concept of well integrity in gas production activities. Ecol Chem Eng S. 2016;23(2):205-213. DOI: 10.1515/eces-2016-0013.10.1515/eces-2016-0013Search in Google Scholar

[35] Konieczyńska M, WoŸnicka M, Antolak O, Janica R, Lichtarski G, Nidental M, et al. Environmental Aspects of Hydraulic Fracturing Treatment Performed on the Łebień LE-2H Well. Final Report. Warszawa: Polish Geological Institute-National Research Institute (PGI-NRI); 2011. http://www.pgi.gov.pl/docman-tree/kopalnia-wiedzy/gaz-lupkowy/786-the-lebien-report/file.html.Search in Google Scholar

[36] Howarth RW, Santoro R, Ingraffea A. Methane and the greenhouse-gas footprint of natural gas from shale formations. Clim Change. 2011;106:679-690. DOI: 10.1007/s10584-011-0061-5.10.1007/s10584-011-0061-5Search in Google Scholar

[37] Roy AA, Adams PJ, Robinson AL. Air pollutant emissions from the development, production and processing of Marcellus Shale natural gas. J Air Waste Manage Assoc. 2014;64(1):19-37. DOI: 10.1080/10962247.2013.826151.10.1080/10962247.2013.82615124620400Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
1898-6196
Language:
English