1. bookVolume 22 (2015): Issue 4 (December 2015)
Journal Details
First Published
08 Nov 2011
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
access type Open Access

Effects of Different Irrigation Strategies on Soil Water, Salt, and Nitrate Nitrogen Transport

Published Online: 22 Jan 2016
Page range: 589 - 609
Journal Details
First Published
08 Nov 2011
Publication timeframe
4 times per year

Intermittent irrigation has attracted much attention as a water-saving technology in arid and semi-arid regions. For understanding the effect of intermittent irrigation on water and solute storage varied from irrigation amount per time (IRA), irrigation application frequency (IRAF), irrigation intervals (IRI) and even soil texture (ST), intermittent irrigation experiment was carried out in 33 micro-plots in Inner Mongolia, China. The experiment results were used for the calibration and validation of HYDRUS-1D software. Then 3 ST (silty clay loam, silty loam, and silty clay), 5 IRA (2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 cm), 4 IRAF (2, 3, 4, and 5 times) and 4 IRI (1, 2, 3, and 4 days) were combined and total 240 scenarios were simulated by HYDRUS-1D. Analysis of variance (ANVOA) of simulated results indicated that ST, IRA, and IRAF had significant effect on salt and nitrate nitrogen (NO3-N) storage of 0-40 cm depth soil in intermittent irrigation while only ST affected soil water storage obviously. Furthermore, salt leaching percentage (SLP) and water use efficiency (WUE) of 0-40 cm depth were calculated and statistical prediction models for SLP were established based on the ANOVA using multiple regression analysis in each soil texture. Then constraint conditions of soil water storage (around field capacity), salt storage (smaller than 168 mg·cm−2), WUE (as large as possible) in 0-40 cm depth and total irrigation water amount (less than 25 cm) were proposed to find out the optimal intermittent irrigation strategies. Before sowing, the optimal irrigation strategy for silty clay loam soil was 6 cm IRA, 3 times IRAF, and 2 days IRI respectively. For silty loam and silty clay soils, IRA, IRAF, and IRI were 8 cm, 3 times, and 2 days respectively.


[1] Mailhol J, Ruelle P, Nemeth I. Impact of fertilisation practices on nitrogen leaching under irrigation. Irrigation Sci. 2001;20(3):139-147. DOI: 10.1007/s002710100038.Search in Google Scholar

[2] Gärdenäs A, Hopmans J, Hanson B, Šimůnek J. Two-dimensional modeling of nitrate leaching for various fertigation scenarios under micro-irrigation. Agr Water Manage. 2005;74(3):219-242. DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2004.11.011.Search in Google Scholar

[3] Feng ZZ, Wang XK, Feng ZW. Soil N and salinity leaching after the autumn irrigation and its impact on groundwater in Hetao Irrigation District, China. Agr Water Manage. 2005;71(2):131-143. DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2004.07.001.Search in Google Scholar

[4] Siyal AA, Bristow KL, Simunek J. Minimizing nitrogen leaching from furrow irrigation through novel fertilizer placement and soil surface management strategies. Agr Water Manage. 2012;115:242-251. DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2012.09.008.Search in Google Scholar

[5] Heffer P. Assessment of fertilizer use by crop at the global level. Paris: International Fertilizer Industry Association. http://www.fertilizer.org/imis20/images/Library_Downloads/AgCom.13.39%20-%20FUBC%20assessment%202010.pdf?WebsiteKey=411e9724-4bda-422f-abfc-8152ed74f306&=404%3bhttp%3a%2f%2fwww.fertilizer.org%3a80%2fen%2fimages%2fLibrary_Downloads%2fAgCom.13.39+-+FUBC+assessment2010.pdf, 2010.Search in Google Scholar

[6] Ritter W. Nitrate leaching under irrigation in the United States - a review. J Environ Sci Health A. 1989;24(4):349-378. DOI: 10.1080/10934528909375486.Search in Google Scholar

[7] Min J, Zhang HL, Shi WM. Optimizing nitrogen input to reduce nitrate leaching loss in greenhouse vegetable production. Agr Water Manage. 2012;111:53-59. DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2012.05.003.Search in Google Scholar

[8] Duan R, Fedler CB. Nitrogen and salt leaching from two typical Texas turf soils irrigated with degraded water. Environ Eng Sci. 2011;28(11):787-793. DOI: 10.1089/ees.2011.0196.Search in Google Scholar

[9] Ramos TB, Castanheira NL, Goncalves MC, Fernandes ML, Januario MI, Lourenco ME, et al. Effect of combined use of brackish water and nitrogen fertilizer on biomass and sugar yield of sweet sorghum. Pedosphere. 2012;22(6):785-794. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.07.016.Search in Google Scholar

[10] Zeng W, Xu C, Wu J, Huang J. Soil salt leaching under different irrigation regimes: HYDRUS-1D modelling and analysis. J Arid Land. 2014;6(1):44-58. DOI: 10.1007/s40333-013-0176-9.Search in Google Scholar

[11] Gun Won J, Soo Choi J, Phil Lee S, Ho Son S, Ok Chung S. Water saving by shallow intermittent irrigation and growth of rice. Plant Prod Sci. 2005;8(4):487-492. DOI: 10.1626/pps.8.487.Search in Google Scholar

[12] Dahab M, Mustafa M, Rahman HA. Intermittent evaporation, moisture distribution, and salt redistribution through saline-sodic clay soil as affected by irrigation frequency and quantity. Soil Sci. 1988;146(3):168-175. DOI: 10.1097/00010694-198809000-00004.Search in Google Scholar

[13] Al-Sibai M, Adey M, Rose D. Movement of solute through a porous medium under intermittent leaching. Eur J Soil Sci. 1997;48(4):711-725. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2389.1997.tb00571.x.Search in Google Scholar

[14] Borojeni BH, Salehi F. Effect of continuous and intermittent irrigation methods on rice (cv. Koohrang) yield. Arch Agron Soil Sci. 2013;59(7):947-954. DOI: 10.1080/03650340.2012.697994.Search in Google Scholar

[15] Tan XZ, Shao DG, Liu HH, Yang FS, Xiao C, Yang HD. Effects of alternate wetting and drying irrigation on percolation and nitrogen leaching in paddy fields. Paddy Water Environ. 2013;11(1-4):381-395. DOI: 10.1007/s10333-012-0328-0.Search in Google Scholar

[16] Ramos TB, Šimůnek J, Gonçalves MC, Martins JC, Prazeres A, Castanheira NL, et al. Field evaluation of a multicomponent solute transport model in soils irrigated with saline waters. J Hydrol. 2011;407(1-4):129-144. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.07.016.Search in Google Scholar

[17] Sepaskhah AR, Tafteh A. Yield and nitrogen leaching in rapeseed field under different nitrogen rates and water saving irrigation. Agr Water Manage. 2012;112:55-62. DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2012.06.011.Search in Google Scholar

[18] Simunek J, Van Genuchten MT, Sejna M. HYDRUS: Model use, calibration, and validation. Trans ASABE. 2012;55(4):1261-1274.Search in Google Scholar

[19] Van Genuchten MT. A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 1980;44(5):892-898.Search in Google Scholar

[20] Mualem Y. A new model for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated porous media. Water Resour Res. 1976;12(3):513-522. DOI: 10.1029/WR012i003p00513.Search in Google Scholar

[21] Schaap MG, Leij FJ, Van Genuchten MT. ROSETTA: a computer program for estimating soil hydraulic parameters with hierarchical pedotransfer functions. J Hydrol. 2001;251(3-4):163-176. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-1694(01)00466-8.Search in Google Scholar

[22] Chen C, Ren T, Hu K, Li B, Wang Y. Estimation of soil clay content using hygroscopic water content at an arbitrary humidity. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 2014;78(1):119-124. DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2013.06.0247.Search in Google Scholar

[23] Nash J, Sutcliffe JV. River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I - A discussion of principles. J Hydrol. 1970;10(3):282-290. DOI: 10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6.Search in Google Scholar

[24] Waller RA, Duncan DB. A Bayes rule for the symmetric multiple comparisons problem. J Am Stat Assoc. 1969;64(328):1484-1503. DOI: 10.1007/BF02479820.Search in Google Scholar

[25] Katerji N, Van Hoorn J, Hamdy A, Mastrorilli M. Salt tolerance classification of crops according to soil salinity and to water stress day index. Agr Water Manage. 2000;43(1):99-109. DOI: 10.1016/S0378-3774(99)00048-7.Search in Google Scholar

[26] Shi D, Sheng Y. Effect of various salt-alkaline mixed stress conditions on sunflower seedlings and analysis of their stress factors. Environ Exp Bot. 2005;54(1):8-21. DOI: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2004.05.003.Search in Google Scholar

[27] Kiggundu N, Migliaccio KW, Schaffer B, Li Y, Crane JH. Water savings, nutrient leaching, and fruit yield in a young avocado orchard as affected by irrigation and nutrient management. Irrigation Sci. 2012;30(4):275-286. DOI: 10.1007/s00271-011-0280-6.Search in Google Scholar

[28] Nachabe MH, Ahuja LR, Butters G. Bromide transport under sprinkler and flood irrigation for no-till soil condition. J Hydrol. 1999;214(1-4):8-17. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-1694(98)00222-4.Search in Google Scholar

[29] Behera S, Panda R. Effect of fertilization and irrigation schedule on water and fertilizer solute transport for wheat crop in a sub-humid sub-tropical region. Agr Ecosyst Environ. 2009;130(3):141-155. DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2008.12.009.Search in Google Scholar

[30] Mermoud A, Tamini TD, Yacouba H. Impacts of different irrigation schedules on the water balance components of an onion crop in a semi-arid zone. Agr Water Manage. 2005;77(1-3):282-295. DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2004.09.033.Search in Google Scholar

[31] Mushtaq S, Dawe D, Lin H, Moya P. An assessment of the role of ponds in the adoption of water-saving irrigation practices in the Zhanghe Irrigation System, China. Agr Water Manage. 2006;83(1):100-110. DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2005.10.004.Search in Google Scholar

[32] Chowdary V, Rao N, Sarma P. A coupled soil water and nitrogen balance model for flooded rice fields in India. Agr Ecosyst Environ. 2004;103(3):425-441. DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2003.12.001.Search in Google Scholar

[33] Buresh R, Castillo E, De Datta S. Nitrogen losses in puddled soils as affected by timing of water deficit and nitrogen fertilization. Plant Soil. 1993;157(2):197-206. DOI: 10.1007/BF00011048.Search in Google Scholar

[34] Gerke H, Genuchten MV. A dual-porosity model for simulating the preferential movement of water and solutes in structured porous media. Water Resour Res. 1993;29(2):305-319. DOI: 10.1029/92WR02339.Search in Google Scholar

[35] Bouchard D, Wood A, Campbell M, Nkedi-Kizza P, Rao P. Sorption nonequilibrium during solute transport. J Contam Hydrol. 1988;2(3):209-223. DOI: 10.1016/0169-7722(88)90022-8.Search in Google Scholar

[36] Sun A, Zhu S, Guo Y, Zhang Z. Jensen model and modified Morgan model for rice water-fertilizer production function. Procedia Engineering. 2012;28:264-269. DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2012.01.717.Search in Google Scholar

[37] Lenferink KO, Van Loon A, Van Huijgevoort M, Van Lanen H. Comparing low moisture availability and relative crop yields on the pan-European scale using the FAO water production function. Drought: Research and Science-Policy Interfacing. 2014: 105. DOI: 0.1201/b18077-18.Search in Google Scholar

[38] Bower C, Ogata G, Tucker J. Rootzone salt profiles and alfalfa growth as influenced by irrigation water salinity and leaching fraction. Agron J. 1969;61(5):783-785. DOI: 10.2134/agronj1969.00021962006100050039x.Search in Google Scholar

[39] Da Silva VDPR, Da Cunha Campos JHB, De Azevedo PV. Water-use efficiency and evapotranspiration of mango orchard grown in northeastern region of Brazil. Sci Hortic-Amsterdam. 2009;120(4):467-472. DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2008.12.005.Search in Google Scholar

[40] Migliaccio KW, Schaffer B, Crane JH, Davies FS. Plant response to evapotranspiration and soil water sensor irrigation scheduling methods for papaya production in south Florida. Agr Water Manage. 2010;97(10):1452-1460. DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2010.04.012.Search in Google Scholar

[41] Selim T, Bouksila F, Berndtsson R, Persson M. Soil water and salinity distribution under different treatments of drip irrigation. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 2013;77(4):1144-1156. DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2012.0304.Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo